|
Blade Runner posted:That dude is a powerful villain for Pete to face, and I want to see how he deals with him in the next issue he's actually a lot like pete, but without the human qualities or empathy dark pete
|
# ? May 31, 2018 23:57 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 03:57 |
|
FWB and I looking for more "Over the clothing" things to try! Any ideas?quote:Hello Reddit! I didn't know where to put this, so I hope that it fits here. My FWB and I are both saving ourselves for marriage, and we have no plans on having sex, but we have definitely been having fun with just over the clothing type of play. Is this what sexual relationships are like in Utah?
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 00:00 |
|
Cough Drop The Beat posted:FWB and I looking for more "Over the clothing" things to try! Any ideas? Oh just gently caress already jesus.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 00:05 |
|
Cough Drop The Beat posted:FWB and I looking for more "Over the clothing" things to try! Any ideas? Strip down to you're undies and grind your gentinals on the coffee table. Be sure to never break eye contact. Gibbis, get your Solomon sword's out. How will you divide this baby (the baby is a house)? My husband's [4 years] father [67m] told his three sons [35m, 25m, 17m] to decide how to split their eventual inheritance. He isn't happy with the decision everyone reached and wants another solution.Non-Romantic https://www.reddit.com/r/relationships/comments/5juq01/my_husbands_4_years_father_67m_told_his_three/ quote:Essentially my FIL announced last Thanksgiving that he's making a new will and wanted everyone present* to come to an agreement on how to divide his assets. Also, FIL has had three heart attacks and wants to return to his home country to die while he's still able to, physically and medically. Also, he's writing the will himself, with no background in law. [it's Solomon who was going to cut a baby in half, right? Sunday school is a long time ago for me.]
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 00:08 |
|
value-brand cereal posted:Strip down to you're undies and grind your gentinals on the coffee table. Be sure to never break eye contact. This is so stupid. Just sell everything. Split three ways. Done. No one is going to be 100% happy with any solution so you might as well go the least painful route and give everyone a stack of cash and let them gently caress that poo poo up on their own.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 00:11 |
|
cock hero flux posted:he's actually a lot like pete, but without the human qualities or empathy Hes pete with a goatee. Nega Pete. Reverse Pete. Ah, how good to see you, Pete, but youre running out of time. Do you save the mayor or do you save the inventor? Its not an ultimatum Pete, just a choice.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 00:11 |
|
Milotic posted:Sorry about your garbage husband with broken brains: FYI it's not actually healthier
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 00:15 |
Tell pops you will do as he says and let him get all pissy when he's dead. I think the mutually agreed idea will work well and it has the benefit of making the entire family as a whole richer, because all the costs of extra houses are avoided. it even becomes a bit of a money maker while avoiding "dick bag outside landlordism" because they fuckin live in it too and would presumably not be scumbags since they have a direct interest that isn't just how much money the place makes. Pops just thinks it makes him look bad when he should be pleased he's basically secured the whole family's situation for the foreseeable future. Next generation could probably come up with a another good solution, seeing as how they came up with a good agreement pretty easy, or use the place as a rental and split the money or sell sell or whatever. Having a nice family home like that solves a ton of problems and it'll continue being a good family asset to have, even if the market caves in, right? It's good for kids to know you cold always fall back to the old house if you gently caress up. Imo pops is concerned about how his legacy and life is gonna be viewed, but he's not looking into a far enough future to see how much these guys really appreciate it.
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 00:25 |
|
QuarkJets posted:FYI it's not actually healthier World Health Organisation disagrees: http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/breastfeeding/en/
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 00:27 |
|
Jealous of breastfeeding dad is a piece of poo poo. If he was just a little weirded out by it (which would still be dumb and wrong) then he wouldn't also be criticizing every other thing about how she cares for the baby. She should tell him to shape up or leave.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 00:36 |
|
It came from Ask a Manager: A job application asked me to rank if torturing a person was worse than prostitution quote:I’m trying to change fields from copywriting freelancer to something in the admin assistance sphere. It could be that my greenness is showing, but is it typical for applications to ask you to rate atrocities?
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 00:59 |
|
Haifisch posted:It came from Ask a Manager: Well??? I really would love to see the reply this person got because LOL.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:04 |
|
We are all prostitutes if you think about it.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:05 |
|
QuarkJets posted:FYI it's not actually healthier Whatever, Enfamil rep
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:09 |
|
Milotic posted:World Health Organisation disagrees: http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/breastfeeding/en/ Unfortunately, the WHO has a regrettable history of endorsing poorly-supported ideas (although they endorse well-supported ideas, too!). Much of the modern literature on breastfeeding finds spurious effects that only appear when the most laxadaisical statistical approaches are employed. Here's an article going over some of the more egregious issues, many of which are present in the sources that the WHO cites https://www.google.com/amp/s/fivethirtyeight.com/features/everybody-calm-down-about-breastfeeding/amp/ My own son is almost 2 now, and I spent the first several months before his birth pouring through the literature on breastfeeding after trying to cross-check some of the more miraculous claims made on mommy blogs. What I found was utterly shocking. I had fully bought into the idea that breastfeeding actually did have many benefits, but my bullshit alarm led me to discover that nearly all of them were poorly founded. At this time, it seems like any observed benefits of breastfeeding are 100 replicatable by using a clean water source and holding your baby in a breastfeeding pose while using a bottle, ie skin to skin in a loving embrace. e: For the record, my wife wanted to breastfeed for awhile but decided to stop after going back to work. I was fine with whatever she wanted to do, because that's her choice. The lack of measurable benefit was comforting though QuarkJets fucked around with this message at 01:33 on Jun 1, 2018 |
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:11 |
|
Haifisch posted:It came from Ask a Manager: What about getting a medal for torturing a person? Or is that only on Gina Haspels application?
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:14 |
|
I think torturing is worst. Prostitution should be legal in my opinion.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:14 |
|
QuarkJets posted:Unfortunately, the WHO has a regrettable history of endorsing poorly-supported ideas (although they endorse well-supported ideas, too!). Much of the modern literature on breastfeeding finds spurious effects that only appear when the most laxadaisical statistical approaches are employed. Here's an article going over some of the more egregious issues, many of which are present in the sources that the WHO cites Lmao the physicist is more smarterer than the inferior brains of, medicine
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:15 |
|
Most engineers I know are way smarter than doctors.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:16 |
|
having knowledge in one area means that you are inherently more knowledgeable in other areas? Stem people are the absolute loving worst about this, hence ostensibly intelligent people investing in bitcoins and other loving nonsense. Because everybody else is stupid, because you’re so smart, mommy said so
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:18 |
|
It's an administrative assistant job, so they'll probably hire the candidate who ranked prostitution the highest, unless the job is with the CIA, then they'll pick whoever ranked torture highest.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:18 |
|
QuarkJets posted:Unfortunately, the WHO has a regrettable history of endorsing poorly-supported ideas (although they endorse well-supported ideas, too!). Much of the modern literature on breastfeeding finds spurious effects that only appear when the most laxadaisical statistical approaches are employed. Here's an article going over some of the more egregious issues, many of which are present in the sources that the WHO cites As you can imagine, in a whole shitload of the world this is nigh impossible and breastfeeding is best. Even in the US you can pop out a boob for feeding but if you pop off your shirt to bottle feed you're going to get some weird looks. Since the WHO is for, y'know, the world and not just Europe and the US their recommendation is apt. The mommy blog hype over breastfeeding making you a superior mom is gross but given the availability of quality fresh water worldwide it really is "better" for most babies. In an area of the US or Europe where infrastructure isn't an outdated joke and you can stay home to bottle feed, sure, yeah, there's no statistically significant difference. therobit posted:Jealous of breastfeeding dad is a piece of poo poo. If he was just a little weirded out by it (which would still be dumb and wrong) then he wouldn't also be criticizing every other thing about how she cares for the baby. She should tell him to shape up or leave. Especially because his wife is literally a midwife
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:18 |
|
Frankly they want the person that ranks typographical errors as being worse than baby murder
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:19 |
|
Pick posted:Lmao the physicist is more smarterer than the inferior brains of, medicine That's not what I'm saying; doctors who actually give a poo poo have criticized these studies for the same reasons that I am: they are sloppily conducted and seem to be trying to put the cart before the horse
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:19 |
|
Haifisch posted:It came from Ask a Manager: I had to take something similar to this. It felt a lot like astrology when i had to read the results.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:19 |
|
Pick posted:having knowledge in one area means that you are inherently more knowledgeable in other areas? Stem people are the absolute loving worst about this, hence ostensibly intelligent people investing in bitcoins and other loving nonsense. Nah, i meant as in the capacity for extreme intelligence. Like, I can remember what someone was wearing like two months later down to the last detail. Or remembering a few dozen complicated formulas. Or building a house or a dam/dike. poo poo that requires alot of thought. That said, there are alot of doctors that run circles around me intelligence wise. Just saying.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:19 |
|
13Pandora13 posted:As you can imagine, in a whole shitload of the world this is nigh impossible and breastfeeding is best. Even in the US you can pop out a boob for feeding but if you pop off your shirt to bottle feed you're going to get some weird looks. Since the WHO is for, y'know, the world and not just Europe and the US their recommendation is apt. Absolutely! In areas with lovely water the benefits of breastfeeding are unsurprising,and those benefits actually are well-supported. I'm just pointing out that when you have clean water and feed in a similar way, suddenly the benefits go away...
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:22 |
|
The overall smartest people I’ve ever met were sales people, certainly not all sales people or to be taken as representative of sales people, but man you should see high-end commercial sales. Some smart loving people in that
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:22 |
|
Should have been a lawyer tbh. Could talk the stripes of a zebra. Depends on what type of sales tbh. I think that sales people are extremely emotionally intelligent as in they know how to find what a person's weakness and exploit it.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:24 |
|
if bottle feeding is equivalent in the best case scenario and worse in the worst case scenario then it sure sounds like breastfeeding is better to me
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:24 |
|
Pick posted:having knowledge in one area means that you are inherently more knowledgeable in other areas? Stem people are the absolute loving worst about this, hence ostensibly intelligent people investing in bitcoins and other loving nonsense. Because everybody else is stupid, because you’re so smart, mommy said so Doctors are arguably the largest contingent of stem and just as commonly guilty of this very real effect. However, that is not what is happening here.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:24 |
|
Brother Entropy posted:if bottle feeding is equivalent in the best case scenario and worse in the worst case scenario then it sure sounds like breastfeeding is better to me On average, sure. The point though is that we're making a lot of mothers who aren't able to breastfeed feel lovely over that even when breastfeeding would make no difference to the health of their babies
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:26 |
|
QuarkJets posted:Doctors are arguably the largest contingent of stem and just as commonly guilty of this very real effect. However, that is not what is happening here. I think you're missing their point though - you touted your background as if it made you more authoritative on the subject when it was irrelevant to the idea you were trying to convey in both subject matter expertise and the argument at hand. If you remove the sentence about your education/work, nothing else about the story changes, you just come off as show-offish like we're supposed to cede to your credibility.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:28 |
|
I'm glad that Quarkjets is bringing the same tiresome pedantry he does in the crypto thread to relationships, thanks dude
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:30 |
|
13Pandora13 posted:I think you're missing their point though - you touted your background as if it made you more authoritative on the subject when it was irrelevant to the idea you were trying to convey in both subject matter expertise and the argument at hand. If you remove the sentence about your education/work, nothing else about the story changes, you just come off as show-offish like we're supposed to cede to your credibility. I believe in laymen's terms that means: talking out your rear end.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:31 |
|
13Pandora13 posted:I think you're missing their point though - you touted your background as if it made you more authoritative on the subject when it was irrelevant to the idea you were trying to convey in both subject matter expertise and the argument at hand. If you remove the sentence about your education/work, nothing else about the story changes, you just come off as show-offish like we're supposed to cede to your credibility. An understanding of statistics is actually super important for spotting the kinds of flaws raised in the 538 article that I linked to, but fine whatever, I'll go edit it out.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:32 |
|
QuarkJets posted:An understanding of statistics is actually super important for spotting the kinds of flaws raised in the 538 article that I linked to, but fine whatever, I'll go edit it out. You're good man. We all open the cheeks every once in a while and let the ole chicken eye speak for a minute.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:33 |
|
QuarkJets posted:An understanding of statistics is actually super important for spotting the kinds of flaws raised in the 538 article that I linked to, but fine whatever, I'll go edit it out. An understanding that medicine and epidemiology have to account for human (societal circumstances that would allow for topless bottle feeding) and environmental circumstances (consistent availability of fresh water) outside of hard numbers is super important for understanding how medical guidelines are established as well.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:36 |
|
MarcusSA posted:Well??? http://www.askamanager.org/2018/02/a-job-application-asked-me-to-rank-if-torturing-a-person-was-worse-than-prostitution.html posted:I … am stumped. The_end posted:It felt a lot like astrology when i had to read the results.
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:37 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 03:57 |
|
Salty Josh posted:You're good man. We all open the cheeks every once in a while and let the ole chicken eye speak for a minute. Thanks. At first I was concerned that I was talking to a crowd that was employing antivax-levels of "blindly trust anyone who tells you what you want to believe" but it seems like maybe that's not the case
|
# ? Jun 1, 2018 01:38 |