Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Chilichimp
Oct 24, 2006

TIE Adv xWampa

It wamp, and it stomp

Grimey Drawer

Stexils posted:

it's not third party voters fault that trump won and getting mad at them rather than anyone who bears far more responsibility makes it look like you're just looking for an easy target to vent at.

Hey guy, I never said they get all my rage, but that's the specific example that was brought up, so that's what got my response.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

Fire Above posted:

We'll let's hope that a super divisive candidate doesn't come out of the primaries in 2020.

:(

Jay Inslee 2020 :geno:

https://www.ft.com/content/0eb23c80-639e-11e8-90c2-9563a0613e56

Stexils
Jun 5, 2008

evilweasel posted:

people who chose not to vote against trump chose to make it more likely that trump would win. they're not the only people who helped him win, but they are part of the group of people who helped him win.

they're like 5th in line behind more responsible parties.

mcmagic
Jul 1, 2004

If you see this avatar while scrolling the succ zone, you have been visited by the mcmagic of shitty lib takes! Good luck and prosperity will come to you, but only if you reply "shut the fuck up mcmagic" to this post!

Horseshoe theory posted:

The same Joe Manchin that votes/spews in lockstep with Trump's policy? :thunk:

You should vote for Joe Manchin over any Trumpist or over Trump himself. This isn't a hard call...

plogo
Jan 20, 2009

WampaLord posted:

Because to get ideas accepted by the public you have to start talking about them way before you're ready to implement them.

We are talking about them, but why does she have to pin down the details? When the time comes for a bill I don't think it matters at all whether she was for UBI or a jobs guarantee now in 2018.

I assume the next shot dems take if they ever have a super majority is gonna be health care again first so I really think you are overestimating how much juice we can get out of debating these policies.

eke out
Feb 24, 2013



this is a good own

https://twitter.com/EmmanuelMacron/status/1061293561059201024

Skippy McPants
Mar 19, 2009


Dang, I was feeling sorta ambivalent about my State's performance after we failed on several important ballot measures, but if we keep flipping close congressional seats, I might have to forgive my dumb neoliberal homeland.

D-Pad
Jun 28, 2006

Crow Jane posted:

I feel like voting for Trump to send a message to the DNC is functionally the same as "pretending" to be racist to get out of jury duty. Even if you were doing it ironically, that stink's still on you forever.

I just say "I believe in jury nullification" and they dismiss me.

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

Stexils posted:

they're like 5th in line behind more responsible parties.

sure, as long as we're clear they're in the line. it's not like discussing them, when we just had an idiot going "durr i would actually vote for trump to protest the dnc because voting third party isn't enough" is because they're The Most Important Reason He Won. it's because the subject came up randomly.

Chilichimp
Oct 24, 2006

TIE Adv xWampa

It wamp, and it stomp

Grimey Drawer

Horseshoe theory posted:

The same Joe Manchin that votes/spews in lockstep with Trump's policy? :thunk:

Chomskyan posted:

Which is why you're part of the problem

It's just an example gang, he'd never get the nom, but you think any neo-con/liberal would be just as bad as a literal loving fascist?

Look, I want M4A, and to close the income gap as much as the next goon, but ~lets not oppose fascism because this candidate doesn't support it~ is a bad take.

motoh
Oct 16, 2012

The clack of a light autocannon going off is just how you know everything's alright.
The only reason you all are talking past each other is that the real, nastier discussion isn't palatable: how do you take control of the DNC within two years and remove these idiots so they DON'T try to foist poo poo off on us?

Zwabu
Aug 7, 2006

Chilichimp posted:

I'd like to say Democrats learned their lesson, but I have slowly lost all faith in people doing the correct thing over the last decade.

If we get a controversial candidate and some faction of democrats stay home, I'm probably going to die fighting for PoC in the American south and my blood can be on their hands too... cuz... ya know... myyyy primary candidate didn't win, or some poo poo, boo fuckin' hoo.

Who's even controversial in the Democratic Party these days though? I suppose the definition of controversial is important here.

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

motoh posted:

The only reason you all are talking past each other is that the real, nastier discussion isn't palatable: how do you take control of the DNC within two years and remove these idiots so they DON'T try to foist poo poo off on us?

The 2020 presidential nominee automatically gets control of the DNC. So support the primary candidate you think should win the nomination, and you'll control the DNC.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

plogo posted:

We are talking about them, but why does she have to pin down the details? When the time comes for a bill I don't think it matters at all whether she was for UBI or a jobs guarantee now in 2018.

I assume the next shot dems take if they ever have a super majority is gonna be health care again first so I really think you are overestimating how much juice we can get out of debating these policies.

It's not about "juice" it's about shifting the Overton Window. Before people were talking about Medicare For All, the only possibly option for expanding healthcare was fixing the ACA, now suddenly M4A is in the conversation.

This is how you get UBI into the national conversation, you have politicians talk about it. Then normal people, not political nerds like us who follow all this poo poo on a daily basis, can go "Oh hey I heard about this UBI thing in the news, sounds neat!" and that's how you shift opinion on things.

Red and Black
Sep 5, 2011

If George W. Bush is running against Donald Trump as a Democrat I will vote for him. Why? Because I'm just that principled.

Ate My Balls Redux
Aug 2, 2018

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

Chilichimp posted:

They can do that, but that makes them loving morons. I'm sorry if you disagree and are happy with fascist Trumpland, but I'm not. They could nominate the most insanely insufferable neo-con liberal shithead in the universe... (uh... Joe Manchin, I guess) for President and I' happily pull that lever.

And this is why nothing ever changes

Chilichimp
Oct 24, 2006

TIE Adv xWampa

It wamp, and it stomp

Grimey Drawer

mcmagic posted:

You should vote for Joe Manchin over any Trumpist or over Trump himself. This isn't a hard call...

when ya got McMagic in here sayin' this, you know you've hosed up.

Party Plane Jones
Jul 1, 2007

by Reene
Fun Shoe

Party Plane Jones posted:

all right I'm going to say several things:

For several months I was the only mod who was looking at D&D reports for US primetime. There are other mods/IKs for other threads/time zones (ober for UKMT/Anidav for AUSPOL) but as I do not really know UK or Aussie politics and they don't know US we don't presume to mod anything but notable shitposting.

If you reported or got probated it's most likely I did it; otherwise guyovich caught you and probated you with a day due to the time zone difference so that you'd actually notice a probation. During the months of september to mid october I looked at and processed something around a thousand reports for D&D; this is partially why we asked for new mod recommendations earlier.

Let it be said that remaking USPOL as it is at the moment didn't arrive in a vacuum. The 4th Trump thread had become USPOL once again in all but name. When 11 people were murdered in Pittsburgh, there wasn't a single post about it in the USPOL thread. When other notable events were happening they weren't posted about in there either; they were put in the Trump thread. The main thing (for better or worse, depending on your point of view and I know CSPAM posters are going to make hay of this) was that Dems are Bad chat was dumped into the Thunderdome thread. This was enforced through warnings and probations.

This is not to say Dems are Good, You Should be Bowing Down to Your Lord and Savior Nancy Pelosi. Dems are at times decent, more often fuckups, and as always trying to maintain a status quo that prefers no real movement that transforms the fabric of American society.

I can certainly see why guyovich made the Thunderdome thread. Having processed that many reports and complaints means posters more often than not were using weaponizing them against people they disagreed with. Sometimes these reports were actually valid, sometimes they weren't. I personally don't love playing alternately hall monitor and school principal for grudges between people. Having looked at the reports since combining USPOL the numbers might have gone up (but then again, that might also be due to the midterms).


(On the subject of derails:
I didn't sit there constantly watching the Trump thread. Modding D&D is not my job. If you got away with talking about something inane like beer or pizza for several hours and I wasn't there to see it, congrats, I wasn't going to probate you for it half a day or days after the fact as by that time the derail had solved itself when the next horrendous thing out of the Trump administration slouched its way to be born reached the news.)


Having said all of that meandering pre-coffee text the current state/design of the threads/USPOL is something LK and I talked about previously and with Ardennes as a newly minted mod we'll all be talking about it. If you'd like to complain more about it you can PM me and I'll take your opinion into consideration.

tl;dr a bunch of words and things


I laughed at this.



In case you missed it (i'll post it in the third post op i guess)

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

Ate My Balls Redux posted:

And this is why nothing ever changes

primary elections exist. go vote in them. if "democrats" nominate someone you don't like, it's because there was a very contested primary election and more people supported the other person.

terrorist ambulance
Nov 5, 2009

It's not even a take, and I know its trite, but I really do enjoy thinking about how apoplectic Fox would be if the bisexual Kenyan socialist Hussein Obummer did this kind of poo poo. We would be hearing about it a decade later

mcmagic
Jul 1, 2004

If you see this avatar while scrolling the succ zone, you have been visited by the mcmagic of shitty lib takes! Good luck and prosperity will come to you, but only if you reply "shut the fuck up mcmagic" to this post!

evilweasel posted:

primary elections exist. go vote in them. if "democrats" nominate someone you don't like, it's because there was a very contested primary election and more people supported the other person.

The party is undeniably moving to the left. Someone like Manchin could NEVER win the nomination in 2020.

Eggplant Squire
Aug 14, 2003


In the scenario where Manchin somehow gets the nomination in 2020 we are hosed either way so the thought experiment of how far you would vote against Trump is pretty moot.

Crow Jane
Oct 18, 2012

nothin' wrong with a lady drinkin' alone in her room
Donnie can't work umbrellas, of course he's not going out in the rain.

Just imagine what that hair would look like wet

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Zwabu posted:

Who's even controversial in the Democratic Party these days though? I suppose the definition of controversial is important here.

It's hard to say because not that many people in the Democratic Party have really gotten much mainstream exposure over the last decade. Most candidates' flaws won't be remembered until they're actually on the campaign trail. For example, Gropey Joe is gonna plummet in the polls once he gets out in front of people's faces and can't coast entirely on name recognition from being Obama's VP. Warren certainly stumbled at the starting line, but I think it'll largely be forgotten as long as she never ever brings it up again.

Zwabu
Aug 7, 2006

I'm going to guess it has nothing to do with the weather. Trump is already probably out of sorts because of the election, and Macron Kung Fu Gripping him at the handshake (or something else between them) pissed off Trump even more so he's probably just going to sulk in his hotel room and watch Fox News.

CubanMissile
Apr 22, 2003

Of Hulks and Spider-Men

motoh posted:

The only reason you all are talking past each other is that the real, nastier discussion isn't palatable: how do you take control of the DNC within two years and remove these idiots so they DON'T try to foist poo poo off on us?

Can't be done in two years. You just vote hard in the primaries for the least lovely ones, try to get other to do the same, then repeat over and someone gets the message. And every once in a while an AOC beats a Crowley and you keep going until slowly poo poo gets where it needs to be.

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

mcmagic posted:

The party is undeniably moving to the left. Someone like Manchin could NEVER win the nomination in 2020.

yeah and nobody in his mold is gonna try. the person closest to the center that has any sort of chance is Biden, and everyone else that has any chance is to the left of him.

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

motoh posted:

The only reason you all are talking past each other is that the real, nastier discussion isn't palatable: how do you take control of the DNC within two years and remove these idiots so they DON'T try to foist poo poo off on us?

I dunno, how would you suggest? :)

probably should have started working on it before now, and hopefully some people did

show up with all your friends to the boring as gently caress local and state party and committee meetings and elect yourselves to party positions

Lote
Aug 5, 2001

Place your bets

evilweasel posted:

primary elections exist. go vote in them. if "democrats" nominate someone you don't like, it's because there was a very contested primary election and more people supported the other person.

Seriously. If the candidate you wanted loses, you should be able to be an adult and vote for the candidate that will be most likely to advance your interests and not act like a child and take your ball and go home.

Stexils
Jun 5, 2008

Zwabu posted:

Who's even controversial in the Democratic Party these days though? I suppose the definition of controversial is important here.

hillary clinton :smuggo:

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

evilweasel posted:

The 2020 presidential nominee automatically gets control of the DNC. So support the primary candidate you think should win the nomination, and you'll control the DNC.

this too

Lightning Knight
Feb 24, 2012

Pray for Answer

eke out posted:

this is a good own

Unfortunately both of these people are shitters and their shittiness is paving the way for resurgent fascist parties in both of their countries.

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

CubanMissile posted:

Can't be done in two years. You just vote hard in the primaries for the least lovely ones, try to get other to do the same, then repeat over and someone gets the message. And every once in a while an AOC beats a Crowley and you keep going until slowly poo poo gets where it needs to be.

no literally you are voting for who controls the DNC when you vote for the 2020 presidential nominee. as soon as a nominee has won, control of the DNC is turned over to them. the people will have selected who should be in charge of the DNC by about june, 2020.

Crow Jane
Oct 18, 2012

nothin' wrong with a lady drinkin' alone in her room

Zwabu posted:

I'm going to guess it has nothing to do with the weather. Trump is already probably out of sorts because of the election, and Macron Kung Fu Gripping him at the handshake (or something else between them) pissed off Trump even more so he's probably just going to sulk in his hotel room and watch Fox News.

It just occurred to me that between this trip and the rally-orama the last few weeks, he hasn't been able to golf in ages

Red and Black
Sep 5, 2011

motoh posted:

The only reason you all are talking past each other is that the real, nastier discussion isn't palatable: how do you take control of the DNC within two years and remove these idiots so they DON'T try to foist poo poo off on us?

True. But are we even on agreement that this is the action we should take? I think the Democratic Party should be seized by the left, but does the "other side", which constantly whines about "SchumerBad PelosiBad" chat agree? My impression is no

plogo
Jan 20, 2009

WampaLord posted:

It's not about "juice" it's about shifting the Overton Window. Before people were talking about Medicare For All, the only possibly option for expanding healthcare was fixing the ACA, now suddenly M4A is in the conversation.



No it wasn't. There were always many dem proposals to healthcare going back to the days of ted kennedy fighting with jimmy carter.

evilweasel
Aug 24, 2002

Chomskyan posted:

True. But are we even on agreement that this is the action we should take? I think the Democratic Party should be seized by the left, but does the "other side", which constantly whines about "SchumerBad PelosiBad" chat agree? My impression is no

the "other side" agrees that if you win the primary, you get the nomination. so if you want to "seize it", get the votes! if you support someone more leftist than the person I supported in the 2020 primary, and they win, i'll be voting for them!

Sanguinia
Jan 1, 2012

~Everybody wants to be a cat~
~Because a cat's the only cat~
~Who knows where its at~

according to the timeline I found in some Florida newspaper we should be getting the final vote count there in the next 15 minutes or so. The initial count had to be done by noon today EST. It'll be interesting to see what the final gap between Scott and Nelson is since it shrank every time the vote updated.

Chilichimp
Oct 24, 2006

TIE Adv xWampa

It wamp, and it stomp

Grimey Drawer

Chomskyan posted:

If George W. Bush is running against Donald Trump as a Democrat I will vote for him. Why? Because I'm just that principled.

"Well guys, if the steak-lovers association of America ever nominates a pile of horse poo poo for tastiest steak... and my choices are a pile of horse poo poo or the septic tank underneath a Golden Coral, then I guess I'm eating a pile of horse poo poo. "

"Your premise is now busted, I've check-mated you" ~Chomskyan

But you see... how in this insane loving analogy did the steak-lovers nominate a pile of horse poo poo as tastiest steak? I feel like this wasn't ever going to happen anyway.

Besides, pile of horse poo poo already served 2 terms. :smug:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Horseshoe theory
Mar 7, 2005

Lote posted:

Seriously. If the candidate you wanted loses, you should be able to be an adult and vote for the candidate that will be most likely to advance your interests and not act like a child and take your ball and go home.

Technically speaking, Trump probably advances my personal interests more than virtually any Democratic candidate, but I will never vote for him or the GOP.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply