|
Your Boy Fancy posted:
I love that this is almost literally true https://www.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/election/article221350970.html posted:Two weeks out from Election Day when polls showed Kobach in a tight race with Kelly, members of his senior staff did a walk-through of the governor’s office, according to a Republican source.
|
# ¿ Nov 11, 2018 19:59 |
|
|
# ¿ May 12, 2024 17:51 |
|
eke out posted:that's what i did, i meant I was quoting so others don't have to bother A nice easy way to contribute to the slow death of journalism (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST) (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ¿ Nov 17, 2018 01:43 |
|
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...51d2_story.htmlquote:The Trump administration has won the support of Mexico’s incoming government for a plan to remake U.S. border policy by requiring asylum seekers to wait in Mexico while their claims move through U.S. courts, according to Mexican officials and senior members of president-elect Andrés Manuel López Obrador’s transition team.
|
# ¿ Nov 24, 2018 18:33 |
|
BrandorKP posted:It's probably time to regulate the internet.
|
# ¿ Dec 19, 2018 23:22 |
|
Lil Mama Im Sorry posted:Quite simply, most journalists that work for these prestigious news orgs are dependent on their government/intelligence sources for their amazing scoops on whether General McRaven thinks Trump is a turd or not. These orgs do not publish stories that can damage those important relationships. you're wrong about this and it's the difference between RT and news. the washington post publishing the snowden leaks is the biggest example I can think of from this decade.
|
# ¿ Jan 4, 2019 21:53 |
|
tetrapyloctomy posted:"Trump deserves blame because he has stupid demands, but what about the Democrats who refuse to capitulate with the stupid demands?!" the tweet has at least generated a decent amount of backlash and discussion about how to improve the journalistic value of fact checks, and how to distinguish fact checks as they're generally thought of (calling someone out when they're attempting to mislead) from 'fact checks' providing information which would only be useful to a person who recently awoke from a 30 year coma
|
# ¿ Jan 9, 2019 10:45 |
|
thanks for the news anyway, the reporters are still working https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/11/us/politics/fbi-trump-russia-inquiry.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage quote:F.B.I. Opened Inquiry Into Whether Trump Was Secretly Working on Behalf of Russia quote:Trump has concealed details of his face-to-face encounters with Putin from senior officials in administration
|
# ¿ Jan 13, 2019 01:04 |
|
Zipperelli. posted:So does the gov't shutdown affect air travel somehow? How does this work for the TSA? Do they have to work and just not get paid? https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/11/nyregion/tsa-shutdown.html quote:The nation’s 51,000 airport security agents are among the federal employees who have been ordered to work through the partial shutdown, which began on Dec. 22.
|
# ¿ Jan 13, 2019 20:29 |
|
interesting devil-in-the-details analysis from herequote:Republicans, badly damaged by the 2017 campaign to repeal the Affordable Care Act, have struggled to craft a powerful message against Medicare-for-all. One argument against it, that it was a "$32 trillion takeover” of health insurance, fell flat in the midterms. A much more promising line of attack is about the bill's implications for private insurance, and the necessity to raise taxes to replace insurance premiums. This month's Kaiser tracking poll found 56 percent of voters backing “Medicare-for-all” — but 60 percent of them opposing “higher taxes,” 60 percent opposing a “threat to the current Medicare program” and 58 percent against “eliminating private insurance companies.” So you've got 56% for m4a in principle, but 58-60% against implementing it. The good news is that's not a HUGE gap, but it does seem to indicate that campaigning on "americans want m4a" is a plan with some holes in it. And hey, the republicans did great running on repealing obamacare while ignoring the details - it's just the election after that where things got messy.
|
# ¿ Jan 30, 2019 00:56 |
|
paul manafort has balls of solid rock and unfortunately a brain of solid rock as well https://twitter.com/kenvogel/status/1095829540138553351
|
# ¿ Feb 14, 2019 00:45 |
|
withak posted:Mr. Manafort is constitutionally incapable of not committing crimes. he's like the terminator, but instead of murder he does crimes wait
|
# ¿ Feb 14, 2019 00:57 |
|
predicto posted:I hate to be that guy but I can't help it https://twitter.com/RobElgasABC7/status/1096197727782924288
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2019 01:30 |
|
Discendo Vox posted:My point isn't about what it says, because there's no real reason to engage with what it says when we know it's bad faith and designed (however well or poorly) to abuse our willingness to process its claims.
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2019 20:19 |
|
Internet Explorer posted:Were you asleep when the term "fake news" was started by non-chuds and then got picked up and distorted by the Cheeto-in-Chief? Or do you think we all stan for Fox News? Discendo Vox posted:I'm not saying it's fake, I'm saying it's a bad faith medium post by an opposition researcher. C'mon. Rigel posted:Yeah, even if you grant every allegation as an agreed fact and read it in the worst light possible, its definitely not illegal, nor is it really unreasonable. You aren't going to be able to hire skilled staff for a seemingly longshot no-hope primary campaign, and if you are lucky enough to have friends and family putting in a lot of hours helping you, there's nothing wrong with going into debt to reimburse them. Of course, people might ask what you would have done with that debt if you lost, but she won.
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2019 20:30 |
|
double nine posted:is maggie haberman a journalist worth reading reporting of? I'm seeing her get a bunch of mentions in my feed but she seems like a generic press pool reporter. she does very little analysis in the her nyt work, it's generally very well-sourced reporting of white house machinations. People here despise her because it's straight reporting and her work doesnt make a point of specifically saying "oh by the way, all this poo poo is awful and these people are telling me this stuff to stab each other in the back"
|
# ¿ Feb 28, 2019 20:57 |
|
Hastings posted:I would buy that argument except her family was involved in the Trump campaign. And she won't say Trump lies. She has a huge conflict of interest. Her mother worked/works for a ny pr firm that represented trump in/since the 90s, which isn’t really surprising since he was a New York personality. That’s quite a big difference from how you’ve framed it. Anyway here’s some news https://mobile.twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1101245624115232768
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2019 06:13 |
|
Cythereal posted:The day when Germany asks you to take an ambassador back because they're a Nazi. it seems like the people who want him gone are actually saying that because he wants them to pay more to nato https://www.politico.eu/article/us-...fense-spending/
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2019 02:54 |
|
Hunt11 posted:Is that actual spend more money on NATO or Trump wanting to be paid the protection money he believes he is owed? (whether it's reasonable for the US to be unhappy about this or not will depend on your understanding of geopolitics, and congrats, you've now given it more thought than the US president has)
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2019 03:05 |
|
https://twitter.com/mattzap/status/1109210607432151040 A senior Justice Department official says the special counsel is not recommending -- and did not recommend -- any further indictments.
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2019 22:52 |
|
Kobayashi posted:I skimmed but gave up after ~20 tweets, what is this getting at? just this, basically https://twitter.com/ErikWemple/status/1111742555891396608 (wemple is a media critic)
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2019 23:41 |
|
sexpig by night posted:This is literally the conflict, from his own account. an msnbc employee (dafna) wanted a journalist (yashar) to not publish news so that the DNC could coordinate the DNC's affairs better. why should an msnbc employee care what the DNC wants, and especially why should an msnbc employee try to convince an unaffiliated journalist to do what the DNC wants?
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2019 01:23 |
|
Flesh Forge posted:I don't disagree in principle that the DNC should not get to decide, but them trying to influence how news plays out is not really something to flip out over In the grand scheme of things it's tiny, but in terms of journalistic ethics it's pretty not good. I also don't really think he was flipping out, I think he was talking about/reporting on some (in his view) unethical behaviour from a colleague. He didn't write a story or anything, it's just some tweets.
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2019 10:16 |
|
WampaLord posted:Uhh, no? Uber workers are just people trying to earn a wage, they're not stealing union taxi payers jobs themselves by crossing a picket line to take a taxi driver job away from striking taxi workers. I’ll blame both the unethical management and the short sighted workers, thanks!
|
# ¿ May 5, 2019 20:25 |
|
Oracle posted:No this is legit, military's been warning them about their potential 5G security issues for years. Then after they found the tiny little microchips on motherboards all that doomsaying took on new urgency. All the tech companies involved in this story deny it, and no other reporting outfit has collaborated the reporting (and they tried). It is probably not true. Having said that, you'd be dumb to assume huawei is not in bed with the chinese government (much like you'd be dumb to assume US based vendors don't also have backdoors)
|
# ¿ May 15, 2019 02:59 |
|
https://twitter.com/shearm/status/1141907380982169600 a war with iran seems to rest on whether john bolton can bully donald trump into it or not, so that's cool e: still, it's a no so far and I'll take it!
|
# ¿ Jun 21, 2019 05:12 |
|
https://nbcnews.to/2J5KgsU https://mobile.twitter.com/NBCPolitics/status/1146141642782662656
|
# ¿ Jul 2, 2019 21:03 |
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/ElizLanders/status/1146084545114116096
|
# ¿ Jul 2, 2019 21:07 |
|
https://twitter.com/wpjenna/status/1146221349855268865
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2019 03:16 |
|
This is an interesting and deeply reported piece. There's a lot of stuff in here that people will "know" but now there's actual proof and details https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/world/national-security/cia-crypto-encryption-machines-espionage/ tl;dr the us and west germany owned a company that sold crypto machines around the world, they weakened the crypto so they could decrypt the communications, and they sold the compromised machines to whoever would buy them including all but their closest allies. Explains why they're so upset about huawei being used for 5g - it's only funny when it happens to someone else.
|
# ¿ Feb 11, 2020 20:26 |
|
|
# ¿ May 12, 2024 17:51 |
|
Deep story by the nyt on the scale of the administration’s failurequote:He Could Have Seen What Was Coming: Behind Trump’s Failure on the Virus https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/11/us/politics/coronavirus-trump-response.html
|
# ¿ Apr 11, 2020 21:02 |