|
LadyPictureShow posted:
I have a super loving morbid sense of... not humor, just interest? I've seen that video. I did not loving laugh at that video. I gasped and jawdropped in awe. I don't regret watching it, but it was not FUNNY. It was Fascinating in a dark way. It was horrifying and incredible. It was not FUNNY. Something's gone wrong with this lady's brain. Farmer Crack-rear end posted:I am really not understanding where the threat of divorce is coming from in that one. Control. They think that a child would never want their parents to be divorced and especially not to be the reason for it, so they threaten it to control him.
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:11
|
|
if you look up the video.
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 00:26 |
|
|
Wife getting more strict with her rules.Relationships (self.relationships) quote:My wife [f37] and I [m36] have been married for 5 years now (with two beautiful girls, [4 & 5]). And in this time, she has become more and more strict. She has rules. She has rules against things that I thought people would not normally have rules against. I DON'T want to throw away a marriage on nonsense, but things that I thought would be 'no big deal', she is 100% opposed. No exceptions, no questions. (Politics, we are agreed on, this is not the issue. Surprisingly. We have other issues.) I like his beaten down "I'm sorry to rant" in reference to a relatively mature post, aside from total lack of spine.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:13
|
|
|
fruit on the bottom posted:Porn is for the emotionally childish What? Peaceful Anarchy posted:this makes me think there's only one cold parent and one stuck in the middle deciding to side with his wife over daughter he never met. And younger children this would need to be explained to somehow.........
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:19
|
|
|
Motronic posted:What? She clarified in the comments - he was born when she was 15, so she was raised as an only child for most of her life.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:24
|
|
|
Which makes her even more bullshit. If your family devoted all their attention to their special needs child when you were growing up then sure it makes sense that you might feel passed over. But when you’re 15 shut the gently caress up. You’re an adult in 3 years. You’re certainly grown enough that you should be able to cope with not being the center of the universe.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:29
|
|
|
maskenfreiheit posted:Wife getting more strict with her rules.Relationships It's been a while since we've seen two people who need a beer and a joint as much as these two people, but for completely opposite reasons.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:34
|
|
|
fruit on the bottom posted:Which makes her even more bullshit. If your family devoted all their attention to their special needs child when you were growing up then sure it makes sense that you might feel passed over. But when you’re 15 shut the gently caress up. You’re an adult in 3 years. You’re certainly grown enough that you should be able to cope with not being the center of the universe.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:37
|
|
|
Outrail posted:It's been a while since we've seen two people who need a beer and a joint as much as these two people, but for completely opposite reasons. he should start claiming he's playing poker and actually just sticks cash in a safe deposit box. when it comes time to split the assets because he DRANK A BEER REEE!1!1!!! it's like oops well looks like they aren't much assets but let's go 50/50 
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:40
|
|
|
maskenfreiheit posted:he should start claiming he's playing poker and actually just sticks cash in a safe deposit box. when it comes time to split the assets because he DRANK A BEER REEE!1!1!!! it's like oops well looks like they aren't much assets but let's go 50/50 Good idea but  GAMBLING!?!?!?! will become against the rules.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:41
|
|
|
"We've been to marriage counseling for a year and it hasn't worked." Maybe take your list of complaints and bring them up at marriage counseling instead of asking the internet.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:46
|
|
Cat Army
|
fruit on the bottom posted:Which makes her even more bullshit. If your family devoted all their attention to their special needs child when you were growing up then sure it makes sense that you might feel passed over. But when you’re 15 shut the gently caress up. You’re an adult in 3 years. You’re certainly grown enough that you should be able to cope with not being the center of the universe. Like it's okay for her to feel lonely or like things changed too fast but she needs to learn to deal with it instead of tracking her bioparents down and then threatening them.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:47
|
|
|
dudeness posted:"We've been to marriage counseling for a year and it hasn't worked." Are marriage counselors generally pro or anti weed?
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:47
|
|
|
Depends if they're a marriage counselor or a "marriage counselor".
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 02:49
|
|
|
Outrail posted:Are marriage counselors generally pro or anti weed? they're pro communication. a good one would probably try to frame it in terms of illegality, a great one in terms of body autonomy, a poor one in terms of the wife needed to better communicate her rules to the husband, and the husband needed individual therapy to meet his  goalsI remember talking with my therapist about an ex in college, and she mentioned the uni offers couples counseling. I looked at her like she was crazy and was like "couples counseling is for married people... if you need couples counseling, doesn't that mean you shouldn't get married" and she just gave an embarrased shrug i dumped her, but i waited til after finals because im not a monster
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 03:04
|
|
|
[DC] I have a peanut allergy and coworker refuses to accommodate me but the company has accommodated me otherwise. What do I do?quote:Hi all. I share an office with no windows with my coworker. We both on occasion eat lunch at our desks but he frequently brings a PB&J sandwich and I have a very bad allergy to peanuts. My blood test showed I scored a 4.5/5 on the allergy scale, or close to that, i forget the specific info on the diagnosis, but it is considered life threatening and I've been prescribed epi pens
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 03:05
|
|
|
La Brea Carpet posted:[DC] I have a peanut allergy and coworker refuses to accommodate me but the company has accommodated me otherwise. What do I do? "I don't want to call HR for a coworker who is passively aggressively trying to kill me," loving what
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 03:07
|
|
|
La Brea Carpet posted:[DC] I have a peanut allergy and coworker refuses to accommodate me but the company has accommodated me otherwise. What do I do? It's reasonable to speak to HR. But start talking to future employers since you'll now be "a problem". If you play it right you can get a nice settlement + a pay bump at your next gig.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 03:08
|
|
|
La Brea Carpet posted:[DC] I have a peanut allergy and coworker refuses to accommodate me but the company has accommodated me otherwise. What do I do? Notify HR that the next time co-worker deliberately and knowingly contaminates the shared space with https://www.allergicliving.com/2017/09/06/michigan-student-pleads-guilty-in-peanut-butter-face-smearing-case/ e: Doesn't say if he guy knew the other guy was allergic or not. It's dumb as hell, but I can see someone easily being charged with manslaughter, or even murder if they knew about the allergy and deliberately brought someone into contact with it. Outrail fucked around with this message at 03:12 on Jan 9, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 03:09
|
|
|
Outrail posted:Notify HR that the next time co-worker deliberately and knowingly contaminates the shared space with what law says i'm obligated to not eat certain foods if someone has an allergy?
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 03:31
|
|
|
maskenfreiheit posted:what law says i'm obligated to not eat certain foods if someone has an allergy? Well generally speaking if you knowingly do something that causes someone to end up in hospital or die that's kind of illegal, even if it's usually legal. You can eat your food and breathe your breath, but you can't eat your food and breathe your breath on someone if it's going to kill them. Especially so if you've been told that doing so will kill them. Outrail fucked around with this message at 03:42 on Jan 9, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 03:37
|
|
|
Outrail posted:Well generally speaking if you knowingly do something that causes someone to end up in hospital or die that's kind of illegal, even if it's usually legal. that usually applies to things like altering their food or offering adulterated food without disclosure. i'd love to see the law that says you can't eat peanut butter in your own office without getting hit with a manslaughter charge. especially since the company has apparently been notified of the issue, but not the inidivual employee. (can you prove that email was read? hint: no - that's why HR has you sign off on important policies)
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 03:40
|
|
|
maskenfreiheit posted:It's reasonable to speak to HR. But start talking to future employers since you'll now be "a problem". She states in the comments she's hesitating because she just turned in a guy to HR for sexual harassment and he got fired and doesn't want to be that person.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 03:40
|
|
|
maskenfreiheit posted:that usually applies to things like altering their food or offering adulterated food without disclosure. i'd love to see the law that says you can't eat peanut butter in your own office without getting hit with a manslaughter charge. quote:He says it's all mental but I trust my doctor and science. Reading the OP I think it's reasonable to assume that he knows about the allergy. You're ignoring the point, if someone knowingly causes someone to have a life threatening allergic reaction it's likely assault: https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...m=.5e566ccefc11 quote:But Justin Dillon of criminal defense and civil litigation firm Kaiser Dillon — whose own child had a severe peanut allergy — convinced me that that approach would be unlikely to be effective. He agreed that deliberately exposing someone to a potentially deadly allergen probably qualifies for assault charges, but he added that most police departments or prosecutors would lack the resources to get involved in a case involving anything short of serious injury. I'm going to go with Justin Dillon of criminal defense and civil litigation firm Kaiser Dillon on this one. Outrail fucked around with this message at 03:47 on Jan 9, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 03:44
|
|
|
Outrail posted:Reading the OP I think it's reasonable to assume that he's knows about the allergy. You're ignoring the point, if someone knowingly causes someone to have a life threatening allergic reaction it's likely assault: There is a difference between defacing the desk of a coworker (a crime regardless of allergies) and peacefully eating a sandwich. It's a shame the employer hasn't provided a peanut free lunchroom for the allergy to eat in, but it's not criminal to eat in your office. One could even argue forcing the other employee out is racism/discrimination of their vegetarianism is rooted in religion.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 03:48
|
|
|
maskenfreiheit posted:harsh maskenfreiheit truth: if you had two loving adoptive parents you did just fine, and tracking down some people who took the time to make sure you ended up in that situation and berating them for daring to gently caress without having a child (something this child, and everyone else on the planet does) isn't a good look. quote:I have no solid memories of my father until around age 11ish. He spent months away at a time. In every photo I’m being held by a different nanny. I’m definitely going to seek a therapist. I feel awful for what I did, and I’ve definitely done a disservice to my birth parents. quote:Since the day my baby brother was born, they have put him as number one. My parents were never hands on with me as a kid but they smother him with love and affection and constantly remind me that one day when hey are gone he will be my responsibility because he will likely need to live with a caregiver his whole life  It really comes off as her biological parents finding the richest couple they could to give the OP to, which sounds like a good idea especially if you're a child yourself. However those parents were more concerned with money than their child, until they mellowed out in late middle age and made a defective baby "of their own" that they've then told the OP she'll be saddled with forever, because now that they care about family the OP logically would as well.
Mameluke fucked around with this message at 03:56 on Jan 9, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 03:50
|
|
|
maskenfreiheit posted:There is a difference between defacing the desk of a coworker (a crime regardless of allergies) and peacefully eating a sandwich. You're just arguing for the sake of arguing.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 03:51
|
|
|
Outrail posted:You're just arguing for the sake of arguing. maskenfreiheit posted:makes sense but unfortunately maskenfreiheit has stated a dumber opinion and will argue it relentlessly for the next few pages.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 03:52
|
|
|
Outrail posted:You're just arguing for the sake of arguing. so to be clear, you concede my points are correct and are moving onto ad hominems?
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 03:52
|
|
|
maskenfreiheit posted:that usually applies to things like altering their food or offering adulterated food without disclosure. i'd love to see the law that says you can't eat peanut butter in your own office without getting hit with a manslaughter charge. Pretty sure a lawyer would respond very favorably to their client telling them that a co-worker believes their lethal peanut allergy is fake in this scenario. Her case is even stronger if there's a recording or other co-workers who have witnessed the co-worker saying crazy things or eating peanut butter near her. Come on, bro. The company can't possibly claim an individual employee hasn't been notified if said employee has had multiple conversations about the subject and is literally denying the dangerous allergy to her face. Cough Drop The Beat fucked around with this message at 03:56 on Jan 9, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 03:53
|
|
|
Cough Drop The Beat posted:Pretty sure a lawyer would respond very favorably to their client telling them that a co-worker believes their lethal peanut allergy is fake in this scenario. Her case is even stronger if there's a recording or other co-workers who have witnessed it. Come on, bro. The company can't possibly claim an individual employee hasn't been notified of said employee is literally denying a dangerous allergy. Sorry you don’t have an important enough job to conceive of not reading every bit that flies into your inbox 
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 03:54
|
|
|
maskenfreiheit posted:Sorry you don’t have an important enough job to conceive of not reading every bit that flies into your inbox Lmao 😂😂😂😂
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 03:55
|
|
|
maskenfreiheit posted:so to be clear, you concede my points are correct and are moving onto ad hominems? No to your first part. I'm not conceding anything, I'm acknowledging that you're just trolling for the hell of it or you're not reading my post that very clearly spelled out a real life lawyer's opinion that deliberately exposing someone with a peanut allergy to peanut butter could be charged with assault: https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...m=.5e566ccefc11 quote:But Justin Dillon of criminal defense and civil litigation firm Kaiser Dillon — whose own child had a severe peanut allergy — convinced me that that approach would be unlikely to be effective. https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/if-you-knew-that-someone-was-severely-allergic-to--2270506.html quote:Phoenix Shannon Michele Ayotte Harris - PRACTICE AREAS: Federal crime, Criminal defense, Military law, Sex crime The issue we were debating is would deliberately exposing someone to a life threatening allergen be grounds for assault. And the answer seems to be yes, seeing as I have two randomly googled lawyers opinions and you do not. Yes, you are correct in that there are likely mitigating circumstances but, in a hypothetical scenario, if someone has been told that they should not eat a PB&J in the office because it causes a severe allergic reaction, and they bring a PB&J into the office and it causes a severe allergic reaction that sends the victim to hospital or kills them, then they could very well be charged with assault. As to your second point: You're a loving moron.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 04:05
|
|
|
You guys are completely making up all the stuff about that level of exposure being "lethal" and "deadly." Her lips and eyes itch. If he smeared it in her face and forced it down her throat, that could theoretically be life-threatening, but he's eating it himself at his own desk. If causing eyes to itch is grounds for a manslaughter charge, don't we all have cases against our companies for making us use monitors that are known to cause dry eye? Or my particularly horrible coworker and her nasty perfume? They should both eat elsewhere. The judge has spoken.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 04:07
|
|
i like nice words
|
Anne Whateley posted:You guys are completely making up all the stuff about that level of exposure being "lethal" and "deadly." Her lips and eyes itch. If he smeared it in her face and forced it down her throat, that could theoretically be life-threatening, but he's eating it himself at his own desk. If causing eyes to itch is grounds for a manslaughter charge, don't we all have cases against our companies for making us use monitors that are known to cause dry eye? Or my particularly horrible coworker and her nasty perfume? Well yeah. My point is if she does have a severe allergic reaction after being told not to bring them in the co-worker is boned one way or another. I dunno, if he accidentally gets it on his fist and punches her right in the mouth that would definitely be assault and peanut buttery at best.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 04:11
|
|
|
Last I read on the science, a peanut allergy requires contact with the substance, not merely inhalation. My eating a peanut butter sandwich, as long as I keep it to my desk and wash my hands, should not pose any harm to any one. If anyone has a recent study demonstrating otherwise, please show me. I love peanut butter, but hate killing people.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 04:11
|
|
|
Avenging_Mikon posted:Last I read on the science, a peanut allergy requires contact with the substance, not merely inhalation. My eating a peanut butter sandwich, as long as I keep it to my desk and wash my hands, should not pose any harm to any one.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 04:14
|
|
|
Apparently the allergy occurs when digesting the protein, and the protein isn't airborne even though the scent is?
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 04:17
|
|
|
Eat sandwich, get some peanut butter on hands, touch stuff in the office or the door handle, she comes in and touches those things as well, she touches her mouth/rubs her eyes and has a mild reaction. Not really improbable.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 04:18
|
|
|
Searched 'peanut' for topical stories, found this instead. He (39,m) was the peanut butter to my jelly (29,f). quote:ME: looking for an intelligent man
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 04:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 00:26 |
|
|
Avenging_Mikon posted:Last I read on the science, a peanut allergy requires contact with the substance, not merely inhalation. My eating a peanut butter sandwich, as long as I keep it to my desk and wash my hands, should not pose any harm to any one. smells are really just you inhaling the particulate of a substance in a fine mist. think about THAT next time you smell poo poo that being said such a small amount probably can't bring up more than trace symptoms (which OP described) Haifisch posted:Searched 'peanut' for topical stories, found this instead. smart guy doesn't work for free
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2018 04:26
|
|