|
Timeless Appeal posted:Ya'll are talking about how clowns weren't really a thing when the movie take place. You're neglecting how big Ronald McDonald was at the time. I've said it before but my ideal would be like Tom Kenny playing a very guidance counselor like Pennywise. Tom Kenny plays a great clown in Shakes the Clown. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnTXyx5zOzE
|
# ? May 24, 2017 05:31 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 08:43 |
|
ruddiger posted:Tom Kenny plays a great clown in Shakes the Clown. This is still my favorite Bobcat Goldthwait movie.
|
# ? May 24, 2017 17:54 |
|
Hoo boy
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 23:30 |
|
The scene where they spend a day at the spa and eat ice cream? This has to be some kind of troll. There's no way they'd put the child orgy in the movie.
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 23:37 |
Hahaha holy poo poo
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2017 23:52 |
|
I feel like even a bunch of 12-year-olds should know how stupid of an idea that is.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 00:03 |
|
Well... I, um. Huh. He thrusts his fists against the posts and still insists he sees the ghosts.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 00:06 |
|
I am like 90% sure that's a troll and 'that scene' is referring to the scene from the trailer where they're hopping into the river.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 00:13 |
|
Hang on they are going to actually have the distasteful orgy in the sewer scene?
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 00:31 |
|
ImpAtom posted:I am like 90% sure that's a troll and 'that scene' is referring to the scene from the trailer where they're hopping into the river. Or went in the sewers. Or any scene where they could get wet.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 00:35 |
|
Why would a little girl even troll about that? There's nothing about that tweet that isn't deeply unsettling.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 01:47 |
|
Mantis42 posted:Hoo boy This is hosed up.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 01:50 |
|
I am seriously laughing my rear end off at that. That's really dark, lol.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 02:01 |
|
It's good confirmation that even a bunch of 12-year-olds know dumb garbage when they read it.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 02:05 |
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:Why would a little girl even troll about that? There's nothing about that tweet that isn't deeply unsettling. Because even young girls have a sense of humor?
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 02:07 |
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:Why would a little girl even troll about that? There's nothing about that tweet that isn't deeply unsettling. If you're asking on Somethingawful.com why a teenager would make a joke like that, well... the answer is because 'they're a teenager.'
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 02:12 |
|
holy poo poo if they actually put that in the movie.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 02:33 |
|
TheBigBudgetSequel posted:holy poo poo if they actually put that in the movie. I think the director was quoted saying that they didn't.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 02:42 |
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:Why would a little girl even troll about that? There's nothing about that tweet that isn't deeply unsettling. Her troll game is strong.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 04:06 |
|
Gotta get them pedo dollars I guess
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 04:12 |
|
Shimrra Jamaane posted:Why would a little girl even troll about that? There's nothing about that tweet that isn't deeply unsettling. You're a long way from the middle school mentality.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 04:27 |
|
Jesus. Since that's made it the elephant in the room once more, has King himself ever offered any comment on the It sewer gangbang? Like "I was really hosed up on drugs, sorry" or "people fail to grasp the metaphor"?
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 06:01 |
|
davidspackage posted:Jesus. Stephen King: "I wasn't really thinking of the sexual aspect of it. The book dealt with childhood and adulthood --1958 and Grown Ups. The grown ups don't remember their childhood. None of us remember what we did as children--we think we do, but we don't remember it as it really happened. Intuitively, the Losers knew they had to be together again. The sexual act connected childhood and adulthood. It's another version of the glass tunnel that connects the children's library and the adult library. Times have changed since I wrote that scene and there is now more sensitivity to those issues."
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 06:09 |
That tweet looks like a photoshop, by the way. Check how the name and the twitter handle are without a space in between. Plus, the @sophialillis account is a fan account if you go check on twitter.
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2017 06:30 |
My prediction is that people are going to hate this movie, and the blame will be placed on the departure of Cary Fukunaga as director.
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2017 22:35 |
|
I'm guessing it was just after the scene we saw in the trailer when they're jumping off a cliff into water? Makes sense to me, anyway. I dunno.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2017 10:29 |
|
lmao at this thread getting trolled by a twelve year old girl
|
# ? Jun 13, 2017 20:11 |
|
The Walrus posted:lmao at this thread getting trolled by a twelve year old girl Someone pretending to be a 12 year old girl
|
# ? Jun 13, 2017 20:38 |
|
The Walrus posted:lmao at this thread getting trolled by a twelve year old girl absolutely
|
# ? Jun 13, 2017 21:35 |
|
Stephen King's 'It' Reboot Gets Official Rating. Not sure how much speculation there's been on this but it's officially R .
|
# ? Jun 22, 2017 12:44 |
They showed some extended clips and a preview of a trailer from IT at SDCC. 1) the Losers taking a swim 2) the Losers discussing Derry's bloody history 3) the Losers saving Mike Hanlon and adding him to the group
|
|
# ? Jul 20, 2017 19:40 |
|
So I'm still wondering, is the plan to really make two entirely separate movie or will there be flashbacks, crossovers and some sort of call backs and interconnectivity? The adults aren't in teh first movie at all, right? I could see it working either way but I liked the way the book jumped around between time periods to aid the storytelling. Same with the TV series. I think it works better that way - showing why the grown up characters are the way they are because of their childhoods. I'm reminded of "Sleepers" that similarly dealt with the passage of time and how childhood emotional trauma defines your adulthood and, even in that film, I often got mixed up about which kid was which adult even though they attempted to make it clear. Thinking about "that scene", the smartest way to do it would just be to replace it with a loving, gentle or even semi-passionate kiss at the most and move on. It would still convey the original intended point and I tend to think that's how they'll handle it.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2017 19:13 |
|
I think they'll elide it entirely.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2017 19:21 |
|
I hope they high-five in the air, personally.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2017 19:56 |
|
BiggerBoat posted:Thinking about "that scene", the smartest way to do it would just be to replace it with a loving, gentle or even semi-passionate kiss at the most and move on. It would still convey the original intended point and I tend to think that's how they'll handle it. The problem with THE SCENE is that even if it isn't meant to titilate, it speaks to a sense of vouyerism that King's narration often takes on. The amount of times a lady's nipples are used to described her mental state across his books is insane. Like a rule of writing should be don't use a lady's nipples to describe her mental state but I think it happens in It at least twice in It. And when that vouyerism is applied to children and he's discussing dick sizes and Bev's orgasms, it feels a little uneasy. But even if the writing didn't represent King's worst impulses, the whole concept of the scene is just kinda lovely in the way that it others Bev from the group. I mean a scene with a bunch of boys lining up to kiss Bev is equally dumb even if it's not as equally gross to watch as THE SCENE as written. A strength that the 90s film had over the book is that the romantic feelings are soley between Bill, Ben, and Bev. And even then, I'd say that I'd prefer Bev's crush to be one sided. Any version of the scene or trying to adapt it ultimately devalues Bev as being truly one of the Losers and not just this girl that they all have a crush on. The blood pack does the job of binding the kids in a way that that treats Bev as part of the group.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2017 23:29 |
|
Blade_of_tyshalle posted:I hope they high-five in the air, personally. only if they freeze frame and then roll the credits/Christopher Cross song
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 02:12 |
|
Rev. Bleech_ posted:only if they freeze frame and then roll the credits/Christopher Cross song I felt that was implied, but yes. Is this film set in the 80s? Get some Judas Priest in there, Parental Guidance would suit me even if Turbo hadn't come out yet.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 02:41 |
|
Blade_of_tyshalle posted:I felt that was implied, but yes. Is this film set in the 80s? Get some Judas Priest in there, Parental Guidance would suit me even if Turbo hadn't come out yet. It's funny, because Priest is one of the bands that gets mentioned on a marquee as being part of the Monsters of Metal (I think that's what King went with, along with Maiden) concert in 1980's Derry in the book when Ritchie is walking around as an adult. In the 50's, when he meets IT as the statue, it's Buddy Holly and some other band, I think.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 03:33 |
|
Blade_of_tyshalle posted:Is this film set in the 80s? 90's as I understand it.
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 05:09 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 08:43 |
|
BiggerBoat posted:90's as I understand it. 1989. Also they should put in Simple Minds' Don't You Forget About Me at the end of the movie. Then a final scene of Mike phoning Bill and the final words should be "It's back." I'd like to thank the Academy...
|
# ? Jul 24, 2017 07:21 |