mind the walrus posted:

I remember Chapelle's Show made a joke about that.

Milo and POTUS posted:

Wait really

El Gallinero Gros posted:

Yeah. Dave did a parody of trading spouses with 1 black couple and 1 white, and the black husband is stunned to find out white people don't use them

DarkSoulsTantrum posted:

So what do white people use instead?

I’m white and I’ve always used a washcloth.

DarkSoulsTantrum posted:

So what do white people use instead?

I’m white and I’ve always used a washcloth.

DarkSoulsTantrum posted:

So what do white people use instead?

DarkSoulsTantrum posted:

So what do white people use instead?

DarkSoulsTantrum posted:

So what do white people use instead?

I’m white and I’ve always used a washcloth.

DarkSoulsTantrum posted:

So what do white people use instead?

I’m white and I’ve always used a washcloth.

Fleta Mcgurn posted:

I mean, I wash my rear end with the patriarchy, but I can't speak for everyone.

Noblesse Obliged posted:

Goons just shed pieces of their assholes in the shower

EorayMel posted:

A two for one deal, perfect for playing a game of "guess the year from EorayMel posts"

sebmojo posted:

oh christ i'd forgotten all about that story

sebmojo posted:

oh christ i'd forgotten all about that story

DarkSoulsTantrum posted:

So what do white people use instead?

I’m white and I’ve always used a washcloth.

D-Pad posted:

Gonna need both of these

Bobby Digital posted:

I don’t wash my rear end because I’m not gay


god that was an amazing reddit thread

Neito posted:

I absolutely, positively refuse to believe that that wasn't some masterful trolling attempt.

Heath posted:

Peanut butter and the dog, then they kiss the dog on the mouth

Ariong posted:

Soricidus posted:

p-value is stored in the balls

Croatoan posted:

Ahem. I am here to announce this week's Chick-fil-a derail
https://www.advocate.com/commentary/2019/11/18/chick-fil-says-they-will-stop-donating-anti-lgbtq-organizations

quote:

Chick-fil-A has pledged to finally stop funding anti-LGBTQ organizations after years of protests against the brand.

The popular fast-food chain's foundation has donated millions of dollars to groups such as Fellowship of Christian Athletes and the Salvation Army. Both organizations have long histories of being anti-LGBTQ and will now allegedly no longer receive money from the company.

“We made multi-year commitments to both organizations and we fulfilled those obligations in 2018,” a Chick-fil-A spokeswoman said on Monday, according to CNBC. The company says it will now be focusing on three pillars of giving that focus on education, homelessness, and hunger.

I guess you can eat there again but honestly the Popeyes one is better. The lines fuckin suck but it'll chill out eventually. Be cautious though. They said the same thing in 2012

Queen Combat posted:

Apparently they're just shifting towards donating to their own foundation, which then donates on cfa's behalf to the same places. Sooooooo

Soysaucebeast posted:

Do you have a link on that? I know I'm going to have more than one friend excited that they can eat Chick-fil-A now, and I'd want something more substantial than "some dude on a dead gay forum" as a source when I tell them about this.

Sir Lemming posted:

Sadly, they will now be donating to some organization called The "Dead Gay" Forum

polymathy posted:

Nah, I just don't fight women. That's all.

I've trained in martial arts for twenty years (since I was a kid). I've studied Tae Kwon Do, Kickboxing and Jiu Jitsu. Don't make me laugh that I'd be afraid of some antifa punks.

I don't choose violence as a resolution to any conflict. That might be your primary way of dealing with intellectual opponents, but it's not mine.

polymathy posted:

Hey, gently caress you for making GBS threads up this thread with your verbal diarrhea. You're a sad excuse for a "man". You're evidently so insecure about what you believe that your only able to vomit incoherent expletives that lower the IQ of anyone unfortunate enough to read your posts.

You talk tough as a pencil neck keyboard warrior, but talk to me like that in real life and I'll beat you like a red-headed stepchild. Send you home crying to mommy with the scars of a public humiliation burned into your psyche.

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

GolfHole posted:

dont listen to these morons any idiot can cut down a tree a fuckin beaver can do it

Tony Snark posted:

Takes a lot Kegels to build up to that level though.

El Gallinero Gros posted:

Yeah. Dave did a parody of trading spouses with 1 black couple and 1 white, and the black husband is stunned to find out white people don't use them

Vincent Van Goatse posted:

The essence of the criticism of the criticism that has been ongoing, at least on my part, is that it is bad. It is not good. It is really not very informative. It is not that it is bad to "care".

If you actually legitimately care about film, there is a good chance you do not post about it on this web site, because if you look at the movie forum (or the book forum, etc) you see that largely there's an incredible fixation on really childish products (and they are usually products rather than films) with a corresponding lack of taste. I'm sure it's an idea that's unfamiliar to you, as a grown man who wants to surgically replace his dick and balls with a coin operated motorised Donald Duck ride who is about 3 wispy chin hairs away from being a convicted rapist, but when criticism is coming from a really juvenile place about a less-juvenile subject it can seem very superficial and difficult to respect. Like when they allow kids to do news reports on the actual news.

This is one side of the coin here. Some of the reviewers present as, essentially, children of varying extreme largeness. But even if you read what they have to say about children's movies, it's still incredibly basic analysis of a film seen through a lens of a culture who are obsessed with identity politics in all things.

For example, if you read this week's review of The Boxtrolls, all you will learn is:

- The reviewer liked Coraline and Paranorman, but this film has a worse story
- There are trolls who wear boxes, also there are two characters who have names
- The film is nominally about the trolls who wear boxes, however it focuses on one of them who isn't REALLY a troll, but is actually a boy. This is a "big problem".
- The villain is avaristic and ugly. He pretends to be a woman, this is also a big problem, but we're not told why. Just that tumblr dislikes that and they're right to do so.
- The animation is good, kids will like it.

The only thing gleaned from this review that you won't get from the trailer is a number score and at some point a man wears a dress. It's an 800 word sideways glance at a movie and it really does not do a good job reviewing it outside of conveying the general sentiment that it's sort of not bad. I don't respect this, and I don't much care what this person has to say about other movies especially if they're more complicated than this movie for 6-year-olds.

On top of which the reviews are completely joyless, on a comedy web site. It's not just that it's really out of place, it's poorly executed in its own right. I'm not trying to illegally troll or insult them so please do not electronically beat me up, but I don't think they're cut out for this.

Thank you for reading this wearying post. As a reward, here is a picture of the cast of Duck Tales taking public transport so you can finally blast the biggest load of your life you mewling piece of poo poo idiot

El Gallinero Gros posted:

Yeah. Dave did a parody of trading spouses with 1 black couple and 1 white, and the black husband is stunned to find out white people don't use them

ratbert90 posted:

Those engineers and scientists do deserve commendation. They are amazing people with a ton of talent. But you can’t discount the guy who is paying them and spearheading the company as well. Without him, those scientists wouldn’t be making the cool tech that might save the planet.

botany posted:

Those slaves do deserve commendation. They were amazing people with a ton of talent. But you can’t discount the slave owners who were owning them and spearheading the plantations as well. Without them, those slaves wouldn’t have produced the goods that ran the american economy.

Ganson posted:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence

botany posted:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuck_off

Alaois posted:

thanks for letting us know, you massive weirdo

Syd Midnight posted:

To be precise, he said they rub the bar of soap "between their nasty asscheeks"

content:

Milo and POTUS posted:

Where is this. It has to be Musk