|
ManifunkDestiny posted:Why? Same iconoclastic nonsense, just of a different political bent I don't think you have seen Maddow. She is fairly decent for what she is. Mourningview posted:One of these days I am just going to make talking about anything that happened on First Take bannable.
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2013 20:48
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 20:39 |
|
|
Ace Jameson posted:The goal is to make the word so common and normalize it to such a degree that the mere mention instantly causes the act itself to occur, kind of like a manchurian candidate or police dog. So you just completely miss his point, make up your own to make him look bad, and dare to question his ability to be reasonable? What is your endgame here? You want to look silly?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2013 03:21
|
|
|
uublog posted:Better yet: if he doesn't want to be criticized in public, he should just not exist in public But freedom of speech! 
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2013 04:21
|
|
|
MourningView posted:it makes people here super mad Our ability to control national narrative is sadly lacking though.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 4, 2014 15:39
|
|
|
The B_36 posted:People like to feel outraged. Its why they script 'reality' shows to begin with, so that people can hear other people say outrageous things and feel righteously indignant. They aren't catering to the very few people who think screaming at a 9yr old to rip off a kids head is appropriate behavior, they're catering to the people who think its terrible. They do cut in a way that brings out the maximum amount "controversy' for lack of a better word, but no they don't try to cater to that group, as its not sustainable and could result in horrible backlash.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2014 16:00
|
|
|
Parlett316 posted:Man if someone was bad mouthing me or making lovely remarks about a personal experience I as going through around someone close to me I hope they just sit there and smile or put their head down like nothing happened. That would be the correct react yeah. Unless you are a child but then your parent disciplines you and everything is all right.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 29, 2014 21:23
|
|
|
morestuff posted:What exactly am I looking at, here? The Birth of a serial killer. With a very specific gimmick.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2014 06:44
|
|
|
The Pussy Boss posted:I mean, you all are kind of reaching to see sex stuff or whatever in that pic IMHO. Its the mascots of the two teams and the Blue Devil had to eat an Orange cause he lost. Everyone knows what they are going for. They just also picked imagery that can be sexual.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2014 21:30
|
|
|
Yeah that is a fairly poorly thought out title.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2014 19:58
|
|
|
Ribsauce posted:Umm, that is pretty much the internet now. Take a poorly phrased comment, project a meaning onto it to make it offensive, blow it out of proportion, then you get to feel smug because you are more enlightened than someone else. Of course you would believe that. Like an angry grandpa yelling at a cloud.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2014 16:51
|
|
|
Umm, Unprotected sex is dumb, but it isn't a bad thing. Unless there is more to this story which would make it turn pretty hard.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 2, 2015 16:35
|
|
|
hcreight posted:I'm not saying it is, but ol' Jeff here is the one equating it with drunk driving and domestic abuse. Oh I didn't mean to imply you did.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 2, 2015 19:19
|
|
|
African AIDS cum posted:Its too late because "real media" is just like them now. Snarky millennial writers, slideshows, clickbait, stories about twitter, feigned outrage, and more. Oh hi grandpa.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 4, 2015 07:13
|
|
|
Sash! posted:If rage at "Thing X did Thing Y, you'll NEVER guess what happened next" makes me a grandpa, then give me a recliner and a bowl full of ribbon candy. I feel like you standing up for him further validates my opinion.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 5, 2015 02:16
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:Jason Whitlock has some words to say about this. What the hell does he think Fascism entails?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2015 04:00
|
|
|
Yeah but usually I can at least understand what they are getting at this one is just confusing.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2015 05:02
|
|
|
To be fair if Tom had no commented his way through this it wouldn't be an issue. You endorse the hot head racist, you roll the dice.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 19, 2015 06:04
|
|
|
Inspector_666 posted:I love that every article about how egomaniacal Athlete X is always includes a little line like this: I like the part wear she somehow holds the basic I really want to win comment against him.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 6, 2016 02:31
|
|
|
Yeah I can't get mad that he brought back a story that effectively had been buried.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 3, 2016 05:49
|
|
|
They aren't famous that is kind of the point.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2016 19:52
|
|
|
morestuff posted:First Take is two hours long, those shows are built to chew up airtime First take wasn't two hours of Skip and Stephen tho.
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2016 20:18
|
|
|
morestuff posted:Last time I saw it it was, though it may just have felt like it Maybe, I haven't watched in a while. Actually it used to feature them in like five minute chunks every twenty minutes.
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2016 23:30
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:We get it dude you don't like Peter Thiel To be fair that is a funny quote
|
|
#
¿
May 26, 2016 18:44
|
|
|
Work Friend Keven posted:It's extremely lovely to tell someone they're a regressive dumb rear end because they love their daughter. Just one mans opinion. That isn't what he is doing?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2016 01:53
|
|
|
Sash! posted:If Heaven was real, half of those people wouldn't be there. What do you have against Donner's Superman?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 28, 2016 04:46
|
|
|
Yeah I was gonna say all those places (outside London) have very serious issues that should be covered. Whether they happen or not.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 30, 2016 07:35
|
|
|
Sash! posted:Sure was nice of the Soviets to build it for us, I guess? Where do you think Donald got his wall idea from???
|
|
#
¿
Sep 22, 2016 07:45
|
|
|
Poonerman posted:
Scoreboard bitch.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 24, 2016 07:05
|
|
Incoming heat-seeking Jason Whitlock garbage:
|
MourningView posted:President Mike Pence isn't any better tbh Hell he is probably worse as you can at least hope Republicans piss Trump off and he shuts down.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 24, 2017 03:58
|
|
|
To be fair we are like two weeks in and he was right.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 31, 2017 05:43
|
|
|
So It Goes posted:If it is a joke, I legitimately don't understand what the joke even is It would only work if he is parodying himself but that requires a self awareness he does not possess.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2017 21:18
|
|
|
Mahoning posted:I'm not sure why it's a controversial statement to say that college basketball players care more. For a huge percentage of them, it is the last bit of Basketball they will ever play, so of course it means a bit more. When people bring up who cares more it's always for condemnations sake, otherwise there is no real point in doing it.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 30, 2017 05:08
|
|
|
Well I mean they are public records so I am not sure what being suspected has to do with anything,
|
|
#
¿
May 4, 2017 07:47
|
|
|
Troy Queef posted:he quit the Colts to work for Barstool and do standup comedy He didn't really fail as he quit of his own accord.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 1, 2017 06:00
|
|
|
Teemu Pokemon posted:Maybe ineffectual is the wrong word if you want to argue semantics, but I think that the conclusion is pretty apparent that whether there is a three point line or not wouldn't change the frequency of longer range shots, the frequency with which those shots are made, or which teams are better than the others. That says nothing of the fact that as long as there is a three point line, you're dumb to ignore the benefits of talking advantage of it. It sounds like you mean the exact opposite of ineffectual. Which is not semantics at all.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 12, 2017 06:28
|
|
|
Teemu Pokemon posted:If it's arguably harder to defend the further from the basket (blocks by distance from the rim is used in the video, which doesn't tell the whole story, but isn't negligible), and shots from 2 feet, and 26 feet have roughly the same chance of going in, how would there being no three point line drastically alter the spacing on the floor? Teams are still going to shoot from outside when they know they can make it, they're not going to bunch themselves in all the much tighter to the rim and make it harder on themselves to move the ball. It doesn't seem like a stretch to think the game would've evolved similarly regardless as players got bigger and harder to beat in close defensively while also getting better at shooting from distance. Seems more that the 3 point line was a catalyst as opposed to the outright cause. You larger point completely changes depending on what word you mean. I am joining the convo, be better at English so I can actually argue with you. Because at this point I don't actually think you know what your arguing. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
¿
Jun 13, 2017 06:52
|
|
|
Teemu Pokemon posted:be gooder at english so that I may fight you on the internet So you don't know what your arguing? I figured.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 13, 2017 17:45
|
|
|
Cool Buff Man posted:You're poo poo!!!!!
|
|
#
¿
Jun 13, 2017 19:35
|
|
|
Crazy Ted posted:ESPN has a long history of basically bending its knees to anyone will complain loudly enough about it, right or wrong. Man I forgot they actually printed that, Jesus Max and his editor should have been suspended.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2017 06:28
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 20:39 |
|
|
Why would you doubt it it's the most Bill thing possible.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2017 07:20
|
|