|
Enjoy that kid while you can. He's gonna get poached by a Premier League side in two years time for sure.
|
# ¿ Nov 27, 2013 19:19 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 02:44 |
|
France and Argentina get groups they'll just stroll through and the US gets the group of death. Fantastic.Arquebus posted:As an Australian, it was already going to be unlikely we'd see a draw that didn't leave us doomed from the start... though I'd probably trade a finger to see us beat Spain, or at least to seriously injure Fernando Torres.
|
# ¿ Dec 6, 2013 22:16 |
|
I mean all I'm saying is that an injury to Torres, especially during international duty, is worth no more than maybe a sprained ankle on your part. He does it so often that he's devalued it.
|
# ¿ Dec 6, 2013 22:20 |
|
You were fired because you asked for a lower points total at the end of that meeting. I guess the game took that as a "demand". Just reload and don't do that. B.
|
# ¿ Dec 12, 2013 19:58 |
|
Wrexham seems like the best choice here, both in terms of actually being the best choice in the game and in terms of plot.
|
# ¿ Dec 16, 2013 22:16 |
|
(Assertively) While I agree that the team needs to improve its scouting knowledge, we have our finances to consider. I authorize the hiring of two additional scouts. (B)
|
# ¿ Dec 28, 2013 23:20 |
|
I hope both Wrexham and Tackleford get promoted, if that's even possible. We get the league lead and they win the playoffs? I want to milk this rivalry for all it's worth.
|
# ¿ Jan 2, 2014 02:28 |
|
1. (Firmly) C. In light of the recent promotion, additional spending on coaching is necessary to compete at the next level. 2. (Passionately) B. Our pitch must be better than that of Tackleford's! 3. (Firmly) B. See my answer to #1, but increase "coaching" with "youth". 4. (Idlely) B. Sure, doesn't cost that much. 5. (Firmly) C. Additional spending will be needed at the next level but let's keep it reasonable.
|
# ¿ Jan 3, 2014 02:18 |
|
Cthulhu Dreams posted:Oh, the board should control the total budget no doubt, but the allocation of the pie between football operational areas seems like a decision for the manager. Until you get a director of football, that is. Then we get control of allocations again.
|
# ¿ Jan 3, 2014 04:29 |
|
The pitch will be in terrible condition by April 10th. It will probably change from bad to terrible condition well before that date, but that's the condition it'll be on that day.
|
# ¿ Jan 5, 2014 00:46 |
|
Yeah, I think the 4-5-1 might not jive with your squad's level of talent. You should look into returning to the 4-4-2 or maybe playing an anchor man. 4-3-3?
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2014 23:15 |
|
(Calmly) Ok. 6-nil at home against Tackleford of all teams. That's not good, not good at all. But the injuries are mounting up and they're spending four times we are. I'll give you a pass this time. (Firmly) But ship up, stay out of the drop zone and don't let that happen again. Or you're shipping out. Dias posted:...so, this is the one they bring up every time the rivalry is mentioned, right? Oof.
|
# ¿ Jan 10, 2014 01:04 |
|
habeasdorkus posted:They're under a transfer embargo. Not that it matters much, since they have basically 3 teams currently under contract. It could screw them up over the summer, though, and at the very least they're not going to be buying every player on the market.
|
# ¿ Jan 10, 2014 23:44 |
|
(Calmly) I'll offer you a contract of £900 a week for one year. I request you focus on bringing in youth talent--- why else did we invest in the new youth development center? Focusing on scoring from set pieces, however, is not of major significance to me.
|
# ¿ Jan 19, 2014 02:54 |
|
If I actually win the pitch condition guess contest, I believe I have the right to become team president. Hell, my guess was a joke because I assumed it would have gotten to terrible months ago. Of course, if I had a dragon, I'd use it to periodically burn the Tackleford pitch, maintaining it at a worse condition than Wrexham's. Even when Wrexham's pitch condition is Terrible, I'd keep Tackleford's pitch at the mythical "Dogshite" level.
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2014 23:38 |
|
rizzen posted:1. D. We need to be aiming high. The Tackleford scum are in League One, and we are not. Reach for those stars, but don't be breaking the bank while doing so.
|
# ¿ Jan 24, 2014 02:54 |
|
KDavisJr posted:No. We'll make 'em red and put dragon wings on the shoulders instead.
|
# ¿ Jan 25, 2014 09:55 |
|
We told you not to do the goals from set pieces goal. But nooo.
|
# ¿ Jan 28, 2014 00:03 |
|
habeasdorkus posted:eta: Also also, when I say that Al-Beloushi's been a different player for Kuwait, I ain't joking. Over 15 recent games with his national team he's got an average rating of 7.35, which is very high for any player and ludicrously high for a goalie, he's making on average two spectacular saves a game with that average. He hasn't had a game where his rating was below 7 in literally a year. He's been decent for us, but nowhere near the stud level he's played for Kuwait. And it's not like he's only playing scrub teams, he earned an 8.9(!) against Chile last year. For us he's been perfectly average, a 6.68 rating with only two games above a 7. I'm thinking I should shift his play style so he's not trying as many long balls, that might be one of the key differences.
|
# ¿ Jan 28, 2014 21:24 |
|
Zeroisanumber posted:I've found that it helps to imagine that everyone in SAS is Karl Pilkington. A horde of Karl Pilkingtons arguing with each other about sports. Forever.
|
# ¿ Feb 4, 2014 21:16 |
|
Am I on the list for people to be executives? I should be because I almost won that pitch condition contest that one time.
|
# ¿ Feb 16, 2014 11:27 |
|
I hope you bitched about the ref in the postgame so much that you got a touchline ban.
|
# ¿ Feb 16, 2014 21:11 |
|
1. B. We need to increase the budget a little to keep up with the new league, but our income just isn't sufficient to justify a large increase at this point. 2. Again, B. We need to keep an eye on our finances. 3. I feel like this might end up being a straight B vote. The club needs to start making more from TV money before you can get all of the transfer money for team purposes. 4. B again. Mujkic is brilliant, but don't blow everyhting on it. 5. Four years, 1000 a week, yearly salary increase of 10% and promotion salary increase of 25%.
|
# ¿ Feb 18, 2014 01:07 |
|
Sky Shadowing posted:a Top Division Promotion Clause of 75%, but also a Top Division Relegation Clause of 75%.
|
# ¿ Feb 18, 2014 22:20 |
|
We will finish 12 points ahead of Tackleford. +12. 6 goal differential.
JT Jag fucked around with this message at 05:39 on Feb 24, 2014 |
# ¿ Feb 23, 2014 08:02 |
|
Sunning posted:Wow, an embezzlement crisis. This really is the most realistic football management game on the market. It's not though. .... Right?
|
# ¿ Feb 24, 2014 23:11 |
|
I was in attendance for the game that this happened. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06LdqVfMBho Now you might be thinking, "JT Jag, are you saying that the most embarrassing thing you've seen in sports is that the Jaguars defense allowed that to happen to them? Three laterals, and Aaron Brooks of all quarterbacks was responsible for the pass! This wasn't even the Drew Brees Saints!" No! The most embarrassing thing is that the kicker, John Carney, missed the extra point. The Saints lost despite all this.
|
# ¿ Feb 25, 2014 20:36 |
|
habeasdorkus posted:Unlikely. We might have another season like we did when we first got to League Two, but we've got a lot of talent on this team.
|
# ¿ Feb 27, 2014 21:56 |
|
Jenner posted:No.
|
# ¿ Feb 28, 2014 20:13 |
|
Yeah, here I was thinking my 12-point difference guess was bold and maybe a bit much, but it isn't even close. Up on Tackleford by 29 points, yikes.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2014 06:29 |
|
1. B. Increase the wage structure gradually to be more competitive with the rest of the Championship, but be careful not to drive us into debt. 2. B. 5.5M and above is a lot of cash at our level. You could buy a lot of new youth players with that sort of dosh. I'd take that. 3. B. Don't blow everything up for Mujkic. I want to keep him but if you give him too much money it'll risk ruining our finances. 4. B. Our scouting and youth development is the club's strongest point. Any measure to strengthen it is warrented.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2014 00:33 |
|
whowhatwhere posted:I eagerly await his war of words with alt-universe Mourinho.
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2014 08:09 |
|
Was going to say nine, but that was taken, so I'm going to pick 11 players.
|
# ¿ Mar 7, 2014 02:52 |
|
Zeroisanumber posted:Yeah, seriously. The last time I remember an NFL game failing to sell out was sometime in the early-90's. NFL games fail to completely sell out all the time, if your definition of "sell out" is "fill the stadium to capacity". And some teams struggle to even fill 70% of the stadium reliably. The San Diego Chargers and Tampa Bay Buccaneers have been particularly bad offenders recently.
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2014 06:57 |
|
Zaodai posted:More directly, if an NFL game doesn't sell out, it gets taken off TV in its home market. It still airs everywhere else it was scheduled to. We also always look out for rumors about other teams being moved, because of the ruthless rumor-mongering about the Jaguars moving to Los Angeles, which has died down in favor of ruthless rumor-mongering about the Jaguars moving to London.
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2014 20:34 |
|
Tithin Melias posted:Ugh, that's not a good run, I mean at least you're out of the relegation zone, but I wasn't expecting your team to struggle this much.
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2014 09:15 |
|
Tithin Melias posted:I knew going into this that this would be a consolidation year, I just didn't expect to be being smashed right out the gate.
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2014 09:59 |
|
Mad Wack posted:My favorite political ad is a mailing:
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2014 20:59 |
|
habeasdorkus posted:(As an aside to the audience) Actually, I'm starting to dream big, back to back to back promotions. But it's unwise to promise what I might not be able to deliver.
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2014 06:28 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 02:44 |
|
When did we pick Mujkic up? League 1? You never get premier-league ready players there.
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2014 20:47 |