Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

Warcabbit posted:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/05/us/richard-mellon-scaife-influential-us-conservative-dies-at-82.html


Well, this'll change things a little. Not as much as one of the Koch brothers, but it'll be interesting to see.

What was the guy's obsession with Clinton, anyway?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

made of bees posted:

Right, and he's a hero because of the treason he committed, which is why saying we should ban the celebration of treason is stupid.

How did John Brown commit treason?

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

Discendo Vox posted:

He died in an attempt to seize a federal armory, which included taking civilian hostages. This was stage one of a plan that basically involved destroying the economies, governments and all public institutions of most of the slaveholding states, starting with Virginia. He was charged with and convicted of treason against that state. Sympathizing with his cause is fine, but he was pretty indisputably a) nuts and b) committing treason. Dude turned his family into a sort of abolitionist cult.

Okay I'll go with treason against a state. I didn't really know that was a thing.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

Nintendo Kid posted:

Attempting to take over a federal armory by force is pretty clear treason against the nation at large, to be honest.

I don't think he was attempting to overthrow the government of the United States.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

Samurai Sanders posted:

Does treason exist as a moral/ethical/philosophical concept, in addition to the legal one?

Betrayal does.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

The Ape of Naples posted:

It's fine. Sorry I snapped. To be honest I think Rand's influence is overstated. Years, there are some rich, powerful followers of hers that have their hands in politics these days. But I think most people haven't really read her stuff. They mean to and then say gently caress it when they see how big and stupid Atlas Shrugged is. They really just like the bullet points of it. That's why the conservatives on the right really don't worry about her atheism because they don't even know it. They just love the money and selfishness. I think that's why Paul Ryan had to change is public tune on her. He's as intimately familiar with her work as he is with Rage Against the Machine.

We talk about and know more about Ayn Rand here in D&D then they do on the right. Like the bible.

EDIT: Confession time, I loved the Fountainhead when I was 17. It's still bad but definitely the "best" Ayn Rand book and a much better story. It still has the 30+ page character rambling. But at least it was more "believable".

Please, Paul Ryan is completely familiar with Rand's work. He just was counting on his supporters being ignorant. His legislative proposals vs his fake soup kitchen stunt demonstrate plain and clear which side he's on and it ain't Jesus.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

ShadowCatboy posted:

Once people start saying stuff with muddy definitions and a bombastic attitude, it becomes obvious that they don't have a cogent point and instead they're just saying words.


It is pretty funny.
So on a completely unrelated subject, let me tell you about poststructuralism...

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

Taerkar posted:

Isn't it actually even dumber in the book? Like a few of the TITANS OF INDUSTRY gardened as a hobby and that would be all they need. After all as TITANS OF INDUSTRY they would no doubt be far more productive with their farms than those leeches that are regular farmers.

I haven't read Atlas Shrugged (Fountainhead was enough to know I didn't want to read the same awful poo poo but 3 times as long) so I'm talking Randroid generalizations here, but one thing I've heard from those types is that the TITANS OF INDUSTRY are literally the only people in the world with genius and initiative. They could do anyone else's job because they're so brilliant, but nobody could start a successful company but them.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

Tigntink posted:

This. My coworkers and I make between $22 - $26 an hour in Seattle and half of my workers have whined incessantly about how it isn't fair and how hard they had to work to get here and those people don't deserve to make so much money.


Tell them to work harder so they'll make more.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

a rowdy mullet posted:

For fucks sake please don't give the republicans money :(

Eh, I gave to the Obama campaign because I wanted a sweet-rear end Biden beer koozie. Sometimes a joke is worth it.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

Captain_Maclaine posted:

Remember back in 2008 when the hillaryis44.com loons insisted in appending $.44 to all their donations under the crazed delusion that Hillary would personally recognize it was from them specifically? Same sort of ritualism, I figure.

http://hillaryis44.com

Still being updated.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

Pornographic Memory posted:

These assholes should put their mouths over those stacks and have somebody hit the gas if it's not so bad, what a bunch of loving shitstains. I'm not that great at being environmentally conscious but this makes me really, really angry.


Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

MrChupon posted:

Hey sorry for the uninformed question but I've just been out of the loop on news in the last month. Is there *actually* some sort of a humanitarian crisis (like, more significant than 1 month, 6 months, or even 5 years ago) on the Mexican border or is this just a trumped up cable news thing?

It's been building over this past calendar year

quote:

Since October, more than 52,000 children — most from Central America and many of them unaccompanied by adults — have been taken into custody. That's nearly double last year's total and 10 times the number from 2009.

A study by the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees found that 58 percent of the unaccompanied children are motivated by safety concerns, fearing conditions back home.

Their home countries have been racked by gang violence, fueled by the drug trade. According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, "Salvadoran and Honduran children ... come from extremely violent regions where they probably perceive the risk of traveling alone to the U.S. preferable to remaining at home."

There's violence in Guatemala, too. Many Guatemalan children, however, come from poor rural areas and may be seeking economic opportunities. The same is true for children from poorer parts of El Salvador. For many, the prospect of reuniting with family members in the U.S. is also a powerful motivating force.

Central American families may have been misled by rumors — often spread by profit-seeking smugglers — that their children will readily be reunited with relatives already in the U.S.

U.S. policy allows Mexican child migrants to be sent back quickly across the border. However, under a 2008 law meant to combat child trafficking, the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act, children from Central America must be given a court hearing before they are deported (or allowed to stay). Given the huge backlog of cases, they may have to wait years for a hearing.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

haveblue posted:

Obviously you don't live in NYC.

I've lived on the East Coast, West Coast, and Midwest and I've never lived in an area where people eat pizza with a fork. I think it's just a scattering of freaks and perverts.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

radical meme posted:

Serious question, and I haven't seen anything in any article about it. Where the hell are the churches in this whole furor? What happened to the right's catch all miracle cure for all social ills, faith based initiatives and our nation's great christian houses of worship? Where the hell do they stand on the anger and xenophobic hatred towards children? Where do they stand on showing compassion and charity towards these children? What happened to WWJD?

The churches in general have been pushing hard for immigration reform, compassion, charity, etc.
Therefore they are being completely ignored.

e: from the Freeper thread

quote:

Catholics importing more poor Mexican...Lutherans importing more Somalians to get signed up for MN welfare... there are plenty of ‘religious’ leftists always clamoring for bigger gubmint ‘safety nets’ .

IIRC,Catholic Charities now gets 40% of their $ from gubmint grants.

50 posted on Wednesday, July 09, 2014 6:51:36 AM by TurboZamboni (Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

wixard posted:

Isn't the end result of this logic that in any military conflict we should go straight to bombing roads and hospitals instead of military targets? Why prioritize military targets at all overseas, we don't even have to worry about their military coming over here. Eventually it will happen anyway so we might as well cut to the chase and end the conflict earlier, right?

That really depends on what your goals are. If you want to occupy the territory, for example, you don't want to destroy infrastructure unless everything else fails.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

Raskolnikov38 posted:

Terry McAuliffe quit and moved to Ohio?

And was replaced by Martha Coakley?

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

On Terra Firma posted:

I don't see how that makes any sense to anyone. Like, if you want people to "behave" how is that any different than government at any level pointing guns at you and hoping you "behave"? Do they not get how they are in their own little way a bit tyrannical? The majority of the country want background checks, but they're deathly afraid of the gun lobby (not out of fear of violent retribution) so nothing ever comes of it.

Except that they're right and you're wrong so it's okay to force someone to do the right thing.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

Cool story Hansel.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

CaptainCarrot posted:

I tried to resist "Weedlord Bonerhitler". I really did.

I didn't try.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

axeil posted:

It was also carrying a sitting US Congressman at the time.

The other incident Joementum is referring to is of course the time the US shot down an Iranian airliner during the Iran-Iraq War. Turns out the US Navy vessel was in Iranian waters when it happened.

Yeah...

Both the Malaysian flight and the Vincennes incident were the results of twitchy, poorly trained anti air crews in a hot combat zone failing to properly identify radar contacts. KAL 007 was shot down by an interceptor jet who visually identified it as a passenger liner but shot anyway. For some reason, that's supposed to be a good comparison for the Republicans. :iiam:

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:

Every mention of Allen West should be followed with War Criminal

We could just refer to him as "that war criminal Army colonel that Fox News hires"

Oh wait, that isn't specific enough.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

ReidRansom posted:

That, and I mean, sure, treason is a crime, just not a war crime.

I'm pretty sure that we can work a war crime or two out of supplying the Contras.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

My Imaginary GF posted:

What I don't get is, if they really wanted to impeach Obama, why not do it for something like his use of surveillence technology against domestic citizens?

I think you know the answer to that.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

Fried Chicken posted:

On that note the New Yorker has an interesting piece on Biden today

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/07/28/biden-agenda

quote:

To illustrate his emphasis on personality as a factor in foreign affairs, Biden recalled visiting Putin at the Kremlin in 2011: “I had an interpreter, and when he was showing me his office I said, ‘It’s amazing what capitalism will do, won’t it? A magnificent office!’ And he laughed. As I turned, I was this close to him.” Biden held his hand a few inches from his nose. “I said, ‘Mr. Prime Minister, I’m looking into your eyes, and I don’t think you have a soul.’ ”

“You said that?” I asked. It sounded like a movie line.

“Absolutely, positively,” Biden said, and continued, “And he looked back at me, and he smiled, and he said, ‘We understand one another.’ ” Biden sat back, and said, “This is who this guy is!”

:drat:

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May
I just love conservatives talking about how a military action to accomplish regime change that lasted less than a year and had zero American casualties was a "complete disaster."

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

DemeaninDemon posted:

That's an awful amount of water for a completely wrong mint julep.

A julep should have just enough water to dissolve the sugar unless you're using simple syrup. The rest is crushed ice and bourbon.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

ReidRansom posted:

Water? I always just muddle the sugar and mint, then add bourbon and ice. Using simnple syrup is no good because you need the grit of the sugar to beat up on the mint leaves.

:shrug: My muddler has a textured end.

:wiggle:

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

radical meme posted:

Do the math and prove it. Otherwise, I stand by my "you're an idiot". I'm not talking about doing a stoner road trip. I've done plenty of those. I'm talking about actually traveling coast to coast and visiting Cities along the way where you get to know people other than your road buddies. Show me the math and prove I'm wrong.

Just by example, Motel 6 costs $40 per night and that awesome Irving Hostel someone mentioned has a price tag of $57 per night. (Ooops, I missed one in Irving that actually goes for $28.55 a night).

Or hit up some goons with couches.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

Nate RFB posted:

Healthcare costs would skyrocket since millions of people receiving health insurance would no longer be able to pay for them. It would be catastrophic.

Hey, remember when the Republicans were shouting about how closing national parks was hurting people in order to get laws Obama wanted passed?

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

Dr.Zeppelin posted:

Which multi-billionaires are backing Glenn Greenwald? George Soros?

Pierre Omidyar.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

Chokes McGee posted:

Well, yeah. The guy's a whack jo---


:stonklol:

Things Bob Barr is good for:
- Laughing at your libertarian friends who talk about "voting on principle"

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

Since he's probably going to run for office again, I'm happy that he keeps running his dumb mouth.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

Magres posted:

Also I would think that Hillary has an enormous amount of political capital built up that Obama didn't. I don't trust Hillary much, but one thing I do trust her to do is to get poo poo done.

The Republicans have held the line on "if we can't get everything we want, nobody will get anything" for 6 years. What will break that?

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

MODS CURE JOKES posted:

There's a lot of variation within the democratic caucus regarding labor (outside of a rising minimum wage), public schools, and health care. At at grassroots level not so much, but there are plenty in power who are corporatists.

The Clintons, of course, being among the most prominent. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Policy_Institute

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

Bunleigh posted:

God drat, Joe Liberman. That is one melted candle I don't miss.

I googled "joe lieberman melted candle" and found this from David "Get Your War On" Rees:

quote:

10 jokes about Joe Lieberman & his threat to filibuster any health care bill which includes a public option

1. Joe Lieberman walks into a bar with a parrot on his shoulder. The bartender turns to him and says, “Sorry, we don’t serve bitter old egomaniacs here. And gently caress your stupid parrot.”

2. Joe Lieberman walks into a second bar. The second bartender says, “Get out.” Joe Lieberman says, “Why? Can’t I buy a drink?” The second bartender says, “Don’t you get it? Everybody hates you.”

3. Knock, knock!
Who’s there?
Joe.
Joe who?
Joe Lieberman.
Get off my doorstep, you rear end in a top hat.

4. Joe Lieberman is on a lifeboat with a young woman who was denied insurance coverage because she was raped, a middle-class guy who can’t afford his premiums, and a sickly child. He stabs them all in the back.

5. Joe Lieberman is fellating the health insurance industry when a little boy opens the door and screams, “What are you doing, Senator Lieberman?!?” Lieberman wipes his mouth and says, “Isn’t it obvious, Timmy?”

6. What do you get when you cross Joe Lieberman with a frog? A fascinating, frog-voiced lump of wrinkles whose blood runs cold with reptilian contempt for those in need. And a frog.

7. Why did Joe Lieberman set his hair on fire and run down the street naked, screaming “Look at me, look at me, everybody look at me”? Because he has a compulsive need for attention.

8. What’s the difference between John McCain and Joe Lieberman? Oh God, WHO CARES? Seriously, enough with those two. What have they been right about in the past 8 years? Iraq? The economy? Please. Anybody who takes anything those two say seriously should check themselves in to one of those emergency-stop-smoking-crack clinics with Dr. Drew.

9. How do you know when Joe Lieberman is lying? His lips are movi– wait, wait. WHO CARES? Why do I let this guy get under my skin? He’s not gonna actually filibuster the Senate bill. He’s just upset that nobody paid attention to him for a few weeks, so he’s lashing out. It’s all based on a deep-seated anxiety about salvaging his hopelessly battered reputation– by clawing his way back into the Sunday-show spotlight, or something. Seriously, I can’t even get inside this guy’s head to figure out his motivation, because after 10 seconds of trying to see the world the way Joe Lieberman sees it, I start to feel clammy and bugs start crawling out of my fingertips and when I look in the mirror, my face looks like a melted candle.

10. Why did Joe Lieberman cross the road? I can only assume it’s because he sucks.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

api call girl posted:

*By putting his name on pre-existing programs, then mandating abstinence-based education thereby setting back the fight on AIDs by decades.

What pre-existing program did Bush re-label as PEPFAR?

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

euphronius posted:

I can't think of anything Bush did that was on balance positive.

Not invade Iran?

The bipartisan 2008 law to combat human trafficking which is causing problems with the migrant children was a good law at the time, though it needs to be adjusted for today's circumstances. He vastly increased HIV/AIDS medication access in Africa. Signed the Stockholm POPs convention (although Congress didn't ratify it because Congress). Um.. eventually fired Rumsfeld?

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

Gyges posted:

To be honest I wouldn't be surprised if a thorough examination of all the theses turned in for degrees/grades found a higher average rate of plagiarization than that. Politicians only get called out more frequently because people are actually checking. Also now with the internet you can just Google the paper and look for hits. Which he should have been aware of in 2007, but apparently he plagiarized well enough to get away with it.

If there's one thing I learned working at a college it's that students will plagiarize by default and often ask your help in doing so. Though there are the noble few who just write their whole paper by pulling poo poo directly from their rear end, and then just look for a list of books to toss into a bibliography. At least they have a little class and moxy.

Early on I did this and got accused of plagiarism because I didn't fake enough footnotes and they didn't believe that I just pulled it directly from my rear end. After that I just wrote papers that were 90% cited quotes and 10% conjunctions.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

StandardVC10 posted:

The liberal arts section at my art college had this Procrustean devotion to the MLA format. Like, if we included a piece that we ourselves made in the paper we were writing, we had to cite it just like we would anything else. I have seldom felt sillier than I did when I was trying to work out how to cite a scan from my own sketchbook.

Citing yourself is a fundamental pillar of academic writing.

  • Locked thread