|
infernal machines posted:yeah, i wouldn't do that outside of yospos i think op has a case of the fyads, where they unironically think the things that everyone else says jokingly.
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 00:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 02:44 |
|
|
Bobby Digital posted:just call it a poortastephone
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 00:43
|
|
|
The MUMPSorceress posted:lmao a bunch of gbsers in the tech support thread got their feelings hurt because I called anroid a poorphone you were being an rear end in a top hat there and I’m still unconvinced that you don’t touch yourself while looking at your av
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 01:44
|
|
|
Jabor posted:i think op has a case of the fyads, where they unironically think the things that everyone else says jokingly. you really don't know me at all then
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 02:20
|
|
|
iPhone elitism is a very pure form of wealthy american elitism.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 02:35
|
|
|
which is strange, because you can buy some very expensive androids, and if nothing else it really shows how little you care about the money because you just spent that much on an actual piece of trash
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 02:39
|
|
|
like you guys realize I'm jbt and I just changed my name right? I'm still the same girl who grew up having to shoplift to eat and who got doxxed for being "too sjw". if you think for one second I'm seriously dissing poor people you're off your rocker. I was just using the ancient yospos meme and was surprised to find that the very same gbs that has an fyad shelter thread demurred at that. whatever I guess that meme is dead now so I'll get over it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 02:50
|
|
|
I don't think you were using it seriously, but deriding anything as "for poors" is a bad look imo. Even if it's ironic. Also you do work for Apple iirc and we had an apple guy come and give a talk about design a while back and he spent like a third of it needlessly dunking on Android (e.g. slide with 1000 different phone models on it: "this is why they can't have a good experience") rather than talking about good design, and made a bunch of elitist comments, so like, idk, corporate culture Sagebrush fucked around with this message at 02:57 on Dec 23, 2019 |
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 02:55
|
|
|
The MUMPSorceress posted:like you guys realize I'm jbt and I just changed my name right? i definitely did not realize that, but also you know better than to use yospos memes outside yospos. they're not getting mad that you made a poor joke, they're mad that you made a poor joke that they're the butt of
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 02:56
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:I don't think you were using it seriously, but deriding anything as "for poors" is a bad look imo. Even if it's ironic. gross gently caress that guy. if you remember his name and dept let me know and I'll let communications know we have a dick head giving talks that make us look bad and I get the criticism. I was just using a meme thoughtlessly and now I'm feeling defensive because I'm being accused of being a sex pervert and fyad doxxer
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 02:57
|
|
|
gets a job at faang and goes full class traitor c-spam would be appalled. APPALLED.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 04:07
|
|
|
free advertising-based operating system is for poors?
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 04:25
|
|
|
it's for everyone, friend. google will drink your data through a hose, rich or poor, they don't discriminate. did you need a cheap piece of poo poo you can buy from a convenience store and slap a prepaid sim in? do you need a janky-rear end foldable prototype that costs $2k and will poo poo itself within a year? either way, it'll be the worst mobile os experience you can buy, and it's available to all
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 04:35
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:either way, it'll be the worst mobile os experience you can buy
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 04:38
|
|
|
android is an os designed for poor companies to put on their off the shelf qualcomm socs and sell to unsuspecting consumers of all income levels
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 06:01
|
|
|
ya its equal opportunity crap op
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 06:10
|
|
|
google knows everything about you whether or not you have an anroid might as well get the cheaper smartphone that does fake e: fixed lovely posting since android and ios have been roughly the same on different crap hardware for half a decade+ now
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 11:24
|
|
|
it'd sure be nice if there was any alternative that wasn't either expensive or abusive to its users, but here we are, at least for now. kudos to apple for finding the one actually durable compelling advantage for their phones.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 13:48
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:I don't think you were using it seriously, but deriding anything as "for poors" is a bad look imo. Even if it's ironic. he's not wrong though. on one side you have a combination of oems adding all sorts of garbage to stock android and then not updating things after 6-12 months and on the other you have those sub-$100 jankphones intended for the developing world where people have to save up for a $70 purchase. of course, that doesn't stop cheapskates above the equator from buying them and complaining about how bad they are. both of these are a recipe for an overall bad user experience then again, they seem to still be working on un-loving the garbage userland they built 10+ years ago, so the os isn't entirely blameless. they somehow still have issues with audio latency despite working to fix it since the early days
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 17:13
|
|
|
e: tweet deleted but "Samsung TV uses a "secure number pad", where the numbers are in a random order, and this button randomizes them on demand???" Pinterest Mom fucked around with this message at 17:48 on Dec 23, 2019 |
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 17:40
|
|
|
The_Franz posted:they somehow still have issues with audio latency despite working to fix it since the early days you can’t play audio on linux, everyone knows this
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 21:59
|
|
|
The Management posted:you can’t play audio on linux, everyone knows this LMFAO Holy poo poo did you come up with that yourself? [wheezing and gasping for breath with laughter] my God can't believe I've been reading yospos for years and this is the first time someone said [pausing to wipe years out of my eyes] l- linux can't play sounds ahahaha
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 22:04
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:e: tweet deleted but maybe they're worried about spyware on the remote??
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 22:07
|
|
|
Jenny Agutter posted:LMFAO Holy poo poo did you come up with that yourself? [wheezing and gasping for breath with laughter] my God can't believe I've been reading yospos for years and this is the first time someone said [pausing to wipe years out of my eyes] l- linux can't play sounds ahahaha I am concerned for your health if anybody ever says buttcoin
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 23:40
|
|
|
Jenny Agutter posted:LMFAO Holy poo poo did you come up with that yourself? [wheezing and gasping for breath with laughter] my God can't believe I've been reading yospos for years and this is the first time someone said [pausing to wipe years out of my eyes] l- linux can't play sounds ahahaha i don't understand why you're laughing. its not a joke. linux cant do sound properly lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2019 23:57
|
|
|
Jenny Agutter posted:LMFAO Holy poo poo did you come up with that yourself? [wheezing and gasping for breath with laughter] my God can't believe I've been reading yospos for years and this is the first time someone said [pausing to wipe years out of my eyes] l- linux can't play sounds ahahaha wait until you hear about the WiFi
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2019 02:33
|
|
|
The Management posted:wait until you hear about the WiFi how? sound still doesn't work
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2019 02:41
|
|
|
Jenny Agutter posted:LMFAO Holy poo poo did you come up with that yourself? [wheezing and gasping for breath with laughter] my God can't believe I've been reading yospos for years and this is the first time someone said [pausing to wipe years out of my eyes] l- linux can't play sounds ahahaha linux sucks rear end. gently caress off.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2019 02:57
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:e: tweet deleted but i've seen places that have three-factor door locks that do that, gotta swipe a card, fingerprint, and then key your pin on a scrambled pad if you're worried about someone seeing where you touched your keyboard after the fact it's good
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2019 03:13
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:how? sound still doesn't work lol owned
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2019 05:46
|
|
|
Jenny Agutter posted:LMFAO Holy poo poo did you come up with that yourself? [wheezing and gasping for breath with laughter] my God can't believe I've been reading yospos for years and this is the first time someone said [pausing to wipe years out of my eyes] l- linux can't play sounds ahahaha anroid by sarnsung
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2019 10:49
|
|
|
infernal machines posted:how? sound still doesn't work lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2019 10:49
|
|
|
I had to install dispera on a Linux once
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2019 14:49
|
|
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:i've seen places that have three-factor door locks that do that, gotta swipe a card, fingerprint, and then key your pin on a scrambled pad hirsch scramble pads, a solution in search of a problem. the last places i knew that still had them replaced them several years ago though i’m sure there are still some in use.
|
|
#
?
Dec 26, 2019 03:15
|
|
|
Midjack posted:hirsch scramble pads, a solution in search of a problem. the last places i knew that still had them replaced them several years ago though i’m sure there are still some in use. this was on a tour of an fbi office a decade ago so probably
|
|
#
?
Dec 26, 2019 04:54
|
|
|
The best part about those scrambling keypads that i've used was that when you press the scramble button it makes a bleepy bloopy sound the whole time you're holding the button down
|
|
#
?
Dec 26, 2019 10:14
|
|
|
the theory is that your code can be easily derived from recording the movements of your hand, even if the keypad is obscured.
|
|
#
?
Dec 26, 2019 16:48
|
|
|
The Management posted:the theory is that your code can be easily derived from recording the movements of your hand, even if the keypad is obscured. or doing the trick from entrapment where you look to see which buttons have been repeatedly pressed. it does what it claims to but the marginal cost isn’t worth it for several reasons. first, if you’re worried about getting your pin shoulder surfed or recorded at distance it’s simple to mount a keypad where you can block it with your body or otherwise make it difficult to observe by a second party, though it’s possible to deduct the key presses from arm motion it’s much harder than when you can see a fingertip push a button. second, if you’re using a multi factor system (card + pin) then you have additional safety though admittedly hardening both factors isn’t bad to do in any case. third, if you have some door that’s super critical yet somehow operates off a single shared pin and is observable from outside your perimeter then it would make some kind of sense to use these though if you have the money to waste on these then you can afford an eac system with individual pins. so yeah, it does what it says but at ridiculous cost for not much benefit. it was the same era that saw the us gov switch from the excellent sargent & greenleaf mechanical combination locks to the sucktastic kaba-mas electromechanical locks, so they were just on a kick of electronic security devices for their own sake in the 90s. thanks for coming to my street corner talk, would you like one of my handwritten manifestos?
|
|
#
?
Dec 26, 2019 17:37
|
|
|
Midjack posted:or doing the trick from entrapment where you look to see which buttons have been repeatedly pressed. not really when entering a credit card number on a computer tho. the string of digits is much longer, entered more infrequently, and most importantly is used to enter a lot more than just that credit card number only. v mossad or not mossad territory where realistically someone that wants card numbers is just gonna buy them in bulk from someone that attached a skimmer to an ATM, not try to deduce them from wear patterns on a phone screen. poo poo smacks of "someone had an idea", where someone didn't consider the idea's usefulness beyond being able to bring up their keen security insights come performance review time. edit: gently caress this is a TV, it doesn't even have wear patterns because it's from a remote. mossad not mossad energy intensifies.
|
|
#
?
Dec 26, 2019 18:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 02:44 |
|
|
CMYK BLYAT! posted:not really when entering a credit card number on a computer tho. the string of digits is much longer, entered more infrequently, and most importantly is used to enter a lot more than just that credit card number only. v mossad or not mossad territory where realistically someone that wants card numbers is just gonna buy them in bulk from someone that attached a skimmer to an ATM, not try to deduce them from wear patterns on a phone screen. agreed, i was mostly talking about the scramble pads for access control, not a soft keypad for credit cards.
|
|
#
?
Dec 26, 2019 18:09
|
|