Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Doc Hawkins
Jun 15, 2010

Dashing? But I'm not even moving!


quote:

Commuting: 50%
Going out to socialise: 50%
Buy a house/flat: 50%

why are these the same number

it could be any number, but that it's the same for all three is very confusing to me

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Starbucks
Jul 7, 2002

Your daily cup of fuck you.

A Buttery Pastry posted:

Looking it up again, the stats appear to be all over the place, and most everyone appears to be using mean values rather than average. And being pretty careless about using the term average when they actually mean median. It's entirely possible for the median to be £40k and the average to be £60k, if you have a bunch of bankers pulling the average up with insane incomes. Like, the stats I found had a median of £33k, and an average of £63k, because the top 10% made more than twice as much as the next 10%, who themselves made 3x the median.

I would also take into account a majority of the people who will be the first against the wall when the revolution comes get paid with capital gains / shares / dividends rather than through PAYE/ Income tax so the mean / median will also be skewed depending on what data is being used.

But two important things: 1. I am pretty terrible at objectively creating a data set or finding one which has the correct source of information 2. I am pretty comfortable with my current situation of not wanting to put in the effort.

I am very much in the UBI / Nationalisation of natural monopolies / Late Stage Capitalism is terrible camp so either way at a minimum people should be able to have basic needs, time for leisure, ability to have time to create or pursue something.

Quotey
Aug 16, 2006

We went out for lunch and then we stopped for some bubble tea.
people aren't very good with numbers in polls

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

Doc Hawkins posted:

why are these the same number

it could be any number, but that it's the same for all three is very confusing to me
I mean, it's probably not the same people voting yes on all of them. There are probably a bunch of people who think they shouldn't be socializing, but rather save up for a house with all the money saved. Like, you don't deserve a house if you're so unserious about your own financial health that you partake in things that bring you joy.

Starbucks posted:

I would also take into account a majority of the people who will be the first against the wall when the revolution comes get paid with capital gains / shares / dividends rather than through PAYE/ Income tax so the mean / median will also be skewed depending on what data is being used.

But two important things: 1. I am pretty terrible at objectively creating a data set or finding one which has the correct source of information 2. I am pretty comfortable with my current situation of not wanting to put in the effort.

I am very much in the UBI / Nationalisation of natural monopolies / Late Stage Capitalism is terrible camp so either way at a minimum people should be able to have basic needs, time for leisure, ability to have time to create or pursue something.
Yeah, the "objective number" is much less important than what kind of life people are able to live. Whether the real number is 40k or 60k isn't really super important when the reality is that a lot of people are being crushed.

gonadic io
Feb 16, 2011

>>=
https://twitter.com/FeileBelfast/status/1687166223899901963?s=20

Fleetwood
Mar 26, 2010


biggest hochul head in china

Private Speech posted:

I mean the UK doesn't even have food stamps, food insecurity is one of those things where the US is miles ahead.

At best you have free meals for the poorest of schoolchildren and food banks, which are funded and run on volunteer basis but despite that you still need a referral for them from social services and can use them only 3 times a month IIRC.

spacemang_spliff posted:

holy poo poo that is insane

mossyfisk
Nov 8, 2010

FF0000
Money is better than food stamps.

namesake
Jun 19, 2006

"When I was a girl, around 12 or 13, I had a fantasy that I'd grow up to marry Captain Scarlet, but he'd be busy fighting the Mysterons so I'd cuckold him with the sexiest people I could think of - Nigel Mansell, Pat Sharp and Mr. Blobby."

mossyfisk posted:

Money is better than food stamps.

We don't let the poor have that either though.

Tarnop
Nov 25, 2013

Pull me out

mossyfisk posted:

Money is better than food stamps.

Supermarkets have doubled the price of their budget food lines in the last year or two. Inflation for the poor is somewhere between 30 and 50%

Quotey
Aug 16, 2006

We went out for lunch and then we stopped for some bubble tea.

check this out. the nhs is beautiful

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-63707689

selections:

quote:

Energy bills: Patients prescribed heating as part of health trial
22 November 2022


Doctors are prescribing heating to patients with conditions that get worse in the cold as part of a health trial.

The Warm Home Prescription pilot paid to heat the homes of 28 low-income patients to avoid the cost of hospital care if they became more ill.

Michelle Davis, who has arthritis and serious pulmonary illness, had her energy bills paid for and said the difference was "mind-blowing".The mum-of-two teenage daughters took part in trial backed by NHS Gloucestershire between December 2021 and March 2022 when she didn't pay a penny to keep her home warm and bright and charge her mobility scooter.

"When the weather turns cold, I tend to seize up," she told the BBC. "It's very painful, my joints ache and my bones are like hot pokers."

In 2020 Ms Davis spent most of the winter in bed, trying to keep warm and was admitted to hospital with pneumonia and pleurisy. But not in winter 2021.

"You're not stuck in bed, you're not going to hospital, my children were able to have a life, they were able to go out and play and get cold," she said.

She welled up as she described being able to warm her kids pyjamas on radiators and have a good Christmas. "I was able to be a Mum," she added. "And my kids could be kids, not just carers."

This first trial achieved such good results, that it's being expanded to 150 households in NHS Gloucestershire's area, plus about 1,000 in Aberdeen and Teesside.

Energy Systems Catapult is the organisation behind the pilot. With the backing of GP surgeries and a local energy charity called Severn Wye, NHS social prescribers, who visit those with long-term conditions in their homes, were able to identify people who would benefit.

Dr Matt Lipson helped design the pilot programme and feels like this preventative step is a no-brainer for the health service.

"If we buy the energy people need but can't afford, they can keep warm at home and stay out of hospital," he said. "That would target support to where it's needed, save money overall and take pressure off the health service."

The change in patients was swift: "The NHS were telling us they were seeing a benefit much more quickly than pills and potions," Dr Lipson added. "It was taking days, not weeks and months."

they credit your account, dunno if a lad comes over to put a card in or anything. also, the Rt Hon Amber Rudd is on the Warm Homes Taskforce

dunno how much it's done over the last 10 months, didnt see a more recent article and didnt search far

Private Speech
Mar 30, 2011

I HAVE EVEN MORE WORTHLESS BEANIE BABIES IN MY COLLECTION THAN I HAVE WORTHLESS POSTS IN THE BEANIE BABY THREAD YET I STILL HAVE THE TEMERITY TO CRITICIZE OTHERS' COLLECTIONS

IF YOU SEE ME TALKING ABOUT BEANIE BABIES, PLEASE TELL ME TO

EAT. SHIT.


mossyfisk posted:

Money is better than food stamps.

That is debatable, combination of both would be best.

There are definitely people who make bad enough money decisions to starve themselves, but at the same time being able to have a bit of niceties/other necessities on top would be nice as well.

In an ideal world, since Britain has neither.

bedpan
Apr 23, 2008

Tarnop posted:

Supermarkets have doubled the price of their budget food lines in the last year or two. Inflation for the poor is somewhere between 30 and 50%

look at this fool who doesn't know that food technically is immune from inflation

Biplane
Jul 18, 2005

Private Speech posted:

That is debatable, combination of both would be best.

There are definitely people who make bad enough money decisions to starve themselves, but at the same time being able to have a bit of niceties/other necessities on top would be nice as well.

In an ideal world, since Britain has neither.

Money is always better.

Private Speech
Mar 30, 2011

I HAVE EVEN MORE WORTHLESS BEANIE BABIES IN MY COLLECTION THAN I HAVE WORTHLESS POSTS IN THE BEANIE BABY THREAD YET I STILL HAVE THE TEMERITY TO CRITICIZE OTHERS' COLLECTIONS

IF YOU SEE ME TALKING ABOUT BEANIE BABIES, PLEASE TELL ME TO

EAT. SHIT.


Biplane posted:

Money is always better.

I disagree, and also remember reading research how the restrictions sometimes help, particularly in families where someone is struggling with addiction. It also makes it harder for the money to be exploited away by unscrupulous profiteers who would squeeze blood from the stone if there was any.

I also read research how it causes issues when money is needed for bills or whatever, plus there's the whole hot food thing. Hence why I said both are best.

genericnick
Dec 26, 2012

Private Speech posted:

I disagree, and also remember reading research how the restrictions sometimes help, particularly in families where someone is struggling with addiction. It also makes it harder for the money to be exploited away by unscrupulous profiteers who would squeeze blood from the stone if there was any.

I also read research how it causes issues when money is needed for bills or whatever, plus there's the whole hot food thing. Hence why I said both are best.

Lol, nah. You're not going to protect people from profiteers by locking them into a special market for people no one gives a gently caress about.

namesake
Jun 19, 2006

"When I was a girl, around 12 or 13, I had a fantasy that I'd grow up to marry Captain Scarlet, but he'd be busy fighting the Mysterons so I'd cuckold him with the sexiest people I could think of - Nigel Mansell, Pat Sharp and Mr. Blobby."

Private Speech posted:

I disagree, and also remember reading research how the restrictions sometimes help, particularly in families where someone is struggling with addiction. It also makes it harder for the money to be exploited away by unscrupulous profiteers who would squeeze blood from the stone if there was any.

I also read research how it causes issues when money is needed for bills or whatever, plus there's the whole hot food thing. Hence why I said both are best.

This is sort of straying into the universal income versus universal services debate on the left because while it's totally true that airdropping cash onto people with serious addictions isn't going to lead to good outcomes for them and doing it for people in powerless situations like most renters limits its value it's not really the point. Neither policy as an abstract policy definitely sorts everyone out, it's all a question of what overall things do need to be set out according to a structural sort of timetable and where is it better to give a higher sense of allocative control to the individuals involved through a completely generic form of control like money while also dealing with the actual material forces being placed upon them. If you just give a heavy drug user £2k in their account due to benefit backlog payments with absolutely no other support then that's a serious risk, if you increase housing support payments without rent controls then the landlords end up with most if not all of it, but also how well can any list of permitted goods on a ration system reflect the diversity of diet that people prefer? To benefit the working class you can't just talk about abstract program, it has to include real communities and their real needs balanced with everyone else the program is supposed to help. That's not something to settle just by theory, it needs democratic participation.

Private Speech
Mar 30, 2011

I HAVE EVEN MORE WORTHLESS BEANIE BABIES IN MY COLLECTION THAN I HAVE WORTHLESS POSTS IN THE BEANIE BABY THREAD YET I STILL HAVE THE TEMERITY TO CRITICIZE OTHERS' COLLECTIONS

IF YOU SEE ME TALKING ABOUT BEANIE BABIES, PLEASE TELL ME TO

EAT. SHIT.


genericnick posted:

Lol, nah. You're not going to protect people from profiteers by locking them into a special market for people no one gives a gently caress about.

It's not really a special market, you just get it from most all food shops and always for the same prices.

Also there's not really a list, it's just money you can use on food. Like yes some things are excluded, but it's mostly only hot food that really matters.

quote:

Households CANNOT use SNAP benefits to buy:

Beer, wine, liquor, cigarettes, or tobacco
Vitamins, medicines, and supplements. If an item has a Supplement Facts label, it is considered a supplement and is not eligible for SNAP purchase.
Live animals (except shellfish, fish removed from water, and animals slaughtered prior to pick-up from the store).
Foods that are hot at the point of sale
Any nonfood items such as:
Pet foods
Cleaning supplies, paper products, and other household supplies.
Hygiene items, cosmetics

Private Speech has issued a correction as of 23:57 on Aug 3, 2023

Biplane
Jul 18, 2005

Private Speech posted:

I disagree, and also remember reading research how the restrictions sometimes help, particularly in families where someone is struggling with addiction. It also makes it harder for the money to be exploited away by unscrupulous profiteers who would squeeze blood from the stone if there was any.

I also read research how it causes issues when money is needed for bills or whatever, plus there's the whole hot food thing. Hence why I said both are best.

All poor people are addicts unable to control themselves in the presence of money, got it. Research!

Private Speech
Mar 30, 2011

I HAVE EVEN MORE WORTHLESS BEANIE BABIES IN MY COLLECTION THAN I HAVE WORTHLESS POSTS IN THE BEANIE BABY THREAD YET I STILL HAVE THE TEMERITY TO CRITICIZE OTHERS' COLLECTIONS

IF YOU SEE ME TALKING ABOUT BEANIE BABIES, PLEASE TELL ME TO

EAT. SHIT.


Biplane posted:

All poor people are addicts unable to control themselves in the presence of money, got it. Research!

The point is that you need to buy food anyway, so you at least can do so and having special money for it also frees up more money for other things.

mossyfisk
Nov 8, 2010

FF0000
People with serious addiction problems just sell food stamps for below their listed value. It is worse than money in every way, like a book voucher.

Biplane
Jul 18, 2005

Private Speech posted:

The point is that you need to buy food anyway, so you at least can do so and having special money for it also frees up more money for other things.

Which conservative think tank are you working for again?

Private Speech
Mar 30, 2011

I HAVE EVEN MORE WORTHLESS BEANIE BABIES IN MY COLLECTION THAN I HAVE WORTHLESS POSTS IN THE BEANIE BABY THREAD YET I STILL HAVE THE TEMERITY TO CRITICIZE OTHERS' COLLECTIONS

IF YOU SEE ME TALKING ABOUT BEANIE BABIES, PLEASE TELL ME TO

EAT. SHIT.


mossyfisk posted:

People with serious addiction problems just sell food stamps for below their listed value. It is worse than money in every way, like a book voucher.

I mean yeah, some people do, but it's a much higher friction thing/harder decision to do than if you just have money.

At some point with bad enough addiction you're willing to sell out yourself and your family and at that point very little matters, but that's not everyone. Also just getting money won't help any in that situation either.

e: Also it not being money makes it immune from (legal and semi-legal at least) debt collectors.

Yes, a sufficient - meaning much higher - universal income would be better, but if we're coming at it from a situation of "how do we prevent people starving" it's a very good start. And even then I would argue it would be better for it to exist alongside as a means-tested benefit rather than being replaced, for the same benefits as above.

Private Speech has issued a correction as of 00:35 on Aug 4, 2023

Biplane
Jul 18, 2005

Lmao

Tarnop
Nov 25, 2013

Pull me out

I would like the amount of food I can afford to stay the same month to month instead of dwindling forever

i am harry
Oct 14, 2003

I liked having a snap card for my food funds it made it very easy to feed my child healthy meals and keep that separate from the rest of the bills so we always had food no matter what.

Fleetwood
Mar 26, 2010


biggest hochul head in china

Quotey posted:

check this out. the nhs is beautiful

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-63707689

selections:

they credit your account, dunno if a lad comes over to put a card in or anything. also, the Rt Hon Amber Rudd is on the Warm Homes Taskforce

dunno how much it's done over the last 10 months, didnt see a more recent article and didnt search far

quote:

Academics estimate that cold homes cost NHS England £860m a year and that 10,000 people die every year due a cold home. But that research was completed before the current cost of living crisis took hold.

:piss:

means testing in a way that you need a debilitating condition to qualify for heat. let people have their dignity for fucks sake!

Jaeluni Asjil
Apr 18, 2018

Sorry I thought you were a landlord when I gave you your old avatar!

i am harry posted:

I liked having a snap card for my food funds it made it very easy to feed my child healthy meals and keep that separate from the rest of the bills so we always had food no matter what.

What is a snap card?

Biplane
Jul 18, 2005

Ten thousand people, at the very least, freeze to death in their homes every year, in the UK? That's actually crazy.

Oglethorpe
Aug 8, 2005

Biplane posted:

Ten thousand people, at the very least, freeze to death in their homes every year, in the UK? That's actually crazy.

Telluric Whistler
Sep 14, 2008


Jaeluni Asjil posted:

What is a snap card?

Pre-loaded debit card for people who receive food benefits (called SNAP in most places) in the states.

Food stamps used to be literal stamp books, and moving to SNAP cards made paying with food stamps a hell of a lot more convenient and less shaming (though you still need to check if the store you are visiting accepts SNAP)

Doc Hawkins
Jun 15, 2010

Dashing? But I'm not even moving!


Jaeluni Asjil posted:

What is a snap card?

supplemental nutrition assistance program, comes with a card that participating retailers will let you buy certain food items with, as opposed to physical tickets or "food stamps". also called an EBT card, and that's the sign that you can look for on a register to see if it's accepted.

it's in some ways more convenient than stamps but with stamps you would have to get change in cash, which you could save up to buy things you weren't supposed to like diapers, so thank goodness that loophole is eliminated.

e: f, snapped

Telluric Whistler
Sep 14, 2008


Doc Hawkins posted:

supplemental nutrition assistance program, comes with a card that participating retailers will let you buy certain food items with, as opposed to physical tickets or "food stamps". also called an EBT card, and that's the sign that you can look for on a register to see if it's accepted.

it's in some ways more convenient than stamps but with stamps you would have to get change in cash, which you could save up to buy things you weren't supposed to like diapers, so thank goodness that loophole is eliminated.

e: f, snapped

The latter part is a really important bit I missed. The money on the EBT card is non-transferrable and your purchases are limited to whatever the administrators of SNAP say you can have. Basically anything hygiene related is excluded, and grocery items that were hot are also excluded - which can be a big deal if you don't have reliable cooking tools / access, and also sucks because rotisserie chickens are a very cost and calorie efficient purchase.

Quotey
Aug 16, 2006

We went out for lunch and then we stopped for some bubble tea.

Biplane posted:

Ten thousand people, at the very least, freeze to death in their homes every year, in the UK? That's actually crazy.

The quote implies it’s due to knock on effects imo. I’ll have to have a look at the study later

I mean, it takes a good bit to actually freeze someone to death, we’re not living in Gotham here

Shogi
Nov 23, 2004

distant Pohjola

Biplane posted:

All poor people are addicts unable to control themselves in the presence of money, got it. Research!

clearly not what they said. all your posts on this have been dumb as gently caress tbh. money alone isn’t a magic bullet when people are already brutalised and I can tell you that with absolute certainty. there’s a lot more you have to do alongside that, or I guarantee the money will literally kill some people

bitmap
Aug 8, 2006

Bryter posted:

You stand accused of both having a cat and pursuing a hobby while ranked Social Grade D, citizen, how do you plead?

https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1686760961657520128

cartoonishly evil demon nation

Jaeluni Asjil
Apr 18, 2018

Sorry I thought you were a landlord when I gave you your old avatar!

Telluric Whistler posted:

The latter part is a really important bit I missed. The money on the EBT card is non-transferrable and your purchases are limited to whatever the administrators of SNAP say you can have. Basically anything hygiene related is excluded, and grocery items that were hot are also excluded - which can be a big deal if you don't have reliable cooking tools / access, and also sucks because rotisserie chickens are a very cost and calorie efficient purchase.

Wow so how do you pay for hygiene items or is this supposed to create "the great unwashed" sub-human "other"?

Facehammer
Mar 11, 2008

Bryter posted:

You stand accused of both having a cat and pursuing a hobby while ranked Social Grade D, citizen, how do you plead?

https://twitter.com/YouGov/status/1686760961657520128

The people voted for pain.

Jel Shaker
Apr 19, 2003

they do it best in america but for lots of people they want a completely destitute class of subhumans that they can point to when you ask for a raise

Private Speech
Mar 30, 2011

I HAVE EVEN MORE WORTHLESS BEANIE BABIES IN MY COLLECTION THAN I HAVE WORTHLESS POSTS IN THE BEANIE BABY THREAD YET I STILL HAVE THE TEMERITY TO CRITICIZE OTHERS' COLLECTIONS

IF YOU SEE ME TALKING ABOUT BEANIE BABIES, PLEASE TELL ME TO

EAT. SHIT.


Jaeluni Asjil posted:

Wow so how do you pay for hygiene items or is this supposed to create "the great unwashed" sub-human "other"?

I mean it's just for food, that's kindof the point. For other things you have either other benefits or work or other income.

Also it's pretty explicit what you can have, no cigarettes/alcohol/supplements/hot food (intended to exclude takeaways, but it does hit things like the aforementioned rotisserie chicken as well). Almost all food retailers participate too.

Private Speech has issued a correction as of 09:54 on Aug 4, 2023

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Tiger Millionaire
Jan 25, 2014

He'll eat your kids and fire your parents!
Jesus I don't agree with the means tested stuff over just giving people money for what they need but a lot of you are deliberately going out of your way to uncharitably read into the guys intent

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply