|
Tom Perez B/K/M? This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| B |
|
77 | 25.50% |
| K |
|
160 | 52.98% |
| M |
|
65 | 21.52% |
| Total: | 229 votes | ||
|
yronic heroism posted:Already you are conflating me as part of a nonexistent "you guys". centrists. you're very existent, and i've been calling you one all day cause you support centrists, centrist policies, and centrist politicians
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2017 22:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 08:35 |
|
|
evilweasel posted:i gave comprehensive answers to your arguments that treated you like an adult, you ignored them and have now chosen to pretend they don't exist, so i'm just going to call you a moron rather than repeat putting in effort to explain why you're wrong again when all you can muster are to repeat the same stupid things i already debunked, but with less detail Talking with condiv.txt
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2017 22:42
|
|
|
hmm, what was evilweasel arguing?evilweasel posted:I have no idea how they picked which democrat to support, but it is absolutely the right decision to pick only one given how the special election (a jungle primary) works. If you want to tell me one of the other ones running is a better pick and why, I'm interested. If there was a separate primary and the DNC spent resources to intervene there I'd consider that a waste in almost all circumstances, but since it's a jungle primary (a) they need to make sure a Democrat is one of the top-two and (b) they desperately want to win it outright by getting 50% instead of going to a second election while the Republicans are fractured. Both make it the right thing to do to pick the strongest candidate and put all of the DNC's backing behind them. If the DNC picked a weaker candidate in this election because of DNC ties, that's bad, but I've seen nothing to that effect. oh wow he turned out to be completely wrong. ossoff was real bad and incompetent and couldn't improve upon a made up democrat every other special election dem outperformed him but virtually all dem support went to the rich guy who hung out with the dem leadership but he sure took a condescending tone while being wrong so yronic looks up to him Condiv fucked around with this message at 22:49 on Jul 31, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2017 22:47
|
|
|
Oolala a tone argument.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2017 22:56
|
|
|
yronic heroism posted:Oolala a tone argument. Can you write at least one post that isn't garbage, please?
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2017 22:58
|
|
|
Condiv should love ossoff since he tried real hard and wouldn't endorse Nancy pelosi.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2017 23:04
|
|
|
I guess that's a no.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2017 23:05
|
|
|
Jizz Festival posted:Can you write at least one post that isn't garbage, please? Well, he may need some of the people in this thread to lead by example.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2017 23:05
|
|
|
yronic heroism posted:Condiv should love ossoff since he tried real hard and wouldn't endorse Nancy pelosi. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rMVNC5l4IM 
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2017 23:08
|
|
|
it only makes sense yronic heroism thinks ossoff ran a good campaign yronic probably dances to fight song every morning
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2017 23:10
|
|
|
who are the idiots taking Pelosi's words at face value, please line up against that wall over there
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2017 23:12
|
|
|
Former DILF posted:who are the idiots taking Pelosi's words at face value, please line up against that wall over there And we're right back to screaming "LYING WHORE!!!!!!!!" to justify your feeling of persecution.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2017 23:29
|
|
|
I hadn't watched this until right now. Centrist dems are retarded xd https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhND2kUsC4M
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2017 23:34
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:And we're right back to screaming "LYING WHORE!!!!!!!!" to justify your feeling of persecution. Oh no! After 8 years of establishment dems letting wall Street skate after a big crisis, supporting charter school, trying to sign Grand Bargains with loony republicans, letting the GOP fiddle with the ACA over a hundred times in exchange for ZERO votes for it, and basically bleeding the party white ntul it's a walking skeleton, you mean there may be some resentment and distrust among the base? I better hope that all of the above happened as a result of persecuting the left. The alternative is that the DLC and the top dogs did it either because they support it, which is vile, or because they are failures, which is tragic.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2017 23:34
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:And we're right back to screaming "LYING WHORE!!!!!!!!" to justify your feeling of persecution. your sexism is showing fulchrum what is it with centrists and hating women?
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 00:01
|
|
|
NewForumSoftware posted:your sexism is showing fulchrum Is this the gender variation on "calling me for my racism is the REAL racism" BS that shitheads like to use? That your endless accusation that women who lead the party are liars who just want to hurt you is somehow just a total coincidence?
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 00:57
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:That your endless accusation that women who lead the party are liars who just want to hurt you is somehow just a total coincidence? You seem to be the one claiming that Pelosi doesn't mean what she's saying, aka lying. We're all taking her at her word, she views the 2018 midterms as unimportant.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:05
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:Is this the gender variation on "calling me for my racism is the REAL racism" BS that shitheads like to use? It def is, check out the tears when he got called out on using slavery as a prop. He literally did a "sorry I care so much" white fragility flounce.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:06
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:Is this the gender variation on "calling me for my racism is the REAL racism" BS that shitheads like to use? That your endless accusation that women who lead the party are liars who just want to hurt you is somehow just a total coincidence? No I think it was the part where he was using the word 'whore' as a slur for women yronic heroism posted:It def is, check out the tears when he got called out on using slavery as a prop. But Hillary did own slaves?
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:08
|
|
|
twodot posted:If a political party can only reach a 60% consensus on a political issue, then it doesn't seem like it can be much of a party plank. Like 60% of the party being in favor of, for example, abortion rights would seem like a serious issue with the party. Only if the other 40% is straight up opposed. If it's 60% support, 20% doesn't give a poo poo and 20% oppose then frankly those opposed are outnumbered 3 to 1.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:11
|
|
|
call to action posted:No I think it was the part where he was using the word 'whore' as a slur for women Yeah, she did. She wrote about what a positive experience having slaves was in a book.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:13
|
|
|
call to action posted:But Hillary did own slaves? Repeat after me: "if he cared about slavery he wouldn't excuse Donald Trump practicing it."
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:19
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:Is this the gender variation on "calling me for my racism is the REAL racism" BS that shitheads like to use? That your endless accusation that women who lead the party are liars who just want to hurt you is somehow just a total coincidence? what's sexist about quote:who are the idiots taking Pelosi's words at face value, please line up against that wall over there you're the one calling her a whore for some reason, just not a good look really
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:23
|
|
|
NewForumSoftware posted:Just for the record, I'm not opposing to disbarring anyone who voted for a slaveholder in 2016 to ever vote again in a presidential election. According to NFS, Trump is a non-slaveowner so I guess he's dropped the pretense.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:25
|
|
|
NewForumSoftware posted:what's sexist about Why do you think that just removing the dog whistling BS and putting what you really feel is somehow a reflection of me?
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:26
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:Why do you think that just removing the dog whistling BS and putting what you really feel is somehow a reflection of me? where's the dog whistling bs? yronic heroism posted:According to NFS, Trump is a non-slaveowner so I guess he's dropped the pretense. try reading it again, this time with more comprehension they were both slaveowners NewForumSoftware fucked around with this message at 01:28 on Aug 1, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:26
|
|
|
NewForumSoftware posted:where's the dog whistle? The part where you endorse Trump and defend voting for Trump hth.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:28
|
|
|
yronic heroism posted:The part where you endorse Trump and defend voting for Trump hth. endorsing trump is a dog whistle for hating women? i think you may have broken your own brain in an attempt at sick ownage, seek assistance good friend
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:31
|
|
|
yronic heroism posted:Repeat after me: "if he cared about slavery he wouldn't excuse Donald Trump practicing it." I know this is from a million pages ago but nobody excused Donald Trump for his actions. The same idiots that always try to bring up me voting for Trump to discredit everything I post and derail the thread, for the millionth time, got a humorous comeback of 'at least he didn't vote for a slaveowner' from somebody. So, of course, that idiot tried to go on the offensive of 'b-b-but Trump built a hotel in Dubai so technically he used slave labor too  ' and somehow that has morphed into disingenuous shitheads like yourself using it as a battle cry days later despite nobody doing the thing you claimed has happened. I haven't said it. The guy who made a joke defense for me didn't say it. The regulars didn't say it. And guess what? Even if we all did, that still doesn't excuse Hillary Clinton's behavior.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:43
|
|
|
Don't even try with the purity squad, if the Dems wanted single payer and mincome tomorrow they'd still be mad. Just come in to laugh every once in awhile.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:45
|
|
|
NewForumSoftware posted:at least he didn't vote for a slaveowner You heard it here: NFS thinks Trump (who call me Charlie voted for) is not a slaveowner. yronic heroism fucked around with this message at 01:49 on Aug 1, 2017 |
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:46
|
|
|
... And then doubled down on it.NewForumSoftware posted:lol at blaming middle eastern migrant labor violations on trump Just a "migrant labor violation" amirite comrades?
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:48
|
|
|
Peachfart posted:Don't even try with the purity squad, if the Dems wanted single payer and mincome tomorrow they'd still be mad. Just come in to laugh every once in awhile. you must be one of the dems excited about the DCCC funding anti-choice dems screw purity tests right?
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:49
|
|
|
yronic heroism posted:You heard it here: NFS thinks Trump is not a slaveowner. it will never cease being amazing that in election 2016 we had two candidates lifelong politician, secretary of state, discourse and political correctness distilled orange clown rapist who wants to build a giant wall to keep the "bad" mexicans out guess which one wrote a book about noticing their slaves had feelings like a human
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:49
|
|
|
Call Me Charlie posted:I haven't said it. The guy who made a joke defense for me didn't say it. The regulars didn't say it. Except he did say it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:51
|
|
|
NewForumSoftware posted:it will never cease being amazing that in election 2016 we had two candidates Why do you think an orange clown rapist would never own slaves?
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:52
|
|
|
Peachfart posted:Don't even try with the purity squad, if the Dems wanted single payer and mincome tomorrow they'd still be mad. Just come in to laugh every once in awhile. people want purity tests cause they're tired of getting dems full control of government for policies like singlepayer just for them to say "oops you didn't vote for the right type of dems better luck next time" centrists find this baffling though because they're comfortable in the status quo and don't need anything to change
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:53
|
|
|
yronic heroism posted:Why do you think an orange clown rapist would never own slaves? it's not so much that I think he'd never own slaves as much it is I don't think even he would be stupid enough to write a book about it
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:55
|
|
|
Peachfart posted:Don't even try with the purity squad, if the Dems wanted single payer and mincome tomorrow they'd still be mad. Just come in to laugh every once in awhile. http://www.rubbercat.net/artduck/03.html Possibly add "neo" or substitute "centrist".
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 08:35 |
|
|
the whole "neoliberal doesn't even mean anything!" kind of fell flat on its face after centrists adopted the term as their own https://medium.com/@s8mb/im-a-neoliberal-maybe-you-are-too-b809a2a588d6
|
|
#
?
Aug 1, 2017 01:58
|
|