Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: dead gay comedy forums)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

comedyblissoption
Mar 15, 2006

euphronius posted:

if you think Stalin was worried about Germany in the late 20s the repressions in Russia throughout the late 20s and 30s have a different context than usually presented

also problems the Bolsheviks had the peasants in Russia in general
just a reminder that a bunch of allied nations invaded russia to back the czar against the revolution and that 1/8th the population of the soviet union were murdered by the nazi invasion and world war 2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allied_intervention_in_the_Russian_Civil_War

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

Ferrinus posted:

the thing is that stalin was dramatically pro peasant compared to people "to his left" (contra trotsky, he believed there were gradations within the peasant class such that many peasants actually were useful to the socialist project, whereas others thought the size and backwardness of the peasantry meant building socialism in russia was pointless and the ussr had to use the last of its strength to try to kickstart revolution elsewhere before it was too late), and he himself released a wide proclamation titled something like "dizzy with success" after the first and most drastic jump in collectivization that basically said things had gone too widely and too quickly and needed to be scaled back and allowed to settle

in general i'm very suspicious of the phrasing "revolution from above". how do you impose a revolution from above, exactly, when a revolution only works at all because the masses participate in, support, or at least don't mind it? my understanding is that the initial steps taken went too fast/too far in the sense that they encouraged strata in the peasantry who'd been waiting for it all along to carry out violence that they'd previously thought the soviet government wouldn't approve of, not, like, went to war on the peasantry and won. you can't win a war with the people who feed you

revolution from above is only used once in that book . that is the one time. I think it is just meant as a short hand description of “what Lenin didn’t want” which was to convince the (non petit boug) peasants to adopt socialism by showing how good it was . who knows how long that would have taken

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

comedyblissoption posted:

just a reminder that a bunch of allied nations invaded russia to back the czar against the revolution and that 1/8th the population of the soviet union were murdered by the nazi invasion and world war 2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allied_intervention_in_the_Russian_Civil_War

oh yeah I know.

genericnick
Dec 26, 2012

https://twitter.com/asatarbair/status/1409313735554916353
I'm just going to continue posting the Stalin guy.

Good Soldier Svejk
Jul 5, 2010

genericnick posted:

https://twitter.com/asatarbair/status/1409313735554916353
I'm just going to continue posting the Stalin guy.

That's almost an Oscar Wilde level pithy quip.
I can appreciate a good bon mot

Ferrinus
Jun 19, 2003

i'm finding this quite easy, i guess in part because i'm a fast type but also because i have a coherent mental model of the world

euphronius posted:

revolution from above is only used once in that book . that is the one time. I think it is just meant as a short hand description of “what Lenin didn’t want” which was to convince the (non petit boug) peasants to adopt socialism by showing how good it was . who knows how long that would have taken

i mean, there were strata within the peasantry who were convinced, who moved with the cp against the strata who weren't. the numbers advantage was small enough that a lot of collectivization happened more violently than you'd like, but i think "essential discontinuity" is going too far, especially given stalin's own decision to ease off on the gas a few years down the line when it became clear how the beginnings of collectivization were playing out in the field

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

Ferrinus posted:

i mean, there were strata within the peasantry who were convinced, who moved with the cp against the strata who weren't. the numbers advantage was small enough that a lot of collectivization happened more violently than you'd like, but i think "essential discontinuity" is going too far, especially given stalin's own decision to ease off on the gas a few years down the line when it became clear how the beginnings of collectivization were playing out in the field

yeah i have to read a Stalin biography next

Ferrinus
Jun 19, 2003

i'm finding this quite easy, i guess in part because i'm a fast type but also because i have a coherent mental model of the world
i got what i'm posting here from ludo martens's Another View of Stalin which is more like a greatest hits/biggest propaganda flashpoints than a proper start to finish bio

indigi
Jul 20, 2004

how can we not talk about family
when family's all that we got?

dead gay comedy forums posted:

sure, it’s a speculative take, but Lenin wouldn’t loving suffer it at all imho

well I suppose it’s a good thing he died then

euphronius posted:

it’s kind of shocking how literate the heroes of 100+ years ago were compared to today

there’s no heroes of today cause they all get killed or imprisoned once they rise to the point of “might potentially possibly be a threat in the medium-term future” while people like deray are pushed to become the face of movements

genericnick
Dec 26, 2012

https://twitter.com/asatarbair/status/1407933384857247746
Just get him an account.

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

Ferrinus posted:

i got what i'm posting here from ludo martens's Another View of Stalin which is more like a greatest hits/biggest propaganda flashpoints than a proper start to finish bio

Id like one that is source heavy and from a person who knows Russian probably. Ill have to look around.

Its interesting about how contextualized Khrushchev's secret speech has become as I learn more. That was not a speech solely interested in the truth at all lol

MLSM
Apr 3, 2021

by Azathoth

You just know some khive tech bro at twitter wrote that bullshit

MLSM
Apr 3, 2021

by Azathoth
I like this guy

https://twitter.com/asatarbair/status/1409529325297143809?s=20

wynott dunn
Aug 9, 2006

What is to be done?

Who or what can challenge, and stand a chance at beating, the corporate juggernauts dominating the world?

I want to drunk drive the holodomor bus with this guy

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011


indigi posted:

well I suppose it’s a good thing he died then

I meant Lenin was going to probably be far more aggressive against fascism than Stalin was (whether this is good or not is for you to consider)

Lenin was the most proactive and the most combative of the bolshevik leadership; he was defeated twice on assembly to mobilize the petrograd soviet to give the blow and by the third try it was a matter of survival

and yeah I get the gist of reevaluating Stalin but besmirching golden vlad lad to make joey look good? joe wouldn't suffer that, he would punch your teeth out for daring to insult the bro he most adored, lol

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011


also, since we are near the subject, I would like some help on the matter: are there any good sources on civil rights under Stalin, lgbtq in particular?

basically, I can't look for poo poo anywhere about the matter without it being a clusterfuck and my awareness of the historiography involved in almost none, and looking through discussions to get a gauge on the issue, well, it sucks. it ends up with people like me who also like to kiss dudes being called bougie degenerate counter-revolutionaries, which lmao

the best I could find is that the deliberate prosecution of homosexuals during Stalin's leadership was carried under Genrikh Yagoda (who has quite an extensive account of homophobia, it seems) leading the NKVD. Stalin himself had no issue at all with the matter (hell by this point, if there was something on his writings indicating something, it would have showed up under the scrutiny), so was it an institutional failure of the Union?

Dr. Poz
Sep 8, 2003

Dr. Poz just diagnosed you with a serious case of being a pussy. Now get back out there and hit them till you can't remember your kid's name.

Pillbug

AnimeIsTrash posted:

I hope Vaush picks some neutral sources like Radio Free Asia or Epoch Times.

but of course, he wouldn't use any western sources.

https://twitter.com/KaioshinXL/status/1378875037550190593

F Stop Fitzgerald
Dec 12, 2010

Dr. Poz posted:

but of course, he wouldn't use any western sources.

https://twitter.com/KaioshinXL/status/1378875037550190593

when i was flipping around one of his sources was Bitter Winter, an italian based org that is a designated Friend of Falun Gong

https://bitterwinter.org/

https://fofg.org/voices-of-support/bitter-winter-reporting-on-religious-persecution-in-china/

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

The Economist isn't a "Western source" because it's not in the Western hemisphere. :smug:

Larry Parrish
Jul 9, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Based

Hodgepodge
Jan 29, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 215 days!

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

I wasn’t aware the Czar literally banned vodka in 1916.

that’s incredibly stupid

(from the recent mike Duncan episode).

it made me the that a lot of the conditions for revolution in 1916 ish are not present here in America at all. yet

some of the reasons Duncan listed iirc

- inflation and scarcity
- food problems with peasants just keeping grain rather than selling it
- women sitting and talking in bread lines 40 hours a week
- nationalist fervor against the czarina
- HE LITERALLY BANNED VODKA
- I may be forgetting some

indigi
Jul 20, 2004

how can we not talk about family
when family's all that we got?

euphronius posted:

- I may be forgetting some

WWI probably

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

indigi posted:

WWI probably

ironically the czar started ww1 to stop the revolution

Centrist Committee
Aug 6, 2019

euphronius posted:

I wasn’t aware the Czar literally banned vodka in 1916.

that’s incredibly stupid

(from the recent mike Duncan episode).

it made me the that a lot of the conditions for revolution in 1916 ish are not present here in America at all. yet

some of the reasons Duncan listed iirc

- inflation and scarcity
- food problems with peasants just keeping grain rather than selling it
- women sitting and talking in bread lines 40 hours a week
- nationalist fervor against the czarina
- HE LITERALLY BANNED VODKA
- I may be forgetting some

eh, I think we’re getting closer. remember those miles long lines for food pantries during the covid lockdowns? on the other hand that’s another great thing about America, instead of radicalizing in the bread lines together, people sit in vehicles alone with nothing but radio and podcasts to pass the time

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

euphronius posted:

ironically the czar started ww1 to stop the revolution

I didn’t realize apis was secretly tsar Nicholas the whole time!

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

Centrist Committee posted:

eh, I think we’re getting closer. remember those miles long lines for food pantries during the covid lockdowns? on the other hand that’s another great thing about America, instead of radicalizing in the bread lines together, people sit in vehicles alone with nothing but radio and podcasts to pass the time

yeah o was gonna say the long lines were crucially atomized people in cars looking at Facebook

The Voice of Labor
Apr 8, 2020

comedyblissoption posted:

just a reminder that a bunch of allied nations invaded russia to back the czar against the revolution and that 1/8th the population of the soviet union were murdered by the nazi invasion and world war 2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allied_intervention_in_the_Russian_Civil_War

why was japan involved? did the czar owe them war reparations that wouldn't be repaid in the event of revolution?

Malleum
Aug 16, 2014

Am I the one at fault? What about me is wrong?
Buglord

Raskolnikov38 posted:

I didn’t realize apis was secretly tsar Nicholas the whole time!

was apis the dude that carried around a wallet made of the old serbian queen or was that one of his flunkies

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011


The Voice of Labor posted:

why was japan involved? did the czar owe them war reparations that wouldn't be repaid in the event of revolution?

more "OH gently caress COMMUNISM"

StashAugustine
Mar 24, 2013

Do not trust in hope- it will betray you! Only faith and hatred sustain.

euphronius posted:

ironically the czar started ww1 to stop the revolution

"Lets start a quick war to keep domestic dissent in check!" is practically a running gag on the show at this point

StashAugustine
Mar 24, 2013

Do not trust in hope- it will betray you! Only faith and hatred sustain.

that said, probably a reason why socialist revolutions were only successful in the periphery

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

Malleum posted:

was apis the dude that carried around a wallet made of the old serbian queen or was that one of his flunkies

first of i'm hearing of it but since he was the one that shot the queen it would probably be him

Larry Parrish
Jul 9, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
unfortunate that the nazis had to ruin the art of making furniture out of the aristocracy to make them be useful for once

Doktor Avalanche
Dec 30, 2008

gradenko_2000 posted:

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

lol incredible

indigi
Jul 20, 2004

how can we not talk about family
when family's all that we got?

StashAugustine posted:

"Lets start a quick war to keep domestic dissent in check!" is practically a running gag on the show at this point

it worked for everyone else in WWI

Prince Myshkin
Jun 17, 2018

F Stop Fitzgerald posted:

when i was flipping around one of his sources was Bitter Winter, an italian based org that is a designated Friend of Falun Gong

https://bitterwinter.org/

https://fofg.org/voices-of-support/bitter-winter-reporting-on-religious-persecution-in-china/

Bitter Winter is the blog of the founder of Eastern Lightning, a Christian fundamentalist cult responsible for at least one murder.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

StashAugustine
Mar 24, 2013

Do not trust in hope- it will betray you! Only faith and hatred sustain.

indigi posted:

it worked for everyone else in WWI

lolling that the SPD was the first socialist party to vote for the war

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply