|
EugeneJ posted:http://buffalonews.com/2017/12/21/cuomo-calls-for-tougher-revenge-porn-laws/ Really burning myself on that take. In more positivish news, there's a state-level initiative to try and protect some of net neutrality: https://twitter.com/thehill/status/943522143245135872 Will it pass this session? I sure hope so!
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 02:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 09:07 |
|
|
the fcc will get an injunction to protect their authority
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 03:19
|
|
|
Real hurthling! posted:the fcc will get an injunction to protect their authority quote:Fahy has introduced a short piece of legislation that would prohibit state, county and city authorities from doing business with internet service providers that engage in business practices that were prohibited by the net neutrality rules, like blocking or throttling web content or making websites buy into internet “fast lanes.” The FCC can't do poo poo about that.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 03:54
|
|
|
nice
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 04:18
|
|
|
Washington State has an even wider-ranging response which Fahy patterns herself partially on, but she might be attempting to do this piecemeal because Cuomo isn't taking lead on this and she wants something she can pass relatively quickly.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 04:25
|
|
|
something good out of the state assembly? hardest thing to believe in 2017 imho
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 04:47
|
|
|
Scrub-Niggurath posted:something good out of the state assembly? hardest thing to believe in 2017 imho It's just being proposed by a not-so-senior member. Meaning it's probably going to take at least two or three years to get passed, optimistically.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 04:48
|
|
|
EugeneJ posted:http://buffalonews.com/2017/12/21/cuomo-calls-for-tougher-revenge-porn-laws/ are you stupid
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 05:10
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:Really burning myself on that take.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 05:36
|
|
|
get that OUT of my face posted:don't worry, congress is drafting up something that not only codifies the net neutrality repeal into federal law, but also prevents states from making their own regulations. party of states' rights Link?
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 05:38
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:Link?
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 05:43
|
|
|
get that OUT of my face posted:unsurprisingly it's been proposed by Marsha Blackburn, one of the biggest shits in Congress So this is 13(c), right? quote:PREEMPTION OF STATE LAW.—No State or political subdivision of a State shall adopt, maintain, enforce, or impose or continue in effect any law, rule, regulation, duty, requirement, standard, or other provision having the force and effect of law relating to or with respect to internet openness obligations for provision of broadband internet access service. I'm not a lawyer, but I think Fahy's proposal does not get preempted in this way. New York State would not be preventing ISP's from providing internet access service - it would just bar ISP's that do not abide by certain standards from being eligible for state contracts. So Spectrum (Charter + TWC) could provide whatever closed-off fast-lane bullshit they wanted to private citizens, if they were willing to give up NYS as a potential client. Spoiler alert: NYS is a BIG client.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 05:56
|
|
|
Would that affect companies that provide internet fast lanes anywhere or just to people living in NYS? If TWC creates fast lanes for montana residents only are they allowed NYS contracts? I'm wondering how much reach they have.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 08:33
|
|
|
get that OUT of my face posted:don't worry, congress is drafting up something that not only codifies the net neutrality repeal into federal law, but also prevents states from making their own regulations. party of states' rights It's like when red states banned muni broadband when the idea was proven to be successful in multiple cities.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 16:32
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:So this is 13(c), right?
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 21:31
|
|
|
get that OUT of my face posted:you've obviously given this more thought than Blackburn has Yeah, and I'm just a hobbyist pedant. Professional pedants (aka lawyers) would probably have a field day with this.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2017 21:33
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/mattbruenig/status/945893645382836224
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 10:49
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 14:05
|
|
|
I like that they feel the need to point out that what they’re currently doing is legal like yeah no poo poo that’s why we’re changing the law dingus
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 14:11
|
|
|
oh yea very “controversial,” police can’t trample roughshod over people they interact with in the affordable parts of the city. how awful.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 15:38
|
|
|
I don't know what "transaction costs of policing" even means. Is it just a euphemism for "the police won't be able to harass people"?
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 15:45
|
|
|
lmao where was this published
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 15:50
|
|
|
Barbe Rouge posted:I don't know what "transaction costs of policing" even means. Is it just a euphemism for "the police won't be able to harass people"?
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 16:23
|
|
i like nice words
|
Anne Whateley posted:If you take the super optimistic view, maybe it just means they have to buy lots of business cards now This is outrageous. My tax dollars being used to buy business cards for public employee union members?!?!
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 16:59
|
|
|
GalacticAcid posted:lmao where was this published found it: https://www.city-journal.org/html/wrong-footing-nypd-15617.html edit: oh ok, everyone the police interact with is guilty 
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 17:03
|
|
|
"a knowledge subsidy" lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 17:25
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/JakeAnbinder/status/945743861850279936
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 18:20
|
|
|
Crusader posted:edit: oh ok, everyone the police interact with is guilty This but not in the way that article means 
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 18:28
|
|
|
Crusader posted:found it: https://www.city-journal.org/html/wrong-footing-nypd-15617.html hahaha “well it’s not OUR fault that the people we stop don’t know their rights, so why should we have to tell them?”
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 18:49
|
|
|
the mayor of the city of new york is colloquially referred to as the 2nd most powerful man in america for a long time whether or not its true i've heard it my whole life
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 19:35
|
|
|
I always wind up defending De Blasio when I'm around conservatives and bitterly denouncing him when I'm with liberals.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 19:39
|
|
|
GalacticAcid posted:I always wind up defending De Blasio when I'm around conservatives and bitterly denouncing him when I'm with liberals. same.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 19:39
|
|
|
GalacticAcid posted:I always wind up defending De Blasio when I'm around conservatives and bitterly denouncing him when I'm with liberals. im mad at him for loving up my job and moving it under harsh new supervision but if i look passed that hes better than the last 2 decades of republican mayors i guess
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 19:44
|
|
|
Real hurthling! posted:the mayor of the city of new york is colloquially referred to as the 2nd most powerful man in america for a long time whether or not its true The phrase is "second most powerful executive" and it isn't meant to refer to the total influence the mayor has, just the relative amount of power it has in the city in comparison to what other executive offices have in their jurisdictions. Mostly the mayor is powerful because of the size and scope of the bureaucracy he leads, which rivals or surpasses most U.S. state governments.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 21:21
|
|
|
Real hurthling! posted:the mayor of the city of new york is colloquially referred to as the 2nd most powerful man in america for a long time whether or not its true Have you heard anyone outside of New York say that?
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 22:54
|
|
|
Ogmius815 posted:The phrase is "second most powerful executive" and it isn't meant to refer to the total influence the mayor has, just the relative amount of power it has in the city in comparison to what other executive offices have in their jurisdictions. Mostly the mayor is powerful because of the size and scope of the bureaucracy he leads, which rivals or surpasses most U.S. state governments. Also the NYPD is basically army in size and even has offices open at international locations.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 23:00
|
|
|
TWU taking cuomo's side over de blasio's is a real mindfuck
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2017 07:00
|
|
|
If the dems in suburbs around here don't run on "these fuckers raised your taxes" I'll die The only people seeing a direct hit immediately are henrys in blue states
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2017 20:11
|
|
|
Grondoth posted:If the dems in suburbs around here don't run on "these fuckers raised your taxes" I'll die If dems are running on fiscal responsibility how is that any better ?
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2017 20:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 09:07 |
|
|
Grondoth posted:If the dems in suburbs around here don't run on "these fuckers raised your taxes" I'll die donovan, king, and zedlin have plausible deniability by voting against the tax hike, but it would be lunacy to not implicate them anyway. i have no idea if anyone is running against the long island GOP contingency but the only dem challenging donovan that looks any good is a prop worker for tv shows. everyone else is a cop or a veteran
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2017 20:17
|
|