Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Serf
May 5, 2011


CelticPredator posted:

Superman needed to save way more people, personally, and not like, punching a space laser spider to save millions... Like actually rescuing people during the Zod fight. Or showing close ups with him reacting to the people's safety.

reminds me of how in age of ultron they spent a lot of time showing the avengers evacuating the area and then saving civilians during the fight. and then you get to civil war and it turns out it still wasn't enough

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

HUNDU THE BEAST GOD
Sep 14, 2007

everything is yours

Serf posted:

reminds me of how in age of ultron they spent a lot of time showing the avengers evacuating the area and then saving civilians during the fight. and then you get to civil war and it turns out it still wasn't enough

More than that, they lied about the number of casualties, for some weird reason.

Guy A. Person
May 23, 2003

CelticPredator posted:

Then stop doing this. It's like, everyone who hates these movies said things that bothered them clearly and it's completely thrown out.


ou're all saying the same thing. This conversation is no different than it was a year ago, or the year before that. No ones opinion has changed.

So stop arguing about it and move on with your life go make fun of "CD weirdos" in GBS about it I guess

Jimbot
Jul 22, 2008

Al Borland Corp. posted:

People wanted Batman to be the good guy and Superman to be the bad guy. They didn't get that.

I still don't know why it took hold so strongly in the zeitgeist that "Superman killed millions, didn't save anyone, the movie wasn't in color, never smiled" or whatever. That just literally is not what is depicted on screen.

I said it earlier but Clark doesn't talk a whole lot in his films. Being a loner who wandered around for years before having his first meaningful connection with someone, besides his mom, when he met Lois, the film does rationalize why he's not a chatterbox. But I could see if he talked more about things the general audience would have been able to get to know him better and better empathize with him.

Serf
May 5, 2011


HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:

More than that, they lied about the number of casualties, for some weird reason.

carrying on a proud tradition, really

HUNDU THE BEAST GOD
Sep 14, 2007

everything is yours

Serf posted:

carrying on a proud tradition, really

The New York Incident: 4, maybe 5 civilian deaths, tops.

Ferrinus
Jun 19, 2003

i'm finding this quite easy, i guess in part because i'm a fast type but also because i have a coherent mental model of the world
Did Six Dozen Really Die?

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

Marvel isn't great about that saving stuff, but I was fine with AoU doing a little spiteful shot at the Snyder films. Too bad the movie wasn't very good at all, making the gesture almost pointless.

Spider-Man was great though. I like they even had him save the villain who I was sure was going to off himself like the other Spider-Man movie villains.

Guy A. Person
May 23, 2003

HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:

The New York Incident: 4, maybe 5 civilian deaths, tops.

All those cabs and cars were empty when the aliens fired plasma grenades into deadlocked rush hour traffic

Darko
Dec 23, 2004

Guy A. Person posted:

All those cabs and cars were empty when the aliens fired plasma grenades into deadlocked rush hour traffic

They are, from what I remember, haha. While MoS makes it purposeful to show the gravity thing is actually killing people.

Crespolini
Mar 9, 2014

CelticPredator posted:

Superman needed to save way more people, personally, and not like, punching a space laser spider to save millions... Like actually rescuing people during the Zod fight. Or showing close ups with him reacting to the people's safety.

You can say "I don't think it needed that, I was fine with what was presented" and that's fair. I was not.

It's really that simple. It rubbed me the wrong way. Even if it was supposed to, its still rubbing me the wrong way.

I don't think I could be any clearer here when I say the end of Man of Steel bothers me more than any film simply for the baffling choices presented. And then he punches a satellite out of the sky and a joke is made and it's completely off putting to me.

I'm glad of it

Darko
Dec 23, 2004

Vintersorg posted:

Yeah, we got that in JL and it was loving garbage.

Yeah, this is how I felt too - it was EXACTLY what people asked for in complaints of MoS and it was really distracting and annoying for me.

Celtic, how did you feel about Superman smiling and saving people everywhere in Justice League in how it fit in with the situation on screen, as compared to how he was in MoS and how it fit that situation? Honest question.

sub supau
Aug 28, 2007

CelticPredator posted:

Spider-Man was great though. I like they even had him save the villain who I was sure was going to off himself like the other Spider-Man movie villains.
If you're talking about Homecoming, Iron Man was the villain of that movie.

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

It was bad. They changed his character too much without a period where he's able to change. He's just a different character. You could've had him slowly get to where he ended up and have it work, but he'd have to be in the film more and the film should've been able to breathe for a second.

And the mustache thing ruined every scene.

LesterGroans
Jun 9, 2009

It's funny...

You were so scary at night.
It was very weird for Avengers 2 to actively make its movie worse in order to take a swipe at a different film. I guess he was already taking swipes at other films with his Captain America characterization, so he may as well spread the love.

Guy A. Person
May 23, 2003

CelticPredator posted:

Marvel isn't great about that saving stuff, but I was fine with AoU doing a little spiteful shot at the Snyder films. Too bad the movie wasn't very good at all, making the gesture almost pointless.

Spider-Man was great though. I like they even had him save the villain who I was sure was going to off himself like the other Spider-Man movie villains.

"Marvel isn't great about that saving stuff" translates roughly to "before AoU they just whitewashed it constantly and never addressed it".

Snyder's greatest film crime is that he literally went "hey what about all these people on the street during these big fights? Wouldn't they die horribly?" and then actually made it a point of the movie. Avengers cuts away from anything violent and then 10 minutes into an alien invasion Lower Manhattan is just magically mostly evacuated.

If they were, in fact, taking a "spiteful shot at the Snyder films" then it's just dumb and hypocritical. I think it's more likely that they were scared shitless that people would start making the same complaints about MCU films next, so they did a 180 and doubled down on the saving and then sanitized the earlier films by saying "oh yeah like 10 people died, and they were mostly old anyway and were gonna die soon so..."

John Wick of Dogs
Mar 4, 2017

A real hellraiser


He was rescuing people personally during the first Zod fight in Smallville, before the kryptonians powers had fully developed. As well as on the oil rig, on the Antarctic ship, and on the bus.

The second Zod fight was an all out attempt at containment, and he consistently tried to move Zod away from population centers. And all of the above was to some extent a struggle.

In Justice League he was just this guy who could do anything and be anywhere and he wasn't a character at all.

Darko
Dec 23, 2004

CelticPredator posted:

It was bad. They changed his character too much without a period where he's able to change. He's just a different character. You could've had him slowly get to where he ended up and have it work, but he'd have to be in the film more and the film should've been able to breathe for a second.

And the mustache thing ruined every scene.

I agree with this, for the most part. I LIKED the more introverted Superman because, well I'm an introvert and can relate more, and it reminded me of the few good parts of Birthright, etc., but I do understand not preferring that take on him. However, this complete 180 shouldn't appease anyone (although I see comments from a bunch of people who are all "thats MY Superman" now).

Sir Kodiak
May 14, 2007


Darko posted:

Yeah, this is how I felt too - it was EXACTLY what people asked for in complaints of MoS and it was really distracting and annoying for me.

Justice League is basically a case study in why the complaints about Man of Steel and BvS were wrongheaded. It wasn't worth losing another actually-good Superman movie, and the brief glimpses of Snyder's work are haunting, but that's the silver lining of that particular dumpster fire.

Serf
May 5, 2011


it's really funny that civil war, the movie that acknowledges that thousands/millions died in sokovia and hundreds/thousands died in new york has its big fight scene take place in a totally-abandoned airport. just lol. same with how bvs had newscasters saying obvious bullshit like "its past 5 in the financial district, clearly no one is there" and stuff

Guy A. Person
May 23, 2003

Serf posted:

it's really funny that civil war, the movie that acknowledges that thousands/millions died in sokovia and hundreds/thousands died in new york has its big fight scene take place in a totally-abandoned airport. just lol. same with how bvs had newscasters saying obvious bullshit like "its past 5 in the financial district, clearly no one is there" and stuff

Yeah, none of this is a coincidence or one studio taking the piss. Everyone got mad spooked by the backlash from MoS so now for the next decade or so we are going to have the obligatory scene of Goku politely asking the villain if they could have their DBZ fight in the abandoned canyon.

Barry Convex
Sep 1, 2005

Think of the good things, Pim! The good things!

Like Jesus, candy, and crackerjacks! Ice cream and cake and lots o'laffs!
Grandma, Grandpa, and Uncle Joe! Larry, Curly, and brother Moe!

Sir Kodiak posted:

Justice League is basically a case study in why the complaints about Man of Steel and BvS were wrongheaded. It wasn't worth losing another actually-good Superman movie, and the brief glimpses of Snyder's work are haunting, but that's the silver lining of that particular dumpster fire.

It doesn't prove the complaints were wrongheaded just because it took such a heavy-handed, pandering approach to addressing them.

Megaman's Jockstrap
Jul 16, 2000

What a horrible thread to have a post.

Barry Convex posted:

It doesn't prove the complaints were wrongheaded just because it took such a heavy-handed, pandering approach to addressing them.

There's simply no way to have a light touch when it comes to a constantly-grinning Daddy Superman who fixes all the problems and prevents all the consequences.

To expound: The reason that he worked in the Donner movies is because they aren't ensembles.

This is what a lot of us have been saying from the get go: Apple Pie and Chevrolet Superman is a dead end. Nothing interesting happens with him, the formula of "he always wins and there are no consequences" is thin and yields extremely diminishing returns, and he's reduced to a stupid cornball when put in any other context but his own broad, idealized movies. A cartoonish Superman is a great folk hero for Truth Justice and the American way but a total dud for people, you know, actually wanting to see his movies.

Megaman's Jockstrap fucked around with this message at 18:27 on Nov 20, 2017

Crackbone
May 23, 2003

Vlaada is my co-pilot.

Less than $100M opening for JL is really bad, isn't it?

Megaman's Jockstrap
Jul 16, 2000

What a horrible thread to have a post.

Crackbone posted:

Less than $100M opening for JL is really bad, isn't it?

If you own stock in Time Warner, I suppose.

Crackbone
May 23, 2003

Vlaada is my co-pilot.

Megaman's Jockstrap posted:

If you own stock in Time Warner, I suppose.

Well yeah, that's what I meant. That's a disastrous opening for a mega-budget superhero movie, especially considering this is the "avengers" of the DCEU. I'd have to imagine the fallout will be big at WB.

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

They’re take away will probably be that they didn’t meddle enough in the production. :(

Happy Noodle Boy
Jul 3, 2002


They didn’t hit the already lowered (three times) projections of $96M. Actuals are out and it’s only $94M.

:rip: DC :rip:

Serf
May 5, 2011


i suppose its too much to hope that this is the beginning of the comic book movie crash

Gatts
Jan 2, 2001

Goodnight Moon

Nap Ghost

Serf posted:

i suppose its too much to hope that this is the beginning of the comic book movie crash

It'll happen after Infinity War 2. Once that's done we will see a decline in general. Marvel may chug out movies but I think it's going to wane after that.

Crows Turn Off
Jan 7, 2008


Serf posted:

i suppose its too much to hope that this is the beginning of the comic book movie crash
People didn't avoid seeing this because it's a comic book movie. They avoided seeing it because it looked like garbage.

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

Happy Noodle Boy posted:

They didn’t hit the already lowered (three times) projections of $96M. Actuals are out and it’s only $94M.

:rip: DC :rip:
It did $185M internationally for a total of $279M.

bring back old gbs
Feb 28, 2007

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

Serf posted:

i suppose its too much to hope that this is the beginning of the comic book movie crash

no, it's a DC film

Barry Convex
Sep 1, 2005

Think of the good things, Pim! The good things!

Like Jesus, candy, and crackerjacks! Ice cream and cake and lots o'laffs!
Grandma, Grandpa, and Uncle Joe! Larry, Curly, and brother Moe!
There is literally zero chance that WB will want Snyder involved with a DC superhero film again, so we'll get better films like Wonder Woman and the the inane arguments we've been having for four and a half years now should just die down over time.

Davros1
Jul 19, 2007

You've got to admit, you are kind of implausible



Barry Convex posted:

There is literally zero chance that WB will want Snyder involved with a DC superhero film again, so we'll get better films like Wonder Woman and the the inane arguments we've been having for four and a half years now should just die down over time.

Not as long as someone says "You know, I didn't really care for MoS/BvS"

jng2058
Jul 17, 2010

We have the tools, we have the talent!





Serf posted:

i suppose its too much to hope that this is the beginning of the comic book movie crash

Yeah, don't get your hopes up on that score. "Comic book movie" has turned out to be a pretty inclusive category. Compare Guardians of the Galaxy (science fiction action/comedy), Captain America Winter Soldier (spy film), Ant-Man (heist film), Logan (mutant western), and Deadpool (R-rated violent comedy), all of which are "comic book movies" but none of them are tonally similar to each other or to mainline comic book movies like The Avengers. The ability of comic book characters to adapt into different genres by simply adding "...but with superheroes" makes the whole thing a lot less likely to crash out quickly or at once.

porfiria
Dec 10, 2008

by Modern Video Games
As long as Marvel's brand is intact they'll keep making money, and the brand will be fine as long as people continue to exit the movies feeling the goodtimechildhoodfunfeelings. JL just looked like an absolute drag in the trailers without even the grandeur and majesty suggested by BvS and MoS or the clean power fantasy of WW. It looked like a beer commercial at halftime honestly.

Barry Convex posted:

There is literally zero chance that WB will want Snyder involved with a DC superhero film again, so we'll get better films like Wonder Woman and the the inane arguments we've been having for four and a half years now should just die down over time.

Snyder was involved in WW heh heh.

I also don't really buy the "Marvel movies are different genres" angle. Like yeah they all have different directors with different sensibilities but I'd say there's a pretty clear house style as far as look and tone are concerned. They're generally very lighthearted, the sex is kept to a middle school level, everything is evenly lit in medium wide shots or whatever.

They're built to appeal to eight year olds and/or the parents of eight year olds. You feel okay bringing your kids to them, there's no weirdo Snyder Superman getting in a bath tub with an older woman or Bruce Wayne loving escorts or Martha Wayne getting her jaw blown off. Even though Snyder has only had sex seven times in his life he seems to have a relatively healthy erotic sensibility whereas the Marvel movies are extremely repressed; I think that aspect has been underdiscussed in their success.

porfiria fucked around with this message at 19:21 on Nov 20, 2017

Happy Noodle Boy
Jul 3, 2002


Barry Convex posted:

There is literally zero chance that WB will want Snyder involved with a DC superhero film again, so we'll get better films like Wonder Woman and the the inane arguments we've been having for four and a half years now should just die down over time.

Arguments will never die, friend. We’ll find some other stupid poo poo to argue about until the heat death of the universe.

ElNarez
Nov 4, 2009
Wonder Woman was just fine, and it's still baffling to me that people don't hate it the way they do Man of Steel, considering it's a movie in which Wonder Woman is all too eager to kill a dude who, turns out, wasn't even Ares.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

bring back old gbs
Feb 28, 2007

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN
DC isnt going anywhere until they poo poo out that property Dwayne Johnson is attached to. I bet they scrap it and reboot after even The Rock cant draw a crowd

  • Locked thread