Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

:wtc: is going on, we’re doing effortposting again?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Mr. Nice! posted:

I know, right? He could at least post the emails.

Russia, if you’re listening, just post the email, okay?

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

also p hosed up that Republicans buy the theory that POTUS can’t be indicted.

Scalia voice: “Show me in the constitution where Mueller can’t charge a sitting president with obstruction. Which article or amendment is that?” (drops mike)

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

I would have considered talking to him to give him a chance to break the news to the agency. But that’s the type of thinking that got me to say privately to a coworker “Hey [Senior Attorney with anger management issues], I just heard you say the N word [in describing Trayvon Martin no less] and I’m gonna ask you not use that in the office anymore.” (On the one hand, he stormed out of his office and yelled at staff “Hey did anyone hear me say n*****!” And then emailed the same staff members along with management to claim he didn’t say it, which pretty much put those staff on notice that he expected them to cover for his denial. OTOH it made his HR complaint (that I was “trying to get him in trouble”) pretty hilarious since I never needed to turn him in for racism thanks to his blow up and email.

Hot Dog Day #91 posted:

The agency told him he needs to self report.

Technically, sounds like your boss should be reported for failure to report if they see this as a “need to” situation.

yronic heroism fucked around with this message at 03:12 on Aug 23, 2018

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Hot Dog Day #91 posted:

Oh I actually did advise him to tell the agency first. I spent an entire day telling him. He kept insisting it's not a conflict.

Also, I'm loving glad I murdered him I got a fan.

Get him to sign it “your number one fan.”

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

mastershakeman posted:

I think we had a tabletop rpg argument in here a year ago and I am ready and willing to explain how you, yes you, play badly and how the system I like is correct and good and objectively better

for starters, any rpg released in the 2000s is trash and so is any homebrew based on it

Apocalypse World solved the riddle of how to design tabletop and all RPGs about being a law student must now be AW reskins and written in IRAC form.

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

nm posted:

Oh poo poo, I did sub a DA once. He interviewed a witness without an investigator present and I wanted him to impeach her.

lol :drat: and looks like CA rules make prior inconsistent statements easier to admit than consistent ones.

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Also the one time I brought a motion to quash a subpoena, I won and it was freakin’ sweet.

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

I assume all people with kids are at least 40.

Also every birthday I tell people who ask that it’s my 40th and see how many I can fool. It’s been a big improvement in my track record these last couple years tho. :smith:

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

There are still some olds around but some age out of posting.

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Vox Nihili posted:

If you ever stop posting the rule is that we have to assume you are dead.

Based on the events in the ask/tell and drug subforums this is usually true anyway.

Fair enough, but samglover still has a blog going.

Also having met a surprising number of lawgoons in person, I can attest that there are closet olds still among us.

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Popero posted:

Millennial lawyers it's so cute

BroEnai (sp?) should rename his anime that.

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Hot Dog Day #91 posted:

Wow. You are all so loving dumb and non observant for lawyers

What fancy lawyers are you hanging out with?

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

All elected judges should be lawgoons with no regard for whether they keep their job and a yearning to spend more time painting their 40k collection.

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

terrorist ambulance posted:

Is there actual statutory presumptions re intent to traffick from just amounts of controlled substance possessed

That would be dumb so someone probably does that, but if a legislature just wants to be tough they can just set a relatively low “large amount” threshold where they treat possession and sale the same. Realistically though, there are tons of ways to prove intent to sell based on cash, “buy books”, circumstances of an arrest, etc. It should be a really large amount before the state’s case is just “amount is inconsistent with personal use.”

Disclaimer: I am not a Texan.

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

ActusRhesus posted:

Aaaaaand. Another time my state proves its superiority. PDs by statute must be paid the same as prosecutors of equal seniority. Also determinations on expert funding and such is done by an independent commission of judges (recuse on questions in their own district) and lawyers (no PDs or prosecutors) appointed by the legislature. Same commission makes PD hiring decisions and handles other matters affecting PDs.

There is a mirror commission to handle prosecutor poo poo. Same model, different members.

When you think about it PDs should really just be in it for justice and you don’t want to attract the wrong kind of people to the job by flashing too much money around, amirite?

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

More than one thing can be true at once, so for example incarcerating murderers can be good and the penal system as a whole can be not so good, and whatever you think of drug prosecutions, it’s absolutely true that those cases are far more common than murders so we can’t ignore that they are part of the system. Prosecutors also can’t pretend that they have no discretion when they have maybe the most of anyone.

There, I just solved criminal justice reform for the thread.

yronic heroism fucked around with this message at 06:15 on Sep 6, 2018

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Capital punishment is only just when carried out by drone or commando raid and all other methods are cruel and/or unusual. (Fight me.)

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

blarzgh posted:

Yeah but if you think about it, everyone is going to die eventually so killing somebody is really just taking an indeterminate amount of their already limited existence away, so its NBD REALLY

“A death sentence, properly imposed, is merely a slightly premature cardiac event at a hunting lodge but with greater forewarning for the convenience of the family of the condemned for funerary planning.” We find no procedural deficiencies in this matter and therefore AFFIRM the judgment of Texas/Florida/Mississippi/Alabama.

Justice Thomas, concurring: I would also hold that a Viagra overdose is not only neither cruel nor unusual, but is, in fact, the most humane form of euthanasia when administered with a reasonable amount of coke can-themed pornographic imagery.

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Tokelau All Star posted:

Did I venture into the weed thread?

A quick check of the weed thread shows they have an obsession with the ideal amounts of product burn-off, doseage, and customer satisfaction, so no.

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

In contrast, this is the thread for bitter, resentful slackers who hate their day jobs and will die at the age of 43.

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

If this is not on any prosecutor’s playlist they need to file more dismissals, for failure to get laid.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GGXzlRoNtHU

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Discendo Vox posted:

thankee, thankee.

Any consideration of death penalty policy should bear in mind that current death penalty methods are inhumane in part because of efforts by anti-death penalty advocates to make other methods impossible.

No, the real problem is that any just death penalty system would be too resource-intensive to deliver. It’s inhumane by its very nature.

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

ActusRhesus posted:

Yes.

It’s your fault for being willing to represent monsters. You should only defend innocent people. Also the state are evil bastard who only prosecute the innocent. Therefore none of your clients are guilt and you have no kills. I’m using DnD logic.

I’d post there. But I like not being banned.

Everyone says evilweasel’s a goon hero.

He’s not a goon hero.

He’s a hero because he got banned in D&D.

I like people who don’t get banned.

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Tbh the average failson in D&D at least didn’t go to law school so who’s the real corncobs?

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Pook Good Mook posted:

I want to see someone seek specific performance following breach of a BDSM contract.

In a 5-4 decision, divided along incel/sex-haver lines...

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Pook Good Mook posted:

5-4 split identical to the typical ideological lines.

Was heavily implied.

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Bushido Brown posted:

Any tips on interviewing

They already know who they want to hire. Just be sure to send a gracious follow-up email noting their probable ethnicity.

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

mastershakeman posted:

I'l be interviewing with a solo for a job I don't want but feel pressured to take and am 100% sure that I'll be told all about this and how thats so hard and that's why the position will pay half of what I make right now but The Experience is Invaluable

Actually instead of woe is me, what's the best substance to relax with when I've had high blood pressure for years (brought on during my period where I was in great shape and working out a ton on gymnastics and using a substance I thought was safe until it got banned by the fda, woops) ? Beer? Whiskey? Weed?

Emails

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

All the lawyers care about is your ability to organize a binder, hth.

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Are they also considered “Boomers” in Norway? I thought that was just our thing?

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Pook Good Mook posted:

Every country that fought in WW2 had a baby boom when it ended.

I mean more in a cultural sense than demographic, though these are linked and I guess most places have their share of lovely old people.

Nice piece of fish posted:

Bigly. Colloquially known as the ""dessert generation", they are the very numerous descendants of the war generation. Enjoying unprecedented wealth after oil and 80s inflation obliterating most debt as well as getting mostly free educations, they voted in right wing government after right wing government to reduce taxes, eliminate inheritance tax (for them, effectively), bloated housing prices to obscene levels, reducing their pension age while increasing ours and strangled young housebuyers by instituting capital requrements for housing loans locking a good portion of millennials out of the market. Now, they've even successfully sold our infinite water power to europe to extract more wealth from our loving natural resources.

Nowadays they are whining about immigrants and not having grandkids. Fuckers. While my generation is nowhere remotely as screwed here as in the US, the massive gulf in opportunities, starting wealth and political power is staggeringly huge. I just hope the inheritance tax doesn't come back until I've inherited, because the boomers croaking will for 90% of the country be the single largest relative transfer of wealth in our history.

Makes sense. Do you have a lot of young chuds these days like the US and most European countries I read about?

yronic heroism fucked around with this message at 18:20 on Sep 13, 2018

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Guams on the beat.

https://www.guampdn.com/story/news/2018/09/17/marshals-attempt-serve-legal-documents-lt-gov-ray-tenorio/912235002/

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Alexeythegreat posted:

I wonder what you're expecting when using a reputable website like SugarDaddyMeet.com
That goes for both of them

Realistically, this situation is probs exactly what all of their non-bot connections are.

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Vox Nihili posted:

guam would probably be real easy to coup

well the lt gov is an ex cop so his excuse is just that he was trying to help.

of course the last cop there to get shot... was shot by another cop who was drinking so this might not actually fly.

yronic heroism fucked around with this message at 18:09 on Sep 20, 2018

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Vox Nihili posted:

Just gonna drop this little fella here so all you "constitutional law" buffs (sophists) can dig in:

https://twitter.com/nytmike/status/1043195272992632835

I like that the denial on the 25th am is tailored as “I haven’t witnessed Trump poo poo his pants in the middle of a meeting personally...”

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

No, confirmation (or non-denial denials) that the president is a mush brain and the Gorilla channel thing happened will always be the best part, and this would not have happened here but for a situation caused by lovely reporting.

So when you think of it, it’s really the best of all possible media landscapes.

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Congrats, that’s the dream.

Also I forgot to reply to this earlier:

Toona the Cat posted:

Dear Law Thread,

I apologize if I have hurt you at any point this year and I humbly ask for your forgiveness.

L’Shalom

Dear Toona,

Thank you for the interview.

I forgot to ask earlier, but by the way...

yronic heroism fucked around with this message at 00:00 on Sep 22, 2018

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

evilweasel posted:

also there are deals that they've been striking where mitch basically says "ok, in these two weeks, if you insist on the full amount of time per judge i can confirm five (number picked out of thin air, not sure what the correct amount is) judges. we can agree that we just vote on those five judges now and take two weeks off, or we can stay in session all two weeks to vote on those judges." and they agree they'd rather have the two weeks of time off with no net change in how many judges get confirmed

Also weren’t they district court judges only?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

yronic heroism
Oct 31, 2008

Well when you’re as good at arguing about THE LAW as I am everyone seems to think you’re a dick.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply