|
tef posted:a quine is a neat trick. from google this seems ok http://www.madore.org/~david/computers/quine.html what do you use to keep track of bookmarks you have like a million links worth reading
|
#
¿
May 8, 2013 16:04
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 19:01 |
|
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:learn one thing until you actually know it well and aren't sulk man self control is at an historic low imo it is so hard for me to focus when you can look up anything, in any language, instantaneously
|
|
#
¿
May 23, 2013 22:31
|
|
|
you can drink your own pisss
|
|
#
¿
May 23, 2013 22:32
|
|
|
tef posted:use wasabi i just looked up what that is. holy poo poo
|
|
#
¿
May 28, 2013 20:52
|
|
|
Jonny 290 posted:hey havent really kept up on this thread. whats going on guys. im a really bad programmer that makes stacks. u can do it too. you must have incredible work life balance
|
|
#
¿
May 30, 2013 15:24
|
|
|
Jonny 290 posted:which is good b/c i run the household too so i've got another 4 hours of work ahead of me when i go home! i dont know i cannot find the time to do anything on my own due to a mix of work and life obligations so i'm impressed out how much you've picked up over time
|
|
#
¿
May 30, 2013 15:46
|
|
|
yo im comin from plangs and i gotta learn java what is a good book?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 24, 2013 16:45
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:the javadocs. java is great and easy and you don't really need a book, just don't try to replicate what you did in those hosed up and lovely p-langs cause it was probably wrong. I THOUGHT THIS WAS THE SERIOUS PROGRAMMING THREAD FOR lovely PROGRAMMERS NOT lovely PEOPLE
|
|
#
¿
Oct 24, 2013 17:09
|
|
|
tef posted:this is wrong, you probably want "Effective Java" by Joshua Bloch. It's a cookbook of good ways to use Java Notorious b.s.d. posted:i believe shaggar was referring to the official oracle/sun tutorial content, not literally the docs generated by the javadoc tool thank you
|
|
#
¿
Oct 29, 2013 17:23
|
|
|
i got my first largish internal java project running today and besides having to set up an insane mountain of poo poo in maven/svn/sql/eclipse, it's pretty great that it works now once it's all set up it's pretty straightforward but man
|
|
#
¿
Jan 15, 2014 23:37
|
|
|
i got a job cause i know perl and welp i gotta do java poo poo now i had asked for help earlier in the thread, dehumanized myself and faced to java, and got a raise deal with it
|
|
#
¿
May 19, 2014 21:43
|
|
|
Werthog 95 posted:so i'm trying to fix this javascript and i've never javascripted before what is breaking in this sense? it stops running at a certain point? is there an ajax call or something that is asynchronous that fails? the non-debugger browser console (not the web console) does not show an error either? Share Bear fucked around with this message at 17:08 on Jun 5, 2014 |
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2014 17:03
|
|
|
the coursera princeton algos course starts today if you're like me and forget everything youve ever learned yearly
|
|
#
¿
Jun 13, 2014 17:12
|
|
|
im bad at debugging something fails an = assignment to innerHTML in js, but there is no error, no browser warning, no debug message in the browser, it just never assigns to it and keeps going is there any way i can catch this, i've set a break point on both the lines, and i have a watch set on innerHTML so i know it never gets assigned, and there are other parts of code which do successfully edit innerHTML
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2014 15:27
|
|
|
Valeyard posted:how exactly are you trying to assign innerHTML? thing.innerHTML = parseThing(arg); i break and step in on the return value for parseThing(), and see the <return> value in the debugger the watch value for parseThing(arg) also shows the return value this is in firefox, safari, and chrome, so i assume there's some magic to innerHTML Share Bear fucked around with this message at 15:38 on Jun 17, 2014 |
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2014 15:34
|
|
|
Valeyard posted:code thanks for the code, but i'd really like to get to the bottom of why this is breaking and maybe report a bug. i have no idea where or what i'd have to look for in this case, firefox module logging also doesn't show crap etc it makes me wonder how people like raymond chen even got that good at debugging giant piles of crap
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2014 16:14
|
|
|
AWWNAW posted:don't use javascript, get a job waiting tables if u have to i make apps* for a living *appetizers quote:does it work if you assign a trivial value to thing.innerHTML bonus comedy points: i cannot edit the source or have it run locally, i am doing it live, and firefox's and chrome's debugger doesn't allow in place editing (chrome does have live JS editing, but that also does not really work)
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2014 20:06
|
|
|
LARD LORD posted:how are you hooking the element that you're injecting HTML into? It's from some other js; i've dumped and diffed the objects after they were hooked when it works and doesnt work, and they are the same; is there a more subtle reason they wouldn't be? diff objects meaning: taking the watch expression on the object at the time of the breakpoint where it works, expanding it, copying it into a text editor, and doing the same for the second breakpoint where it fails, then running diff against the two files js dev!!!!! Share Bear fucked around with this message at 21:35 on Jun 18, 2014 |
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2014 21:03
|
|
|
the bug i reported is a big deal lol gently caress all yall someone else do my work
|
|
#
¿
Jun 20, 2014 22:06
|
|
|
I gave up on the princeton algos course because I hated the exercises they provided, mainly due to tedium imma resign myself to never doing anything interesting or cool and pop out a couple of kids, later
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2014 05:37
|
|
|
Cheap Diner Coffee posted:same but the first week i thought the first week was a weed-out week that they forgot to take out of the online course, but nope this is moreso for the "exercises" rather than the actual homework, which was challenging enough. they probably won't give a survey to ask why i dropped the class. the exercises were mostly questions about what'd happen if you stopped an algorithm after a certain, usually tedious to calculate, number of steps. you could of course write your own implementation, hope it was accurate, and use that to solve the questions, but then you could not reuse the code for the homework.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2014 15:25
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:data structures and algorithms are the most important things they'll teach you in a comp sci program. thanks for the update
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2014 16:03
|
|
|
i have the algos book and a big rear end java book and i gotta read more of both, but seriously gently caress that class
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2014 16:07
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:yeah thats a lovely way to teach it. if its a common algorithm like quicksort or mergesort they should give you the code and let you step through it to observe the changes it makes. i am just bitching since the class does reflect this model, i suck at many things at once, and have learned to never start learning multiple things at the same time, which in this case is both java and algorithms.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2014 16:20
|
|
|
MononcQc posted:I really like Steven Skienna's book for algos and data structures everyone recommended the MIT one, which is surprisingly easy to read, but is gigantic, so i got that one i also just found that ocw site and will probably make an attempt at that instead of the coursera/princeton one
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2014 17:44
|
|
|
coffeetable posted:ps if you're a cs major and not making heavy use of library genesis to at least preview texts, you done hosed up im not im a script janitor and i purchase books legitimately when i need them the other links are cool and ill check them soon, i am envious of that visualization guy, where'd he get started, how did he learn this etc
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2014 22:10
|
|
|
Symbolic Butt posted:same the machine learning class was also really neat and v applicable when you have any sort of good linear algebra library available
|
|
#
¿
Jul 9, 2014 21:15
|
|
|
i check this thread to see if there are any other books to be recommended
|
|
#
¿
Aug 21, 2014 21:59
|
|
|
coffeetable posted:im readin this atm the only mooc really worth a drat was the machine learning one on coursera, i highly recommend it
|
|
#
¿
Aug 21, 2014 22:15
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:nah, lets back up a bit. what books or resources did you use to understand how eclipse and all this stuff is working? i'm constantly impressed by your knowledge in regards to java building and development
|
|
#
¿
Sep 9, 2014 21:28
|
|
|
Bloody posted:idk id just always rather read pseudocode than maths because my background is stronger in codethings than mathsthings yeah, i browsed some math-y books on coworkers desks and there's the assumption that you know what all these symbols mean or imply already without even defining other stuff or what it's supposed to do
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2014 16:44
|
|
|
mongo is good if you never EVER want to formalize your mongo data into normalized, relational data and just want a giant document hash where its ok if a write doesnt make it this is not how people use it in my experience though, they want normalized, relational data where the data is there and failure is apparent gently caress mongo
|
|
#
¿
Oct 17, 2014 18:11
|
|
|
VLADIMIR GLUTEN posted:anyone done the MIT open courseware CS courses? i'm thinking of just starting at the first course and working my way through since i've never had a lot a lot of formal CS education and its starting to show as i tackle bigger projects. the stanford moocs are very good for this so far, no word on using mit's stuff
|
|
#
¿
Oct 22, 2014 16:35
|
|
|
BONGHITZ posted:i am looking at exercism, am i an idiot? oh it looks cool but is totally predicated on there being people who want to comment on your stuff and them always being around same with moocs i guess but a wider net of people who have done it
|
|
#
¿
Oct 22, 2014 20:15
|
|
|
im never gonna get a programming job i guess
|
|
#
¿
Oct 31, 2014 21:32
|
|
|
like i'm gonna take those home for the weekend and see if i can figure out an answer without searching google or anything from my present frame of knowledge, but i definitely cannot solve either in a reasonably quick amount of time
|
|
#
¿
Oct 31, 2014 21:33
|
|
|
AWWNAW posted:there are lots of programming jobs you can get without having to cram this poo poo and they pay almost as well i think all the jobs are this and they just put that in front to deter people Share Bear fucked around with this message at 21:40 on Oct 31, 2014 |
|
#
¿
Oct 31, 2014 21:37
|
|
|
ill report back on monday with a CoC level post about how i'd solve the first one, second one would take about the same amount of time
|
|
#
¿
Oct 31, 2014 22:29
|
|
|
i am growing to hate learning java-on-the-job but mainly because so much crap is impossible to figure out with a book when working from someone's production code then you gotta bother someone whose time is probably better spent not talking to you about honest-to-g-d baby level things you dont understand like dependency injection or spring, which totally are not in that java book you bought so you wouldnt have to ask a million questions
|
|
#
¿
Dec 9, 2014 23:50
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 19:01 |
|
|
git sucks because they had all these verbs from subversion they could've used but chose not to because they're loving linux programmers and it has to be different and clever yes i work at a place which just switched from svn to git why do you ask Share Bear fucked around with this message at 19:09 on Dec 17, 2014 |
|
#
¿
Dec 17, 2014 19:07
|
|