|
Stultus Maximus posted:9/10, the cancer thing didn't pan out. 9.5, it wasn't cancer, it turned out it was actually microdick and sterility. Which the writer probably pitched but then the editor was like "c'mon man"
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 05:22 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 05:00 |
|
This is the article it’s from and this is the good timeline:
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 05:34 |
|
Platystemon posted:This is the article it’s from and this is the good timeline: I’m getting flashbacks to civilization tech charts.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 05:39 |
|
MazelTovCocktail posted:This is not good. Holy gently caress this is bad.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 05:56 |
|
I feel like I need to decouple myself from the poo poo going on in the world. The anger over Rittenhouse, the rage over Covid exploding again over here because it was an election year and no-one in government dared to pump the brakes before the fall/winter, the dread over Putin doing some more Anschluss... It's just not healthy at all.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 06:00 |
Duzzy Funlop posted:I feel like I need to decouple myself from the poo poo going on in the world. The anger over Rittenhouse, the rage over Covid exploding again over here because it was an election year and no-one in government dared to pump the brakes before the fall/winter, the dread over Putin doing some more Anschluss... My friend, I have one word for you. Weissdeutscheschaferhund.
|
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 06:03 |
|
BIG HEADLINE posted:I envision a near-future where pickup trucks roam neighborhoods with armed chuds in the cab hunting for Others and 'undesirables.' And when that future comes, I'm taking at least some of those fuckers with me. I misjudged you. You’re decent people imo.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 06:28 |
|
Bored As gently caress posted:Holy gently caress this is bad. —smooth-brained, "anti-imperialist"s I love this framing of Ukraine erecting defenses: https://twitter.com/RT_com/status/1461811016921137153?s=20 The RT Twitter hero image is :chefskiss:. Just the most deliberate "our mission is to unapologetically spread FUD". Vranyo, indeed.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 06:33 |
|
Duzzy Funlop posted:I feel like I need to decouple myself from the poo poo going on in the world. The anger over Rittenhouse, the rage over Covid exploding again over here because it was an election year and no-one in government dared to pump the brakes before the fall/winter, the dread over Putin doing some more Anschluss... At this point I don't think anyone could shame anyone for peacing out of the news cycle. Trying to follow all this stuff is hell. There's so much awful and there's so little that can be done about it.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 07:32 |
|
Wrong Theory posted:Alright, so, someone smarter than me (it's a low bar I promise), does this set any sort of precedent? Or am I wrong in how that works? I suspect nobody in a Wisconson court will submit evidence via Apple Airdrop for at least several years.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 07:34 |
|
There are potential positive developments in the Ahmaud Arbery murder case: https://twitter.com/ASFleischman/status/1461855436903231493 Apparently the Georgia citizens arrest law (since repealed) still required probable cause. "Black guy running away from you" or "black guy looking at a house" isn't probable cause, so the judge may potentially napalm the defense's argument in the judge's jury instructions. But it's still Georgia, so
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 07:59 |
|
All 3 of those fuckers need to be put away for life. A literal modern day lynching. gently caress them.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 08:09 |
|
Platystemon posted:This is the article it’s from and this is the good timeline:
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 10:04 |
|
ASAPI posted:I never thought I would see a 10/10 prediction from ‘97 And Wired too lmao
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 10:51 |
|
So would NATO actually intervene if Russia invaded Ukraine? I mean, Russia could feasibly knock out all of Ukraine’s critical infrastructure and then invade, and do the same for any country that helps the Ukrainians. Our critical infrastructure is so loving vulnerable it's ridiculous. Any attack by the SVR's or GRU's hackers could mean disaster. Would we really risk that?
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 10:57 |
|
Bored As gently caress posted:So would NATO actually intervene if Russia invaded Ukraine? I've always wondered if the "we will turn off your gas" threat to the EU would be balanced out by whoever gets paid for that gas just plain old offing Putin if he put them in that situation.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 11:00 |
Bulky Bartokomous posted:
Lol
|
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 11:13 |
|
I won't answer insults with insults. I'll try to have a good faith discussion. I see a spectrum of activity that people could argue would bar one from invoking self defense: Legal, Provacative Activity - He had it coming! Examples: wearing Dolphins gear to a Bills game; marching with your CHUD friends; telling offensive jokes; drawing the Prophet Mohammed | | Illegal, Non-Violent Activity - Jaywalking, curfew breaking, public intoxication, trespassing, vandalism, protesting | | Violent Activity - starting fights, robbery, attempted murder I'd argue that at the top of this spectrum nothing a person can do, no matter how distasteful, would bar them from claiming self defense if someone attacked them while they were doing it. In the middle category, I come to the same answer I think. Maybe there's a fact pattern out there I could think of, but it would be pretty rare. In the last category, I'd argue you almost certainly waive your right to self defense but, it can be recovered. Based all the video I saw, Rittenhouse was in Category I and II the entire time. I guess that makes me a racist. I'll have to start watching Fox News I guess and find a new internet discussion board to hang out on.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 13:00 |
|
Proud Christian Mom posted:insane right wingers go looking for a fight, starting to lose and blasting their way out of it is self-defense you say This is indeed the law in Florida. If the gunman at my protest had started shooting, he would not have been arrested or charged. I could be dead, he would walk, and there would be zero civil liability as well.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 13:10 |
Not gonna lie all the takes of "well legally this is actually consistent and the verdict is correct" while all ignoring the greater context of why a 17 year old was running around the streets during a riot with an AR15 in the first place really comes off as some "actually its ephebophilia" poo poo. I can't possibly give a gently caress with the logical decorum was perfectly preserved and the sanctity of the law upheld when the system backing it is a turd in the 1st place.
|
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 13:18 |
|
That Works posted:Not gonna lie all the takes of
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 13:24 |
|
That Works posted:Not gonna lie all the takes of Well, that's fair. As soon as you find a better system let me know. I'm not being snarky, I'm being serious. What is a better alternative to the rule of law? It sure sounds like you're advocating for mob rule, which is great if you're on the right side of the mob.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 13:34 |
|
maffew buildings posted:I've been saying for years I'll loving DIE for brands. I'm willing to kill for Golden Corral and I'm inspired as gently caress seeing this brave brand warrior did what was needed for their local capital generating property *There goes my hero national guard commercial song starts playing in the background*
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 13:40 |
|
Bulky Bartokomous posted:Well, that's fair. As soon as you find a better system let me know. I'm not being snarky, I'm being serious. What is a better alternative to the rule of law? It sure sounds like you're advocating for mob rule, which is great if you're on the right side of the mob. Lmao
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 13:42 |
|
Bulky Bartokomous posted:Well, that's fair. As soon as you find a better system let me know. I'm not being snarky, I'm being serious. What is a better alternative to the rule of law? It sure sounds like you're advocating for mob rule, which is great if you're on the right side of the mob. You're being serious while arguing "Mr. Washington you can't revolt against king George, that's illegal!" ?
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 13:48 |
|
Bored As gently caress posted:So would NATO actually intervene if Russia invaded Ukraine? I think the idea would be to just attempt to overrun the country while NATO is still loving around trying to figure out its plan, with a solid dose of misinformation and hacking to extend the window of "well we don't know if there's an INVASION per se, so we don't know if there's anything to intervene for." If you can extend strategic paralysis past the point where action would be relevant then NATO never has to take any action, and then everyone's happy except Ukraine.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 13:48 |
|
While my school had a bunch of confederate bullshit there was one famous alumni who was a semi famous civil rights advocate after he became a priest. He’s famous because he got sawed in half by multiple shotgun blasts from a part time cop and store owner that was about to execute a 10 year old black girl for trying to buy a soda. She was wounded, the priest was blown in loving half while he pushed her out of the way. Another priest was also shot in the back but survived in this incident. There is no debate over the facts of the case. The store owner/cop was acquitted on all counts. Yup nothing can be improved. There is no better system. Gotta trust the process. Butter Activities fucked around with this message at 13:53 on Nov 20, 2021 |
# ? Nov 20, 2021 13:51 |
Bulky Bartokomous posted:Well, that's fair. As soon as you find a better system let me know. I'm not being snarky, I'm being serious. What is a better alternative to the rule of law? It sure sounds like you're advocating for mob rule, which is great if you're on the right side of the mob. For leftists, minorities, the poor, women, etc you're already on the wrong side of the mob or whatever you want to call the legal system at present. Rule of law isn't really a thing when it only applies to selected groups / individuals. Anyway, there is no need (for me at least) to discuss this further itt.
|
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 13:57 |
|
Bulky Bartokomous posted:It sure sounds like you're advocating for mob rule, which is great if you're on the right side of the mob. Would ask you to look at just this situation as essentially that — a small pasty lumpus on the right side of the mob kills two people and injures a third, and sees no consequences due to mob capture of a well-intentioned system. The burden is not on others to think up an entirely new and better way before criticizing the current bad one! Towards a better way though — part of that mob capture is this intense and relentless media and thought promulgation system. It caught my dad, it caught multiple people at work who now are antivaxxing out of their profession… otherwise good people, caught by wicked, hateful, viral ideas and… infected. Then their infection is reinforced over, and over, and over, and over, and over (pretend I copy pasted another 100 times) This thread has talked about that before — the use of a media storm as a system of control: https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/04/how-the-media-became-putins-most-powerful-weapon/391062/ Younger people seem slightly more immune, through skepticism? Heck, I credit this site for helping expose me to other opinions I would never get living in the South. What else could be done about that? I would love to hear the screeching about prospective vaccines against Fox News. E:typo
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 13:57 |
|
That Works posted:For leftists, minorities, the poor, women, etc you're already on the wrong side of the mob or whatever you want to call the legal system at present. Rule of law isn't really a thing when it only applies to selected groups / individuals. Fair enough. I'll see myself out.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 13:58 |
|
That Works posted:I can't possibly give a gently caress with the logical decorum was perfectly preserved and the sanctity of the law upheld when the system backing it is a turd in the 1st place. stealie72 fucked around with this message at 14:02 on Nov 20, 2021 |
# ? Nov 20, 2021 13:59 |
|
Bulky Bartokomous posted:Fair enough. I'll see myself out. No... stop... don't.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 14:00 |
|
Laws are just a vibe, that resonate based on ethnic/socioeconomic status
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 14:01 |
|
SMEGMA_MAIL posted:While my school had a bunch of confederate bullshit there was one famous alumni who was a semi famous civil rights advocate after he became a priest. Hey, it's either white supremacist militia violence or no laws at all. This is the choice. I am definitely arguing in good faith.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 14:02 |
|
SMEGMA_MAIL posted:While my school had a bunch of confederate bullshit there was one famous alumni who was a semi famous civil rights advocate after he became a priest. Clearly the only alternative to rule of law is not modifying said rules, but mob rule like what all those bad guys did in that Batman movie with Bane and Scarecrow
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 14:03 |
|
Duzzy Funlop posted:I feel like I need to decouple myself from the poo poo going on in the world. The anger over Rittenhouse, the rage over Covid exploding again over here because it was an election year and no-one in government dared to pump the brakes before the fall/winter, the dread over Putin doing some more Anschluss... Do it. I’ve backed off all that poo poo completely and my life is significantly better for it. I just don’t really give a poo poo any more and it’s way better than getting mad about things I can’t do anything about.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 14:16 |
|
Hey, I wonder how the Rittenhouse verdict is being interpreted... https://twitter.com/MichaelEHayden/status/1461764866847432706
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 15:11 |
|
The right wing twitterverse is also spamming out disgusting memes glorifying what he did, as well. It's disgusting. They act as if the chubby ignorant dumbass even knew the guy was a sex predator before he shot him.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 15:21 |
|
That Works posted:Not gonna lie all the takes of Right. The end result is the enaction of the classic “there will be blood in the streets” scenario, used against the idea of people carrying weapons and going lethal in what would otherwise be nonviolent or street brawl encounters rather than homicides with the added bonus of stray rounds flying through town. “The fastest gun in the west” wasn’t meant to mean the first guy to figure out a legal tripwire might’ve been ticked and start killing people. In the micro sense, I see how the case created reasonable doubt. But now we’re all supposed to watch a guy with a longarm run around in crowds, raise his weapon to flag people, but do nothing about it unless either A: the person starts murdering B: someone does something to the guy with the gun, at which point good luck knowing who is an active shooter vs who is assaulting a (technically) law abiding gun carrier. The right wing response to this has not been to say “this was a rare and unfortunate blood in the streets scenario.” It has been to cheer that this is the intended blood in the streets outcome.
|
# ? Nov 20, 2021 15:21 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 05:00 |
|
Look at these loving scumbag pieces of poo poo: https://twitter.com/FPWellman/status/1461765540737863693?s=20 https://twitter.com/MichaelEHayden/status/1461764866847432706?s=20 https://twitter.com/TeaPainUSA/status/1462055446873882624?s=20 All the experts on white supremacists and right wing terrorists are ringing the alarm bells. https://twitter.com/MalcolmNance/status/1461859449111560211?s=20 https://twitter.com/MichaelEHayden/status/1461764866847432706?s=20 Also look at these loving crybabies whining and moaning about Black Rifle Coffee not supporting Rittenhouse and *GASP* doing an article with the NYT. OH GOD THE HORROR https://www.revolver.news/2021/07/black-rifle-coffee-new-york-times/ Aaaaaand a palate cleanser: https://twitter.com/pptsapper/status/1462067188043554819?s=20 Bored As Fuck fucked around with this message at 16:46 on Nov 20, 2021 |
# ? Nov 20, 2021 16:03 |