Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
The Senate is working on a deal where the Republicans agree to stop filibustering the new Covid aid package in exchange for allowing an amendment to prevent Biden from lifting Title 42 until they submit a plan to deal with the expected surge in migrants following its lifting.

Schumer has had a policy of not allowing amendment votes for most major spending bills; which has annoyed both Republicans and other Democrats. This would lift his policy just for this bill and then go back to not allowing amendments.

quote:

Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the caucus’ No. 2 and No. 3 leaders, said in interviews that the GOP’s desired vote is worth taking in order to shake loose the stalled Covid bill. What’s more, if they don’t give in, Republicans could make the same demand on other bills and potentially stall more Democratic priorities.

“I’m old-school,” Durbin said. “Amendments on the floor, it’s part of the assignment. And now we have people scared to death of all amendments on both sides. And I think that really is taking away from this place.”

Still, both he and Murray said the decision was ultimately up to Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, who has called the GOP’s push “extraneous” and supports the Biden administration’s decision to end the deportation policy known as Title 42. Democrats are unsure whether they could defeat an amendment on the issue that requires 60 votes to pass, but Murray said she supported holding a vote to unstick the Senate floor: “All I know is, we need to get Covid funding done.”

quote:

Biden’s decision to end the policy is splitting the Democratic caucus. Several vulnerable incumbents have called for Biden to reverse course on rolling back the deportation limits, pushing instead for bipartisan legislation from Sens. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) and James Lankford (R-Okla.) that requires the administration to have a plan in place to address an anticipated surge in border crossings. While the administration last month sought to appease those concerns by releasing a memo on its plan, some Democratic senators saw that as insufficient.

Democratic supporters of easing the Covid-related migration constraint don’t want to see the Senate take up a GOP amendment that’s likely to pass, given the interest from their own party’s senators up for re-election as well as those from purple states. In a 50-50 Senate, Democrats could only lose 9 of their members to vote against any Title 42 amendment at a 60-vote threshold.

“That’s not my decision, it’s the leader’s decision. But Title 42 has nothing to do with coronavirus [aid], and from my perspective, if Republicans want to play with the nation’s health security, they should pay a price for it,” said Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), who warned that Democrats should not fall for what he called Republicans’ “political trap.”

quote:

Still, for some Democratic senators, the vote on border policy is inevitable.

“Whether we should or not, I think we’re going to,” said Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) “I’m a big believer that there ought to be amendment votes on bills. So whether or not it would be my preferred amendment ... I think they’re going to say ‘hey, if you want to have a Covid bill, we want to have a vote on this’ ... That’s the way I’ve been seeing it for a while.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/10/democrats-border-gop-covid-aid-00031371

Fister Roboto posted:

I don't think it's unreasonable to be wary of liberals who only start caring about issues when they affect them personally. Because that means it's very likely that they'll stop caring again when they are no longer affected, and even go so far as to scold the people who do continue to care. In the end it's not very effective for building a sustained movement that protects all people, and just becomes about protecting relatively well-off white people.

Seems like protecting abortion in exchange for making liberals who don't pay attention to politics feel proud before they stop paying attention again is a pretty good deal.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

selec
Sep 6, 2003

Professor Beetus posted:

At least this post is essentially saying "I disagree with the majority of democratic voters about what is a sufficient means of fighting for a right," which is not hinging on a disprovable of others' motivations.

I have faith in the motivations of most Dem voters, if also believing that most of them have been inculcated into beliefs about society that it’s really hard to tear them away from.

I’m being serious when I say the level of capitalist indoctrination in this country requires years of deprogramming for most individuals, and is impossible for a lot of people. In the same way there are emotions that Americans cannot experience because we were not raised in a culture that has a name or understanding of those emotions, for some people it’s an impossible barrier to escape the mainstream understanding of politics, a lie that has been consciously told by people who do not believe in it. In short, a lot of the ruling class believe in socialism, in the same way they believe that tigers exist, and have a similar desire to never meet either in the wild, and do a lot of work to ensure it never happens, and the product of that is visible in Americans politics, and possibly even in this thread from time to time.

VideoGameVet
May 14, 2005

It is by caffeine alone I set my bike in motion. It is by the juice of Java that pedaling acquires speed, the teeth acquire stains, stains become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my bike in motion.

Nonsense posted:

I find it difficult to believe that Republicans will settle on it remaining a state issue.

Mitch and others are already on record calling for a national ban.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/05/mitch-mcconnell-acknowledges-a-national-abortion-ban-is-possible-if-roe-is-overturned

And a slew of GOP elected and candidates are calling for the birth control ruling to be overturned.

https://sports.yahoo.com/republican-senate-candidate-endorsed-peter-012001327.html

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

Fister Roboto posted:

Yes, and people who are like that tend to be liberals. Self-interest is kind of a core component of liberalism.

:actually: it's a core component of conservatism/libertarianism/objectivism, but we're doing that thing where liberals are all the bad things, so cool I guess.

Heck Yes! Loam!
Nov 15, 2004

a rich, friable soil containing a relatively equal mixture of sand and silt and a somewhat smaller proportion of clay.

selec posted:

How often since Roe did leftists control the presidency and house?

That's my point. They aren't any more successful at protecting rights than the democrats. they try a lot harder and are much more honest about it, but the outcome is no different.

I've been fighting for climate change awareness my entire adult life, but I've lost that fight my entire life as well. Everyone knows about climate change but that has done absolutely nothing to stop the fright train. It is frustrating as hell, but I am not going to look at a young person today and tell them my past advocacy is the way forward because I've obviously failed to this point.

RBA Starblade
Apr 28, 2008

Going Home.

Games Idiot Court Jester

selec posted:

I have faith in the motivations of most Dem voters, if also believing that most of them have been inculcated into beliefs about society that it’s really hard to tear them away from.

I’m being serious when I say the level of capitalist indoctrination in this country requires years of deprogramming for most individuals, and is impossible for a lot of people. In the same way there are emotions that Americans cannot experience because we were not raised in a culture that has a name or understanding of those emotions, for some people it’s an impossible barrier to escape the mainstream understanding of politics, a lie that has been consciously told by people who do not believe in it. In short, a lot of the ruling class believe in socialism, in the same way they believe that tigers exist, and have a similar desire to never meet either in the wild, and do a lot of work to ensure it never happens, and the product of that is visible in Americans politics, and possibly even in this thread from time to time.

What emotions do you believe Americans are incapable of experiencing? Are you able to yourself?

Fister Roboto
Feb 21, 2008

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:


Seems like protecting abortion in exchange for making liberals who don't pay attention to politics feel proud before they stop paying attention again is a pretty good deal.

You completely missed the point of my post. Yes, if it ends with abortion being a protected right for EVERYONE then it is a good thing. But that is probably not what's going to happen.

Heck Yes! Loam!
Nov 15, 2004

a rich, friable soil containing a relatively equal mixture of sand and silt and a somewhat smaller proportion of clay.

RBA Starblade posted:

What emotions do you believe Americans are incapable of experiencing? Are you able to yourself?

yeah, sorry i have to know what emotions I am incapable of feeling because of capitalism. I love some good woo in my morning arguments.

Heck Yes! Loam! fucked around with this message at 18:19 on May 10, 2022

Leon Trotsky 2012
Aug 27, 2009

YOU CAN TRUST ME!*


*Israeli Government-affiliated poster
In 2021, congress made it so the CDC is finally able to study and report on gun violence again.

Hooray...?

They basically confirmed what everyone already knew, but put it in exact numbers:

- The increase in gun murders was huge.

quote:

Gun deaths reached the highest level ever recorded in the United States in 2020, the first year of the pandemic, the Centers for Disease Control reported on Tuesday. Gun-related homicides in particular rose by 35 percent, a surge that exacted an unprecedented toll on Black men, agency researchers said.

- Black people, especially black men under 40, are overwhelmingly the victims of gun crime.

quote:

Black Americans remained disproportionately affected by gun violence in 2020. Firearm homicide rates increased by 39.5 percent among Black people from 2019 to 2020, to 11,904. The victims were overwhelmingly young men.

The Johns Hopkins analysis found that young Black Americans accounted for 38 percent of all gun murder victims in 2020, though they represented just 2 percent of the U.S. population.

Black men aged 15 to 34 were more than 20 times more likely to be murdered with a gun than white men of the same age. The number of Black women killed by guns also increased by almost 50 percent in 2020, compared to 2019, Mr. Davis said.

- Gun suicide rates also rose, but they were primarily among middle-aged white men and very few were among young Black Americans.

https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1524073543935438853

quote:

Gun deaths surged during the pandemic’s first year, the C.D.C. reports.

Soaring rates were driven largely by gun-related homicides, which rose 35 percent from 2019 to 2020.

Gun deaths reached the highest level ever recorded in the United States in 2020, the first year of the pandemic, the Centers for Disease Control reported on Tuesday. Gun-related homicides in particular rose by 35 percent, a surge that exacted an unprecedented toll on Black men, agency researchers said.

“This is a historic increase, with the rate having reached the highest level in over 25 years,” Dr. Debra E. Houry, acting principal deputy director of the C.D.C. and the director of the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, said at a news briefing on Tuesday.

“We need to be vigilant in addressing the conditions that contribute to homicides and suicides and the disparities observed,” she added.

More than 45,000 Americans died in gun-related incidents as the pandemic spread in the United States, the highest number on record, federal data show. But more than half of gun deaths were suicides, and that number did not substantially increase from 2019 to 2020.

The overall rise in gun deaths was 15 percent in 2020, lower than the percentage increase in gun homicides, the C.D.C. said.

The rise in gun murders was the largest one-year increase seen in modern history, according to Ari Davis, a policy adviser at the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions, which recently released its own analysis of C.D.C. data.

He said preliminary figures suggest that gun deaths remained persistently high in 2021.

Federal officials and outside experts are not certain what caused the surge in gun deaths. The rise corresponded to accelerated sales of firearms as the pandemic spread and lockdowns became the norm, the C.D.C. noted.

But federal researchers also cited increased social, economic and psychological stressors; disruptions in routine health care; tension between police and community members following George Floyd’s murder; a rise in domestic violence; inequitable access to health care; and longstanding systemic racism that contributes to poor housing conditions, limited educational opportunities and high poverty rates.

Murders involving firearms were generally highest, and showed the largest increases, in impoverished communities.

“One possible explanation is stressors associated with the Covid pandemic that could have played a role, including changes and disruption to services and education, social isolation, housing instability and difficulty covering daily expenses,” said Thomas R. Simon, associate director for science at the agency’s division of violence prevention.

Black Americans remained disproportionately affected by gun violence in 2020. Firearm homicide rates increased by 39.5 percent among Black people from 2019 to 2020, to 11,904. The victims were overwhelmingly young men.

The Johns Hopkins analysis found that Black Americans accounted for 38 percent of all gun murder victims in 2020, though they represented just 2 percent of the U.S. population.

Black men aged 15 to 34 were more than 20 times more likely to be murdered with a gun than white men of the same age. The number of Black women killed by guns also increased by almost 50 percent in 2020, compared to 2019, Mr. Davis said.

Rising rates of gun-related homicides were seen in all racial and ethnic groups, the C.D.C. said — except among Americans of Asian and Pacific Islander descent, who saw a small decrease.

Gun-related suicides have long been more common among older white men. But in 2020, rates rose mostly sharply among Native Americans and Alaska Native groups.

“Suicides impact a different population, typically middle-aged to older white men in rural communities,” Mr. Davis said. “We’re going to need to develop different types of solutions to deal with different types of gun violence.”

selec
Sep 6, 2003

RBA Starblade posted:

What emotions do you believe Americans are incapable of experiencing? Are you able to yourself?

There are distinct emotions of mourning and bloodlust (these are at best analogies, and not exact matches) that are experienced in individual cultures that are simply not present in others, just to give one example.

I am no more able to feel these emotions than anyone else not acculturated to them.

You experience the emotions your culture has a space for, and don’t experience ones that it does not; it’s hella weird but it’s where the research is pointing.

Here’s some starter material:

https://www.npr.org/programs/invisibilia/530718193/emotions

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotions_and_culture

selec fucked around with this message at 18:22 on May 10, 2022

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Jaxyon posted:

It's non-existent.

They proposing a law they know won't pass, and if it came close they'd withdraw their support. You even pointed out the fact that they haven't even introduced the bill.

It's talk. They're not even wiling to go through the motions of pretending they'd ever support a bill.

When they do something, let me know, until then they are not pro-choice.

Actually, I crossed out "introduced" because I was on my phone and didn't have a chance to check. They have, in fact, introduced it.

I'm not really sure what would qualify as "do something" in your eyes, though. Two senators by themselves can't do much of anything, except refuse to join in on something that takes 50 or 60 votes to pass.

Fister Roboto
Feb 21, 2008

Jaxyon posted:

:actually: it's a core component of conservatism/libertarianism/objectivism, but we're doing that thing where liberals are all the bad things, so cool I guess.

If calling them conservatives or libertarians will make you feel better, then fine. People should be wary when conservatives hop onto a social movement because their support is usually only out of self-interest, and will end as soon as their interests are served. Is that better?

RBA Starblade
Apr 28, 2008

Going Home.

Games Idiot Court Jester

selec posted:

There are distinct emotions of mourning and bloodlust (these are at best analogies, and not exact matches) that are experienced in individual cultures that are simply not present in others, just to give one example.

I am no more able to feel these emotions than anyone else not acculturated to them.

You experience the emotions your culture has a space for, and don’t experience ones that it does not; it’s hella weird but it’s where the research is pointing.

Could you provide that research? I find it hard to believe Americans don't have a concept of bloodlust or the ability to mourn, not to mention the various subcultures in the country.

RBA Starblade fucked around with this message at 18:24 on May 10, 2022

selec
Sep 6, 2003

RBA Starblade posted:

Could you provide that research? I find it hard to believe Americans don't have a concept of bloodlust or the ability to mourn.

It’s not that we don’t have the ability, it’s that these are specifically different emotions than those, and you are not reading for understanding or not reading generously, and I’d ask you to start doing whichever of those you are not.

Start here:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotions_and_culture

Then listen to the second half of this:

https://www.npr.org/programs/invisibilia/530718193/emotions

Heck Yes! Loam!
Nov 15, 2004

a rich, friable soil containing a relatively equal mixture of sand and silt and a somewhat smaller proportion of clay.

selec posted:

There are distinct emotions of mourning and bloodlust (these are at best analogies, and not exact matches) that are experienced in individual cultures that are simply not present in others, just to give one example.

I am no more able to feel these emotions than anyone else not acculturated to them.

You experience the emotions your culture has a space for, and don’t experience ones that it does not; it’s hella weird but it’s where the research is pointing.

you're going to need to pony up on this because it goes against some pretty fundamental research in emotional psychology that would point to otherwise. The stimulus for emotions and preference for emotions will be culturally dependent, but the range and capability are not culturally dependent. The idea that you can culture emotions into or out of existence seems to be the basis for a sci-fi horror movie.

RBA Starblade
Apr 28, 2008

Going Home.

Games Idiot Court Jester

selec posted:

It’s not that we don’t have the ability, it’s that these are specifically different emotions than those, and you are not reading for understanding or not reading generously, and I’d ask you to start doing whichever of those you are not.

Start here:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotions_and_culture

Then listen to the second half of this:

https://www.npr.org/programs/invisibilia/530718193/emotions

I was hoping for actual research papers, but I guess NPR will do if that's what you've got.

Lib and let die
Aug 26, 2004

I think people are justifiably going to be, at the very least, skeptical of "new blood" into direct action communities/movements over Roe (or any controversial decision, really) - whether that direct action is overtly signalling to the ruling class that It'd Be A drat Shame If Something Happened To That Nice Home Of Yours, I Sure Hope You're Keeping Up On The Insurance Payments or ad-hoc leaderless networks of individuals moving women in and out of particular states for whatever medical procedure is legal/not legal where they need to be - the former especially. A sloppy, careless agent with no heed for opsec could easily compromise themselves and the women they cater to and ultimately the entire mutual aid network.

You don't get the benefit of going from "look you loving tankies just need to Be Realistic And Trust The Process, you entitled little shits" to "just thinking about Roe v Wade makes me want to burn this motherfucker down, comrade!" overnight without reservation from those whose movement you now attempt to join (and, so far as I'm concerned, attempt to co-opt). That's not how it works. This isn't the marvel loving universe where the kid from Captain America's childhood gets to now be a good guy because, "well gee howdy we just had some wrong preconceived notions that we had to sit down and talk through but it turns out we were on the same page all along!" - all this "new blood" trying to pour into direct action have been openly at odds with us for so long as any of us can remember and we don't loving trust you.

You want to get in on direct action and mutual aid? First thing you can do is sit down, shut up, and learn how it works.

Gumball Gumption
Jan 7, 2012

selec posted:

There are distinct emotions of mourning and bloodlust (these are at best analogies, and not exact matches) that are experienced in individual cultures that are simply not present in others, just to give one example.

I am no more able to feel these emotions than anyone else not acculturated to them.

You experience the emotions your culture has a space for, and don’t experience ones that it does not; it’s hella weird but it’s where the research is pointing.

Here’s some starter material:

https://www.npr.org/programs/invisibilia/530718193/emotions

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotions_and_culture

Just skimming through that wiki article it sounds like it's similar to a lot of other concepts and how we perceive through our senses and share those experiences. In the same way everyone who can see is general seeing the same spectrum of light the way we perceive those colors is influenced by our culture. Everyone can feel angry/happy/sad but your culture and external influences are what break "angry" into all the different emotions and words that are inside of angry. Your culture will change how to interpret those feelings which will change those feelings inside of you.

selec
Sep 6, 2003

Heck Yes! Loam! posted:

you're going to need to pony up on this because it goes against some pretty fundamental research in emotional psychology that would point to otherwise. The stimulus for emotions and preference for emotions will be culturally dependent, but the range and capability are not culturally dependent. The idea that you can culture emotions into or out of existence seems to be the basis for a sci-fi horror movie.

I ask you to explain to me a concept that our culture has no words or concepts for, because you insist this is possible. Language and culture define us very, very deeply, and though it seems counterintuitive to think so, you cannot know a thing unless you can name it, so having no name for it as a culture makes it invisible to the vast majority of people.

Edit:

Think about therapy; the most important thing to do initially for a LOT of people is learn to identify their emotions. People sometimes have to learn what anxiety is to be able to even describe how they feel.

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

Fister Roboto posted:

If calling them conservatives or libertarians will make you feel better, then fine. People should be wary when conservatives hop onto a social movement because their support is usually only out of self-interest, and will end as soon as their interests are served. Is that better?

They should be wary. When you decided it was a core component of a political philosophy where it wasn't, was the problem

Heck Yes! Loam!
Nov 15, 2004

a rich, friable soil containing a relatively equal mixture of sand and silt and a somewhat smaller proportion of clay.

Lib and let die posted:

I think people are justifiably going to be, at the very least, skeptical of "new blood" into direct action communities/movements over Roe (or any controversial decision, really) - whether that direct action is overtly signalling to the ruling class that It'd Be A drat Shame If Something Happened To That Nice Home Of Yours, I Sure Hope You're Keeping Up On The Insurance Payments or ad-hoc leaderless networks of individuals moving women in and out of particular states for whatever medical procedure is legal/not legal where they need to be - the former especially. A sloppy, careless agent with no heed for opsec could easily compromise themselves and the women they cater to and ultimately the entire mutual aid network.

You don't get the benefit of going from "look you loving tankies just need to Be Realistic And Trust The Process, you entitled little shits" to "just thinking about Roe v Wade makes me want to burn this motherfucker down, comrade!" overnight without reservation from those whose movement you now attempt to join (and, so far as I'm concerned, attempt to co-opt). That's not how it works. This isn't the marvel loving universe where the kid from Captain America's childhood gets to now be a good guy because, "well gee howdy we just had some wrong preconceived notions that we had to sit down and talk through but it turns out we were on the same page all along!" - all this "new blood" trying to pour into direct action have been openly at odds with us for so long as any of us can remember and we don't loving trust you.

You want to get in on direct action and mutual aid? First thing you can do is sit down, shut up, and learn how it works.

This is the completely wrong approach. Every year people age into being politically active, and when the old guard is actively hostile to them and new ideas on how to do things it only fractures the potential size of the movement. Telling an 18-year-old to learn the ways of the past and how they have failed is useful, but only to a point.

Jaxyon
Mar 7, 2016
I’m just saying I would like to see a man beat a woman in a cage. Just to be sure.

Main Paineframe posted:

Actually, I crossed out "introduced" because I was on my phone and didn't have a chance to check. They have, in fact, introduced it.

I'm not really sure what would qualify as "do something" in your eyes, though. Two senators by themselves can't do much of anything, except refuse to join in on something that takes 50 or 60 votes to pass.

Supporting a bill that has a chance of passing would be a great start.

Bel Shazar
Sep 14, 2012

selec posted:

There are distinct emotions of mourning and bloodlust (these are at best analogies, and not exact matches) that are experienced in individual cultures that are simply not present in others, just to give one example.

I am no more able to feel these emotions than anyone else not acculturated to them.

You experience the emotions your culture has a space for, and don’t experience ones that it does not; it’s hella weird but it’s where the research is pointing.

Here’s some starter material:

https://www.npr.org/programs/invisibilia/530718193/emotions

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emotions_and_culture

Your second link specifically states that emotions are universal.

Heck Yes! Loam!
Nov 15, 2004

a rich, friable soil containing a relatively equal mixture of sand and silt and a somewhat smaller proportion of clay.

selec posted:

I ask you to explain to me a concept that our culture has no words or concepts for, because you insist this is possible. Language and culture define us very, very deeply, and though it seems counterintuitive to think so, you cannot know a thing unless you can name it, so having no name for it as a culture makes it invisible to the vast majority of people.

Edit:

Think about therapy; the most important thing to do initially for a LOT of people is learn to identify their emotions. People sometimes have to learn what anxiety is to be able to even describe how they feel.

No, you're just completely misrepresenting research as woo bullshit.

selec
Sep 6, 2003

Bel Shazar posted:

Your second link specifically states that emotions are universal.

It literally says “according to some theories” right at the top buddy. Some others disagree, and I think the research is pointing more and more that way.

Cranappleberry
Jan 27, 2009

Heck Yes! Loam! posted:

This is the completely wrong approach. Every year people age into being politically active, and when the old guard is actively hostile to them and new ideas on how to do things it only fractures the potential size of the movement. Telling an 18-year-old to learn the ways of the past and how they have failed is useful, but only to a point.

A large issue is that in many places there is no institutional support from democrats or otherwise. Without support in hostile places, groups quickly dry up and for good reason. People who can leave do leave such areas. Often as new groups form and reform, they reinvent the wheel because there is no knowledge-base, cross-region or cross-movement support, either (there are exceptions to this)

The other issue is that in a lot of hostile places, there is a direct threat of physical and other harm to anyone who wants to participate. This threat comes from a powerful, militarized police, from other government security forces, from hired corporate security, from counter-protesting groups and just from the state in general (hey now they have another way to threaten to take away your kids or if you are a kid, to hunt you down). It's always been this way to a degree, but a technological panopticon has allowed for would-be participants to be found easily and targeted anywhere.

The idea of even a perfect, peaceful protest or strike that could lead to economic harm or violence has always made people iffy, especially if they are terrified of losing what little they do have. Now, they will try to find you anywhere. That's scary to a lot of people.

Lib and let die
Aug 26, 2004

Heck Yes! Loam! posted:

This is the completely wrong approach. --snip--

It's called opsec. The pigs and the spooks in government practice it. Any mutual aid network worth its salt does, too. People are risking jailtime or worse to provide shuttle services over state lines. Zero trust is the only way mutual aid succeeds when it has to function in an openly oppressive system such as the US has.

e: Cranappleberry makes the argument better than I do.

selec
Sep 6, 2003

Heck Yes! Loam! posted:

No, you're just completely misrepresenting research as woo bullshit.

Take it up with the anthropologists:

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/06/01/529876861/an-anthropologist-discovers-the-terrible-emotion-locked-in-a-word

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

Professor Beetus posted:

I mean if you read the press release it does show that much of her voting record at that point was supportive of reproductive health care. And part of political action at that level is to foster relationships like that. The fact that Collins and Murkowski have collapsed into spineless puddles in recent years doesn't really change that calculus.

It's from 2017, in other words 12 years after Collins voted to confirm Sam Alito the author of the leaked anti-Roe draft

In what way is voting for one of the most anti-abortion judges on the court consistent with "much of her voting record supporting reproductive health care", it's like saying well Mrs Lincoln you have to admit much of the evening at the theater was very nice.

Reminds of me of hearing how Hillary voted with Bernie 99% of the time sounds great except the 1% is all the important stuff

Bel Shazar
Sep 14, 2012

selec posted:

It literally says “according to some theories” right at the top buddy. Some others disagree, and I think the research is pointing more and more that way.

That's great. Your wikipedia link sucks for trying to make that point.

BiggerBoat
Sep 26, 2007

Don't you tell me my business again.

selec posted:

I have faith in the motivations of most Dem voters, if also believing that most of them have been inculcated into beliefs about society that it’s really hard to tear them away from.

I’m being serious when I say the level of capitalist indoctrination in this country requires years of deprogramming for most individuals, and is impossible for a lot of people.

Right?

"I work 55 hours a week with an rear end in a top hat boss for $15/hour, catch "points" every time I've 10 minutes late and paid off my student loans so why can't everybody else?"

"If you don't want medical bills, then just don't get sick and, if you do, make sure you have a job like mine that treats me like a slave so you only have to pay $15,000 for it instead of $125,000! Maybe they won't hold the time off you need for rehab, mandatory doctor visits and physical therapy against you and perhaps won't replace you with a kid fresh out of college with no children that'll work for $13.50."

So simple. Just spend every waking hour of your free time working like god intended. You can enjoy life when you're 70 or look forward to heaven when you're dead.

"Oh, look! There's a funny Pepsi commercial on the Tee Vee!"

Heck Yes! Loam!
Nov 15, 2004

a rich, friable soil containing a relatively equal mixture of sand and silt and a somewhat smaller proportion of clay.

That is not research. That's just a dude telling a story. stop peddling woo.

Cranappleberry posted:

A large issue is that in many places there is no institutional support from democrats or otherwise. Without support in hostile places, groups quickly dry up and for good reason. People who can leave do leave such areas. Often as new groups form and reform, they reinvent the wheel because there is no knowledge-base, cross-region or cross-movement support, either (there are exceptions to this)

The other issue is that in a lot of hostile places, there is a direct threat of physical and other harm to anyone who wants to participate. This threat comes from a powerful, militarized police, from other government security forces, from hired corporate security, from counter-protesting groups and just from the state in general (hey now they have another way to threaten to take away your kids or if you are a kid, to hunt you down). It's always been this way to a degree, but a technological panopticon has allowed for would-be participants to be found easily and targeted anywhere.

The idea of even a perfect, peaceful protest or strike that could lead to economic harm or violence has always made people iffy, especially if they are terrified of losing what little they do have. Now, they will try to find you anywhere. That's scary to a lot of people.

What does any of this have to do with the original point of getting upset at people joining your cause is counter-productive. op-sec is one thing, but hostility to new ideas and members is just self-defeating.

Heck Yes! Loam! fucked around with this message at 18:46 on May 10, 2022

RBA Starblade
Apr 28, 2008

Going Home.

Games Idiot Court Jester


The research you're referencing now is this man's wife died and he felt something that therapy didn't help but cathartic release did, and then this links to his book of poetry and photography.

Dick Trauma
Nov 30, 2007

God damn it, you've got to be kind.
Having been born into an era of dystopia and hopelessness I've been marinating in it for my entire life. Most of the time I think the best thing that I can do is donate money, get out of the way of people who still have hope and not drag the hopeful down into my pit.

selec
Sep 6, 2003

Heck Yes! Loam! posted:

That is not research. That's just a dude telling a story. stop peddling woo.

Is your assertion that this guy doesn’t know what he’s been studying for years or what? That the phenomena hasn’t been studied?

We are getting pretty anti-intellectual here in an attempt to own a poster.

Here’s a different expert in a different field who is saying the same thing:

https://amp.theguardian.com/books/2020/sep/25/im-extremely-controversial-the-psychologist-rethinking-human-emotion

Is she also a kook?

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!!
May 31, 2006

Heck Yes! Loam! posted:

This is the completely wrong approach. Every year people age into being politically active, and when the old guard is actively hostile to them and new ideas on how to do things it only fractures the potential size of the movement. Telling an 18-year-old to learn the ways of the past and how they have failed is useful, but only to a point.

18 year olds are not being referred to.
what is being referred to is you, and other people very freshly arrived to the revelation 'democrats had no intention of protecting abortion rights, and have no intention of doing so in the future.'

such people are welcome to join. their voices, due to their tremendous inexperience and long years of faulty thinking up to this point, are not going to be given serious consideration until such time as it is clear they have figured out -why- they were wrong in the first place.

you do not let an intern drive the forklift on their first day, because they could hurt themselves and a lot of the people around them. a similar principle applies.

you are a dangerous person, through minimal fault of your own, and will be treated as such by any organization interested in protecting its members, until such time as you are not.

Willa Rogers
Mar 11, 2005

Professor Beetus posted:

My point is that you are banging on about an unprovable because I have no idea what "people" means in this case because people very clearly have been mad and upset about the erosion of rights and have been active politically to try and push back against it. Who specifically are you talking about? It seems like you are making the exact same assumptions about others that you get angry about posters here making about you (i.e. all you're doing is posting about it).

Are you privy to the inner thoughts of everyone currently angry and up in arms about this? Do you know that they weren't volunteering with pro-choice groups or donating to them or writing letters to their congresspeople? The idea that you alone were mad about things for the past thirty years is narcissistic and absurd.

I never said I was the only one angry about this; I said I've watched liberals either ignore the ramifications of Casey or make excuses for anti-choice Dems over the past three decades.

I'm pretty sure that includes several dnd'ers of yore (bc I distinctly remember arguing with some trying to minimize Casey), but my anger hasn't been directed toward Oracle or dnd posters but rather the Dem party, as I've specifically laid out in subsequent posts.

I don't understand people trying to personalize this as an Angry Willa issue when I've made it clear whom I blame.

RBA Starblade
Apr 28, 2008

Going Home.

Games Idiot Court Jester

selec posted:

Is your assertion that this guy doesn’t know what he’s been studying for years or what? That the phenomena hasn’t been studied?

We are getting pretty anti-intellectual here in an attempt to own a poster.

He wasn't studying the emotion "liget" for years. He was studying the Ifugao tribe. He learned what it meant after he lost his wife.

Discendo Vox
Mar 21, 2013

We don't need to have that dialogue because it's obvious, trivial, and has already been had a thousand times.
Two Puerto Rican mayors have been arrested by the FBI in a large bribery conspiracy investigation.

Looking at the details, this is probably just the beginning; the two conspiracies appear to involve the same businesses, and the municipalities are geographically separated. Worth also noting that mayors are fairly significant figures in PR.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Lib and let die
Aug 26, 2004

Dick Trauma posted:

Having been born into an era of dystopia and hopelessness I've been marinating in it for my entire life. Most of the time I think the best thing that I can do is donate money, get out of the way of people who still have hope and not drag the hopeful down into my pit.

I will just say that as someone whose job aligns closely to the nonprofit sector...do your research. Food banks, shelters, clothing giveaways (sometimes your local Church can cover 2 out of 3 of these, and point you to a good shelter in your community) are key. Forget Habitat for Humanity, we've got way more houses already built than will ever be needed. 20 cans of $1 beans from the grocery store will do more good than a $100 check to Ronald McDonald House that some poo poo company like Blackbaud is going to take 15% of for themselves anyway.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply