|
Rudy Giuliani seems to be really involved in this Turkey thing, and not in a good way. There some suggestion here that there might be good reason he's providing a desperate defense of Trump, and not because he just really believes in Trump. I'm not totally sure what to make of it yet.. https://twitter.com/KlasfeldReports/status/1074725107048873985
|
# ? Dec 17, 2018 19:16 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 00:49 |
|
Herstory Begins Now posted:The extent that modern conservative ideology is anti-women both abstractly and concretely is so extreme that it's getting into isolating feed back loops for right wing young men. That MRA culture has largely fused with young conservatives, insofar as they exist, should terrify the gently caress out of anyone who actually identifies as a conservative and has any hope for the future of conservative politics. Those people are getting radicalized right along with the incels because the MRA and incel nonsense is just standard conservative ideas about women being taken to their logical conclusion. The entire conservative establishment just unified behind putting a duplicitous unhinged sexmonster on the supreme court despite having a list full of ideologically-vetted business stooge candidates to pick from any one of whom would have ruled just like Kavanaugh and would have sailed through with 54 votes like Gorsuch. It was all completely unforced but sticking a finger in the eye of the American woman became the goal. The only worrying a traditional family values conservative is doing over the party's descent into open woman-hating is worrying over how to make it illegal for women to vote.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2018 19:31 |
|
mystes posted:I had a right wing coworker who repeatedly insisted liberals were sexist for thinking it was time for a female president because it was sexist to care about the gender of the president. E: Definitely no men until the 2246 election, as gender sits pretty close to 50/50. The exact ratio of white women to WoC is harder to figure out exactly, should it be based on current numbers or the historic population data? E2: If anyone cares we can follow this up in USPOL. Harik fucked around with this message at 19:57 on Dec 17, 2018 |
# ? Dec 17, 2018 19:52 |
|
VitalSigns posted:Those people are getting radicalized right along with the incels because the MRA and incel nonsense is just standard conservative ideas about women being taken to their logical conclusion. That's a good point that it was specifically intended as a gently caress you to women. I think that's a more accurate analysis than the popular idea that they wanted someone who would defend sexual abusers. The amount of rage towards women in the young conservative/mra/incel world is completely insane and I think largely flies under the radar to most men. Like we live in a racist af society, but I see far more misogyny on a daily basis than racism. Young men and lonely old guys are really, really loving bitter.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2018 21:26 |
|
https://twitter.com/juliaioffe/status/1074706152733188101 (This brought me to revisit the goddamn history of the travesty/tragedy of the Scottsboro Boys: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottsboro_Boys)
|
# ? Dec 17, 2018 22:03 |
|
Party Plane Jones posted:6https://twitter.com/jerryiannelli/status/1074715722104872960 poo poo like that is loving gross. I hate when the right tries to re-write or erase history because they have a loving child like ideal of the world because they were fed on the teat of fox news all their lives. useless parasites.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2018 23:24 |
|
https://twitter.com/darreldrowland/status/1074829503476756481 Another article about the same set of report materials as I linked yesterday. This is getting published and leaked to maximize public coverage, and with very good reason; it's explosive.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 02:18 |
|
It really isn't, no one will remember two days from now. Some social media bots no one cares about, if that's the extent of "Russian influence".
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 02:21 |
|
Discendo Vox posted:https://twitter.com/darreldrowland/status/1074829503476756481
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 02:43 |
mystes posted:Everyone already knows that Russia used social media to meddle in election. Why do you think anyone is going to care about this report? it's news, that was breaking, and this is a thread to post news in. great question though!
|
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 02:46 |
|
This thread really isn't coping well with the fact the Mueller investigation has been irrelevant so far. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 02:48 |
|
Lambert posted:This thread really isn't coping well with the fact the Mueller investigation has been irrelevant so far. People are going to prison and millions in assets have been seized.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 02:52 |
|
Sen. Jeff Merkley Wants to Stop Congress Members From Insider Trading By Banning Them From Owning Stocksquote:Sen. James Inhofe, an Oklahoma Republican recently elevated to chair the Senate Armed Services Committee after the death of John McCain, was implicated recently in what looked to be an insider trading scandal. A few days after meeting with President Donald Trump and Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis to successfully advocate for a military budget increase, Inhofe purchased between $50,000 and $100,000 of stock in defense contractor Raytheon, which stands to profit from additional defense spending.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 02:53 |
|
Public opinion on Mueller's investigation on Trump has swung what 20 points in the last 8 months or so, I don't think the claim that his revelations have had no impact holds literally any water at all.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 02:54 |
|
Xand_Man posted:
Does anybody really care about some toadies being arrested for lying to the FBI? That's not what anyone is hoping for.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 03:03 |
|
Lightning Knight posted:Sen. Jeff Merkley Wants to Stop Congress Members From Insider Trading By Banning Them From Owning Stocks All congressmen shouldn't be allowed to directly invest in anything. All resources liquidated and placed into passive indexes.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 03:05 |
|
Lambert posted:Does anybody really care about some toadies being arrested for lying to the FBI? That's not what anyone is hoping for.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 03:06 |
Slugworth posted:No reasonable human being is expecting Trump to be taken out of the White House in shackles. But every single thing that Mueller finds hurts republicans in elections. So yeah, keep arresting toadies. Lambert can't stop telling us about how no one cares about random nobodies like the campaign manager, deputy campaign manager, national security advisor, etc
|
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 03:09 |
|
I mean hell if nothing else the investigation resulted in a significant rift between the President and his Attorney General, which led to Sessions' early exit from the administration. To call the investigation 'irrelevant' is exceptionally shallow analysis.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 03:27 |
|
Lightning Knight posted:Sen. Jeff Merkley Wants to Stop Congress Members From Insider Trading By Banning Them From Owning Stocks Edit: nope, misleading headline. Good, this needed to happen.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 03:41 |
|
The newest story from these reports details, in particular, that the Russian government specifically targeted the Mueller investigation as soon as it began. The big deal about the reports, though, is that they were commissioned by a bipartisan Senate committee and the R committee chair is agreeing with their findings.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 04:45 |
|
eke out posted:Lambert can't stop telling us about how no one cares about random nobodies like the campaign manager, deputy campaign manager, national security advisor, etc You know, last week, when we found out that Cohen committed crimes and lied to Congress on the order of Trump, and that Mueller had the receipts.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 05:05 |
|
Mueller is pushing into completely unknown ground as he has to deal with a president who has been thoroughly compromised by foreign powers. So him taking his time to make sure that every member of the team who helped set it up gets hosed is a good thing.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 05:15 |
|
Hunt11 posted:Mueller is pushing into completely unknown ground as he has to deal with a president who has been thoroughly compromised by foreign powers. So him taking his time to make sure that every member of the team who helped set it up gets hosed is a good thing. He's a Fed. That's what Feds do: slow walk Terminator style.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 05:28 |
|
Discendo Vox posted:The newest story from these reports details, in particular, that the Russian government specifically targeted the Mueller investigation as soon as it began. The big deal about the reports, though, is that they were commissioned by a bipartisan Senate committee and the R committee chair is agreeing with their findings. poo poo like that makes me think, like i have gurgled before, that the senate will flush trump if all the bad poo poo comes out. the party is hosed either way anyway. with that they can go with the "trump wasn't a REAL conservative" and "we did our part" narratives easier.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 05:58 |
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:poo poo like that makes me think, like i have gurgled before, that the senate will flush trump if all the bad poo poo comes out. the party is hosed either way anyway. with that they can go with the "trump wasn't a REAL conservative" and "we did our part" narratives easier. I think people are absolutely testing the waters for that.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 06:08 |
|
Discendo Vox posted:I think people are absolutely testing the waters for that. yeah, i think if the mueller poo poo is bad enough, plus god knows what else will be turned up by the house and the various other state/etc investigations. i think if they don't throw him out or force him to resign, they will try to primary him. they will pick kashich or romney and it will be 1968 meets 1912 elections for the GOP.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 06:19 |
|
https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/1074797494448676864
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 06:24 |
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:yeah, i think if the mueller poo poo is bad enough, plus god knows what else will be turned up by the house and the various other state/etc investigations. i think if they don't throw him out or force him to resign, they will try to primary him. they will pick kashich or romney and it will be 1968 meets 1912 elections for the GOP. Was just going to post that Romney will lead the anti Trump charge while simultaneously pushing for some shitbird legislation to protect the leeches of the capital class.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 06:38 |
|
Mustached Demon posted:Was just going to post that Romney will lead the anti Trump charge while simultaneously pushing for some shitbird legislation to protect the leeches of the capital class. well the GOP would always do that. my view is it would be a rebellion against trump but also a push to keep the out and out racist poo poo underground and the return of the dog whistle. so its probaly gonna be romney or kasich since they can both pull that kinda bullshit. my guess is trump would run third party against them out of pure spite.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 06:47 |
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:also a push to keep the out and out racist poo poo underground and the return of the dog whistle How exactly would they achieve this? It seems as though a significant chunk of the base is fine with the explicitly racist messaging. The GOP can try to stuff the racist cat back into the bag, but I'm not sure how well forgiven they'll be by the Trumpists. The GOP is simply incapable of winning any but the reddest of red districts and states without them.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 07:00 |
|
The same Tulsi Gabbard who sneaked off to Syria and declared that the rebels against Bashar al-Assad were "terrorists"? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/26/tulsi-gabbard-bashar-al-assad-syria-democrats No loving thank you. [your signature is being processed. check the notification bar for updates]
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 07:01 |
|
paperwind posted:How exactly would they achieve this? It seems as though a significant chunk of the base is fine with the explicitly racist messaging. The GOP can try to stuff the racist cat back into the bag, but I'm not sure how well forgiven they'll be by the Trumpists. The GOP is simply incapable of winning any but the reddest of red districts and states without them. They could just shut up about race but still pass voter ID, crime stuff, etc. What will their racist as gently caress base do? Vote Democratic party?
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 07:08 |
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:well the GOP would always do that. my view is it would be a rebellion against trump but also a push to keep the out and out racist poo poo underground and the return of the dog whistle. so its probaly gonna be romney or kasich since they can both pull that kinda bullshit. my guess is trump would run third party against them out of pure spite. I suspect that while the base is unlikely to ever turn on Trump, the big money donors may have different limits. Like I'm not sure what exactly motivates the Koch brothers but if they wanted to they could put immense pressure on Congress. How likely that scenario is I don't know.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 07:14 |
|
Squalid posted:I suspect that while the base is unlikely to ever turn on Trump, the big money donors may have different limits. Like I'm not sure what exactly motivates the Koch brothers but if they wanted to they could put immense pressure on Congress. How likely that scenario is I don't know. The Koch's are motivated purely by greed. Probably the agony of starving children too.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 07:32 |
|
Mustached Demon posted:The Koch's are motivated purely by greed. Probably the agony of starving children too. It's worse than that, David maybe, but Charles Koch is a dyed-in-the-wool, Kool-Aid drinking, Libertarian ideologue. He's deliberately flouted government regulations many times, even when complying meant he would actually profit.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 07:43 |
|
Neo_Crimson posted:It's worse than that, David maybe, but Charles Koch is a dyed-in-the-wool, Kool-Aid drinking, Libertarian ideologue. He's deliberately flouted government regulations many times, even when complying meant he would actually profit. Wait, really? I always assumed they were more grifters than ideologues.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 08:10 |
|
someone had fun
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 08:22 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 00:49 |
|
Charlz Guybon posted:Wait, really? I always assumed they were more grifters than ideologues.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2018 14:08 |