(Thread IKs:
dead gay comedy forums)
|
dead gay comedy forums posted:I also feel that is very appropriate to elaborate here for Marxism thread purposes: This is extremely interesting and right up my alley. Do you have any books to recommend on this topic?
|
# ¿ Jan 25, 2024 03:29 |
|
|
# ¿ May 11, 2024 09:57 |
|
dead gay comedy forums posted:Not my alley, but from the little I know of modern epistemology, anything by Thomas Kuhn, Feyerabend or Lakatos has a lot to do in taking down that crap. Lakatos, funnily enough, was a hardcore Stalinist. Thank you! I'll see what they've got to say
|
# ¿ Jan 25, 2024 06:56 |
|
I thrive on psudoku intellectualism
|
# ¿ Feb 1, 2024 01:20 |
|
BillsPhoenix posted:It's me. I'm rejecting it, but I'm trying, and failing to do it on empirical arguments, not ideologies. "Free of ideology" doesn't exist hth You're entire idea of trying to find empirical arguments is itself ideology
|
# ¿ Feb 8, 2024 02:45 |
|
I found the discussion interesting, at least
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2024 00:33 |
|
I think for that last one you use some kind of press
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2024 01:10 |
|
BillsPhoenix posted:I disagree therefore I don't exist. Make it a perma, who carez. You're not as smart as you think, and would benefit from engaging others honestly. But it's your account and your choice!
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2024 20:51 |
|
BillsPhoenix posted:Marx was wrong. Capitalism defeated communism. And there we have the apparent core of your thesis
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2024 21:04 |
|
hubris.height posted:on the upshot it created some good posts from the people itt that helped an unread fool like me understand a little better This is why it's never wasted effort to engage imo. At least until the other person indicates they're the world's stupidest puppetmaster
|
# ¿ Feb 16, 2024 19:19 |
|
BillsPhoenix posted:I'd like to be able to infer it myself, rather than be lead to the answer. Sounds like you're saying that if anyone tries to teach you anything you will reflexively reject the points and seek counterexamples, purely out of a need to feel like you came to the answer without anyone's help. The optimistic reading is that you've now positively identified the root problem and why you remain perpetually confused by everything. Step 2 is fixing it
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2024 22:59 |
|
Dreylad posted:if he is an econ major then I get why there's that reflex. Nah I get it too, I think it's an understandable reflex upon really fully seeing and accepting how much bullshit there actually is on all fronts at all times, in the US especially But you gotta move past it somehow
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2024 23:15 |
|
World's calmest flat earther bowing out of an astronomy conference with "agree to disagree, i guess"
|
# ¿ Feb 22, 2024 20:01 |
|
Fat-Lip-Sum-41.mp3 posted:mfers just dont know to read multiple nested independent clauses that may or may not be someone marx is quoting rather than something marx is saying, most likely a mixture of both (and you wont know which) Thanks, German language!
|
# ¿ Feb 23, 2024 18:35 |
|
Flournival Dixon posted:bills for gods sake read capital, if you want to learn about marxism read capital His problem isn't that he doesn't know the right information, it's that the entire way he processes the information and uses it is hosed. If he read Capital he'd be making up nonsense counterexamples every other paragraph while absorbing nothing, and close the book completely assured that he'd understood and conquered a failed ideology. e: what 3 said
|
# ¿ Feb 23, 2024 20:49 |
|
Son of Sorrow posted:BP should be permitted to post imo. He's dumb and annoying and poorly educated but that's no different than anyone else in this forum. He can post all he wants
|
# ¿ Feb 23, 2024 21:43 |
|
SMEGMA_MAIL posted:I was just speaking about the military as a whole, but yeah within the branches the Air Force or Marines would probably be on average the least fertile grounds. But on average, the military is by miles the only significant locus of power I can think of where a significant number of troops and junior officers have any prayer of switching sides in the US. Raskolnikov38 posted:I think creating propaganda aimed at converting soldiers would be more productive than enlisting to organize cadres within it. what you'd want in a revolutionary situation is for the rank-and-file to side with the revolution or at least lay down their arms. trying to convert from within just seems like asking for a very long stay at leavenworth
|
# ¿ Feb 27, 2024 07:13 |
|
i say swears online posted:those chow halls used to be a lot more revolutionary when it was the military feeding the military instead of neoliberalized to contractors
|
# ¿ Feb 27, 2024 07:30 |
|
i say swears online posted:i think this shift is extremely important You're absolutely right. I was just suddenly hit with how much it's changed. I can't really trust my assumptions at all anymore lol. But I think that underscores the importance of, if you're going to work at raising consciousness in the military, best to do it at arm's length. Just talk to them, esp friends/family. Son of Thunderbeast has issued a correction as of 07:44 on Feb 27, 2024 |
# ¿ Feb 27, 2024 07:41 |
|
In an interesting coincidence, I just today got to this letter by Bobby Seale from The Black Panthers Speak, that addresses the topic from his perspective (and that of the party). I think it's a good model. I can't find an online version to copy/paste so I've transcribed it (in full and uncensored) below. Bobby Seale posted:Black Soldiers as Revolutionaries to Overthrow the Ruling Class The thing that stands out the most to me is the strong underlying heartbeat of solidarity and empathy and love that resonates through every word. He never loses sight of it (nor do any of the other Panthers), or the humanity of his intended audience (Black US soldiers--but also others, including white soldiers who know what's up). He makes sure to keep the true common enemy in focus at all times. Son of Thunderbeast has issued a correction as of 02:25 on Feb 28, 2024 |
# ¿ Feb 28, 2024 02:16 |
|
Brain Candy posted:why is it a good model? you like it, cool, but why would it be effective? why would it be now? why wasn't it then? Depends on what you mean by "effective" because that can mean a whole lot of things at a whole lot of scales. Did this letter cause an uprising in the US military? Did it create communism? Of course not, and it would be silly to expect that, or argue that it should have to, to be considered effective. Of course it wouldn't be "effective" in this sense, in any era. Did it sway the hearts and minds of soldiers who may have been harboring doubts or been coming to the same conclusions on their own? Maybe prompt some of them to look into socialism on their own, or look into a local BPP chapter to see how they could help, or otherwise raise consciousness? I guarantee it did. And to me, that's effective. I shared the letter as an example of the type of rhetoric that would be best if one wanted to talk to people in the military for the purposes of propaganda/conversion. In that sense, I say it was effective then, and now.
|
# ¿ Feb 28, 2024 07:05 |
|
Is crossing someone up anti-revolutionary? (it's real)
|
# ¿ Feb 28, 2024 22:22 |
|
Flournival Dixon posted:it's still the only widespread mode of anti-capitalist thought in the nation.
|
# ¿ Feb 28, 2024 23:59 |
|
If you have a coat, the use value of the second one is lower because you're already wearing one. QED theoryailures
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2024 21:04 |
|
I've found this discussion valuable, even with the anticoats. People you talk to about these things are sometimes going to land on similarly silly-sounding counterarguments or hypotheticals, so it's useful to know that no matter how exotic the example, it's still just mud pies
|
# ¿ Mar 7, 2024 23:27 |
|
Perhaps an anti-coat has a negative use value, that is, its existence reduces the use value of a regular coat. If you were to combine an anti-coat and a coat, their use values would annihilate into something with no use value.
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2024 02:44 |
|
Homeless Friend posted:I’m just wondering if marx ever considered if it wasnt just the capitalist, but also the workers linen their pockets
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2024 05:22 |
|
Halser posted:I, for one, hope that Bills continues to shitpost here so we can get more of this
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2024 20:33 |
|
dead gay comedy forums posted:hell yea. ty ferrinus
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2024 01:45 |
|
A decent elevator pitch, if your elevator breaks down for a couple hours
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2024 15:53 |
|
mila kunis posted:I think despite being a stupid moron with bad intentions, billsphoenix has been a net boon to this thread. That's dialectics
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2024 23:24 |
|
Al! posted:i put on my anti-coat and wizard hat
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2024 01:59 |
|
lumpentroll posted:anyway trump ftw This is what Marx calls praxis
|
# ¿ Mar 21, 2024 03:09 |
|
AFancyQuestionMark posted:The problems it's supposed to solve are worker alienation from government and excessive beurocratism. There is a reason Lenin once called the soviets "the purest form of democracy ever to exist". I'm also v interested in this topic so +1 to this
|
# ¿ Apr 7, 2024 16:45 |
|
Bald Stalin posted:Does Marxism point to the big bang or a simulation or both or something else? Something else, i would say
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2024 05:57 |
|
mawarannahr posted:At the beginning there was only Hegel. Marx cut his balls off. They fell into the ocean and became Lenin and Stalin. The rest is history.
|
# ¿ Apr 16, 2024 04:33 |
|
Commodity fetishism came up in a conversation last night and i wanted to double check my understanding/the example i gave. I brought up the brain geniouses who protest companies going "woke" by filming themselves destroying the company's products that they already paid for and own (shoes, keurig, etc), as though destroying the commodity itself had any effect outside of the plain fact that they were destroying their own personal property. I contrasted this with e.g. destroying a shipment of shoes before they get to the store, or even before they leave the factory, or somehow preventing the materials from being assembled in the first place, all of which would have an actual material effect on the target of their ire.
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 00:44 |
|
Halser posted:Being bald is praxis Lenin would agree
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 00:00 |
|
|
# ¿ May 11, 2024 09:57 |
|
dead gay comedy forums posted:Commodity fetishism writeup The point about objects ruling the rulers (oranges example) is one that's always stuck with me, because even when I was totally ignorant of anything outside of the typical American political landscape, I still felt like The Market was spoken about and treated like a deity, what with trusting the invisible hand and all. At the time it was coming from a protestant POV, since I interpreted this as idolatry, which I guess wasn't necessarily wrong per se, just using a framework that was insufficient to explain anything further than that.
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 21:21 |