|
Escobarbarian posted:I was wondering, if I go back and log the dates I watched movies, or add my reviews from criticker, does that bump them back up to the top? I don’t wanna be spamming the hell out of anyone’s feeds. Yes it does, actually. I follow filmmaker Sean Baker and a week ago I got a bunch of his updates in my feed because he was logging movies he watched in 2016 and adding reviews about which theaters or festivals he was at.
|
# ? Nov 29, 2018 02:37 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 03:30 |
|
still unclear to me why people constantly mention where they watched something.
|
# ? Nov 29, 2018 04:04 |
|
Escobarbarian posted:So after years of laziness and gradually adding everything I rated on criticker I finally completed my account! I’m over at https://letterboxd.com/escobarbarian/ It will show up in people's feeds, but if they're old then there's a cap on how many will show up. Five at a time, if memory serves. So no need to worry
|
# ? Nov 29, 2018 05:02 |
|
SMP posted:still unclear to me why people constantly mention where they watched something. Once I found someone who was listing the production details, shoot cameras/format, how many Ks the DI was, what theatrical projection/home video format they watched the movie in, then maybe one sentence of review. Teenage Fansub fucked around with this message at 05:27 on Nov 29, 2018 |
# ? Nov 29, 2018 05:23 |
|
I think it’s more for personal diary keeping than anything. I don’t see the point in logging format though, just strikes me as obsessive.
|
# ? Nov 29, 2018 06:00 |
|
SMP posted:still unclear to me why people constantly mention where they watched something. If you watch films as a shared experience, the experiences taint, for better or worse, your impression of the films themselves. If the first time you saw The Texas Chainsaw Massacre was at home on pristine BluRay while you answered texts from your friends throughout your impression of the film will be different than if you saw it for the first time on a hot summer night in a packed theatre at midnight from an old print that was turning pink in places and had the mono sound cranked too loud.
|
# ? Nov 29, 2018 16:47 |
|
SMP posted:still unclear to me why people constantly mention where they watched something. I do that in my tags. If I see something in a theater, I'll specifically log where I watch things, but that stuff usually gets kept in a separate list. For the older stuff, it's partially just a nostalgia thing. Seeing how poo poo your taste was years ago, remembering places that probably got shut down or bought out... InfiniteZero posted:If you watch films as a shared experience, the experiences taint, for better or worse, your impression of the films themselves. This too.
|
# ? Nov 29, 2018 19:48 |
|
Friends Are Evil posted:I do that in my tags. If I see something in a theater, I'll specifically log where I watch things You and I are like twins with our Letterboxd habits! I put the theater I watched a movie at in my tags. It's nice knowing when and where I saw a movie in theaters. It was really helpful with MoviePass, and I like knowing how much I contribute to my indie theater. I also started logging which movies I watched on FilmStruck with a tag so I could have a nice reminder of that service.
|
# ? Nov 29, 2018 20:10 |
|
Tags sounds like a good idea. I might go and do that, but I’m still getting used to the site overall (went and tried to add the date I watched a movie that I had already reviewed and it made them two separate entries which is ultra confusing but I think I get it now)
|
# ? Nov 29, 2018 20:46 |
|
Escobarbarian posted:Tags sounds like a good idea. I might go and do that, but I’m still getting used to the site overall (went and tried to add the date I watched a movie that I had already reviewed and it made them two separate entries which is ultra confusing but I think I get it now) For that, just "Edit Review" and then you can add a date. Or if you didn't write a review, go to "Diary" and then "Edit Entry" and you can fix the date you watched it without making duplicates. That's also the easiest way to delete duplicates. Tags are a nice idea if you wanna know how often you go to the theaters vs how often you watch Netflix vs Hulu or something. I also do it for tracking the movies I show at my horror movie nights and stuff. Making lists for everything is time consuming and makes clutter.
|
# ? Nov 29, 2018 21:12 |
|
You know what I really love? Letterboxd.
Somebody fucked around with this message at 22:20 on Nov 29, 2018 |
# ? Nov 29, 2018 21:37 |
|
Yes. It is a great site for movie lovers like you and me.
Franchescanado fucked around with this message at 22:20 on Nov 29, 2018 |
# ? Nov 29, 2018 21:38 |
|
Franchescanado posted:I put the theater I watched a movie at in my tags. It's nice knowing when and where I saw a movie in theaters. It was really helpful with MoviePass, and I like knowing how much I contribute to my indie theater. I did this for a while when I had MoviePass, but then I went nuts and just started keeping a spreadsheet with the location/runtime/ticket price/my letterboxd rating for every movie I saw in theaters. I ended up refunding MP when they switched to 3 movies/month, but I saw 35 movies at a cost of 98 cents per movie, with an average runtime of 107 minutes and letterboxd rating of 2.8.
|
# ? Nov 29, 2018 21:52 |
|
I love Letterboxd and I love everyone in CineD.
Somebody fucked around with this message at 22:21 on Nov 29, 2018 |
# ? Nov 29, 2018 22:11 |
|
I'm glad we all love Letterboxd.
|
# ? Nov 29, 2018 22:21 |
|
Well that was confusing.
|
# ? Nov 29, 2018 22:22 |
|
Spatulater bro! posted:Well that was confusing. You saw nothing.
|
# ? Nov 29, 2018 22:26 |
|
Heavy diet of short and early-twentieth century films and cartoons results in
|
# ? Nov 30, 2018 20:40 |
|
Samuel Clemens posted:Incidentally, what does Letterboxd's filter consider to be a short film? Anything below 40 minutes? I asked this question way back and accidentally stumbled upon the answer today. Letterboxd treats anything that runs for 45 minutes or less as a short. Anything above 45 minutes is considered a feature. At least I'm assuming that's how it works, because when I hide short films, Sherlock Jr. (45 min) disappears but After Death (46 min) doesn't. For comparison, the AFI's and BFI's cutoff point is 40 minutes. The French CNC defines a feature as anything above 60 minutes, although they make a further distinction by calling everything between 30 and 60 minutes a medium-length film. Festivals seem to be all over the place, but most don't allow you to submit a short film if it runs longer than 30 minutes. I don't know why Letterboxd settled on 45 minutes, but there you go. You might say it doesn't really matter what limits you choose, but I think the labels we apply do affect how we think about a film. We've seen examples in this thread where a few posters don't log shorts since they consider them to be of lesser importance. And we see it in the commercial world where anything between 30 and 70 minutes will have severe distribution problems because it's too long for the festival circuit and too short for a theatrical release. It's a shame because I quite often see features that have about 40 minutes of solid content but not enough to sustain a 90-minute running time, leading to severe pacing issues. Samuel Clemens fucked around with this message at 14:52 on Dec 2, 2018 |
# ? Dec 2, 2018 14:43 |
|
Hello I made one of these in my quest to watch an average of one movie a night for a year. Also working on giving at least a few sentences about everything I watch. https://letterboxd.com/mikeycp/ Also here's my stars for the couple months that I've been using this thing.
|
# ? Dec 4, 2018 22:31 |
|
Are those stats only available with a pro account?
|
# ? Dec 4, 2018 22:47 |
|
Yes
|
# ? Dec 4, 2018 23:08 |
|
Geez, I didn't realise they made four [REC]s.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2018 00:28 |
|
Sounds like they got worse and worse when I looked at 3 and 4. I was done after the 2nd after loving the original.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2018 00:32 |
|
I liked 3 more than 2, but it's a really different thing. 4 was just bland.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2018 00:52 |
|
Yeah. I like them all except 4.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2018 01:25 |
|
Letterboxd' Christmas Gift Guide includes this, which is just awesome: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01K5XNP4...boxd_lv_dp_vv_d
|
# ? Dec 5, 2018 03:08 |
|
I, Butthole posted:Letterboxd' Christmas Gift Guide includes this, which is just awesome: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01K5XNP4...boxd_lv_dp_vv_d That is awesome, but I'm partial to the "Rocky Balboa in a Wheelchair From Rocky II" action figure.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2018 17:55 |
|
InfiniteZero posted:That is awesome, but I'm partial to the "Rocky Balboa in a Wheelchair From Rocky II" action figure. Could you link that? I can't find it on their lists.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2018 01:49 |
|
Power of Pecota posted:Could you link that? I can't find it on their lists. Jesus, it's a real thing: https://toywiz.com/rocky-ii-rocky-balboa-exclusive-action-figure-post-fight-wheelchair/ I shouldn't be surprised though, I remember seeing a Rocky figure for the hanging meat he trains on in the first movie in a nerd store ages ago.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2018 02:05 |
|
I, Butthole posted:Jesus, it's a real thing: https://toywiz.com/rocky-ii-rocky-balboa-exclusive-action-figure-post-fight-wheelchair/ The Rocky meat figure costs $70 on Amazon
|
# ? Dec 6, 2018 03:10 |
|
quote:Vegan alert:
|
# ? Dec 8, 2018 19:01 |
|
Is there a way to block certain types of notifications? I don’t like seeing “<person> liked <person’s> review of <movie>” this much if I can help it.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2018 07:59 |
|
Only if you have a Pro/Patron subscription.
|
# ? Dec 10, 2018 13:16 |
|
Letterboxd Pro down to $12 again. Had it for a year before, and unless things have changed a lot it feels more like a $5/year service, but others seem to like.
|
# ? Dec 25, 2018 21:33 |
|
I check my stats page more than I use a lot of other things I subscribe to.
|
# ? Dec 25, 2018 21:43 |
|
EL BROMANCE posted:Letterboxd Pro down to $12 again. Had it for a year before, and unless things have changed a lot it feels more like a $5/year service, but others seem to like. Was this only for one day? I'm looking and I only see $20 as an option.
|
# ? Dec 26, 2018 13:49 |
|
Yeah looks like it expired, I’m seeing $19 again too.
|
# ? Dec 26, 2018 14:13 |
|
Is the site even more broken than usual for others? I don’t think I regularly use something that gives so many errors.
|
# ? Dec 28, 2018 17:52 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 03:30 |
|
EL BROMANCE posted:Is the site even more broken than usual for others? I don’t think I regularly use something that gives so many errors. Yeah, their twitter posted about it this morning/late last night. They are aware and investigating
|
# ? Dec 28, 2018 17:55 |