|
https://twitter.com/nicknprince/status/1142145102858485760 I like Gerry but this is pretty cucked. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2019 22:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 21:08 |
|
|
resistentialism posted:Don't they usually do 'exile all FOO from your graveyard, until end of turn you may play/cast those cards, return all unplayed cards to your graveyard at end of turn'? i think the idea is that the ones you exile can't be reincarnated, not that they can.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2019 22:04
|
|
|
Ya, that much is fairly obvious. Just seems like there's possibly some extra bookkeeping if you're putting other legendaries back in the yard in the same turn.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2019 22:06
|
|
|
fadam posted:https://twitter.com/nicknprince/status/1142145102858485760 ....why?
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2019 22:09
|
|
|
MikeCrotch posted:I like listening to your podcast even though I will very likely never play Modern (I only play on Arena) Thank you for this!
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2019 22:09
|
|
|
fadam posted:https://twitter.com/nicknprince/status/1142145102858485760 Haha, I saw someone post pics on twitter of them doing this to their Guru lands.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2019 22:11
|
|
|
Framboise posted:....why? Those are the ones with Terese Neilson art.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2019 22:14
|
|
|
Kurieg posted:Those are the ones with Terese Neilson art. as opposed to the art from who?
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2019 22:15
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:as opposed to the art from who? a non-chud?
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2019 22:19
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:as opposed to the art from who? Jamie Jones, I guess. tqilamknbrd posted:a non-chud? I think weasel's point was more in reference to the fact that old FoW was also Nielson art
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2019 22:20
|
|
|
fadam posted:https://twitter.com/nicknprince/status/1142145102858485760 imagine being this much of a chud
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2019 22:27
|
|
|
Eej posted:imagine being this much of a chud I’m literally Vice President of the DSA.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2019 22:29
|
|
|
Eej posted:imagine being this much of a chud This is the exact opposite of being a chud, really.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2019 22:32
|
|
|
Arivia posted:This is the exact opposite of being a chud, really. he's talking about fadam, the guy who still uses the word "cuck" in 2019 and thinks it's really funny to make fun of poor people
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2019 22:35
|
|
|
-Last words
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2019 22:35
|
|
|
little munchkin posted:he's talking about fadam, the guy who still uses the word "cuck" in 2019 and thinks it's really funny to make fun of poor people Nobody’s perfect.
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2019 22:40
|
|
|
 quote:"Eternal Isolation"
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2019 23:02
|
|
|
LSV with a quick exit on day one...
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2019 23:23
|
|
|
fadam posted:https://twitter.com/nicknprince/status/1142145102858485760 You know what you gotta do WOTC. Time to reprint FoW with a different artist at rare so everybody can
|
|
#
?
Jun 21, 2019 23:32
|
|
|
fadam posted:https://twitter.com/nicknprince/status/1142145102858485760 Given that nobody has ever proven anything beyond her liking some tweets, this seems extreme. But it's his own property so he can do whatever.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2019 00:13
|
|
|
"I'm going to destroy the value of $520 of my own property to spite someone who has unfortunate political beliefs I don't like while not affecting them in any remote way" is kind of a massive self-own tbh like I'm pretty drat disappointed about Nielsen too but if you think I'm about to wreck a card I spent a lot of my own hard-earned money on you're nuts Framboise fucked around with this message at 00:32 on Jun 22, 2019 |
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2019 00:17
|
|
|
Star Man posted:Planeswalkers with static abilities are the problem. At the main event at magicfest Taipei, they made a big announcement before R1 so EVERYONE REMEMBERS THE STATIC ABILITIES, STOP loving IT UP
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2019 00:27
|
|
|
Sounds like he should quit magic since they send Mooney to Nielsen
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2019 00:31
|
|
|
Framboise posted:"I'm going to destroy the value of $520 of my own property to spite someone who has unfortunate political beliefs I don't like while not affecting them in any remote way" is kind of a massive self-own tbh Who is making you wreck your own cards? Like, why the hell are you taking this so personally?
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2019 00:51
|
|
|
to be fair, gerry t is also massively owning all the soggy bottom babies in this thread crying about it, so that's worth even more
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2019 00:54
|
|
|
Gerry has given up maybe tens of thousands of dollars with his world's and MPL protests, why do you think he gives a poo poo about his FoWs?
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2019 00:56
|
|
|
Actually, destroying the resale value of the product, while doing nothing to hinder its actual value for playing a card game, is excellent. It's making a statement against chuds and against toxic capitalism at the same time, which is like a two-for-one, which if you know your advanced Magic strategy is a form of card advantageLone Goat posted:to be fair, gerry t is also massively owning all the soggy bottom babies in this thread crying about it, so that's worth even more Holy poo poo, I didn't even think of this. So much value
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2019 00:57
|
|
|
GerryT is a treasure, the magic community does not deserve him, but I’m grateful he is a part of it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2019 00:58
|
|
|
His video can serve as metaphorical. Like, "here's a $520 gently caress you to the ideology this person may or may not hold but at least represents." And it's not like he threw his brand new jordans in a fire, it's still cardboard and he might still be able to play them (not sure about alters these days.)
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2019 01:01
|
|
|
Your protests aren't meaningful unless you're willing to inconvenience yourself or be harmed to make your point.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2019 01:04
|
|
|
Ada posted:His video can serve as metaphorical. Like, "here's a $520 gently caress you to the ideology this person may or may not hold but at least represents." And it's not like he threw his brand new jordans in a fire, it's still cardboard and he might still be able to play them (not sure about alters these days.) The art needs to be recognizable, so the cards aren't playable, unless he says it's a political statement in which case the judges will probably fold.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2019 01:10
|
|
|
What's up with this spoiler season, why don't I know what the flying horse guy and vivien who doesn't make tokens or an emblem does? I thought it was just a week? Or is it a week monday to monday?
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2019 01:14
|
|
|
Spiderdrake posted:What's up with this spoiler season, why don't I know what the flying horse guy and vivien who doesn't make tokens or an emblem does? I thought it was just a week? According to their preview schedule, there are previews on Monday.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2019 01:18
|
|
|
LifeLynx posted:The art needs to be recognizable, so the cards aren't playable, unless he says it's a political statement in which case the judges will probably fold. Since when? Legit question. I would have thought (and indeed always did think) the important part was to be able to unambiguously identify the card.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2019 01:20
|
|
|
Spiderdrake posted:vivien who doesn't make tokens or an emblem Elyv posted:have some intro deck walkers
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2019 01:21
|
|
|
Yeah but it looks like the new real Vivien doesn't do either, as well.LifeLynx posted:According to their preview schedule, there are previews on Monday. What a weird spoiler season after two great ones.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2019 01:25
|
|
|
JerryLee posted:Since when? Legit question. I would have thought (and indeed always did think) the important part was to be able to unambiguously identify the card. Since it’s an instant you just need to say what the card name is and it’s in the graveyard. Might be different with permeates. But I obviously have no nodes what the letter of the law it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2019 01:25
|
|
|
JerryLee posted:Since when? Legit question. I would have thought (and indeed always did think) the important part was to be able to unambiguously identify the card. Just checked, it's still in the Magic Tournament Rules. "Artistic modifications are acceptable in sanctioned tournaments, provided that the modifications do not make the card art unrecognizable, contain substantial strategic advice, or contain offensive images. Artistic modifications also may not cover or change the mana cost or name of the card."
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2019 01:33
|
|
|
Star Man posted:Your protests aren't meaningful unless you're willing to inconvenience yourself or be harmed to make your point.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2019 01:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 21:08 |
|
|
JerryLee posted:Since when? Legit question. I would have thought (and indeed always did think) the important part was to be able to unambiguously identify the card. Could be a problem if someone doesn't speak or read the language of the card being played.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2019 01:52
|
|