Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

i miss like 1-2 months ago when you could post current events threads in gbs

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

also there was too much anime

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

finally a circumcision thread in d&d

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

Dreylad posted:

I've come to realize that Mike Judge is a pretty funny dude, and anything of his that I don't find funny is usually because it's not aimed at me. Explains why he seems so hit and miss for me.

youre thinking of jike mudge

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

so its final. president rand paul

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

A GIANT PARSNIP posted:

http://youtubedoubler.com/dd2I

Mute right, maximize right.

You're welcome.

lmao

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

Gail Wynand posted:

what do you mean at least in EU4 you dont have to understand the intricacies of medieval inheritance laws

ya i have never understood ppl who think ck2 is easier to understand than eu4. managing a state is way easier than keeping track of all the feudal bullshit if you are playing it correctly

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

Aliquid posted:

i don't wanna go through another six months of learning how an in-game economy works

lucky for you, in vicky 2 it doesnt

seriously it makes no loving sense at all. paradox is poo poo at modeling an economy due to their failure at grounding their games in economic materialism and marxism-leninism

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

my dad thinks harrison bergeron means vonnegut basically endorses ayn rand objectivism lmao

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

Nintendo Kid posted:

Where did you go to school as a kid?

this a pretty common reading in my experience. people are loving stupid

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

i like the story he wrote about peeing in bed

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

Dr. Faustus posted:

Sophomore year, AP English, we were given copies of Ayn Rand's little book Anthem and given an assignment to write a paper with the theme, "Ayn Rand's Anthem As A Scathing Condemnation Of Collectivism."

To this day I don't know if my English teacher had any particular agenda, there. She never took a pro or con stance on why Rand condemned Collectivism, only that it was a theme we should all be able to support with our meager writing skills using just the source material.

I just remember the word "scathing" making me wonder.

this is standard curriculum in a lot of school districts, she probably had nothing to do with the term "scathing"

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

anthem is americas 1984 and its assigned to millions of students

there is no joke or punchline there

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

zoux posted:

Cat's Cradle is my favorite Vonnegut book btw.

same

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

capital in the twenty-first century suffers from the typical soft leftist rot which ignores the fact that if nothing is done, if there are no radical social movements to steer the global economy to other ends, that the consequences will be catastrophic

like a lot of left-academia it's the useful Very Serious Analysis you can print in the NYT, ignoring that we are fast running out of time, that we are creating a hot house planet with billions of future refugees, resource shortages where a lot of people die



analysis of the near future without going over the necessary political responses to such dire circumstances is unhelpful hth

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

Shear Modulus posted:

With how much Republicans love to make kids learn about how evolution is just a theory and abstinence and that slavery/the Trail of Tears/ etc weren't all that bad I'm suprised that Ayn Rand being required reading isn't more pervasive than she already is.

because if you read anything else she wrote shes a militant atheist and writes a lot about atheism

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

that guy is a national treasure and he did nothing wrong

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

Shear Modulus posted:

i want to try and join my school's student democrats to see if theres any worthwhile networking to be had but theyre making it real hard to care by holding their meetings at loving 7 pm

meet up with the local socialist outfit. there will be more drinking, more yelling, and you dont have to sell newspapers if you dont join

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

ReidRansom posted:

Join the socialists instead. Or if they don't exist, start a socialists group. Also become a socialist first if you aren't already.

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

wow thats just like my work environment

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

whats the problem with a nuclear energy iran, constantly inspected, and how is it any more dangerous than a nuclear armed israel, which doesnt even declare its nuclear arsenal?

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

I support an Iranian nuclear deterrent to Israeli aggression

all the sadder that Mossad agrees that they arent even doing that

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

The Iranian State is ready to launch into full jihad, watch Khamenei start a loving nuclear war.

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

what loving planet do you live on

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

"bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran" - united states presidential candidate. death to america

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

Volkerball posted:

They're also inching ever closer to calling it the United States instead of the Great Satan. Progress!

whats the end game other than constant ratcheting up of rhetoric and saber rattling

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

Volkerball posted:

i don't know but there's a balance between not just being aggressive for sake of it and not being neville chamberlain

wait so are we talking about modern iran 2015 or nazi germany 1938

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

Raskolnikov38 posted:

the end game is dialing back the rhetoric and saber rattling and letting the ME states continue their influence wars amongst themselves without using nuclear weapons

that is not at all going to happen, and is a silly fiction.

as time goes forward nuclear capability is easier and easier, no one can stop Iran other than an invasion. Iran should be a natural ally, they should be friends, not our enemies.

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

Volkerball posted:

we're talking about a country that currently has soldiers and militias in syria and iraq slaughtering civilians and propping up dictatorial regimes, and that helped overthrow the government in yemen to set up another one.

wait so are you talking about the United States or Iran?

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

Volkerball posted:

i don't think we should be friends with any sectarian government thats response to opposition politics is to kill everyone, personally

good joke

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

Volkerball posted:

oh are we on the "obama is no different than bush, bad things don't happen anywhere unless the us does them" kick?

a nuclear iran would stabilize the middle east

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

lets here assume that volkerball, an idiot, believes that iran is Evil and will nuke Israel because Reasons which will never be explained

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

Raskolnikov38 posted:

yes giving iran an even bigger dick to swing with it as it fucks around in the disasters the US left will surely stabilize the region

because iran is a natural regional power and has have a sphere of influence like any other powerful nation on this dumbass world

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

Volkerball posted:

i don't think they'll do anything to israel. the issue to me is that the left and dems are moving towards this reconciliation with iran idea, and it's largely based around a really stupid premise: that iran is cool and good, and if we be friendly to them, cool and good things will happen. we can totally crush terrorist groups who rose up specifically over oppression from iran and its proxies by just helping iran oppress them harder. a sustainable, long term solution that will in no way end poorly.

confronting the iranians with hostility and militarism, going with the israelis and assuming iranians are awful villains in the bibi sense, that is the worst possible outcome for nation that is not that

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

if the Iranians are not developing nukes, they should, because if they don't the United States and Israel might consider a war.

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

Badger of Basra posted:

we must secure the existence of our nukes and a future for persian children

i will argue against iranian nuclear technology when israel declares their own and signs the non-proliferation agreement

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

TEAYCHES
Jun 23, 2002

Absurd Alhazred posted:

So you will never have an independent opinion about Iran because the Middle East is a pissing match with Israel for you?

in the sense that its a powerplay, sure. having your own independent opinion out of context of that is pissing into the wind

  • Locked thread