|
DariusLikewise posted:Mike Glennon is the stereotypical Tall-Elway style quarterback Denver needs.
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 19:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 09:32 |
|
|
DariusLikewise posted:Mike Glennon is the stereotypical Tall-Elway style quarterback Denver needs. Um, he's black though?
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 20:14
|
|
|
What if Mike Glennon were made of delicious barbecue spare ribs?
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2017 22:45
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/SportsCenter/status/941836606922661889?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2017 03:59
|
|
|
ShaneMacGowansTeeth posted:I composed a completely scientific poll on my twitter feed last night and asked a simple question: on a neutral field in Wichita, who would win in a hypothetical match-up, the 2008 Detroit Lions or the 2017 Cleveland Browns. And after the votes were tabulated, the 2008 Lions are still the worst team of all time Those Lions were truly, truly awful.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2017 05:59
|
|
|
AsInHowe posted:Those Lions were truly, truly awful. I wen through the season, and they could have beaten the Vikings at least once, and that would have been even worse as Millen probably doesn't get fired if they somehow went 1-15 or 2-14
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2017 11:38
|
|
|
ShaneMacGowansTeeth posted:I wen through the season, and they could have beaten the Vikings at least once, and that would have been even worse as Millen probably doesn't get fired if they somehow went 1-15 or 2-14 Millen was fired in like September that season.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2017 17:20
|
|
|
Spelling Mitsake posted:Millen was fired in like September that season. Exactly this. Late September we freed ourselves.
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2017 18:24
|
|
|
Spelling Mitsake posted:Millen was fired in like September that season. I know he went mid-season, I just couldn't remember when
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2017 15:57
|
|
|
I can hear that marching band warming up for the parade from 300 miles away.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2017 23:46
|
|
|
Hockles posted:I don't want the Browns to win again ever. I want to see how many consecutive losses will happen before they move or they contract the team.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2017 23:48
|
|
|
I kind of wish they hadn’t won that game last year, because surely two winless seasons in a row could never be beaten? Guess we’ll have to wait for next year.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2017 23:50
|
|
|
I want to see how much consecutive losses they can get before even Haslam turns on Hue dude must be a really good asskisser to have this much goodwill in his first HC job
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2017 23:51
|
|
|
Chris James 2 posted:I want to see how much consecutive losses they can get before even Haslam turns on Hue he was HC of the raiders awhile back
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 00:51
|
|
|
a patagonian cavy posted:he was HC of the raiders awhile back
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 03:40
|
|
|
Boomer The Cannon posted:...and went 8-8 with a lovely Raiders team, which is what makes this odd. He also went insane and traded a bunch of picks for a retired Carson Palmer
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 05:50
|
|
|
a neat cape posted:He also went insane and traded a bunch of picks for a retired Carson Palmer He was just following Al Davis's final instructions: "Start the reactor. Free the AFL."
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 06:38
|
|
|
Vincent Van Goatse posted:He was just following Al Davis's final instructions: "Start the reactor. Free the AFL." Someone post the comic.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 14:25
|
|
|
Happy Noodle Boy posted:Someone post the comic. on it 
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 14:54
|
|
|
Browns currently have the #1 and #4 picks in the first round. - I believe they are 100% for the #1 pick regardless of what they do in the last two games due to strength of schedule. Not worth worrying about anyway. - Giants at 2-12 are guaranteed a top 7 pick if they win out, but are picking either #2 or #3 overall if they lose or go 1-1. - Colts at 3-11 will pick a #3 if the Giants win one game, and #2 if the Giants win two, and if the Colts lose out. If the Colts win one game, they could drop to #4 (swap with the Texans), and since they play the Texans week 17 it's possible they win that one. If the Colts win out they could drop all the way to the #10 range, depending on what other teams below them do. - Texans at 4-10 currently hold the #4 spot, but the pick belongs to Cleveland. If the Texans lose out, including a week 17 loss to the Colts, they could end up at #3 overall due to SOS. Based on current SOS, if the Texans win one game, they could drop all the way to around #10, and if they win out they could be as low as #14 overall, but there is still a lot of volatility among the middle of the pack teams. -- If by some miracle, the Giants win out, the Colts win out (or possibly go 1-1 if end of season SOS puts them behind the Texans), and the Texans lose out, Cleveland is getting the #1 and #2 overall picks. -- If Cleveland loses out, Giants lose out, Colts go 1-1 (beating the Texans), and the Texans lose out, Cleveland has #1 and #3. I gotta believe!!!
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 16:21
|
|
|
Bigass Moth posted:-- If by some miracle, the Giants win out, the Colts win out (or possibly go 1-1 if end of season SOS puts them behind the Texans), and the Texans lose out, Cleveland is getting the #1 and #2 overall picks. Is there a highly skilled set of twins that will be in next year's draft? https://thehockeywriters.com/the-sedin-twins-and-the-1999-nhl-entry-draft/
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 16:31
|
|
|
I also hope the Browns continue to lose until a change in management. At this point who gives a gently caress. Also I hope we draft 1 and 3. It’s probably going to be a QB who will have his future destroyed at 1 and I hope 3 is a female kicker I heard was in the college system somewhere. Like Dawson she will be responsible for all the offense points. Edit: as long as we are poo poo can we draft a hot football player wife at 3? I mean at least she can be like a Princess of England or something that gives an aura of glamour and be in the news all the time to distract from the pain. Gatts fucked around with this message at 17:40 on Dec 18, 2017 |
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 17:35
|
|
|
Bigass Moth posted:Browns currently have the #1 and #4 picks in the first round. Remember when the Eagles played teams that rested their starters weeks 16 & 17 last year and the two wins dropped the Browns pick from #9 to #12?
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 18:52
|
|
|
this bears/browns game is gonna be awesome
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 19:19
|
|
|
mastershakeman posted:this bears/browns game is gonna be awesome For a given value of awesome, sure.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 20:20
|
|
|
The 2017 Chicago Bears are going to sweep the AFC North.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2017 22:15
|
|
|
Mega64 posted:The 2017 Chicago Bears are going to sweep the AFC North. Hahaha oh poo poo I forgot they beat the Ravens.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2017 03:29
|
|
|
Fenrir posted:Hahaha oh poo poo I forgot they beat the Ravens. edit: I think I forgot something about a monkey paw finger curling...
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2017 04:23
|
|
|
Yo guys keep talking like this and the Browns are going to blowout the Bears in a game where nothing makes sense at all culminating in Hue getting fired for winning.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2017 05:32
|
|
|
i get the distinct feeling that it's another 1-15 year because of the bears
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2017 07:32
|
|
|
Happy Noodle Boy posted:Yo guys keep talking like this and the Browns are going to blowout the Bears in a game where nothing makes sense at all culminating in Hue getting fired for winning. The current #2 in draft order is 2-12 (giants) so they could win a game and still pick #1 overall that said I hope they go 0-16 this year and the next because it'll be funny
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2017 13:26
|
|
|
Semi-serious question, what do you even do with two picks at 1 and 3 or 4? I feel like the right thing to do is trade away that 1st for at least a couple of proven NFL players. The Browns are definitely not good at drafting. God I can't imagine being a Browns fan and watching your team draft yet another QB in the first round.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2017 14:21
|
|
|
Bird in a Blender posted:Semi-serious question, what do you even do with two picks at 1 and 3 or 4? I feel like the right thing to do is trade away that 1st for at least a couple of proven NFL players. The Browns are definitely not good at drafting. God I can't imagine being a Browns fan and watching your team draft yet another QB in the first round. Right? I genuinely don’t know what you do if you’re a GM because now if you draft anything less than two superstars you’re out the door
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2017 14:44
|
|
|
Assuming they end up with 1 and 3, and have 3 QBs ranked equally (seems like a good year for QBs), then they could pick at either spot and auction off the other pick to whoever wants to get in front of the Giants if they move the #1. Unless they sign Alex Smith or Kirk Cousins, they have to pick a QB with one of those picks, and even then I'd probably still draft one.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2017 14:44
|
|
|
Bird in a Blender posted:Semi-serious question, what do you even do with two picks at 1 and 3 or 4? I feel like the right thing to do is trade away that 1st for at least a couple of proven NFL players. The Browns are definitely not good at drafting. God I can't imagine being a Browns fan and watching your team draft yet another QB in the first round. Trade the #1 to one of the QB hungry teams (giants, jets etc ) and take the best pass rusher at #3
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2017 14:47
|
|
|
The Browns always take the best [insert non-quarterback here] early then draft a quarterback at pick 22 or lower.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2017 14:51
|
|
|
Pick the best (wrong) Quarterback at 1, pick a WR at 3. They are both hurt by mid-August.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2017 14:52
|
|
|
Pick the best QB at 1, pick the second (or third) best QB at 3 and hope one of the two works out. If you find your franchise QB everything else will sort itself out over the next years. This bold approach will be lauded by the media who is QB obsessed anyway and prevent you from getting fired because traded away the pick with which the next great franchise QB got drafted.
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2017 15:00
|
|
|
GaussianCopula posted:Pick the best QB at 1, pick the second (or third) best QB at 3 and hope one of the two works out. If you find your franchise QB everything else will sort itself out over the next years. That's probably not a terrible idea, since whichever guy you end up not starting will still have a 1st round grade and could potentially be traded for a 1st round pick or other relevant value. I mean when the competition is Kizer, Kessler and Hogan, getting two top rookie QBs to fight each other for the start could be interesting. Of course, after the first bad game (week 1) they'd be pressured to start the other guy, so maybe not a great idea after all.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2017 15:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 09:32 |
|
|
Yeah but both qbs will probably suck and then it'll be even funnier
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2017 15:33
|
|
