Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

Some amazing photos in this thread!

Quick question about cheapo light boxes...

What's the best material to use for the sides to let the light in? One guide I found said tracing paper but I'm not sure about how to get that. Can I substitute in parchment paper (used in baking)? Is there something else I can use that's better?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

I'm sorry for the noobish question -- even if I take macro shots on a tripod I need to set the picture to go off in timed mode because I find I end up shaking the camera far too much when I press the button to take the picture. Is there something that exists like a remote that I can use with my camera (Canon Rebel XS) to snap the picture instead?

That off camera flash cord looks like a great idea.

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

Just got this contraption in the mail yesterday:


Haven't had a chance to test it out much yet but I think it's going to help me get a lot more keepers. It's fairly heavy and awkward though.

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

orange lime posted:

What is the name of such a contraption? It looks useful.
Universal Macro Flash Bracket

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

I got a late Christmas present in the mail today (Stackshot) and had to try it out. Any guesses as to what these two are (Hint: both from something edible)?





I'm pretty much going to lose my job now because I can't stop taking pictures of stuff in the house.


[edit]
One last one...this is an Indian sugar candy I [used to] enjoy:



:barf:

InternetJunky fucked around with this message at 06:44 on Jan 4, 2012

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

HookShot posted:

I want to say candied orange peel for the first one.

Maybe crackers for the second?
First one is actually a peanut (lime and chili flavoured)


Second is an almond shell.

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

Yawgmoft posted:

How come I can't get shots that look that good? Do I need
A magnifier? I got the canon 100mm macro for christmas and all of my test shots come out pretty boring and standard.
The 100mm macro is what I shot that with as well, but I also had extension tubes and a macro rail to help me. My peanut is actually 40 separate shots stitched together.

Like all things photography, macro photography is also a bottomless pit of money once you start down that path.

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

Today's picture -- a 2mm x 2mm piece of spiral shell:

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

I had a choice this morning...do some work or take macro shots. The sensible option won.

Blackberry section:


Almond skin:


Hazelnut skin:


Blueberry:


Almond shell:

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

Mr Asshat NZ posted:


Spidey by The1KrisRoB, on Flickr

Unfortunately the poor little guy didn't make it through the "chill the bug so they stay still while you shoot them" stage. R.I.P little spidey guy :smith:

postin' dead bodies itt
This is a great shot of a spider, dead or alive. I also tried the 'bug in the freezer' trick this last summer and ended up killing the bugs as well. For the time being I've resorted to macro shots of inanimate stuff, like this cross section of a coconut from today:



On an unrelated note, I'm trying to figure out how I can get closer to my subjects. I have a 100mm f/2.8 with a full set of extension tubes, but that isn't close enough for me. Does anyone know anything about lens reversal? If I flip a 50mm around is that going to get me closer? Can I use the extension tubes and get even closer still? Lastly, is a reversal setup going to get closer than the Canon 65mm 1x-5x macro lens?

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

Abnegatus posted:


Blood-Orange-30-31-crop by Abnegātus, on Flickr
I think I'm going to stop taking macro shots of stuff I eat. I love blood oranges, but that looks like an alien seed pod ready to spit forth a facehugger.

Here's a shot I'm happy with from today: Jalapeno pepper seeds and inside junk

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

Mr. Despair posted:

Spent the night with a 50mm reverse mounted on my camera.
Are these stacked shots or individual? Either way, great detail! I like the gritty texture these shots have.

I'm still taking pictures of anything that looks interesting. Yesterday I got very excited because I found some mould on a sesame seed bun:


I was able to get a little closer (aside from some stacking artifacts on the edges that were cropped out this is pretty much full frame):


Also, I present a baby potato that has seen better days:

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

Bioshuffle posted:

All of your pictures are absolutely amazing. What kind of lighting set up do you use? Can you go into a little more detail about the macro rail and set up you use? It almost looks like it was taken through a stereo microscope. What's the total magnification of the pictures of the sesame seed mold? Sorry for asking so many questions, I am just curious as to what kind of gear makes pictures like that even possible.

All of the pictures here are stunning and just out of curiosity I'm wondering how much money I would have to set aside to take pictures like those.

The closest thing I have to a macro is the 70-300mm Sigma AP0, which to my understanding isn't really a macro lens despite claiming to be, because it only goes upto 1:2 magnification.
Thanks for the compliments. My setup is actually pretty basic (compared to most macro addicts anyway).

1.) Stable tripod
2.) Flash
3.) Macro lens (100mm f/2.8)
4.) Kenko extension tubes
5.) Stackshot macro rail
6.) Zerene Stacker software
7.) Cheapo lightbox



I don't really know what the total magnification is with this gear, but as you can see from the sesame seeds that are visible in my bun picture it's not bad (that's as close as I could get with my setup). That bun shot is full frame pretty much.

Most of the things I listed are not mandatory to start out. A set of extension tubes and you're good to go, but if you want to do image stacking then a macro rail is super helpful.

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

yoohoo posted:

Just got a flash over the weekend so finally I've been able to get some more macro shooting in. Unfortunately with these, the pan I used had a nice coat of oil on it (was supposed to be clean :argh:) so they look a little noisy and messy, but whatever, it was my first attempt.




Those came out pretty great. Are you timing the shot manually or do you have a fancier setup?


I really need to work on my macro lighting. I built a large diffuser for my flash so now I end up with a nice reflection of my square diffuser instead:



For future reference: a ladybug can't live in a container for 2 days without food or water. :(

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

Everything I take a picture of seems to come with a complimentary rat hair.

Cheese mould:

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

Who wants peaches?









InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

Thanks for the compliments. My peach mould is coming along nicely.






Something delicious instead of something gross -- strawberry milk:


And something a bit different -- part of my airbrush heavily cropped:



This is a great shot. You have to teach me how to get the fly to pose for you like that.

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

I have enough trouble with birds in flight -- bee in flight is very impressive!

quote:


Untitled by anveo, on Flickr
I don't know how you guys get these shots in the wild. Hand-held I can't come close to this, and with a tripod the bug has to be dead already to still be there when I finally get set up.

Continuing with my fruit experiment...







InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

Studebaker Hawk posted:

What do you use for your high-mag stuff? I am a former MP-E65mm user but it was stolen, re-evaluating my entire setup in favor of mirrorless but still need a suitable high-magnification macro kit to fufill my lust for tiny things.
For now I'm using a cheapo Canon 100mm macro with Kenco tubes. For the fruit pictures I use a Stackshot focus stacking setup. Each of the pictures I post are a composite of 30-60 shots.

The MP-E65mm is top of my wish list right now. I really want to get so much closer than what I'm achieving.

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

I don't know what it is (Creme Brulee?) but it looks delicious.

Have something not delicious:

Broccoli




Strawberry (now a fuzzy lump):


InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

I finally got a field kit for my stackshot, as well as a stable tripod. It was pretty cold today but I managed to find some interesting stuff to shoot. Sadly I screwed up most of it because I have little experience using a flash with macro.

This came out pretty neat though (it's a roughly 1cm x 1cm piece of old tree):


There's a ghost bug in the right side of the picture that must have shown up in a few of the 30 stacked shots taken to make this.

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

Atticus_1354 posted:

That is really cool. Any way you can make the bug show up all the way or get rid of it all together? It is kind of distracting now that I see it. The only other critique I have is that it seems kind of flat.
Unfortunately I deleted my original shots after performing the focus stacking so the bug is there to stay. Post-processing is problematic for these types of shots because you can't focus stack RAWs (at least I haven't found a way) so I shoot JPGs and there's only so much I can change in post.

Here's one more shot from yesterday, the underside of a tree fungus:


Here's my setup:

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

Rovasti posted:

At least with Helicon Focus you can use RAWs.

And why do you delete originals :confused:
Thanks for the link. I'll give this software a try.

If I don't delete originals I end up with unmanageable photo folders. Yesterday I ended up with about 25 final shots, but that was nearly 1000 source images.

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

I went out for a walk again today with my mobile setup. I found some sluggish bugs that I thought were cooperating, but when I tried to stack the images it was clear they had moved a bit.

Oh well, still got some fun shots out of the attempts:






Is there an easy to way to modify a series of images so that the exposures match on all of them? I shot a whole series of shots in Av mode without realising it and each exposure came out slightly different. This is making my stacking software go nuts.

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

ExecuDork posted:

I've got to figure out a lighting solution. Bright, direct sun is absolutely necessary for me and macro at the moment.
18 pages of ideas

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

Merry Christmas!

Who wants some turkey chilli?









InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

William T. Hornaday posted:

Is it from like three years ago and you just found it at the back of the fridge?
Two years old, maximum.


somnambulist posted:

Whoa o_o How zoomed in is this?
Each picture is perhaps 1/2 cm x 1/2 cm. It's tough to say because some were taken with a crop body and others with full frame, all at different distances.


PREYING MANTITS posted:

Haha, that's awesome and disturbing at the same time.
It's probably disturbing how many mould pictures I have now.

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

Time to brag...

National Geographic picked one of my macro shots for this month's magazine. :)

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

spongepuppy posted:

If you can afford it, a Stackshot motorized rail is absolutely worth the tiny pittance (relative to most specialised, high quality macro gear) they charge for it. I looked into DIYing something, but it likely would have been much worse and only marginally cheaper. I think it was a good investment, because it has freed me to work on other aspects of my technique, like lighting and specimen prep. It also means that you can take much more precise stacks quickly, which can be an issue with really small specimens.
It's what I use, and it's awesome. When your entire subject is 1mm across, being able to have a rail advance in precise units 100 times across that 1mm is just something I don't think you can do with a manual rail.



BANME.sh posted:

"The photo is a composite of 30 highly focused images"

:eyepop:

Congrats, that's a cool looking photo. Any chance of seeing it as not a photo of a printout?
Thanks, here's the shot: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/wallpaper/#/06-0313-moldy-peach-skin-macro-670.jpg

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

xzzy posted:

The phrase "highly focused" bugs me a lot more than it should. :spergin:

Way I see it, focus doesn't have shades. It's either in focus or it's not.
Bugs me as well, but what can you do. You try explaining focus stacking to someone who doesn't seem to have any idea what you're talking about. They came up with "highly focused" all by themselves.

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

I think I'm going to upgrade my macro setup a bit with the purchase of a Canon MT-24EX Macro Twin Lite Flash and the MP-E 65mm. I'm interesting in hearing experiences from anyone who has the macro flash -- it sounds like I should probably get some diffusers along with it at the very least.

In terms of the 65mm, if I want to get more than 5x can I use extension tubes?

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002


http://www.cognisys-inc.com/products/insect_rig.php?osCsid=4b3fb95f475ab349be7ddd41f747d886

:fap:

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

I couldn't help myself...

quote:

Order Summary:
Shipping Details:
Order Date: 2013-04-24 16:14

Products on order:
1 x Canon MP-E 65mm f2.8 Macro
1 x Canon Macro Twin Lite MT-24EX

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

Tiglath III posted:

Only flies here at the moment, still cold outside.


Fly by Bryan's Photo Pages, on Flickr
This is just plain gorgeous. Well done!

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

Finally had a chance to try out the 65mm MP-E today:

Butterfly Wings


Water drops on a leaf




Focusing is ridiculous if there's even a tiny breeze. I got lots of shots of fly's asses.

edit: I also guess I really need to clean my sensor

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

Abugadu posted:

My friend recently opened his website where he does macro photo/video of nudibranchs and other tiny marine life from the Philippines and Guam, worth a look I promise :)

http://www.macronesia.net/
You speak the truth. Really amazing stuff!

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

I haven't posted a macro shot in ages. Here's a couple of sea critters:



InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

Graniteman posted:

Loving my new stackshot. I'm hoping to assemble a shooting stage over the holidays this month. Just some wood and rails bolted together so I don't have to keep putting things together and breaking them down every time I want to shoot.

Fly

PREYING MANTITS posted:


D7000, Nikon/Nikkor 55mm Micro/DCR-250/Single flash diffused over the top on a glass desk.

I would love to see what kind of lighting setup you guys used for these, they are stunning shots!

spongepuppy posted:

I need to dust my stackshot off and get shooting again.
Me too.

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

PREYING MANTITS posted:

Well since I'm a huge fan of your nature photography and you asked with flattery, I figure I'll reveal my secret. Prepare yourself for probably the greatest macro lighting setup of all time. I mean it, contain your envy....



In this dramatic recreation of the set on my desk, I substituted the ant with some humping bears so as to assist in locating where the subject was placed. I kept it covered with a glass until it settled down enough that I could take the glass off, pop off a few shots and then cover it again before it wandered off. I have the flash set on a cheap wireless trigger and the flash itself is a "well loved" Yongnuo YN462 manual flash with the battery compartment door held shut via one high quality Paul C. Buff brand rubber band. The diffuser is a limited edition foil lined plastic Blue Bonnet brand butter container with a hole cut out for the YN462 head and only the best brand of paper towels are taped to the opening so as to spread the light effectively. Then I simply shot from the lowest angle possible to get the nice reflection, cleaned it up a little bit in Photoshop since apparently my glass desk is scraped to hell and it was done!

If santa decides to deliver my list this year, I'm going to do a setup like this: http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/compound-eye/2013/01/02/recipe-for-a-photograph-1-reflected-ant-on-black/ (currently down as of posting, but should be back up before long) since I like the angle better on his and I'd like to photograph a few other creatures in the same visual style so anything that could discourage a prison break is highly desired. :)

Graniteman posted:

I don't have a photo I can show for a week while I travel but I'll try to explain my own ghetto lighting rig.

I got a $10 four-armed "helping hands" thing from the electronics store. Basically four flexible bendy arms ending in alligator clips.
Arm 1 holds the fly by just clamping the wings.
Arm 2 holds a sheet of black background material positioned behind it.
Arm 3 holds half of a white styrofoam coffee cup over the fly so that it is pretty close and sort of envelops it a bit as the main diffuser.
A flash is on a $12 knockoff eBay friction arm, positioned to shoot down through the cup.
Arm 4 holds a sheet of aluminum foil under the fly to bounce back up some of the light from the flash. The foil is sort of shaped like a bowl I guess.

I try all kinds of lighting setups though. I have lots of pingpong balls cut up in various ways which work well for extremely even lighting. Right now I think styrofoam cups are my favorite. Good light transmission and easy to cut into shape.
Thank you both for describing/showing your setups. I've tried home-made diffusers in a bunch of different configurations and I've never been able to achieve such nice smooth lighting as what you guys had in your shots. No matter what I try I still get very harsh lighting.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

InternetJunky
May 25, 2002

I do some stacking in the field. It definitely draws some attention however:


Finding slow-moving bugs is the real challenge.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply