|
The Mash posted:Hegav studied(studies?) law so he's as corrupt as they come He also has a rich dad...
|
# ? Dec 16, 2014 21:14 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 14:43 |
|
*tugs colllar* Blatter is bad
|
# ? Dec 16, 2014 21:16 |
|
Jose posted:Garcia's appeal over the statement FIFA released of his report has failed on the basis it wasn't a legally binding decision Lol That poo poo needs leaking
|
# ? Dec 17, 2014 01:04 |
|
Where's the #GoP when you need them?
|
# ? Dec 17, 2014 16:27 |
|
Garcia has now resigned from FIFA, to add more to the poo poo show: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/30522170
|
# ? Dec 17, 2014 17:02 |
|
ellspurs posted:Garcia has now resigned from FIFA, to add more to the poo poo show: That'll show them.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2014 17:03 |
|
How much was he paid for this? Comes off looking pretty good with everything that has happened and probably made a killing in the process http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/dec/17/michael-garcia-resigns-fifa-ethics-committee The Guardian posted:Garcia also revealed that the Fifa executive committee led by Sepp Blatter tried to have disciplinary proceedings opened against him in September. The attempt was rejected by the chairman of Fifa’s disciplinary panel. lol
|
# ? Dec 17, 2014 17:15 |
|
Fuel for the fire: http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2014/12/17/world/middleeast/ap-soc-qatar-fake-fans.html
|
# ? Dec 17, 2014 18:18 |
|
Big Black Dick posted:Fuel for the fire: http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2014/12/17/world/middleeast/ap-soc-qatar-fake-fans.html They're literally the North Koreans.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2014 18:21 |
|
Jose posted:How much was he paid for this? Comes off looking pretty good with everything that has happened and probably made a killing in the process "FIFA in turmoil" in the subtitle is probably wrong, it's more likely "FIFA in not giving a gently caress".
|
# ? Dec 17, 2014 18:46 |
|
Gigi Galli posted:They're literally the North Koreans. dprk citizens actually like football iirc
|
# ? Dec 17, 2014 20:26 |
|
Watch Russia suddenly have 2018 taken away because they can no longer bribe FIFA execs, lmao.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2014 21:27 |
|
Blatter trying to get Garcia in front of a disciplinary panel is hilarious. On what loving grounds, spilling the beans?
|
# ? Dec 17, 2014 21:37 |
|
TheBigAristotle posted:Blatter trying to get Garcia in front of a disciplinary panel is hilarious. On what loving grounds, spilling the beans? For not following the strict ethical code that he and the rest of the ExCo adhere to so religiously, obviously.
|
# ? Dec 17, 2014 21:39 |
|
Gigi Galli posted:They're literally the North Koreans. I said this would happen months ago someone give me a medal
|
# ? Dec 17, 2014 22:25 |
|
Migrant workers in Qatar are being paid $1 a day to be fake sports fans
|
# ? Dec 17, 2014 23:05 |
|
Wait, how long has this been going on in the US?
|
# ? Dec 17, 2014 23:47 |
|
Syncopated posted:Wait, how long has this been going on in the US? When did Seattle join MLS?
|
# ? Dec 18, 2014 02:02 |
|
TheBigAristotle posted:Blatter trying to get Garcia in front of a disciplinary panel is hilarious. On what loving grounds, spilling the beans? He submitted his report in September, Eckert's abbreviated summary was put out mid-November, so it can only be for the grave crime of saying the entire report should be made public. Unless he said or did something in private that FIFA didn't like and that hasn't been reported.
|
# ? Dec 18, 2014 18:08 |
|
Edmund Honda posted:He submitted his report in September, Eckert's abbreviated summary was put out mid-November, so it can only be for the grave crime of saying the entire report should be made public. If FIFA didn't like this hypothetical private thing, why wouldn't it have been reported?
|
# ? Dec 18, 2014 19:25 |
|
pik_d posted:If FIFA didn't like this hypothetical private thing, why wouldn't it have been reported? secret courts are better than public courts when you're more corrupt than soviet russia in its heyday
|
# ? Dec 19, 2014 11:30 |
|
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/dec/19/fifa-agrees-publish-michael-garcia-report-world-cup-bid-qatar-russiaquote:Fifa’s executive committee has agreed unanimously that an “appropriate” form of the Garcia report into World Cup bidding should be published. What are ray winstone's odds on the publication having any effect whatsoever?
|
# ? Dec 19, 2014 13:07 |
|
Thats the version of the report with all the names and anything incriminating redacted isnt it.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2014 14:41 |
|
serious gaylord posted:Thats the version of the report with all the names and anything incriminating redacted isnt it. Yes, because otherwise that's basically self-incriminating many of their members. At the very least this will shed light on just how corrupt they are. They're extremely corrupt.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2014 15:02 |
|
serious gaylord posted:Thats the version of the report with all the names and anything incriminating redacted isnt it. Unless they're a whistleblower anyway
|
# ? Dec 19, 2014 15:07 |
|
Humphrey Vasel posted:http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/dec/19/fifa-agrees-publish-michael-garcia-report-world-cup-bid-qatar-russia The only appropriate form of the report would be one written in the blood of Fifa Executive Committee members written on skin flayed off the back of Sepp Blatter
|
# ? Dec 19, 2014 15:10 |
|
Honestly I'd settle for a simple execution. No need to flay the man. You guys go so overboard sometimes.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2014 15:57 |
|
Humphrey Vasel posted:http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/dec/19/fifa-agrees-publish-michael-garcia-report-world-cup-bid-qatar-russia Appropriate form means the entire Qatar and Russia sections will be blacked out, but we get all the names of British, American, or Australian people who did anything even remotely close to wrong or corrupt.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2014 16:04 |
|
Humphrey Vasel posted:http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/dec/19/fifa-agrees-publish-michael-garcia-report-world-cup-bid-qatar-russia FYI this was done to bypass the proposal to change the rules on what constitutes "appropriate" to include the whole report (as the amendment put forward by Theo Zwanziger could only be implemented if there was a vote)
|
# ? Dec 19, 2014 16:19 |
|
serious gaylord posted:Thats the version of the report with all the names and anything incriminating redacted isnt it. The appropriate form
|
# ? Dec 19, 2014 16:20 |
|
Garcia just sends report.doc to the times and is like "nah guys I saved you time don't worry"
|
# ? Dec 19, 2014 16:33 |
|
Masonity posted:Honestly I'd settle for a simple execution. No need to flay the man. You guys go so overboard sometimes. Change the subject of The Interview from NK to FIFA
|
# ? Dec 19, 2014 16:35 |
|
BlueBayou posted:Change the subject of The Interview from NK to FIFA United Passions 2: The Interview
|
# ? Dec 19, 2014 17:01 |
|
Masonity posted:Honestly I'd settle for a simple execution. No need to flay the man. You guys go so overboard sometimes. I am all for having them Hung, Draw, and Quartered so I think we should be allowed some fun with how they meet there demise.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2014 17:06 |
|
The report will have every word except "the" blacked out.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2014 19:58 |
|
c0burn posted:The report will have every word except "the" blacked out. I'm sure 'Its all englands fault' will be perfectly visible.
|
# ? Dec 19, 2014 20:06 |
|
You know, generally the only reason things are redacted is for national security reasons or to protect the identity of victims. Has FIFA even bothered to make a bullshit excuse for redacting this, other than the unspoken 'We want to save our own skins.'
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 11:10 |
|
Quasimango posted:You know, generally the only reason things are redacted is for national security reasons or to protect the identity of victims. Has FIFA even bothered to make a bullshit excuse for redacting this, other than the unspoken 'We want to save our own skins.' Its not even unspoken, thats literally their reason
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 11:12 |
|
Quasimango posted:You know, generally the only reason things are redacted is for national security reasons or to protect the identity of victims. Has FIFA even bothered to make a bullshit excuse for redacting this, other than the unspoken 'We want to save our own skins.' The reason given for originally not publishing the report was because it would lead to criminal charges. Thats exactly it.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 12:53 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 14:43 |
|
My prediction is the recdactions on each page will form a raised middle finger. Or maybe Sepp will just scan his and that will be the "appropriate" form of the report we get.
|
# ? Dec 20, 2014 14:00 |