Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: OwlFancier, crispix)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Marmaduke!
May 19, 2009

Why would it do that!?
Yep it's a death spiral

Evergreen page snipe

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

His Divine Shadow
Aug 7, 2000

I'm not a fascist. I'm a priest. Fascists dress up in black and tell people what to do.
Hard to summon sympathy though, where I hang out I get exposed to a lot of the swedish suburban middle class person and I deeply loathe them and their well off (and wasteful) lives.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
It might be nice for the press to talk to the staff at the pubs and restaurants and cafes who are complaining that they just had their worst winter season on record and aren't getting any bonuses rather than the temporarily embarrassed discretionary spend people.

Mega Comrade
Apr 22, 2004

Listen buddy, we all got problems!

MeinPanzer posted:

It's time for this thread's favourite kind of journalism: the "help, we make £80k a year but we're poor" article: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/mar/04/middle-class-workers-mortgages-bills-tax.

Hmm, computer, enhance.

Right, so that's about £2,300 of his £4,400 take home accounted for, leaving £2k for everything else. Computer, zoom in again.



With a student loan type 2 his take home would be £4000. But he also mentions having a pension so would be less than that again.

MeinPanzer posted:

The kicker? They bought a £400k house, an electric SUV that must be £40k, regularly take expensive vacations--and do that all with a huge dose of financial help from their parents. Meanwhile my wife and I are doing just fine living in a house that costs less than half that amount, driving a used car that cost £4k, and taking modest vacations.

Cool where do you live? Cos £200k would net me a shed where I live. My mortgage DOUBLED this year, and even in the midlands where prices are lower I do feel for people being caught off guard after a decade of low interest.

As for the leased car, yeah I wouldn't get one but it's a dumb decision they are now locked into and a LOT of the pre-owned car market is fueled by those lease cars, so if those chumps didn't exist the 2nd hand market would get substantially pricier.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

I guess the thing that surprises me is that on those salaries I'd expect them to be doing better. I'm on less and not having similar issues, but then I've foregone the idea of home ownership or kids in the near term (if at all), so I guess it's more that the aspiration of a house and kids is unaffordable now, and yeah pretty much.

The Tories got what they wanted, the youth impoverished and in despair, and then they bitch about us not having kids.

Scikar
Nov 20, 2005

5? Seriously?

His Divine Shadow posted:

Hard to summon sympathy though, where I hang out I get exposed to a lot of the swedish suburban middle class person and I deeply loathe them and their well off (and wasteful) lives.

Yeah, the economic point is a valid one and not everyone in the article is necessarily an arsehole, but it's hard to be sympathetic towards people who share no sympathy themselves. Lowering taxes to rectify a cost of living crisis is straight up FYGM - yeah it helps if you're working in private sector, don't rely on public services and currently pay a lot of tax. But it leaves teachers and nurses on pay freezes while their cost of living continues to spike. Then there's the guy at the end - claims to be fine with paying his share of taxes as someone in the top 2%, but is annoyed by the state of public services - again the solution there is quite obviously to spend money on public services instead of enriching Tory donors. But he gives himself away in the end when he says he's jealous of other people who go on holidays as he can't afford to. As though all these holidaymakers he's jealous of aren't making their own sacrifices to afford them?

DreddyMatt
Nov 25, 2002
MY LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OF CURRENT EVENTS IS EXCEEDED ONLY BY MY UNQUENCHABLE THIRST FOR PISS. FUK U AMERIKKKA!!
Pretty hosed up that home ownership, children and the occasional meal out are now viewed as luxuries

Great country, A++ would recommend

Tai
Mar 8, 2006

Tesseraction posted:

The Tories got what they wanted, the youth impoverished and in despair, and then they bitch about us not having kids.

But we can always rely on immigrat.........

Jaeluni Asjil
Apr 18, 2018

Sorry I thought you were a landlord when I gave you your old avatar!

From what I gather (ok from watching too much Blaze channel), the Knights Templar had a complicated and not altogether adversarial relationship with the Muslamics.

Eg

quote:

Robert of St. Albans (died 1187)[1] was an English templar knight who converted to Islam from Christianity.[2] In 1187, he led an army for Saladin[3] against the Crusaders during the Battle of Hattin as well as the reconquest of Jerusalem,[4] which was at the time under the control of the Franks.[5]

Robert eventually married the niece of Saladin,[6] but was killed shortly after outside Jerusalem.[7]

Robert's conversion to Islam caused significant dismay among the Christians and sparked ill-will toward the Knights Templar in general.[8]


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_of_St._Albans

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Scikar posted:

Yeah, the economic point is a valid one and not everyone in the article is necessarily an arsehole, but it's hard to be sympathetic towards people who share no sympathy themselves. Lowering taxes to rectify a cost of living crisis is straight up FYGM
Yeah it's this. It's always an interview with the "you won't guess what this guy in the top 10% recommends to fix the economy (it's the same thing that benefits our board of directors)" type and never with the people downstream of that who are more affected and will never even get a look in at that life.

Jaeluni Asjil posted:

From what I gather (ok from watching too much Blaze channel), the Knights Templar had a complicated and not altogether adversarial relationship with the Muslamics.
The modern Knights Templar is just a racist group thinly disguised as a Freemasons knockoff though. I forget who, but one of England's fash heroes got kicked out of Hungary for being associated with them, as a group too racist even for Hungarian politics. One of Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lemon's friends.

xtothez
Jan 4, 2004


College Slice

His Divine Shadow posted:

If I focus on a single example, take modern led lamps, studies show they cost on average around 1500€ to replace and last on average 15 years, that is 150€ per year if it lasts that long.
"Vimes' LED headlights" doesn't have quite the same ring to it, sadly

MeinPanzer posted:

Right, so that's about £2,300 of his £4,400 take home accounted for, leaving £2k for everything else. Computer, zoom in again.

Ah, there it is! No way we can buy, say, a used car instead of leasing! Lots of conspicuously unexplained gaps in these budgets where money just happens to disappear. Also, the commonly identified culprit? Those dang taxes being too high for us honest middle class earners!
...
The kicker? They bought a £400k house, an electric SUV that must be £40k, regularly take expensive vacations--and do that all with a huge dose of financial help from their parents.

The thing that immediately stood out to me here is that the guy is paying bare minimum into a pension and wants to pay less. The first advice people with this level of income get is to increase pension contributions where possible, as it's <=50p per £1 in your pocket now versus >= 80p towards retirement. With large enough contributions he could even be claiming child benefit for those two kids to offset the lower take-home figure, while paying substantially less of his gross income to tax.

However spunking between £1k and £2k on a car lease is obviously more important.

Noxville
Dec 7, 2003

Outside of what you think about this particular guy, it has to be acknowledged that if someone on a 90th percentile salary can't live comfortably there must be something deeply wrong with this country.

Jedit
Dec 10, 2011

Proudly supporting vanilla legends 1994-2014

Tesseraction posted:

The Tories got what they wanted, the youth impoverished and in despair, and then they bitch about us not having kids.

I wouldn't say that they wanted that. They wanted to have all the money. An impoverished despairing youth is just a by-product of that, one that Tories don't care about because they are not young. Everything else is the standard boomerism of "I did it with all the advantages I had, so why can't you do it now we've taken them away?"

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Guavanaut posted:

I forget who, but one of England's fash heroes got kicked out of Hungary for being associated with them, as a group too racist even for Hungarian politics.
Correction on looking it up, it was one of NI's wannabe fash heroes, Jim Dowson. He's now head of Knights Templar International.

So whatever they were in the past, their current namesake is this bullshit:

quote:

Dowson relocated to Budapest, Hungary, and has been observed in several eastern European countries with his latest venture, Knights Templar International (KTI), along with the former BNP leader Nick Griffin and a Hungarian anti-abortion campaigner Imre Teglasy. Dowson's last sighting, according to the Daily Mirror, was on the Turkey–Bulgaria border with the KTI supplying equipment to a vigilante paramilitary group, the Shipka Bulgarian National Movement, to hunt down asylum seekers. Dowson was subsequently reported as having developed close links with the Russian extremist Aleksandr Dugin, with Dugin aiding Dowson in the establishment of a Belgrade office for his internet activity in support of the "alt-right".

Sir Sidney Poitier
Aug 14, 2006

My favourite actor


xtothez posted:

The first advice people with this level of income get is to increase pension contributions where possible

When do they get this advice, and from whom?

There's a lot of animosity being wasted on higher paid people when it could be directed towards the tories who got us into this mess. That said, high paid folks quoted should just shut up moaning, it's not a good look.

smellmycheese
Feb 1, 2016

xtothez posted:

"Vimes' LED headlights" doesn't have quite the same ring to it, sadly

The thing that immediately stood out to me here is that the guy is paying bare minimum into a pension and wants to pay less. The first advice people with this level of income get is to increase pension contributions where possible, as it's <=50p per £1 in your pocket now versus >= 80p towards retirement. With large enough contributions he could even be claiming child benefit for those two kids to offset the lower take-home figure, while paying substantially less of his gross income to tax.

However spunking between £1k and £2k on a car lease is obviously more important.

And then either the private pension provider will collapse or the terms of the public one will be crushed and he will end up with gently caress all. gently caress that. Live for today and enjoy a nice motor

serious gaylord
Sep 16, 2007

what.

Bozza posted:

this is extremely dumb and short-sighted

if people with "a lot" of money aren't spending it because their bills have gone up, that is a symptom of an economy in collapse. every pub, restaurant, venue, coffee shop, local shop and indy retailer pretty much relies entirely on discretionary spend by people with "excess" money so if people who traditionally were those people are now not those people we are going to see vast swathes of british economic life shuttered

the article isn't "woe is me, I can't afford private school fees" it's "I pay all my bills but they have all gone up so substantially that I no longer have money to spend on other things" which is terrible for everyone. it's easy to laugh but GDP line will go up as asset prices rise and nobody will care that the very essence of society has been crushed

yeah they could save a bunch of money to get a cheaper car but they didn't, they don't have spare cash and now your local is closed down because nobody has any money. it's a symptom of a society with deep sickness in its soul which is caused by landlordism, multi-millionaires and billionaires, not by some software engineer on £75k

blaming taxes is also dumb but we need to be taxing assets to the same level if not more so than actual gainful employment

This is a great post.

Scikar
Nov 20, 2005

5? Seriously?

Sir Sidney Poitier posted:

When do they get this advice, and from whom?

There's a lot of animosity being wasted on higher paid people when it could be directed towards the tories who got us into this mess. That said, high paid folks quoted should just shut up moaning, it's not a good look.

Again this isn't necessarily everyone quoted in the article, but I'm just as capable of holding animosity towards the Tories as I am towards the people who vote for them and only start complaining when they are personally affected by the results.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal
Also a really good way of increasing discretionary spend in the local economy would be to make sure that everyone can afford the basics, because then any wages on top of that tend to go to discretionary spend in the local economy. Media outlets only interviewing people who complain about taxes and rates deserves mockery.

TACD
Oct 27, 2000

Guavanaut posted:

Those are sweater puppies, I've never heard it the other way around. Although in the theme of the above, it's possible that we're both some kind of deviated prevert
Oh I was definitely thinking of this phrase, ha.

His Divine Shadow
Aug 7, 2000

I'm not a fascist. I'm a priest. Fascists dress up in black and tell people what to do.

xtothez posted:

"Vimes' LED headlights" doesn't have quite the same ring to it, sadly

Also, I meant 100€ not 150€, but still a new H4 halogen is 3 euros.

Sir Sidney Poitier
Aug 14, 2006

My favourite actor



I missed this originally but it's a good take.

Nuclear Spoon
Aug 18, 2010

I want to cry out
but I don’t scream and I don’t shout
And I feel so proud
to be alive
as someone on less than 30k i would love 75k that's my opinion

Zalakwe
Jun 4, 2007
Likes Cake, Hates Hamsters



Bozza posted:

this is extremely dumb and short-sighted

if people with "a lot" of money aren't spending it because their bills have gone up, that is a symptom of an economy in collapse. every pub, restaurant, venue, coffee shop, local shop and indy retailer pretty much relies entirely on discretionary spend by people with "excess" money so if people who traditionally were those people are now not those people we are going to see vast swathes of british economic life shuttered

the article isn't "woe is me, I can't afford private school fees" it's "I pay all my bills but they have all gone up so substantially that I no longer have money to spend on other things" which is terrible for everyone. it's easy to laugh but GDP line will go up as asset prices rise and nobody will care that the very essence of society has been crushed

yeah they could save a bunch of money to get a cheaper car but they didn't, they don't have spare cash and now your local is closed down because nobody has any money. it's a symptom of a society with deep sickness in its soul which is caused by landlordism, multi-millionaires and billionaires, not by some software engineer on £75k

blaming taxes is also dumb but we need to be taxing assets to the same level if not more so than actual gainful employment

Returning superstar with an extremely good post.

Scikar posted:

Yeah, the economic point is a valid one and not everyone in the article is necessarily an arsehole, but it's hard to be sympathetic towards people who share no sympathy themselves.

I think that's a big assumption. These people tend to be well educated and politically aware, particularly when it comes to local issues. For example you will never find a bigger supporter of teachers at a local primary school than middle class parents. They pretty much consider teachers superhuman and in the most part will back pay rises to the hilt. Post office closing? They can rally an army. Local foodbank needs this or that, who do you think buys it?

However they also have nothing to get excited about at a national level and are extremely time poor, making anything nuanced and complex, like the internal politics of the Labour party, a massive turn off. Far easier to be jealous of your neighbour's holiday and moan about the state of the roads. These things used to just work.

There will always be twats and people who are never going to get it because of upbringing or whatever, but although some might have a slightly better boat it's the same storm we're in. We need to stick together.

Tesseraction posted:

I guess the thing that surprises me is that on those salaries I'd expect them to be doing better. I'm on less and not having similar issues, but then I've foregone the idea of home ownership or kids in the near term (if at all), so I guess it's more that the aspiration of a house and kids is unaffordable now, and yeah pretty much.

Kids are very expensive. Particularly in the two years before free hours of childcare kicks in. You can easily spend over a £1000 per month, per kid. I remember one thread regular with what a lot of people here would consider a very good salary mentioning that they have two under two and struggling at the moment. In another somewhat bleak post I remember them saying they basically don't go out, which doesn't surprise me either.

Owning a house is bizarrely often not as expensive as renting provided you can afford the deposit in an area you would like to have a house. I have a dream that if I ever win the lottery I am just going to provide houses outright then rent them cheaply, give one away to the renters as soon as I have the money to buy another saved up and so on

Zalakwe fucked around with this message at 15:23 on Mar 5, 2024

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Yeah I would say if you don't think you can live comfortably on £70k then the issue isn't the economy it's that you have an utterly warped notion of "comfortable".

If I was on 70k I would be putting half of it in the bank and quitting my job as soon as I had enough to run me the rest of my life, and still have every material possession I could want.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

Zalakwe posted:

Owning a house is bizarrely often not as expensive as renting provided you can afford the deposit in an area you would like to have a house. I have a dream that if I ever win the lottery I am just going to provide houses outright then rent them cheaply, give one away to the renters as soon as I have the money to buy another saved up and so on
That's a bit like one of Corbyn/McDonnell's best ideas, but people decided they wanted brexits instead.

Mega Comrade
Apr 22, 2004

Listen buddy, we all got problems!
I think the posts of "if I was on £70k" are forgetting he's the soul breadwinner of a family of 4.

That families have the choice of both parents working but child care costing THOUSANDS of £ a month or one partner just not working at all, is an issue facing people all different classes and incomes (well except the super rich).

domhal
Dec 30, 2008


0.000% of Communism has been built. Evil child-murdering billionaires still rule the world with a shit-eating grin. All he has managed to do is make himself *sad*. It has, however, made him into a very, very smart boy with something like a university degree in Truth. Instead of building Communism, he now builds a precise model of this grotesque, duplicitous world.

Guavanaut posted:

It might be nice for the press to talk to the staff at the pubs and restaurants and cafes who are complaining that they just had their worst winter season on record and aren't getting any bonuses rather than the temporarily embarrassed discretionary spend people.

Yes. But the Guardian knows where it's bread is buttered, and it's not at those places.

keep punching joe
Jan 22, 2006

Die Satan!
The solution is not to gripe and complain about who makes £20k or £30k or £70k a year. The solution is solidarity and the willingness to strangle the landlords, aristocrats, and CEOs.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

The goal of a decent society is for everyone to be able to afford nice things, not for us all to be sitting in the mud. These people didn't cause the economy to be poo poo, they merely have higher wellies.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Wellies I'd like, mind you.

Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

domhal posted:

Yes. But the Guardian knows where it's bread is buttered, and it's not at those places.
More fool them, if they went to a local cafe they could get it buttered and get some bacon and sauce on it.

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


His Divine Shadow posted:

Hard to summon sympathy though, where I hang out I get exposed to a lot of the swedish suburban middle class person and I deeply loathe them and their well off (and wasteful) lives.

Are you sure it isn't the Swedish you hate & not the middle class?

Sir Sidney Poitier posted:

When do they get this advice, and from whom?

There's a lot of animosity being wasted on higher paid people when it could be directed towards the tories who got us into this mess. That said, high paid folks quoted should just shut up moaning, it's not a good look.

I assure you I have enough animosity to go around.

Bozza posted:

this is extremely dumb and short-sighted

if people with "a lot" of money aren't spending it because their bills have gone up, that is a symptom of an economy in collapse. every pub, restaurant, venue, coffee shop, local shop and indy retailer pretty much relies entirely on discretionary spend by people with "excess" money so if people who traditionally were those people are now not those people we are going to see vast swathes of british economic life shuttered

the article isn't "woe is me, I can't afford private school fees" it's "I pay all my bills but they have all gone up so substantially that I no longer have money to spend on other things" which is terrible for everyone. it's easy to laugh but GDP line will go up as asset prices rise and nobody will care that the very essence of society has been crushed

yeah they could save a bunch of money to get a cheaper car but they didn't, they don't have spare cash and now your local is closed down because nobody has any money. it's a symptom of a society with deep sickness in its soul which is caused by landlordism, multi-millionaires and billionaires, not by some software engineer on £75k

blaming taxes is also dumb but we need to be taxing assets to the same level if not more so than actual gainful employment

I don't know about extremely dumb. It's entirely relatable. Like yeah, it's entirely true that this country is loving ruined & has been completely ransacked over the last 17/18 years in particular (though honestly the rot started in '79 & more people need to be willing to say that) to the point where the connection between the health of "the economy"™ & 99.5% of people's actual lives has been completely severed. But there's people who do get by on under £20k a year, with families. Doing 35 hours a week on national minimum wage gets you about £19k a year. So if you're earning that, while raising a kid & your partner works part-time while school is on because you can't afford childcare, so 6 hours a day or at weekends? I think you can see why someone wouldn't exactly waste a tear on someone earning 3 times that. Meanwhile an adult living alone without kids on the dole is expected to get by on £9,119.76 a year. People, barely, manage this. Not really sure how, but they do, they have to. And then Scott from Leicestershire is in the top 10% of earners & is claiming he pays too much tax. Cry me a loving river. Lillian from County Durham acknowledges we need public spending but oh, it can't come from those earning £70k a year! Fucksake man, (it's annoyingly hard to find historical income tax bands) in 1973 the highest band was 75% of earnings over £20k, with the basic rate being 30% on earnings below £5k. Which according to the BoE's inflation calculator works out at £50k & £200k respectively. By comparison the top rate for now is 45% on earnings over £125k. People earning £50k+ to £124,999 are paying 45% on those earnings over £50k. And yet aside from a few rock bands pissing off to tax havens in the Harold Wilson years, people survived these outrageous tax rates!

Yes, broadly speaking the problem is that the concentration of wealth in the UK is growing greater & greater, leaving the rest of us behind. The Marxian analysis of their only really being 2 classes when it comes to economics is truer than ever, the people who make poo poo & the exploiters, or the proletariat & bourgeoisie if you prefer 19th century terminology. But the thing is, these people earning £50k & up a year need to realise that they have more in common with the guy behind the till in Tesco than they with the CEO running their company too. The only one in that Guardian article who gives even a hint that he realises how hosed it must be for everyone else if he's struggling is Lee from Surrey. Because an awful lot of what we'll call culturally middle class have no loving interest in class solidarity, are the types of people who are fully signed up to not rocking the boat, of addressing the systemic rot in the system. That spent the 4 years from 2015 to 2019 fully believing that Jeremy Corbyn wanted to murder all the Jews & use their blood to fertilise his allotment or something equally deranged. That looked at a chance for doing something about the rampant inequality in our system (not even much, ultimately Corbyn was still willing to play within the confines of capitalism) & shrugged & decided they'd rather vote for Boris Johnson & chums. I can realise that laughing in their faces at their misfortune is counterproductive, but you can't stop me being angry at them. Like I'm a dumb loving minimum wage worker & I managed to work it out, how can't our university attending betters?

Poor people these days don't have much. Let us have this. I promise I won't be like that to their faces, honey attracts more flies than vinegar etc, but I've only so many of the world's smallest violins to play at once.

His Divine Shadow
Aug 7, 2000

I'm not a fascist. I'm a priest. Fascists dress up in black and tell people what to do.

forkboy84 posted:

Are you sure it isn't the Swedish you hate & not the middle class?

Yeah I'm pretty sure, I also hate the finnish middle class, basically anyone more well off than me.

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


Sorry, the more I looked at that Graun article the more angry I got. So I just started ranting.

Nuclear Spoon
Aug 18, 2010

I want to cry out
but I don’t scream and I don’t shout
And I feel so proud
to be alive
everyone has made really good points but i would still really like 70k

Reveilled
Apr 19, 2007

Take up your rifles

His Divine Shadow posted:

If I focus on a single example, take modern led lamps, studies show they cost on average around 1500€ to replace and last on average 15 years, that is 150€ per year if it lasts that long. I pointed this out and someone countered with that most people would be new owners so it doesn't matter (yeah gently caress 2nd or 3rd hand owners) and if it broke they would have insurance replace it so increased costs on lamp replacement doesn't really matter. But you think the insurance companies will just take that lying down? They will get that money back by increasing rates. Which affects even you with a very old car using halogen bulbs you can replace at home for a few euros / pounds.

Well, good news and bad news! Good news: your insurance won't put the rates up to pay for the cost of replacing a lamp that breaks due to reaching the end of its lifecycle. Bad news: that's because car insurance doesn't cover mechanical failures and natural wear and tear.

I dreaded conversations about this when I worked in car claims. Car insurance is one of the few areas of insurance where we cover you 99% of the time (not out of the goodness of our employers hearts but because of very solid laws and regulations), but that doesn't count people who'd phone up to ask us to pay for their breakdown and I had to explain that no, insurance just flat out doesn't cover that sort of thing. It's for accidents fires and thefts. Even breakdown cover, a service most car insurers provide, is about providing you transport to a garage or back home, not actually paying for replacement parts.

Bonus good news: While mechanical wear and tear isn't covered, it's usually not covered so hard that you get a knockback before you can even make a claim, so you don't have to report that you tried to claim in future!
Bonus bad news: The increasing price of parts does still increase the cost of replacing a lamp damaged in an accident, which causes more write offs and more expensive claims, so the costs still affect everyone's premiums like you said.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

There is something incredibly perverse about paying through the nose to have led headlamps for the sole purpose of making everyone else on the road worse off.

The most Tory invention.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Imo people in this thread are allowed to not sympathise at a ratio of their income to the person they're disdaining.

Unless you're disdaining me. I am smol bean and you're a jerk if you do

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Tai
Mar 8, 2006
£70k a year is not enough to live on as I get ready to go out for my 4th dinner this week at Haute cusine £150 per head.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply