|
meatpotato posted:just for fun, here are some photos of some interesting taiwanese house keys I took a while back isn't this the kind that skeleton keys are a bypass for lol
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 16:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 00:48 |
|
|
Krankenstyle posted:all locks can be picked https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLsJDELd4lo 
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 16:36
|
|
|
i'm not a fan of bumping but it's feasible on that: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4f1H6mYHOI at least in theory: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nO1zkWKK5dA e: lot more info on a practical attack: https://enterthecore.net/foiling-the-forever-lock-by-deviant-ollam/ Wiggly Wayne DDS fucked around with this message at 17:48 on Jan 17, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 17:36
|
|
|
wow, holy gently caress virtualbox is still maintained?
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 18:14
|
|
|
If its dogshit you know Larry has his hands all over it. That is the only "blessed" VM platform for Oracle DBs and they will threaten the poo poo out of you with legal and sales if you attempt to run their software on a different stack
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 18:17
|
|
|
imagine being stupid enough to buy something from oracle in this day and age you get more equitable treatment from muggers
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 18:21
|
|
|
I don't know if they still do this, but a few years back if you ran a 2 vCPU Oracle VM on a 16 core server they would try to make you license all 16 cores. They justified this by saying that the paravirtual drivers offloaded cycles from inside the VM to the hypervisor allowing you to have more performance than you were entitled to by running their software in a VM. gently caress Oracle.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 18:25
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:I don't know if they still do this, but a few years back if you ran a 2 vCPU Oracle VM on a 16 core server they would try to make you license all 16 cores. They justified this by saying that the paravirtual drivers offloaded cycles from inside the VM to the hypervisor allowing you to have more performance than you were entitled to by running their software in a VM. gently caress Oracle. lol hold on, were they arguing A) running in a 2-core VM provided greater performance than if you were running on 2-core bare metal, ergo you owe us more money or B) running on a 2-core VM should provide lesser performance than on bare metal, and the fact that it doesn't means you owe us more money ??
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 18:33
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:I don't know if they still do this, but a few years back if you ran a 2 vCPU Oracle VM on a 16 core server they would try to make you license all 16 cores. They justified this by saying that the paravirtual drivers offloaded cycles from inside the VM to the hypervisor allowing you to have more performance than you were entitled to by running their software in a VM. gently caress Oracle. these days they make you buy Oracle Database Appliances (ODAs) which are essentially magical physical servers running the UEK oracle linux as a kvm hypervisor and then on top of that are DB VMs running oracle enterprise linux or some poo poo. licensing wise they've got you by the nuts. admittedly if you dont touch them they appear to not fall over but holy lol when they do prepare for a 6+ hour phone call. last time our ODAs exploded i got called in despite not being a DBA or even proper linux dude (i know linux for the most part but it's not my day-to-day). they just needed someone to take over the 8 hour support call lol edit: oh yeah the ODAs run in HA pairs and despite what you'd think it actually doubles complexity when troubleshooting. you can then cluster the HA pairs so when poo poo goes pair shaped you get to play "find the DB VM whereever it may have been?" Pile Of Garbage fucked around with this message at 18:40 on Jan 17, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 18:37
|
|
|
20-years left as of this Friday to fix your 32-bit integers
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 18:43
|
|
|
Things are going well for MacOS lately. https://twitter.com/wdormann/status/953651214532726789
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 18:50
|
|
|
Lain Iwakura posted:20-years left as of this Friday to change careers and let some other suckers clean up your poo poo
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 18:52
|
|
|
yeah macos is on a roll lately
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 18:52
|
|
|
Truga posted:yeah macos is on a roll lately was the development of it taken over by the itunes crew?
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 19:00
|
|
|
Lain Iwakura posted:20-years left as of this Friday to fix your 32-bit integers way back in the day the article on wikipedia about this said something like "with a move to 64-bit timetsamps, the next time this will be an issue is in approximately 290 billion years; this is generally not considered a pressing issue" but of course wikipedia hates fun
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 19:01
|
|
|
Diva Cupcake posted:Things are going well for MacOS lately. lmao they really need to rewrite those priv escalation dialogs from the group up e: ok the "allow" button wont show up in the sysprefs panel until you click "ok" to the dialog that tells you the app is unsigned. but i still get a username/password prompt. maybe it only happens for kexts (possibly since they dont have any UI and are not loaded through the UI?) Carthag Tuek fucked around with this message at 19:14 on Jan 17, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 19:09
|
|
|
Farmer Crack-rear end posted:lol hold on, were they arguing A, baby pay for the whole host system but only use the tip
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 19:19
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:I don't know if they still do this, but a few years back if you ran a 2 vCPU Oracle VM on a 16 core server they would try to make you license all 16 cores. They justified this by saying that the paravirtual drivers offloaded cycles from inside the VM to the hypervisor allowing you to have more performance than you were entitled to by running their software in a VM. gently caress Oracle. Farmer Crack-rear end posted:lol hold on, were they arguing microsoft does this too with server 2016. your server only has 2 VCPUs but you gotta license for the bare metal cores and if you're clustering you gotta license the cores on the other physical hosts because in a failover situation itll now be running on those cores
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 20:01
|
|
|
licensing huh? not my area, you'll have to file an NMP (Not My Problem)
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 20:12
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/0xdude/status/953374654068031489
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 20:18
|
|
|
Lain Iwakura posted:20-years left as of this Friday to fix your 32-bit integers this is legitimately scarier than y2k
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 20:39
|
|
|
gently caress me I wish I had no morals
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 20:43
|
|
|
redleader posted:this is legitimately scarier than y2k I'm considering a career change 5-years before at the latest.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 20:44
|
|
|
minor thing but i noticed that whatsapp doesn't seem to actually hide message content on android lockscreen if you have that setup in the OS settings android has an option to hide sensitive notification content which includes who sent you a message, message content, etc i complained to whatsapp that it's literally the only app that does this and whatsapp just got back to me that it's a feature not a bug after instructing me how to disable notifications entirely
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 21:04
|
|
|
NEED MORE MILK posted:microsoft does this too with server 2016. your server only has 2 VCPUs but you gotta license for the bare metal cores and if you're clustering you gotta license the cores on the other physical hosts because in a failover situation itll now be running on those cores lol this is not true
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 21:11
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:lol this is not true 
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 21:16
|
|
|
That's on bare metal, they have a different set of confusing rules if you're licensing Server Standard in a virtual environment (fully licensing a machine gets you two virtual licenses) But the big difference is that MS decreased their per-core cost so that the cost didn't increase dramatically from before the per-core switch (unlike Oracle I'm guessing)
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 21:22
|
|
|
Truga posted:yeah macos is on a roll lately more like infosec people slightly turned their heads in its direction 😜
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 21:23
|
|
|
Yes you pay your licenses for the cores on the host and then run as many guests as you want. This is not the scenario I am describing with oracle. They want you to buy licensing for each core your application might possibly touch, sometimes including other hosts in an HA cluster if the sales guy you are talking to is an Exceptional Dick. Or you buy their entire VM stack with UNLIMITED LICENSING for a half mil or whatever and its a big pile of dogshit because gently caress you.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 21:23
|
|
|
wyoak posted:That's on bare metal, they have a different set of confusing rules if you're licensing Server Standard in a virtual environment (fully licensing a machine gets you two virtual licenses) it only stays the same if youre < 16 cores/host. i dont even think intel makes a xeon with less than 12 cores now so thats 24 right there if youre dual cpu. also the HA licensing requires that you license the max number of VMs for every host so if you have two hosts with 5 vms you have to license each host for 10 vms if each host has 20 cores you have to have 10 vms * 20 cores * 2 hosts = 400 core licenses / 2 because you get 2 vms per fully licensed host = 200 core licenses licensing is about $60 a core before any discounts so thats 12 grand 30 TO 50 FERAL HOG fucked around with this message at 21:32 on Jan 17, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 21:27
|
|
|
NEED MORE MILK posted:it only stays the same if youre < 16 cores/host. i dont even think intel makes a xeon with less than 12 cores now so thats 24 right there if youre dual cpu. also the HA licensing requires that you license the max number of VMs for every host
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 21:32
|
|
|
NEED MORE MILK posted:it only stays the same if youre < 16 cores/host. i dont even think intel makes a xeon with less than 12 cores now so thats 24 right there if youre dual cpu. also the HA licensing requires that you license the max number of VMs for every host https://ark.intel.com/products/120499/Intel-Xeon-Platinum-8156-Processor-16_5M-Cache-3_60-GHz The 'have to run Oracle' SKU.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 22:01
|
|
|
PCjr sidecar posted:https://ark.intel.com/products/120499/Intel-Xeon-Platinum-8156-Processor-16_5M-Cache-3_60-GHz lmao jesus is intel getting in on the gouging because $10k for 4 cores is insane. that thing better have just absolutely preposterous single thread performance
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 22:17
|
|
|
NEED MORE MILK posted:it only stays the same if youre < 16 cores/host. i dont even think intel makes a xeon with less than 12 cores now so thats 24 right there if youre dual cpu. also the HA licensing requires that you license the max number of VMs for every host Yep, that's about the pricing that its always been for datacenter licenses. MS has to do something to deal with core per socket counts going to the moon.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 22:27
|
|
|
NEED MORE MILK posted:lmao jesus is intel getting in on the gouging because $10k for 4 cores is insane. that thing better have just absolutely preposterous single thread performance it’s probably the cheapest major part of the box it goes in and the hardware probably isn’t more than 10% of the total cost of the system do never oracle
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 22:37
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:Yes you pay your licenses for the cores on the host and then run as many guests as you want. This is not the scenario I am describing with oracle. They want you to buy licensing for each core your application might possibly touch, sometimes including other hosts in an HA cluster if the sales guy you are talking to is an Exceptional Dick. Or you buy their entire VM stack with UNLIMITED LICENSING for a half mil or whatever and its a big pile of dogshit because gently caress you. honestly surprised Oracle hasn't tried to make moves for licensing based on percentage of revenue or dollar amount, whichever is greater
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 22:46
|
|
|
Farmer Crack-rear end posted:honestly surprised Oracle hasn't tried to make moves for licensing based on percentage of revenue or dollar amount, whichever is greater lol I've been accidentally forwarded internal sales spreadsheets from a few of the big tech companies like that and if you don't think their sales guys have a spreadsheet with your estimate gross/net revenue and current tech outlays and will be adjusting their pricing to squeeze every red cent they can out of you then you're fooling yourself
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 22:48
|
|
|
The Hawaii agency that messed up with the false ICBM launch warning keeps their passwords publicly visible https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/...source=vicefbus
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 23:45
|
|
|
Zamujasa posted:way back in the day the article on wikipedia about this said something like "with a move to 64-bit timetsamps, the next time this will be an issue is in approximately 290 billion years; this is generally not considered a pressing issue" I like that Wikipedia hates fun, because the alternative, a Wikipedia laden with "hilarious" "jokes", would probably be absolutely intolerable.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 23:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 00:48 |
|
|
Doom Mathematic posted:I like that Wikipedia hates fun, because the alternative, a Wikipedia laden with "hilarious" "jokes", would probably be absolutely intolerable. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2018 23:57
|
|
