Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: dead gay comedy forums)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

2016 was a different time

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.
I'm actually happy I'm getting chain probed by fyad for the first time. I feel like a real member of the community. It's like I'm getting "sexed in".

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

Dr. Kyle Farnsworth posted:

when u think about it flavius is just Stalin purging the old bolsheviks (tossing them into fyad)

sadly u are the old bolsheviks

Honored to be getting purged for the crime of being too cool for school :c00l:

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

Flying-PCP posted:

This is obfuscating the fact that if a different mod replaced Flavius, and that mod did anything at all resembling their job as defined by the admins, you'd just end up hating them just as much.

I just want the theory thread to go back to how it used to be tbh.

If left to it's own devices the thread will produce a slur approximately every 3-4 months.

This is far better than the SA average of 1 slur a week.

It's math.

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

Atrocious Joe posted:

wtf are Marxist-Humanists

got called a Tankie by a bunch of them today

Marxist that don't like it when people are mean and think socialists should try being nice

Essentially demsocs with pretensions of marxism. The kind of person who argues that the Soviet Union "wasn't real socialism"

A lot of DSA types fit in this group. At least, ones that have enough self awareness to not identify as libertarian socialists.

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

you're not an ultramoderator harry, don't be a pedo

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

The Voice of Labor posted:

that actually doesn't help at all. it's ad hominem. doesn't matter if he was a forum moderator, he recorded imagine and millions of people listened to it and liked it and millions of people continue to listen to it and like it. by way of scattershot, some of them are bound to pay attention to the lyrics and some are bound to say "you know, he's right, I hadn't thought about that before" just by shear numbers alone. there isn't even that low bar being matched today and I'm not sure it's possible between media monopolization and algorithmic control of poo poo like youtube. I bring up this example and could say, like, bob dylan, not to laud them but to point out that it doesn't look like we're even allowed that anymore at any scale.

hippies had a bunch of sex and did a bunch of drugs, they got part of the schema totally right

You're putting the superstructure before the base rather than the other way around.

The fact of the matter is that if counter culture could convince the masses to rise up it would've happened already.

The dominant values of any given state will be the values of the ruling class. If a counter culture is allowed to exist it is precisely because the establishment does not view it as a serious threat to the status quo.

The vast majority of Russian workers didn't consider themselves to be socialists before 1917. Then WW1 happened and the Bolsheviks were the only ones providing leadership with an acceptable solution. gently caress the war, we'll take territorial loss over dying for the ruling class.

Changes in material conditions change people's ideology not the other way around.

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Even the godawful "peoples' microphone" was too much of a government for them, which is part of why the "activists" responsible for CHAZ made sure it'd have no governing whatsoever.

Didn't a sound cloud rapper declare himself the president of CHAZ

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

The Voice of Labor posted:

they are and marx would drink all of you under the table

Both the CNT-FAI and Mao's China declared drug use to be a symptom of the despair caused by capitalism. Meanwhile the Soviet Union attempted to stamp out alcohol consumption for it's entire existence.

I can't think of a single socialist movement of any note that didn't crack down on drug use, both illicit and legal.

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

The Voice of Labor posted:


hippy drugs of choice are psychedelics and weed which are extra powermoderator dumb things to be down on. like, "what's the biggest obstacle in the way of creating and maintaining a socialist state? drugs that radically increase people's sense of empathy!"

Yeah just ask notable lsd users bill gates and Steve jobs how much it did to increase their empathy.

poo poo I don't even have a problem with hallucinogens, but they don't radically alter a person's behavior anymore than affordable therapy would.

In reality the only people not concerned about illicit drug use are the ones well off enough to not have said drugs destroy their community. ie: hippie dilettantes

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

fart simpson posted:

racism has existed for pretty much all of human history and predates capitalism;

I think you might be conflating racism with more generalized prejudice.

Race as we understand it is a relatively novel concept that came about due to European colonization. Before skin color became a big deal, religious and ethnic affiliation were way more important factors in determining prejudice. The Romans didn't hate the Teutons for being pale redheads, they hated them because they weren't Romans.

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

dead gay comedy forums posted:

We have a saying here, a quip by one of our foremost thinkers: "Brazilians are foreigners in their own homeland".

What country in America isn't an ideological construct?

drat it's almost like all the countries in this hemisphere are colonial projects :thunk:

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

docbeard posted:

One of the issues in (but not necessarily unique to) an American take on socialism is that it would probably work better if it weren't called socialism, due to the lifelong conditioning of more than half a century's worth of Americans to see socialism as a nightmare dystopian dictatorship that hates you, yes you, little Charlie and Susie, personally. (To the point where, even knowing better, it's hard for me not to knee-jerk see it that way sometimes.) I suspect we're starting to see that go away but it'll be a few decades before it's gone completely.

(Obviously rebranding everything as, I dunno, Americans Coming Together or something would be a dealbreaker for a lot of people in much the same way that using nationalist rhetoric at all would be.)

This is essentially lying to Americans on the reasoning that they're too dumb to:

A. Become socialists because of ideological conditioning

B. Not recognize socialism with a red white and blue coat of paint

To the first point I'd rebut that only people old enough to remember the cold war have any deeply ingrained opposition to socialism.

These people are also by and large the more comfortable half of the American population and thus the least sympathetic demographic to socialism already

People born after the breakup of the USSR received a substantially more cursory anti-communist indoctrination. If surveys on the issue are anything to go off of socialism is more popular than capitalism with young people.


To the second point I'd say lying to people about your ideology is antithetical to leftwing thought. The Nazis tried to equate socialism with German nationalism precisely because they, like the rest of the right wing, are bad faith liars.

Attempting to synthesize socialism with "Americanism" can only end in the discrediting of socialism as a valid form of anti-imperialism.

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

The Voice of Labor posted:


the united states has never produced, and is possibly incapable of producing, its own communist party.



Wtf are you talking about the CPUSA was influential enough in the 20s and 30s to scare the bourgeois into the new deal.

Your reasoning is so patently false I'd recommend you read a history book on the American labor movement.

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

mawarannahr posted:

I don’t have time to read a history book on a failed movement, I have enough of those in the bathroom. What did they do to scare the bourgeoisie into the New Deal?

If you're an American leftist you absolutely should read about what didn't work in the past in your country. Otherwise you're just going to repeat their mistakes to worse results.

Suffice to say


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbD1XDhKr8U

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

Pentecoastal Elites posted:

the only reason that CPUSA was any flavor of threat was because the Soviet Union existed

Well yeah, the only reason the CPUSA existed in the first place is because of people jumping ship from the spusa post Russian rev

You might as well be making the same argument about literally any 20th century communist party, including the successful ones. Ie: china.

Outside backing doesn't change the fact that the local national party itself was the vector through which the working class was organized. Americans joined the CPUSA because of the CPUSAs preeminence in the labor movement, not because of the USSR.

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

Ardennes posted:

They really didn't dig their teeth into serious reformism generally until after the war. There is a difference between a party existing and for institutional forces to allow it to actual start making changes to society.


I don't disagree with you but a notable exception to this was the weimar republic.

Sure it was created specifically to crush the communist insurgents but it also embodied the SPDs ideological project of 'perfecting' parliamentary democracy.

Of course, we all know how that turned out

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

MSDOS KAPITAL posted:

Meanwhile we've apparently had a doctor shortage for years while the effort in time and money to become a doctor is kept artificially high.

Just promote senior nurses to doctors after a given amount of time. They do most of the work anyway.

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

Ferrinus posted:

you could characterize lysenko's flaw as voluntarism, ie thinking that because everything in nature is a process of transformation rather than a static essence then anything can be turned into anything else by just wanting it hard enough, when in fact things only transform if the resolution of their internal contradictions is also supported in the correct way by their external environment. mao's example is that you can warm an egg and see it hatch into a chicken, but will be disappointed if you warm a stone the same way

A time traveler gave him a copy of the secret and he took it way too literally

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

Ferrinus posted:

china doesn't count for a bunch of silly reasons going all the way back to stuff like "mao used peasants instead of workers so the revolution wasn't even marxist"

Ironically enough it would be Mao that proved bakunins assertstion that the peasants had revolutionary potential

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

Lenin also dressed up as a woman to move around undetected. thats real left unity

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.
The Joe Stalin Megathread (which i think has some merit)

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.
I feel like any conversation about Beria needs to take into account he replaced the even more purge happy Yagoda.

What got Beria the job was the same instinct that drove Beria to choose markets and detente with the west. The dude had a preference for the path of least resistance, we don't have to resort to characterizing him as the overman who only cared about acquiring power for it's own sake.

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

LittleBlackCloud posted:

in CPUSA we have had several encounters with something called "patriotic socialists" which I think is like the Infrared thing. Or maybe just larouchites? Also join CPUSA.

The racist socialist tendency is so odd. Htory shows it's political suicide (strasserism nazbol, more recently twp) but the dumbest intellectuals keep trying to revive it.

They're practically asking to get Long Knife'd.

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

V. Illych L. posted:

yankees, why does american leftism have such a boner for demonstrated total failures kautsky and bernstein and USPD-ism

it seems very silly and it's started bleeding into countries with actual socialist traditions, please stop

I don't wanna hear this poo poo from some welfare-nannied norwegian

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.
Guy from the herrenvolk social democracy with a smaller population than wisconsin: how about you yanks learn from a country with a real leftwing tradition, me and my 16 cousins :smug:

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

MLSM posted:

How good/important is Theories of Surplus Value compared to Das Kapital and the Grundrisse? Marx described it as the fourth volume of capital, but what more does it offer in addition to the other three volumes, if any?

It teaches you how to get laid

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

MLSM posted:

Your mom already taught me that

Goondolences

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

The Voice of Labor posted:

given that the hegelian project of thesis/antithesis/synthesis doesn't end until the universe expires, what would the faces of opposition be if we ever achieved communism? like, what would be the shaping force of history once it's no longer class struggle?

Humanity vs the aliens (we are going to gently caress them)

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.
Socialism with Jeffersonian Characteristics

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

The Voice of Labor posted:


like, even in the bummiest of bumfuck nowheres there's still society, just less of it and it's usually less oppressive

Living out in the sticks without access to quality healthcare, education, and employment didn't feel very liberating to me but maybe your experience is different.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

Fish of hemp posted:

I mean, why do all communist movements dream about concrete cubes and drab clothing? What's wrong with nice clothes and wooden buildings?

Well for one concrete cubes are better than literal homelessness

Also we are too dependent on timber as it is

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply