Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

Can you explain the difference between a European political party and the parliamentary groups? Like, Labour is in the "Party of European Socialists" but their parliamentary group is the PAS&D. Are they the same thing with different names?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

Char posted:

I wanted to make a summary for the Italian situation, but guess what? poo poo's hosed up.
I'll do it nonetheless but this round of elections is turning into local politics: we're pretty much going to verify if Berlusconi's really dead, if Renzi's really our new Berlusconi and if Grillo has vision or is just a hack.

Question about Renzi: he has talked up Tony Blair and said he's great and super cool. Do people outside the UK not realize that Tony Blair was terrible and widely loathed by the time he left?

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

LemonDrizzle posted:

He did a great job of building coalitions as a centrist in Belgium, but in Europe I imagine that he'd be far too outspokenly federalist to get anything of note done - he'd alienate huge chunks of the EPP and a large fraction of S&D right from the get-go. Regardless, it's all a bit academic since he's got no hope of taking the presidency.


Are there any figures on projected turnouts around the union?

edit - re: Blair, I think he gets an unfairly bad rap from the left on non-Iraq issues. People tend to forget that Labour ran on its traditional socialist platforms four times between 1979 and 1992 and lost horribly each time, even when the Tories were pushing policies that literally started riots and tanked the economy. Most of his domestic policies were reasonable compromises given that the public clearly had little appetite for unreformed social democracy, and New Labour did have a number of notable and unambiguously positive achievements that tend to get glossed over or straight up disregarded.

You better hope no UK megathread posters see this.

And I don't think it's unfair for him to be remembered mostly for Iraq considering it was against public opinion, done in spite of massive protests, and has been an unmitigated disaster. It's what he's going to be remembered for. His bizarre need to continue pontificating on what the Middle East needs (spoilers: it's bombs and secular dictatorship) just makes it worse.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

GaussianCopula posted:

The northern european public will not accept Eurobonds, it's really that simple. Yes the German SPD was in favor of it for a certain time, but as soon as election time got closer they did not want to talk about it at all.

I dont think that the people in the EU are ready for an even closer integration. They still feel like they are German, French, Greek as their primary identity and are not willing to allow further centralizing of the EU. They dont want to pay for the southern states, because they feel that they lived beyond their means and the austerity measures are the only way for them to get back onto the right track. Thats why EU and Euro sceptic parties had so many victories on Sunday.

In my opinion it is important that the will of the people is respected and they dont want more EU they want less.

Furthermore it is comical to me that southern europe still does not get that austerity is the only way. The idea of "lets spend more and it will get better" is absurd, its throwing good money after bad. If spending more money than you can afford is such a brilliant policy, why is Germany, who never used fiscal policy for anything but a strong DM, the strongest economy and not Greece or Spain, who spend so much more?

If they're not going to do eurobonds or tranfers or any more integration, they should just break it apart. All the Euro does now is force Southern Europe to commit to austerity instead of inflation.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

Phlegmish posted:

I don't think this type of electoral condescension has ever worked. People just vote for the 'extremists' out of spite.

Didn't it work in the last Greek election?

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

Riso posted:

Erdogan manages to be worse than Putin but nobody cares because he's in NATO or something.

Something something Jeane Kirkpatrick.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

Cat Mattress posted:

If you need to use a prestigious name like Champagne to sell your product, then it's because you product doesn't sell on its own merits, which means your product is crap.

Have you never heard of a genericized trademark before?

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

namesake posted:

What would the secession do apart from annoy Spanish nationalists? I know it's a wealthy part of Spain but surely that isn't going to destroy Spain's economy.

It would probably gently caress up their budget, and since that's literally the only thing anyone seems to care about in the Eurozone it's a Big Deal.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

LemonDrizzle posted:

Pretty pictures from Auntie Beeb:



Why not just...give people money?

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

Typo posted:

A flat income tax in second world countries might not necessarily be a bad thing because rich people are really good at gaming the tax code and a flat tax sometimes actually increases the proportion paid by the wealthy.

Syriza might be far left but I don't think they've joined the Warsaw Pact yet.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

GaussianCopula posted:

You do understand that part of the reforms that are required by Greece address the problem of lacking competitiveness and are aimed to reduce the unemployment rate? Creating more public sector jobs is not the solution, because they do not finance them self. Deficit spending to Greece to were it was in 2009/10, an insolvent country that was no longer able to finance itself. How on earth could you believe that more of the same would yield beneficial results?

It was necessary that Greece's GDP would contract because wages had to fall and because Greece could not devalue it's currency, that meant nominal wages had to fall, which causes a contraction in the GDP.

Oh and if you want to reduce welfare dependency, Greek public sector jobs are in many cases just another form of welfare.

Having done all these things, why has Greece's unemployment rate climbed to 26%?

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

Cat Mattress posted:

If the Greek are expected to absolutely 100% repay back their debt no matter what, then they should do so, certainly -- but capping the interest rate at inflation level, no more. In the absence of the ability to default, then interests above inflation is usury, plain and simple.

Well hey, if they stay at this long enough they might get some deflation!

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

GaussianCopula posted:

So did Syriza already do something? They had some day 1 promises didn't they?

They called off the privatization of the Port of Piraeus.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

Nintendo Kid posted:

When you say 750€ minimum wage, that's 750€ per how much time worked exactly?

Per month I imagine.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

Gorelab posted:

The Greeks as they EU is keeping them are almost certainly better off defaulting it feels. Either way they take a haircut but right now the EU just seems to be wanting them to stay in an eternal twilight of just barely paying while at least in a default there's some chance of getting out.

I think as has been demonstrated in this thread, they don't want them to improve until the perfidious Greeks have completed sufficient penance for their transgressions. There is no sane economic reasoning behind austerity and there's a whole mountain of proof that it doesn't do what they say it does. EU economic policy is just about punishment.

Badger of Basra fucked around with this message at 18:54 on Jan 28, 2015

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

GaussianCopula posted:

The Greeks can have their socialist utopia, if they can pay for it. The social systems of the Northern European countries are not being propped up by Greece or Spain, they are paid for by the inhabitants of those countries. To me that is an important difference.

Are you saying Germany's trade surplus has nothing to do with its generally better economy? The inhabitants of Germany are definitely not paying for that.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

GaussianCopula posted:

The Troika isn't forcing Greece to do anything. They are simply stating that if Greece does something the Eurozone wants (e.g. reforms, spending cuts), they get money from the Eurozone. The choice is still made be the Greeks them self.

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion: We tortured some folks > EuroPol Thread: The EU is a protection racket

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

GaussianCopula posted:

I don't have a crystal ball, sorry. But it is considerable harder for them because they dont get "bonus seats" like Syriza got in Greece, which will potentially make it harder for them to form a government even if they should win.

That's another fun fact about Greece, their government is not even backed by 50% of the votes but they like to harp on and on about the mandate they got from the Greek population.

Of course, the austerity governments of the last five years had massive public support.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

Geriatric Pirate posted:

Sure, no one can stop a default, but for the millionth time here, the issue is not that Greece wants to default, it's that Greece wants to default and still borrow money and have the ECB prop up their banks.



Also, I do find the complaining about Eastern European emigration to be the ultimate hypocrisy/FYGMism of the guys on this thread. Consequences of immigration within the EU:
- Eastern European emigrants get a better life in the west
- People who stay behind in Eastern European countries enjoy the highest wage growth and per capita GDP growth rates in the EU
- Companies in the west get a wider pool of potential employees
- Poor little Western European raised goons now have to compete with much harder working Eastern Europeans for jobs, claim a "race to the bottom" (despite the rise in Eastern European wages), cry about it online, oppose immigration on the grounds that it's hurting the countries where immigrants are leaving from

Why shouldn't we want Eastern Europeans to be able to have stable, fulfilling lives in their home countries? As an American I have no problem with Mexican immigration, but I think we'd all be better off if Mexico was a safe and prosperous country.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

They could always go back to what got Papandreou thrown out in the first place and call a referendum.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

PT6A posted:

I'm not well-informed about how EU politics work, but aren't the democratically-elected representatives (and presumably the people they appoint) supposed to look out for the interest of their constituents? This means they're pushing Greece very hard, but that would seem to be to the benefit of the rest of the EU for the most part. You can't say they don't give a poo poo about democracy when they're in charge of representing not only the man on the street in Athens, but also the man on the street in Frankfurt, Paris, Amsterdam, Madrid and everywhere else in the union.

I think the last 5 years have shown that grinding austerity is not, in fact, to the benefit of the rest of the EU.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

Xoidanor posted:

Costs of living across Europe vary way to much for that to in any way be workable.

Too bad no one thought of that when they decided on the Euro!

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

awesome-express posted:

That's what the Maastricht criteria are for, but in its eternal wisdom Greece fudged those numbers so lolz

And in their eternal wisdom the Germans decided to accept them to the single currency.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

doverhog posted:

So, should the EU have required a caretaker government be appointed as a condition for the bail outs? Might've been a good idea really, if a bit extreme.

They did anyway, did you forget about Papademos and Monti?

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

NihilismNow posted:

This seems like a impartial paper.

So he set out to prove austerity caused suicide and he proved austerity caused suicide. Amazing.

quote:

his co-author, economics professor Alan Collins

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

Unsurprising that our resident Nazi doesn't understand press freedom.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

demonicon posted:

Okay so if this is just about the preventing the suffering of people on principle: Why do you think Greece would be the first in line? Why do you think it is the job of European countries to do this and not the job of all countries?

Because the Eurozone caused the suffering in the first place.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

GaussianCopula posted:

You are seriously supporting the idea of recruiting an army of google glasses wearing people that are going to spy on every business they frequent to combat VAT evasion?

I thought tax evasion was the most super serious problem facing Greece and Syriza should be doing everything to fight it?

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

Riso posted:

British labour opened the immigration floodgates and are therefore the preferred party anyway.

The rivers...have they taken on a red tinge lately?

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

3peat posted:

I was actually just about to post the one from the latest eurobarometer



Do the Hungarians want to be saved from their own government or what?

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

3peat posted:

It's so good of an idea that I expect millions of Irish politicians to cry out in terror

The Celtic Tiger is roaring back!!!

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007


Very confused by this post since Romania does not appear in the graph.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

Freezer posted:

It does specify Western Europe. As a wild guess, imagine a really small bar all the way to the right, followed only by Bulgaria.

Randler posted:

Financial assets might not include real estate. If you include real estate, a lot of "poor" countries move to the left and "rich" Germany moves to the right. :eng101:

I was making a reference as to 3peat's proclivity for posting things about Romania, you see.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

V. Illych L. posted:

valls is a huge arsehole and a third wayist

of course hollande is hollande

why can the PS not have any talent

Maybe they should change their name to les Démocrates.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

Shadoer posted:

Well before a responsible greek government should have come to power and did things like collect taxes and pursued a growth strategy. That didn't happen.

So now it's either repay the debt through the ECB plan or go to the Drachma.


Except then you get into the problems of hyperinflation again.

Hint: a "growth strategy" in a depression involves deficit spending.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007


Lol "you're a bunch of whiny babies who won't do what we want - vote yes!"

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

Riso posted:

Domestic politics.

And Angela Merkel is obviously being a clear-eyed internationalist.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

GaussianCopula posted:

My argument is not that an increase in VAT is generally not regressive, because under "normal" circumstances it might very well be, but that it is not in Greece, because of very specific parameters.

Which parameters are those

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007


"Cutbacks aimed at trying to drag the Nordic country out of a three year economic downturn."

Good to know the press still don't get it!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

Isn't C's just a vaguely liberal pro-EU party?

  • Locked thread