|
He's not wrong.
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 01:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 22:53 |
|
|
Phlegmish posted:He's not wrong. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 01:30
|
|
|
Montasque posted:
i dont get why he wants to suck putins dick so much. maybe shithead kinship and he is dumb enough to think putin is fighting ISIS instead of killing rebels to keep assad from being murdered. then again trump seems ok with assad because he kills browns.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 02:30
|
|
|
Pohl posted:Trump has already called Iowa voters losers. interesting take my man
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 02:33
|
|
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:i dont get why he wants to suck putins dick so much. maybe shithead kinship and he is dumb enough to think putin is fighting ISIS instead of killing rebels to keep assad from being murdered. then again trump seems ok with assad because he kills browns. Putin runs his country as they wish the US was, they of course assume they would be one of the elect.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 03:03
|
|
|
I don't see how Trump comes in anything other than 1st or a close 2nd in Iowa, and he's got a double digit lead in NH, SC and Nevada. If he comes in a close 2nd in Iowa, which is very likely, I can't see that Ted Cruz bump being enough to cause him to lose the next 3 primaries. And if that happens, then call it a day and embrace Trump V Clinton in the general.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 03:05
|
|
|
Powered Descent posted:Also, the very first look that many voters ever got of him (his introduction at the first debate) was, literally, this: This is so beautiful.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 03:15
|
|
|
uncurable mlady posted:isn't trump's entire shtick based on him being a winner? he's dead in the water if he doesn't finish first. people hate a loser. I saw an interesting argument the other day that Trump's fans have been following him long enough that there's a momentum there in itself; deserting him now would be admitting that they were wrong, and so they won't. Is it true? I doubt it, but if Trump keeps going after losing Iowa, expect to see that reasoning appear again. Joementum posted:Probably, but it's not like he's running a significantly better campaign in the other primary states. If Trump fails to win Iowa it's because his campaign isn't really a new, unknown force in politics and the general rules that govern how these things work are still in place, which means he's also going to lose in NH and SC and everywhere else. I'd be shocked if Trump wins Iowa, but if he manages a close showing, I think he's got a pretty good shot at NH. Jewel Repetition posted:It really seems like you have blinders on regarding Rubio, and have for a while now. The weird thing about Rubio is that he seems like a really solid candidate right until he opens his mouth. His campaign has been doing a wonderful job keeping him from doing that, for the most part, but I'm pretty sure you can't win a campaign that way. He started out as a Tea Party man, but people wanted to think that he'd 'grown out of it' into a proper 'establishment candidate', probably for the sake of The Narrative. He hasn't!
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 03:27
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 03:28
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 03:28
|
|
|
The Nastier Nate posted:I don't see how Trump comes in anything other than 1st or a close 2nd in Iowa, and he's got a double digit lead in NH, SC and Nevada. If he comes in a close 2nd in Iowa, which is very likely, I can't see that Ted Cruz bump being enough to cause him to lose the next 3 primaries. And if that happens, then call it a day and embrace Trump V Clinton in the general. After NH a bunch of third tier candidates are going to drop out and Trump's low favorability numbers make it more likely their supporters will consolidate around whatever establishment candidate performed best. 35% of the vote is okay for the first few primaries but to win the whole thing you really want 50%+, doubly so for Trump as he is likely to get screwed at the convention. In 1992 Bill Clinton lost the first four primaries but still ended up winning 51% of all votes.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 03:41
|
|
|
Sir Tonk posted:That Cruz image would make the best avatar ever.  
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 03:50
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 03:50
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 03:51
|
|
|
Squalid posted:After NH a bunch of third tier candidates are going to drop out and Trump's low favorability numbers make it more likely their supporters will consolidate around whatever establishment candidate performed best. 35% of the vote is okay for the first few primaries but to win the whole thing you really want 50%+, doubly so for Trump as he is likely to get screwed at the convention. In 1992 Bill Clinton lost the first four primaries but still ended up winning 51% of all votes. The last few polls that did 1st + 2nd choices had trump at 50-55% and the next placed guy at 35-40%. The main problem with stumping trump is finding a not trump that multiple groups don't hate. Cruz is an odious tea party goblin with all the charm of a liver fluke. Rubio is latino and part of something called the gang of 8 which turned out to not be the new tarantino film but part of a group that didn't declare obama as a muslim antichrist, he has also had jeb spread rumors for years about illicit affairs and shady financials in florida. Lastly ben carson is the platonic ideal of an overconfident surgeon unaware of his limitations.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 04:09
|
|
|
Oh it's been a while since i looked at those polls. Apparently a ppp poll from yesterday gave Trump better favorability ratings than Rubio? lol drat guess I better get on the Trump bandwagon.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 04:27
|
|
|
Did Walker drop out before Trump entered? His appeal really seemed like it stemmed from the same slit trench Trump's does, where you could run a rotting ham sandwich and win their hearts and minds if you wrote "KILL LIBERALS" on the bread in mustard.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 04:36
|
|
|
FAUXTON posted:Did Walker drop out before Trump entered? His appeal really seemed like it stemmed from the same slit trench Trump's does, where you could run a rotting ham sandwich and win their hearts and minds if you wrote "KILL LIBERALS" on the bread in mustard. nope, walker hadn't even formally joined in once trump was really getting going like walker somehow managed to start really late and flame out really early, it was hillarious
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 04:37
|
|
|
fishmech posted:nope, walker hadn't even formally joined in once trump was really getting going I feel like he spent more time with his ludicrous logo reveal than he did in the race.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 05:00
|
|
|
Bryter posted:I feel like he spent more time with his ludicrous logo reveal than he did in the race. ...I'd managed to blot that out of my memory...
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 05:01
|
|
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:i dont get why he wants to suck putins dick so much. maybe shithead kinship and he is dumb enough to think putin is fighting ISIS instead of killing rebels to keep assad from being murdered. then again trump seems ok with assad because he kills browns. I didn't know Assad was on the Bengals.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 05:17
|
|
|
It's kind of mind-boggling that someone would have Trump as a second choice. He seems like a love him or hate him kind of guy. Unless people answer him as the default when they can't remember any other options
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 05:34
|
|
|
blue squares posted:It's kind of mind-boggling that someone would have Trump as a second choice. He seems like a love him or hate him kind of guy. Unless people answer him as the default when they can't remember any other options people might like cruz more. and cruz is just a "quieter" douchier trump
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 05:42
|
|
|
I can't believe how excited I am about the Jeb campaign!
H5N1 fucked around with this message at 23:25 on Oct 18, 2016 |
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 05:43
|
|
|
H5N1 posted:I can't believe how excited I am about the Jeb campaign! who?
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 05:54
|
|
|
PDP-1 posted:who?
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 06:02
|
|
|
fishmech posted:nope, walker hadn't even formally joined in once trump was really getting going The only difference between Walker and Jeb is that Walker saw early on the republican electorate wasn't going to go for an establish stooge and rather than drag himself out for 6 months to embarrass himself and take on campaign debt, he cut his losses early. It was clearly the right choice, so credit to him.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 06:15
|
|
|
PDP-1 posted:who? a tough guy, I hear
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 06:16
|
|
|
twitter default pic lmao 
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 06:31
|
|
|
Immortan posted:twitter default pic lmao These hands got into a super weird bar last night
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 06:37
|
|
|
These HEAL Hands
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 07:04
|
|
|
Brannock posted:These HEAL Hands These heal hands. These hands.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 07:08
|
|
|
FAUXTON posted:These heal hands. These hands. Thands.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 07:19
|
|
|
The Nastier Nate posted:The only difference between Walker and Jeb is that Walker saw early on the republican electorate wasn't going to go for an establish stooge and rather than drag himself out for 6 months to embarrass himself and take on campaign debt, he cut his losses early. It was clearly the right choice, so credit to him. Except he HAS campaign debt and for some reason Ted Cruz is begging his supporters to pay it off?
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 08:01
|
|
|
Brannock posted:These HEAL Hands Read it as HEAL These Hands. Maybe this is just a cry for help from Friend Ben?
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 08:05
|
|
|
He's looking for a orthopedic surgeon 
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 08:10
|
|
|
World Famous Whore posted:A few pages back but I made these for the Politoon thread and ya' are free to have them. Why does /pol/ hate this dude so much? He seems to love Trump as much as they do and his stuff is often hilarious.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 08:19
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 08:42
|
|
|
Now Jeb!'s wearing a dress? With the comic progressing like this, I fully expect the next one to be Trump loving Jeb! in the rear end.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 08:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 22:53 |
|
|
The fictional representation of the blowhard kills an equally fictional problem while a man in a costume tries to keep up the pretense, even though it is preposterous to any outside observer. An accurate if somewhat misogynist cartoon.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2015 08:56
|
|
