Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: fart simpson)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Morbus
May 18, 2004

brugroffil posted:

I guess they should have gotten those nuclear weapons more quickly.

it is generally advisable to do that before talking mad poo poo, yes

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

spacemang_spliff
Nov 29, 2014

wide pickle

lmao

Fellatio del Toro
Mar 21, 2009

dont worry those guys are just big fans of us marine scout snipers

Vernii
Dec 7, 2006

Reminder that the USAF plastered the poo poo out of a Wagner battalion in Syria a few years back which burnishes the DoD's antifascist credentials.

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

Russian state media is reporting there has been a serious "vibe shift" in ukraine, and the Hypebeast era may be coming to a close

Torpor
Oct 20, 2008

.. and now for my next trick, I'll pretend to be a political commentator...

HONK HONK
the biggest lesson in all of this is a) get nuclear weapons and b) never give up nuclear weapons.

brugroffil
Nov 30, 2015


Putin: Our strategy is this: We will fight them over there so we do not have to face them in the Russian Federation!




"leftists": yes this invasion is totally 100% justified

Fly Molo posted:

no it wasn’t it kept getting delayed

The delays started in November, isn't then when Russia began their slow buildup?

Truga
May 4, 2014
Lipstick Apathy

brugroffil posted:

I guess they should have gotten those nuclear weapons more quickly.

my opinion is still that russia should have sent a couple hundred nukes to cuba and keep them there until they get their geopolitical goals done, this war bullshit sucks

Zurtilik
Oct 23, 2015

The Biggest Brain in Guardia

Torpor posted:

the biggest lesson in all of this is a) get nuclear weapons and b) never give up nuclear weapons.

Poor South Africa.

a primate
Jun 2, 2010

*carefully counting the number of nazis on either side to justify civilian deaths*

AnimeIsTrash
Jun 30, 2018
Probation
Can't post for 43 minutes!

Karl Barks posted:

Russian state media is reporting there has been a serious "vibe shift" in ukraine, and the Hypebeast era may be coming to a close

turn up

barnold
Dec 16, 2011


what do u do when yuo're born to play fps? guess there's nothing left to do but play fps. boom headshot
russia should just join NATO. problem solved

Schnorkles
Apr 30, 2015

It's a little bit juvenile, but it's simple and it's timeless.

We let it be known that Schnorkles, for a snack, eats tiny pieces of shit.

You're picturing it and you're talking about it. That's a win in my book.

Al-Saqr posted:

hmmm it’s been several hours since the last major update I wonder what’s going on with the war…

i genuinely wish there was some sense of how things are shaking out, everyone on the ukranians side is saying millions of Russian tanks are dying on the gates of Kiev while the Russian side is playing dead silent and it seems like they’re making slow but steady progress

Security analysts seem to mostly say that Ukraine is fighting a long slow defeat but that they're more successful than Russia probably anticipated.

Archduke Frantz Fanon
Sep 7, 2004

if russia wanted the us to back their pipeline they should have made a few detours through the poor or black areas of american urban centers

would have been approved instantly

Normie Chomsky
Apr 10, 2008


barnold posted:

russia should just join NATO. problem solved

then russia would be justified to civil war itself

Torpor
Oct 20, 2008

.. and now for my next trick, I'll pretend to be a political commentator...

HONK HONK

Karl Barks posted:

Russian state media is reporting there has been a serious "vibe shift" in ukraine, and the Hypebeast era may be coming to a close

the important questions like “how’s the vibes going in this war?”

vyelkin
Jan 2, 2011

blue squares posted:

Why is Russia willing to go to war over NATO? What does NATO actually do other than say "We don't like Russia and if Russia attacks one of us, we will fight together"? It's not as if NATO countries would ever attack Russia preemptively. It seems to me like the only point of NATO is to prevent Russia from expanding its borders through war? But if so, then Russia would have no reason to attack Ukraine to prevent them from joining if they were never planning on expanding there anyway.

Obviously there is a reason other than that, so I don't get it. I am a noob at politics in this region

the short version is that there is a very long history of Russia being invaded by outside powers, especially by Europe. You can go back as far in history as you want for this: the Mongols, the Poles, the Swedes, but in more recent history Napoleon invaded in 1812 and Germany invaded in 1914 and 1941, and every time it happened it was more devastating than the time before.

the solution the Soviet leadership came up with in 1945 was to establish an ironclad buffer zone outside of the USSR's own borders in the form of the Eastern Bloc/Warsaw Pact nations. Part of the whole idea of setting up the satellite states was so that when (not if, when) the capitalists decided the time was right to crush socialism with military force, then at least the fighting would start somewhere else. A lot of Soviet actions during the Cold War should be understood through the desire to preserve this paradigm, for example through intervention to preserve pro-Soviet governments on the USSR's borders in Hungary in 1956, in Czechoslovakia in 1968, or in Afghanistan in 1979. You don't have to agree with those choices to understand why they were made, and the reasons why they were made are pretty obvious.

NATO is rightfully seen as an anti-Russian alliance, because it was created as an anti-Soviet alliance and then didn't disband when the USSR ceased to exist. Instead it expanded, first into the states that used to be the Soviet buffer zone and then into the states that used to be part of the Soviet Union itself. For Russia, as a country that sees itself as a great power with legitimate strategic interests just like anybody else, that means losing the defensive territory that their geopolitical interests demand and instead placing what is very clearly a hostile military alliance directly on their borders.

NATO is constructed as a defensive alliance, but from the Russian perspective there's more to it than that. NATO has not historically restricted itself to a purely defensive role, as demonstrated by its bombing campaigns in Yugoslavia in the 90s and its invasion of Afghanistan after 9/11. From the Kremlin, NATO doesn't just look like a defensive alliance set up to protect its countries from potential Russian aggression, it looks like a regular old military alliance where the members support each other in both offensive and defensive military campaigns, and that was created and continues to exist primarily to counter Russian strength in Eastern Europe. For Russia, a country that has not only political and military interests in its neighbours but also cultural, social, and economic interests there, that looks like an existential threat designed to slowly weaken, isolate, and marginalize Russia so that other countries can boss it around.

As a result, it has been longstanding Soviet and Russian foreign policy not to have NATO expand into Eastern Europe. Gorbachev told Bush I that NATO shouldn't expand into Eastern Europe, Yeltsin told Clinton that NATO shouldn't expand into Eastern Europe, Putin and Medvedev both told Bush II that NATO shouldn't expand into Eastern Europe, and the West ignored them because they lost the Cold War so they don't get to decide how the winners conduct their business, and up until 2008 Russia was too weak and the West too strong to do anything about it. That is demonstrably no longer the case.

You can acknowledge that Putin's ultimate decision to invade Ukraine was wrong while still understanding how and why it came to be, and none of the talk about how Ukraine is a sovereign country that should have the right to decide its own future (true!) is going to change the fact that its interests fundamentally differ from Russia's interests and the West strung Ukraine along and then hung it out to dry.

spacemang_spliff
Nov 29, 2014

wide pickle

brugroffil posted:

When did NATO last invade Russian territory?

100% justified in preemptive invasion of another country, lol

what do you expect Russia to do? Wait to be surround by countries with nuclear weapons that are openly hostile to them?

seems like we've been on this course for decades, this isn't like the US invading Iraq

StashAugustine
Mar 24, 2013

Do not trust in hope- it will betray you! Only faith and hatred sustain.

brugroffil posted:

Putin: Our strategy is this: We will fight them over there so we do not have to face them in the Russian Federation!




"leftists": yes this invasion is totally 100% justified

The delays started in November, isn't then when Russia began their slow buildup?

again not to say this makes the invasion right or good, but nato absolutely poses way more of a threat to russia than iraq did to the us lmao

Truga
May 4, 2014
Lipstick Apathy

barnold posted:

russia should just join NATO. problem solved

they asked, nato didn't take them because they were weak lmafo

what a loving blunder

lollontee
Nov 4, 2014
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!
i am extremely calm

Al-Saqr
Nov 11, 2007

One Day I Will Return To Your Side.

Karl Barks posted:

Russian state media is reporting there has been a serious "vibe shift" in ukraine, and the Hypebeast era may be coming to a close


lol what does this even mean

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

brugroffil posted:

I don't think "this country will join NATO" justifies Russian invasion and overthrow of their government. Ultimately force rules at the end of the day so it doesn't matter what's "justified" or not, but it was Putin's choice to invade.

I'm also not sure that there's good reason to believe that even full Minsk 2 and NS2 coming online would be enough. The rhetoric and demands from Putin over the last couple of weeks are way more expansive than that.

Yeah this basically. There is plenty of room for criticism of the west's actions over the past decades, but this is not a "defensive" invasion by Russia and there's no justification for it.

it wasn't 'maybe they'll join NATO' it was 'Ukraine seems to think joining NATO is their inevitable right and are openly posturing about how many troops they'll have on Russia's border' including Zelensky getting spicy about 'well maybe we should have nukes on that border too'.

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

brugroffil posted:

The pipeline was pretty much on track until Russia started building up military forces though?

It was not “on track”.

Christ, I know people don’t understand military postures but quickly -

Mobilizing, Concentrating and Working Up forces during diplomatic talks is a signal the talks are not proceeding. The build up was in response to being stonewalled.

The reason we believed there would be no invasion was that the “ask” (sign Minsk II) was so small relative the potential “cost” (Ukraine obliterated) that we thought it would be insane to further stall.

When you back someone into a corner, ignore their attempts to talk it out, they square up, you continue to ignore them, you say “we’re done here. What are you going to do, hit me?”

Sometimes they hit you.

Torpor
Oct 20, 2008

.. and now for my next trick, I'll pretend to be a political commentator...

HONK HONK

Truga posted:

my opinion is still that russia should have sent a couple hundred nukes to cuba and keep them there until they get their geopolitical goals done, this war bullshit sucks

Cuba actually had like 160 tactical nukes during the crisis that the US wasn’t aware of and had the us invaded it would have been a nightmare.

fits my needs
Jan 1, 2011

Grimey Drawer
https://twitter.com/CBSNews/status/1496888911565672449?s=20&t=qMr8i4n79jKBvkG7u9ox4g

Lostconfused
Oct 1, 2008

AFancyQuestionMark posted:

Last week: lol where's your invasion shitlibs

Today: lol russia had no choice but to invade because of nato

Nice to see you're still here.

pissinthewind
Nov 11, 2021

civilian casualties bad
azov battaltion disappearing the second a real fight breaks out hilarious
neo-ussr also hilarious

Fellatio del Toro
Mar 21, 2009


thank u george

Harry Potter on Ice
Nov 4, 2006


IF IM NOT BITCHING ABOUT HOW SHITTY MY LIFE IS, REPORT ME FOR MY ACCOUNT HAS BEEN HIJACKED

Al-Saqr posted:

lol what does this even mean

Buy Nike boots not trainers

Frosted Flake
Sep 13, 2011

Semper Shitpost Ubique

Control Volume posted:

Lolling at this sentence. Fantastic content everyone

What do you think “war is a continuation of politics by other means” means idiot?

brugroffil
Nov 30, 2015


Frosted Flake posted:

It was not “on track”.

Christ, I know people don’t understand military postures but quickly -

Mobilizing, Concentrating and Working Up forces during diplomatic talks is a signal the talks are not proceeding. The build up was in response to being stonewalled.

The reason we believed there would be no invasion was that the “ask” (sign Minsk II) was so small relative the potential “cost” (Ukraine obliterated) that we thought it would be insane to further stall.

When you back someone into a corner, ignore their attempts to talk it out, they square up, you continue to ignore them, you say “we’re done here. What are you going to do, hit me?”

Sometimes they hit you.

The asks were well beyond Minsk 2, at least in the last few weeks.

Al-Saqr
Nov 11, 2007

One Day I Will Return To Your Side.
awesome thanks for the vote of confidence america:-

https://twitter.com/ragipsoylu/status/1496895423772086282?s=20&t=0EVXjc0Dp3xfK4BAu1BreQ

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

The Real Amethyst posted:

Likewise if you're a marxist and you're posting poo poo like "I hope Ukraine gets steamrolled and every nazi is murdered" in he face of footage such as https://mobile.twitter.com/girkingirkin/status/1496854488933715972?s=21 and then maybe it's time for some self-reflection also.

to be slightly fair this one doesn't seem to be intentional but rather the result of one of the missiles being a dud

Morbus
May 18, 2004

MLSM posted:

Nobody said russia was leftist you dumbass

What we’re saying is russia is 100% justified in preventing Ukraine from joining a nuclear military alliance given the last 30 years of nato bullshit in the region hth

There's a difference between understanding why russia is doing what it is, and justifying the way they are doing it. And there's a further difference between justifying it, and cheering in soyfaced glee over some imagined righteous insult to american empire (especially considering the US pushed as hard as possible to achieve this very outcome).

animist
Aug 28, 2018

Al-Saqr posted:

lol what does this even mean

theyre gonna start getting into techwear instead of sneakers

Lostconfused
Oct 1, 2008

https://twitter.com/swanfull2_0/status/1496777740736995331

MLSM
Apr 3, 2021

by Azathoth

brugroffil posted:

When did NATO last invade Russian territory?

100% justified in preemptive invasion of another country, lol

Dude how are you so ignorant of the situation lmao

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

Al-Saqr posted:

lol what does this even mean

Ukrainians are no longer listening to Drake, but now prefer the musical styling of lil durk

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

MLSM
Apr 3, 2021

by Azathoth

Excellent news. Any word on zelensky and collaborators being taken into custody?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply