|
quote:Commuting: 50% why are these the same number it could be any number, but that it's the same for all three is very confusing to me
|
# ? Aug 3, 2023 18:47 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 04:09 |
|
A Buttery Pastry posted:Looking it up again, the stats appear to be all over the place, and most everyone appears to be using mean values rather than average. And being pretty careless about using the term average when they actually mean median. It's entirely possible for the median to be £40k and the average to be £60k, if you have a bunch of bankers pulling the average up with insane incomes. Like, the stats I found had a median of £33k, and an average of £63k, because the top 10% made more than twice as much as the next 10%, who themselves made 3x the median. I would also take into account a majority of the people who will be the first against the wall when the revolution comes get paid with capital gains / shares / dividends rather than through PAYE/ Income tax so the mean / median will also be skewed depending on what data is being used. But two important things: 1. I am pretty terrible at objectively creating a data set or finding one which has the correct source of information 2. I am pretty comfortable with my current situation of not wanting to put in the effort. I am very much in the UBI / Nationalisation of natural monopolies / Late Stage Capitalism is terrible camp so either way at a minimum people should be able to have basic needs, time for leisure, ability to have time to create or pursue something.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2023 18:56 |
|
people aren't very good with numbers in polls
|
# ? Aug 3, 2023 19:04 |
|
Doc Hawkins posted:why are these the same number Starbucks posted:I would also take into account a majority of the people who will be the first against the wall when the revolution comes get paid with capital gains / shares / dividends rather than through PAYE/ Income tax so the mean / median will also be skewed depending on what data is being used.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2023 19:24 |
|
https://twitter.com/FeileBelfast/status/1687166223899901963?s=20
|
# ? Aug 3, 2023 20:04 |
|
Private Speech posted:I mean the UK doesn't even have food stamps, food insecurity is one of those things where the US is miles ahead. spacemang_spliff posted:holy poo poo that is insane
|
# ? Aug 3, 2023 20:07 |
|
Money is better than food stamps.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2023 21:48 |
|
mossyfisk posted:Money is better than food stamps. We don't let the poor have that either though.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2023 23:15 |
|
mossyfisk posted:Money is better than food stamps. Supermarkets have doubled the price of their budget food lines in the last year or two. Inflation for the poor is somewhere between 30 and 50%
|
# ? Aug 3, 2023 23:19 |
|
check this out. the nhs is beautiful https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-63707689 selections: quote:Energy bills: Patients prescribed heating as part of health trial they credit your account, dunno if a lad comes over to put a card in or anything. also, the Rt Hon Amber Rudd is on the Warm Homes Taskforce dunno how much it's done over the last 10 months, didnt see a more recent article and didnt search far
|
# ? Aug 3, 2023 23:21 |
|
mossyfisk posted:Money is better than food stamps. That is debatable, combination of both would be best. There are definitely people who make bad enough money decisions to starve themselves, but at the same time being able to have a bit of niceties/other necessities on top would be nice as well. In an ideal world, since Britain has neither.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2023 23:29 |
|
Tarnop posted:Supermarkets have doubled the price of their budget food lines in the last year or two. Inflation for the poor is somewhere between 30 and 50% look at this fool who doesn't know that food technically is immune from inflation
|
# ? Aug 3, 2023 23:31 |
|
Private Speech posted:That is debatable, combination of both would be best. Money is always better.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2023 23:36 |
|
Biplane posted:Money is always better. I disagree, and also remember reading research how the restrictions sometimes help, particularly in families where someone is struggling with addiction. It also makes it harder for the money to be exploited away by unscrupulous profiteers who would squeeze blood from the stone if there was any. I also read research how it causes issues when money is needed for bills or whatever, plus there's the whole hot food thing. Hence why I said both are best.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2023 23:42 |
|
Private Speech posted:I disagree, and also remember reading research how the restrictions sometimes help, particularly in families where someone is struggling with addiction. It also makes it harder for the money to be exploited away by unscrupulous profiteers who would squeeze blood from the stone if there was any. Lol, nah. You're not going to protect people from profiteers by locking them into a special market for people no one gives a gently caress about.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2023 23:48 |
|
Private Speech posted:I disagree, and also remember reading research how the restrictions sometimes help, particularly in families where someone is struggling with addiction. It also makes it harder for the money to be exploited away by unscrupulous profiteers who would squeeze blood from the stone if there was any. This is sort of straying into the universal income versus universal services debate on the left because while it's totally true that airdropping cash onto people with serious addictions isn't going to lead to good outcomes for them and doing it for people in powerless situations like most renters limits its value it's not really the point. Neither policy as an abstract policy definitely sorts everyone out, it's all a question of what overall things do need to be set out according to a structural sort of timetable and where is it better to give a higher sense of allocative control to the individuals involved through a completely generic form of control like money while also dealing with the actual material forces being placed upon them. If you just give a heavy drug user £2k in their account due to benefit backlog payments with absolutely no other support then that's a serious risk, if you increase housing support payments without rent controls then the landlords end up with most if not all of it, but also how well can any list of permitted goods on a ration system reflect the diversity of diet that people prefer? To benefit the working class you can't just talk about abstract program, it has to include real communities and their real needs balanced with everyone else the program is supposed to help. That's not something to settle just by theory, it needs democratic participation.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2023 23:55 |
|
genericnick posted:Lol, nah. You're not going to protect people from profiteers by locking them into a special market for people no one gives a gently caress about. It's not really a special market, you just get it from most all food shops and always for the same prices. Also there's not really a list, it's just money you can use on food. Like yes some things are excluded, but it's mostly only hot food that really matters. quote:Households CANNOT use SNAP benefits to buy: Private Speech has issued a correction as of 23:57 on Aug 3, 2023 |
# ? Aug 3, 2023 23:55 |
|
Private Speech posted:I disagree, and also remember reading research how the restrictions sometimes help, particularly in families where someone is struggling with addiction. It also makes it harder for the money to be exploited away by unscrupulous profiteers who would squeeze blood from the stone if there was any. All poor people are addicts unable to control themselves in the presence of money, got it. Research!
|
# ? Aug 3, 2023 23:57 |
|
Biplane posted:All poor people are addicts unable to control themselves in the presence of money, got it. Research! The point is that you need to buy food anyway, so you at least can do so and having special money for it also frees up more money for other things.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2023 00:00 |
|
People with serious addiction problems just sell food stamps for below their listed value. It is worse than money in every way, like a book voucher.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2023 00:02 |
|
Private Speech posted:The point is that you need to buy food anyway, so you at least can do so and having special money for it also frees up more money for other things. Which conservative think tank are you working for again?
|
# ? Aug 4, 2023 00:04 |
|
mossyfisk posted:People with serious addiction problems just sell food stamps for below their listed value. It is worse than money in every way, like a book voucher. I mean yeah, some people do, but it's a much higher friction thing/harder decision to do than if you just have money. At some point with bad enough addiction you're willing to sell out yourself and your family and at that point very little matters, but that's not everyone. Also just getting money won't help any in that situation either. e: Also it not being money makes it immune from (legal and semi-legal at least) debt collectors. Yes, a sufficient - meaning much higher - universal income would be better, but if we're coming at it from a situation of "how do we prevent people starving" it's a very good start. And even then I would argue it would be better for it to exist alongside as a means-tested benefit rather than being replaced, for the same benefits as above. Private Speech has issued a correction as of 00:35 on Aug 4, 2023 |
# ? Aug 4, 2023 00:06 |
|
Lmao
|
# ? Aug 4, 2023 01:16 |
|
I would like the amount of food I can afford to stay the same month to month instead of dwindling forever
|
# ? Aug 4, 2023 01:19 |
|
I liked having a snap card for my food funds it made it very easy to feed my child healthy meals and keep that separate from the rest of the bills so we always had food no matter what.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2023 03:20 |
|
Quotey posted:check this out. the nhs is beautiful quote:Academics estimate that cold homes cost NHS England £860m a year and that 10,000 people die every year due a cold home. But that research was completed before the current cost of living crisis took hold. means testing in a way that you need a debilitating condition to qualify for heat. let people have their dignity for fucks sake!
|
# ? Aug 4, 2023 03:35 |
|
i am harry posted:I liked having a snap card for my food funds it made it very easy to feed my child healthy meals and keep that separate from the rest of the bills so we always had food no matter what. What is a snap card?
|
# ? Aug 4, 2023 04:15 |
|
Ten thousand people, at the very least, freeze to death in their homes every year, in the UK? That's actually crazy.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2023 04:39 |
|
Biplane posted:Ten thousand people, at the very least, freeze to death in their homes every year, in the UK? That's actually crazy.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2023 04:45 |
|
Jaeluni Asjil posted:What is a snap card? Pre-loaded debit card for people who receive food benefits (called SNAP in most places) in the states. Food stamps used to be literal stamp books, and moving to SNAP cards made paying with food stamps a hell of a lot more convenient and less shaming (though you still need to check if the store you are visiting accepts SNAP)
|
# ? Aug 4, 2023 04:49 |
|
Jaeluni Asjil posted:What is a snap card? supplemental nutrition assistance program, comes with a card that participating retailers will let you buy certain food items with, as opposed to physical tickets or "food stamps". also called an EBT card, and that's the sign that you can look for on a register to see if it's accepted. it's in some ways more convenient than stamps but with stamps you would have to get change in cash, which you could save up to buy things you weren't supposed to like diapers, so thank goodness that loophole is eliminated. e: f, snapped
|
# ? Aug 4, 2023 04:50 |
|
Doc Hawkins posted:supplemental nutrition assistance program, comes with a card that participating retailers will let you buy certain food items with, as opposed to physical tickets or "food stamps". also called an EBT card, and that's the sign that you can look for on a register to see if it's accepted. The latter part is a really important bit I missed. The money on the EBT card is non-transferrable and your purchases are limited to whatever the administrators of SNAP say you can have. Basically anything hygiene related is excluded, and grocery items that were hot are also excluded - which can be a big deal if you don't have reliable cooking tools / access, and also sucks because rotisserie chickens are a very cost and calorie efficient purchase.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2023 05:45 |
|
Biplane posted:Ten thousand people, at the very least, freeze to death in their homes every year, in the UK? That's actually crazy. The quote implies it’s due to knock on effects imo. I’ll have to have a look at the study later I mean, it takes a good bit to actually freeze someone to death, we’re not living in Gotham here
|
# ? Aug 4, 2023 06:14 |
|
Biplane posted:All poor people are addicts unable to control themselves in the presence of money, got it. Research! clearly not what they said. all your posts on this have been dumb as gently caress tbh. money alone isn’t a magic bullet when people are already brutalised and I can tell you that with absolute certainty. there’s a lot more you have to do alongside that, or I guarantee the money will literally kill some people
|
# ? Aug 4, 2023 06:33 |
|
Bryter posted:You stand accused of both having a cat and pursuing a hobby while ranked Social Grade D, citizen, how do you plead? cartoonishly evil demon nation
|
# ? Aug 4, 2023 08:32 |
|
Telluric Whistler posted:The latter part is a really important bit I missed. The money on the EBT card is non-transferrable and your purchases are limited to whatever the administrators of SNAP say you can have. Basically anything hygiene related is excluded, and grocery items that were hot are also excluded - which can be a big deal if you don't have reliable cooking tools / access, and also sucks because rotisserie chickens are a very cost and calorie efficient purchase. Wow so how do you pay for hygiene items or is this supposed to create "the great unwashed" sub-human "other"?
|
# ? Aug 4, 2023 08:49 |
|
Bryter posted:You stand accused of both having a cat and pursuing a hobby while ranked Social Grade D, citizen, how do you plead? The people voted for pain.
|
# ? Aug 4, 2023 09:20 |
|
they do it best in america but for lots of people they want a completely destitute class of subhumans that they can point to when you ask for a raise
|
# ? Aug 4, 2023 09:37 |
|
Jaeluni Asjil posted:Wow so how do you pay for hygiene items or is this supposed to create "the great unwashed" sub-human "other"? I mean it's just for food, that's kindof the point. For other things you have either other benefits or work or other income. Also it's pretty explicit what you can have, no cigarettes/alcohol/supplements/hot food (intended to exclude takeaways, but it does hit things like the aforementioned rotisserie chicken as well). Almost all food retailers participate too. Private Speech has issued a correction as of 09:54 on Aug 4, 2023 |
# ? Aug 4, 2023 09:51 |
|
|
# ? May 26, 2024 04:09 |
|
Jesus I don't agree with the means tested stuff over just giving people money for what they need but a lot of you are deliberately going out of your way to uncharitably read into the guys intent
|
# ? Aug 4, 2023 10:40 |