|
Cojawfee posted:There are enough of these videos that it has to be practically impossible for an axe throwing establishment to get insurance. https://www.mnaxe.com/ One of these just opened up by my house, didn't seem like there were any regulatory delays. Insurance just don't care!
|
# ? Dec 23, 2019 21:49 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 22:11 |
|
It's all in the reflexes.
|
# ? Dec 23, 2019 21:54 |
poo poo POST MALONE posted:An escape room where you have to throw axes to get out. I actually did an escape room where you had to reveal a code by shooting targets with a BB gun. Unfortunately it was chained down.
|
|
# ? Dec 23, 2019 22:00 |
|
chitoryu12 posted:I actually did an escape room where you had to reveal a code by shooting targets with a BB gun. Unfortunately it was chained down. Did you try shooting the chain?
|
# ? Dec 23, 2019 22:17 |
|
https://twitter.com/nedroid/status/1209231981210472448
|
# ? Dec 23, 2019 23:37 |
|
SUGAR MAN!
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 00:25 |
|
Whatever, that’s a half-day’s supply of cocaine for Miami (or a solid morning for Tony Montana).
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 00:31 |
|
It’s been a while since we checked in with Swift, let’s see how things are going! (Found on Imgur) Oh.
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 00:43 |
|
https://i.imgur.com/BrMv1oM.gifv
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 00:52 |
|
zedprime posted:How do the feathers end up in a vehicle to fall out? Hell yeah. The only good thing about my insurance is they offer free windscreen replacement and free tow truck. Costs me €480 per year.
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 01:02 |
|
Using gasoline to deforest my neighborhood
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 01:19 |
|
Phanatic posted:Ah, so less “can’t” and more “won’t.” Thanks. I knew there were exceptions in the rules of evidence large enough to drive a (Swift) truck through and that that probably fell under one of them. It’s weird for the FAA to falsely hide behind the rules of evidence. Maybe they’re envisioning someone other than the pilot as the videographer, but so what? Find who the videographer is and subpoena them. Isn’t safety investigation the FAA’s job?
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 01:56 |
|
Platystemon posted:Thanks. I knew there were exceptions in the rules of evidence large enough to drive a (Swift) truck through and that that probably fell under one of them. They probably care more about the big fish that can pay big fines rather than some guy in a small plane who can only pay a small fine and maybe lose his license.
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 02:02 |
|
Platystemon posted:Thanks. I knew there were exceptions in the rules of evidence large enough to drive a (Swift) truck through and that that probably fell under one of them. I know nothing of the specifics, so this is just the basest of conjecture, but the whole thing smells a lot to me of a under-funded, over-committed agency trying to put resources where they'll do the best. This guy is probably just going to kill himself and whoever is dumb enough to get in an airplane with him. Meanwhile, if they investigate it that's investigators who are chasing after him rather than looking for the hosed poo poo that could drop an airliner. There are plenty of dumb little regional airlines who catch poo poo from the FAA for unsafe bullshit. Google around about Spirit Airlines for a good example. The last biggie I heard of is they had engine parts rain down on part of Detroit. Not everything they have to deal with is that extreme, but there's a lot of ongoing investigations of dumb poo poo. Kind of like how the IRS doesn't even bother investigating tax fraud if it's below a certain threshold.
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 02:02 |
Video evidence is weird. You almost always either need an admission "yeah that's me in the video", a witness "yes, I was there and I did a formal, court-approved identification procedure and that's him in the video" or absolutely picture-perfect quality where a jury is sure that's the defendant in the video and other independent evidence that the act took place.
|
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 02:04 |
Cyrano4747 posted:I know nothing of the specifics, so this is just the basest of conjecture, but the whole thing smells a lot to me of a under-funded, over-committed agency trying to put resources where they'll do the best. This guy is probably just going to kill himself and whoever is dumb enough to get in an airplane with him. Meanwhile, if they investigate it that's investigators who are chasing after him rather than looking for the hosed poo poo that could drop an airliner. There are plenty of dumb little regional airlines who catch poo poo from the FAA for unsafe bullshit. Google around about Spirit Airlines for a good example. The last biggie I heard of is they had engine parts rain down on part of Detroit. Not everything they have to deal with is that extreme, but there's a lot of ongoing investigations of dumb poo poo. Yeah, and if he's got a semi-competent attorney, he can drag out the process for a looong time and presumably file a poo poo-ton of appeals after they take away his license, so they choose to go after bigger targets with their limited budget, which will save more lives. It's hosed up, but it makes sense.
|
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 02:55 |
|
Cyrano4747 posted:Kind of like how the IRS doesn't even bother investigating tax fraud if it's below a certain threshold. Lucky. Around here the CRA will put the screws to bit players to the point of subpoenaing Home Depot for their list of customers with corporate accounts to go after guys doing jobs for cash under the table on weekends, but if you're a gigantic corporation literally building torture prisons in Libya the Prime Minister himself will try to cover for you.
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 03:16 |
|
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 03:28 |
|
ekuNNN posted:From that document, in one of many injury reports: Mic Dicta did an episode about the waterslide, it's pretty well done. https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/mic-dicta/episode-11-no-such-things-as-Cm2BUw9tGPz/
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 03:33 |
|
how else are you gonna make 100 of em an hour?
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 03:58 |
|
Platystemon posted:Thanks. I knew there were exceptions in the rules of evidence large enough to drive a (Swift) truck through and that that probably fell under one of them. It might have something to do with this: https://www.flyingmag.com/technique/tip-week/faa-enforcement-and-youtube/ quote:First, FAA inspectors are being reminded they have "no authority to direct or suggest" that a flying video you posted on the Internet be removed, according to the new policy. It's your First Amendment right to upload any video you want. Safety inspectors are also being reminded by top agency brass that a video alone is "ordinarily not sufficient evidence" to determine whether any FARs have been broken. A video purporting to show something legally questionable must also be "authenticated" by the FAA inspector before any enforcement action is taken. This is the policy itself: https://c-6rtwjumjzx7877x24bbbx2ekf...ua=1&i10c.dv=11 And what is says regarding Youtube stuff is: quote:In all cases, the FAA must have acceptable evidence in support of all alleged facts So it sounds like one overzealous inspector wrote an official warning he shouldn't have written, and that led to this official reminder of how things are supposed to work, and then that somehow filtered down through the ranks and metastasized to "Youtube videos aren't admissible evidence."
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 04:14 |
|
Sorry, but during his aerobatic maneuvers, his government issued photo ID that was taped in view of the camera fell down, so we can't verify it was him for that portion of the video.
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 04:22 |
|
Who needs lockout/tagout for high-voltage electrical work when you have piece of cardboard taped over switch?
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 06:12 |
|
the hard cases learn why this is dumb the first time they try it on a 3-way setup.
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 06:21 |
|
I hate using the bandsaw at my work, our shop tech is lazy so the band is always loose and liable to twist and jump or snap without hesitation
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 06:26 |
|
Smiling Jack posted:Video evidence is weird. You almost always either need an admission "yeah that's me in the video", a witness "yes, I was there and I did a formal, court-approved identification procedure and that's him in the video" or absolutely picture-perfect quality where a jury is sure that's the defendant in the video and other independent evidence that the act took place. Considering deepfakes, that’s probably a good thing.
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 10:48 |
|
That deer looks like its one piece and whatever he just cut he throws off camera so im confused what hes cutting out
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 11:55 |
|
What he's cutting out is the deer Also Jesus Christ no wonder that gif is taking so long to load it's 150 MB Link gifv versions instead for the love of god https://i.imgur.com/c27NprK.gifv
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 12:08 |
|
Pepperoneedy posted:Who needs lockout/tagout for high-voltage electrical work when you have piece of cardboard taped over switch? It never ceases to give me a giggle that lockout-tagout locks are the weakest loving locks you can buy, with bodies made of plastic, but they're super challenging to pick. You can just bash them off with a hammer, but if you try and pick them you have to be a moderately skilled lock-picker with a bunch of specialized tools and dozens of hours of experience.
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 12:40 |
|
MisterOblivious posted:lockout-tagout locks are the weakest loving locks you can buy This does not at all match my experience
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 13:09 |
|
MisterOblivious posted:It never ceases to give me a giggle that lockout-tagout locks are the weakest loving locks you can buy, with bodies made of plastic, but they're super challenging to pick. You can just bash them off with a hammer, but if you try and pick them you have to be a moderately skilled lock-picker with a bunch of specialized tools and dozens of hours of experience. Huh. So they are. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4XGY0_cwcM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RfNXrvXmUc I understand why they’re physically weak, but I didn’t know they were relatively difficult to pick. Someone in the comments on the second video suggests that the cores have the security they do to 1) allow more possible keyings for large workplaces and 2) prevent the wrong key from being close enough to accidentally open the lock. I was going to leave it at that, but then I saw this comment from a CHUD: quote:The security pins are there to prevent claims that a LOTO lock was picked open either during or after an accident, which is a claim that could be made to shift fault for an accident from a negligent technician to the company. Likewise most LOTO locks use ball-bearing lockup to avoid claims of shimming the lock. gently caress that noise about “false” claims. There are absolutely bosses out there who would risk lives by picking locks and bypassing the procedures that have been written in blood.
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 13:20 |
|
Listen, I know things are tough as a new window, but why do you keep bugging me about this? It was just a dumb accident- if he really thought it would be that dangerous for us to turn the like back on, then why did he use a PLASTIC lock? You're lucky we're not charging you for the 4 hours of production time we lost
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 14:25 |
|
Cyrano4747 posted:... This poo poo is no joke. Wrote them off completely a couple years ago after I got on a route for the second time (years apart) where the gear shook violently on rotation. I don't want to make assertions about their maintenance but I'll draw conclusions from my experience in comfort.
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 14:28 |
|
For those interested this guy's name is Alex Snodgrass. He has a ton of content on youtube related to bandsaws.
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 15:56 |
|
I assume this is a dumb question, but if you were doing that sort of thing on a regular basis for any appreciable amount of time, why wouldn't you buy some light chainmail gloves? Sooner or later your concentration is going to slip, and so will your fingers.
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 16:23 |
|
Does a bandsaw even give a poo poo about chainmail? eta: quote:The meat processing industry has been utilising a range of gloves for personal protection for many years. Several reports have examined the suitability of the gloves specifically highlighting some of the negative elements of the chain mail version1. Traditionally the gloves have been used during the boning process and have been very effective in protecting the users across a range of processes. With the continuing modernisation of factories an increase in the number of high powered band saws has resulted, and as such an examination of the suitability of this glove style for this specific processing role (band saw operations) is required. So the jury is out when it comes to using gloves with butchers’ bandsaws. Platystemon fucked around with this message at 16:36 on Dec 24, 2019 |
# ? Dec 24, 2019 16:29 |
|
Didn’t give a poo poo about my mom’s fingernail, that’s for drat sure
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 16:32 |
|
Icon Of Sin posted:Didn’t give a poo poo about my mom’s fingernail, that’s for drat sure My question would be whether or not the gloves give enough resistance to let you jerk back in time. Losing a fingernail sucks. Losing a finger sucks more.
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 16:42 |
|
Didn’t even take the whole thing, just a middle section from the tip to the nail bed. The docs took the rest, the (now) 2 separate nail beds on either side My dad was opening a bag of deer corn with a knife and cut through the bag, and split his own middle finger open down to the bone. I guess it’s something I’ve got to look forward to
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 16:44 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 22:11 |
|
I'm gonna defend the boomer here and say that the scroll saw (basically what that is) is totally safe to use like that for small woodworking projects. It's got such a tiny blade that yeah you'd nick your finger or something but it's not gonna grab and pull your whole body in. He's not cutting huge aluminum stock on a 1" blade with gnashy teeth.
|
# ? Dec 24, 2019 17:48 |