|
Spiderman defeats Octopus Man with the power of love, he's a good guy.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 18:26 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 09:37 |
|
So are we doing "Not My Spider-Man" ironically or...
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 18:26 |
|
I think I gave the Schumacher Batman films a bad rap because they weren't the Batman films I wanted them to be. Now that we'd had four grim and serious Batman films and a bevy of animated films of varying tone and quality, I'm better able to appreciate them on their own merits. I rewatched them recently, and the biggest flaw in both is that they just...kind of happen. A thing happens, and then a thing happens, and this other thing is also happening over here, and nothing really ties it all together. They're not convoluted; the films aren't hard to follow. But each film is a pile of scenes in search of a story.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 18:34 |
|
The biggest flaw in both is that reverse footage shot of Robin going back under the water. What the gently caress was the editing room thinking on that one?
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 18:54 |
|
bushisms.txt posted:Nope. Spider-man is actually a smart social kid, tobey is the opposite of this the entire series. The only reason he talks to people outside his circle is because they fall in love with the suit. He can't even beat doc Ock without ock killing himself. Actual Spider-Man would use his wits to create something or just plain out smart him. Raimi is fine having doc Ock just by chance put this guard down, and not having Spider-Man do his part to earn the win. Spider Man doesn’t exist and he’s been portrayed differently by the countless people who’ve written him.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 18:54 |
|
SleepCousinDeath posted:So are we doing "Not My Spider-Man" ironically or... They should grow up and admit the truth; The Raimi movies are the one true canon.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 18:59 |
|
sponges posted:Spider Man doesn’t exist and he’s been portrayed differently by the countless people who’ve written him. Agreed, and raimi's is the outlier. The not my Superman claims were funny because all their complaints were actually on screen or answered, raimi spider-man doesn't attempt to be the same character outside of aesthetic. Besides that, Spider-Man 2 ends on an unearned moment that doesn't even regard the characters in the film as they are. A True Jar Jar Fan posted:Spiderman defeats Octopus Man with the power of love, he's a good guy. Spiderman uses an opportunity given to him by the writers to reprogram ock. Ocks arms go from omniscient to ineffectual in a blink, just really lazy. bushisms.txt fucked around with this message at 19:10 on Jan 26, 2018 |
# ? Jan 26, 2018 19:08 |
|
The best Spider-Man was Ryan Reynolds in the opening of Just Friends.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 19:16 |
|
Best bit is when Mary Jane ran past the Punisher in SM2
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 19:19 |
|
He incapacitates Doc Ock using his own science against him and then convinces Octavius that he's not actually evil and saves the day. But he's definitely not Spider-Man.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 19:23 |
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:The biggest flaw in both is the Chris O'Donnell performing extreme laundry drying action scene in Batman Forever.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 19:38 |
|
sorry folks, the science is in, Marvel movies are better than DC movies, this is absolutely an argument that people are going to make, so I thought I'd give you the heads up http://www.adweek.com/tv-video/marvel-tops-dc-at-the-box-office-because-fans-emotionally-connect-with-its-characters-study-shows/ quote:ZappiStore tested a number of DC and Marvel movie trailers to measure viewer emotional engagement and find out which elements impacted performance of the trailers, including how much the respondents “loved” the trailer, how well the trailer grabbed their attention, and how likely respondents were to share the trailer on social media.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 19:40 |
|
There is no Marvel's Avengers: Civil War
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 19:43 |
|
ElNarez posted:sorry folks, the science is in, Marvel movies are better than DC movies, this is absolutely an argument that people are going to make, so I thought I'd give you the heads up Cognitive literary theory ain't good.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 19:56 |
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:The biggest flaw in both is that reverse footage shot of Robin going back under the water. What the gently caress was the editing room thinking on that one? Neo Rasa posted:The biggest flaw in both is the Chris O'Donnell performing extreme laundry drying action scene in Batman Forever. Some aspect of these films can only be explained in terms of Schumacher's apparent fascination with wet young men.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 19:56 |
|
Al Borland Corp. posted:There is no Marvel's Avengers: Civil War That's just accurate branding.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2018 20:04 |
|
bushisms.txt posted:Yes, let's not forget that RDJ was a huge leap of faith for the movie back then, he was just the druggie coming back via mel Gibson insurance. Now we're just pulling any old celeb who kind of looks like them. There last great casting was probably the guardians. Bautista, Gilliam and Diesel are inspired choices. Bradley cooper forgets what voice he was using between movies, he sounds so strained in 2. I always thought that Cooper's work just wasn't...intergrated with everyone else. It really sticks out, and you can tell that he wasn't there on the day and that it's people reacting to a tennis ball voiced by a guy miles away. Halloween Jack posted:I think I gave the Schumacher Batman films a bad rap because they weren't the Batman films I wanted them to be. Now that we'd had four grim and serious Batman films and a bevy of animated films of varying tone and quality, I'm better able to appreciate them on their own merits. The best explanation for them I've found is that they are the movies about Batman made in the universe of the first two movies. Snowman_McK fucked around with this message at 04:12 on Jan 27, 2018 |
# ? Jan 27, 2018 04:09 |
|
Snowman_McK posted:I always thought that Cooper's work just wasn't...intergrated with everyone else. It really sticks out, and you can tell that he wasn't there on the day and that it's people reacting to a tennis ball voiced by a guy miles away. I loved him in the first Guardians movie but got this exact same feeling while watching the sequel. You can tell they put a lot more work into getting an actual performance out of Rocket's CG and the voice acting in the first one. Not to say the CG in 2 is bad but a lot of times Rocket is just sort like, around or he's very separated from everyone or he's stationary is a talking head.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2018 04:57 |
|
Neo Rasa posted:I loved him in the first Guardians movie but got this exact same feeling while watching the sequel. You can tell they put a lot more work into getting an actual performance out of Rocket's CG and the voice acting in the first one. Not to say the CG in 2 is bad but a lot of times Rocket is just sort like, around or he's very separated from everyone or he's stationary is a talking head. I honestly felt like that about the first one. There's a cadence and rythmn to movies, and RR just felt like his was different. I think it's just the product of so much of performance, by necessity, taking place in a different space to everyone else's.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2018 05:06 |
|
Corrosion posted:Cognitive literary theory ain't good. There's something sickening about that whole field that I just can't put into words.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2018 10:20 |
|
Bradley Cooper's voice work is the second best thing about the GotG movies.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2018 10:58 |
|
I Before E posted:There's something sickening about that whole field that I just can't put into words. It comes from the same perspective that emotions aren't real because they can be triggered by neurochemical reactions, or there's no such thing as altruism since a plausible evolutionary biological explanation exists for the development of self-sacrificial behavior. In other words, that explaining the underlying quantitative mechanism of a phenomenon is as good as explaining it away, and sweeping aside the indelible qualia of the human experience is a good and laudable goal of scientific inquiry.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2018 12:41 |
|
sassassin posted:Bradley Cooper's voice work is the second best thing about the GotG movies. Is it? What's the first?
|
# ? Jan 27, 2018 12:43 |
|
bushisms.txt posted:Is it? What's the first? They're over haha
|
# ? Jan 27, 2018 13:22 |
|
sassassin posted:They're over haha I wish I could share in your great dunk but http://www.digitalspy.com/movies/guardians-of-the-galaxy/feature/a829022/guardians-of-the-galaxy-vol-3-trailer-cast-release-date/
|
# ? Jan 27, 2018 13:36 |
|
I'm glad I'm not the only one who was bored during gotg 2
|
# ? Jan 27, 2018 17:11 |
|
ElNarez posted:sorry folks, the science is in, Marvel movies are better than DC movies, this is absolutely an argument that people are going to make, so I thought I'd give you the heads up “Viewer emotional engagement to trailers” Imagine thinking this metric meant anything.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2018 18:38 |
|
GonSmithe posted:“Viewer emotional engagement to trailers” if that mattered the canonical objective best comic book movie ever made would be Batman vs. Superman: Dawn of Justice.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2018 19:40 |
|
I Before E posted:There's something sickening about that whole field that I just can't put into words. A cognitive theorist came in to a class I took while still in University and said that we should "Read Nick Carraway in The Great Gatsby based on the line “Whenever you feel like criticizing any one,” he told me, 'just remember that all the people in this world haven’t had the advantages that you’ve had.'" Like as a rule for engaging the book, and its characters' minds. That whole field, like I think some things are true only in so far as "It's true people think this means something." I think people conceive of characters as continuing, but typically it's based on that whole "lived in"/emotional engagement poo poo. I really wish I had the words, too.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2018 19:48 |
|
Corrosion posted:Cognitive literary theory ain't good. I think it’s actually a great idea. Accelerate this poo poo. I’m talking live encephalograms streamed directly to social media and aggregated, eliminating the need for primitive comments sections or ‘like/dislike’ buttons. Real-time tracking of subconscious ‘likes’ on a nanosecond by nanosecond basis. Pink Spiderman Prank Elsa Poop Needle Feet neurochemically proven as the pinnacle of artistic achievement. Taco Bell wins the franchise wars.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2018 19:49 |
|
SuperMechagodzilla posted:I think it’s actually a great idea. Accelerate this poo poo. I’m talking live encephalograms streamed directly to social media and aggregated, eliminating the need for primitive comments sections or ‘like/dislike’ buttons. Real-time tracking of subconscious ‘likes’ on a nanosecond by nanosecond basis. Pink Spiderman Prank Elsa Poop Needle Feet neurochemically proven as the pinnacle of artistic achievement. Taco Bell wins the franchise wars. Should I be more aware of what Demolition Man means to the punch line though?
|
# ? Jan 27, 2018 19:53 |
|
ElNarez posted:sorry folks, the science is in, Marvel movies are better than DC movies, this is absolutely an argument that people are going to make, so I thought I'd give you the heads up tfw so into these comic franchise wars you start huffing farts and thinking things like "cinematography is overrated" and "Captain America is my friend"
|
# ? Jan 27, 2018 20:02 |
|
Corrosion posted:Should I be more aware of what Demolition Man means to the punch line though? Taco Bell will win the franchise wars, so all restaurants will be Taco Bell.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2018 20:41 |
|
Corrosion posted:Should I be more aware of what Demolition Man means to the punch line though?
|
# ? Jan 27, 2018 20:53 |
|
Actually true and actually accurate. Glad you fixed your face.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2018 20:58 |
|
Found our official uniform. https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2072588442983984&id=1683227221920110
|
# ? Jan 28, 2018 03:21 |
|
Feeling clean rad and powerful deadlifting in my <3 Zack Snyder tankie
|
# ? Jan 28, 2018 04:13 |
|
DrVenkman posted:So, this blind item. It's easy to see that they're talking about WB/DC. But any idea who they're referring to? Going back to this because I just found this Joss, Jed and Zack Whedon WHY
|
# ? Jan 28, 2018 09:17 |
|
That family gave them Snyder so none of that makes sense.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2018 09:23 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 09:37 |
|
bushisms.txt posted:That family gave them Snyder so none of that makes sense. What lunatic would interpret the Snyder films as opposing "more realistic-themed movies" and being "for kids" in this dichotomy.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2018 20:48 |