|
Quandary posted:Legit question is making your school after a group a bad thing always? Obviously if it's a slur IE Redskins that's awful but having them be the Aztecs isn't necessarily bad or derogatory. It's fine if they're looooooong gone, Trojans, Spartans.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 01:56 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 04:07 |
|
Quandary posted:Legit question is making your school after a group a bad thing always? Obviously if it's a slur IE Redskins that's awful but having them be the Aztecs isn't necessarily bad or derogatory. The cultural appropriation is generally the problem I think? Think of the old Illini thing where someone would dress up as an Indian chief and dancing around, poo poo like that. Or the Chiefs, like there's nothing at all bad about the name itself but I understand why some native americans would be pissed about all the fans showing up in headdresses and a white cheerleader dressed in a vaguely native american fashion riding around on a horse after Touchdowns and poo poo. I have no clue how much or little SDSU does with Aztec things.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 01:57 |
|
I think "Trojans" is a hilarious name because people assume they won the Trojan War/that the Trojan Horse was their thing
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 02:22 |
|
Oh the Vandals. Forgot about the Vandals.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 02:25 |
|
Asproigerosis posted:My understanding is that a huge majority of mexicans are of hispanic descent and that actual native descendants are a rarity on the level of native americans in the US. 68% mestizo and 11% amerindian makes 79% of the total population of Mexico that identifies Native American ancestors as a meaningful part of their heritage
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 02:40 |
|
Declan MacManus posted:feel like you're looking past vandy and app state lol i didn't realize uga scheduled app what the gently caress were they thinking
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 03:06 |
|
PostNouveau posted:It's fine if they're looooooong gone, Trojans, Spartans, Nittany Lions angryrobots fucked around with this message at 05:13 on Apr 21, 2017 |
# ? Apr 21, 2017 05:08 |
|
PostNouveau posted:It's fine if they're looooooong gone, Trojans, Spartans. I mean, that gets back to the statute of limitations thing. What's the timing. Aztec empire was a thing 500 years ago. The Aztec people are a collection of other ethnicities. Vandals were a thing 1500 years ago. Spartans and Trojans were things 2500 years ago. I'm sure there was some Greek somewhere that traces his lineage back to Sparta. Vikings were a think 1000 years ago. We've got Swedes, Norse, Dutch, Saxons, Celts, Irish, Cajuns, Quakers, Crusaders, Goths, Hill-toppers, Pilgrims, plus all manner of Native American tribes, voluntary or not. Which of those are we too close to?
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 05:35 |
|
I think more important than time is power dynamics. Native Americans and Mexican-Americans are historically marginalized groups that still face discrimination today, so when an institution that's largely not made up of the ethnic group in question profits from peddling their cultural heritage, it feels kinda exploitative. Trojans, Spartans etc are okay because basically nobody holds any emotional attachment to Troy or Sparta, and something like Notre Dame or ULL's mascots are a bit more "genuine" since the people who chose those names actually had that heritage. (actually I'm not 100% sure about ULL having a significant Cajun student body, I just assumed cause of the location) Pakled fucked around with this message at 06:03 on Apr 21, 2017 |
# ? Apr 21, 2017 06:00 |
|
Pakled posted:I think more important than time is power dynamics. Native Americans and Mexican-Americans are historically marginalized groups that still face discrimination today, so when an institution that's largely not made up of the ethnic group in question profits from peddling their cultural heritage, it feels kinda exploitative. Thoughts on Irish as a mascot?
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 06:04 |
|
kayakyakr posted:Thoughts on Irish as a mascot? Ah whoops I was working on that edit when you made that post
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 06:04 |
|
Quandary posted:Legit question is making your school after a group a bad thing always? Obviously if it's a slur IE Redskins that's awful but having them be the Aztecs isn't necessarily bad or derogatory. I don't think so. Various Native American groups like it when the Army/Air Force/Navy name helicopters after them. They even have to get tribal approval to go ahead with the name. kayakyakr posted:Thoughts on Irish as a mascot? I give no shits. Plus its not like they're called the Surly Micks or anything. Signed, An Irish-American from a family of Irish Catholic Notre Dame fans
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 14:24 |
|
Wait, Vandals are an ethnic group?
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 14:33 |
|
Henchman of Santa posted:Wait, Vandals are an ethnic group? like, 2000 years ago yeah.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 14:32 |
|
Henchman of Santa posted:Wait, Vandals are an ethnic group? Bunch of guys from Poland-ish, ran roughshod over Europe for 700 years, sacked Rome in 455.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 14:40 |
|
Quandary posted:Legit question is making your school after a group a bad thing always? Obviously if it's a slur IE Redskins that's awful but having them be the Aztecs isn't necessarily bad or derogatory. I agree with you 100%, but we are indeed going to end up on the wrong side of history.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 15:03 |
|
Henchman of Santa posted:Wait, Vandals are an ethnic group? Learn some drat history! Who do you think sacked Rome? Stop naming teams after people. All teams should have good car mascots thank you for your time
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 15:20 |
|
I am honestly curious now about PETA's stance on naming teams after animals.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 15:26 |
|
swickles posted:I am honestly curious now about PETA's stance on naming teams after animals. I'm assuming they are fine with that but strongly against live mascots.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 15:27 |
|
Without cultural appropriation we'd all still be wearing animal skins and living in caves. Human history is the spread of traditions.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 15:32 |
|
General Dog posted:Without cultural appropriation we'd all still be wearing animal skins and living in caves. Human history is the spread of traditions. What culture is the grode jar appropriated from?
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 15:47 |
|
an adult beverage posted:What culture is the grode jar appropriated from? Aggies are their own culture and should be discriminated against
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 15:50 |
|
an adult beverage posted:What culture is the grode jar appropriated from? Emblematic of the mixing pot that is A&M, it borrows from the female tradition of menstruation and the ancient Mesopotamian tradition of putting things in jars.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 16:14 |
|
General Dog posted:Without cultural appropriation we'd all still be wearing animal skins and living in caves. Human history is the spread of traditions. Yeah, you know there's a difference between appropriation and diffusion. But you gotta keep up with the regressive gimmick. I sometimes wonder if you're a false flag Texas poster deliberately playing into every awful Aggie stereotype. For the few OU posters (or anyone else, I guess) who still occasionally lurk the thread: I'm putting the O/U on "Sooners" getting replaced at 15 years. Any takers?
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 16:14 |
|
Aggies are essentially the evil horde from the 13th Warrior/Eaters of the Dead except with cum and dead dogs instead of cannibalism
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 16:20 |
|
TipTow posted:I sometimes wonder if you're a false flag Texas poster deliberately playing into every awful Aggie stereotype. Sounds like a lot of work for a Texas fan.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 16:30 |
|
Alaois posted:Tanner Lee will have 2 or 3 throws a game that will make him look like the greatest quarterback in school history, and then throw 5 completely inexplicable interceptions poo poo, we're used to that 'round these here parts
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 16:40 |
|
I like being the Aztecs because it's unique and I'd rather be unique than one of 20 Tigers or Wildcats or Warriors or something generic. I've never once thought it was offensive or have it even cross my mind as being offensive, but I am super white so I don't know why it would have.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 19:42 |
|
kayakyakr posted:Thoughts on Irish as a mascot? too drunk to care, so go for it
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 19:58 |
|
I'm trying find a way to relate... If someone was to call their team the "Jews" then I might think that a dumb name. But naming a team directly after any religion is dumb, even if that religion is also an ethnic group. It's not really about being insensitive, though. OTOH, if someone was to name their team the "Hebrews" I would probably think that's a pretty cool team name. The Hebrews as a tribe were mean and would gently caress you up as soon as look at you.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 20:13 |
|
I would pull for a team named the Philistines.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 20:53 |
|
kayakyakr posted:I'm trying find a way to relate... If it were a specifically or even predominately Jewish school nobody would really care. Go Brandeis Fighting Hebrews. My alma mater used to be called the Presbyterian Steamroller and then became the Fighting Scots.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 20:57 |
|
TipTow posted:For the few OU posters (or anyone else, I guess) who still occasionally lurk the thread: I'm putting the O/U on "Sooners" getting replaced at 15 years. Any takers? OU naming themselves after a bunch of land thieves is the best thing about OU.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 22:23 |
|
Hey, we stole "Boomer Sooner" from two different sources too. At least we didn't half-rear end the "thief" thing.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 22:52 |
|
TipTow posted:Yeah, you know there's a difference between appropriation and diffusion. But you gotta keep up with the regressive gimmick. Not a chance in hell
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 23:03 |
|
Elephanthead posted:
This sounds like Tim Tebow has become a serial killer with a very memorable trademark. That's what you meant, right?
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 23:16 |
|
TipTow posted:For the few OU posters (or anyone else, I guess) who still occasionally lurk the thread: I'm putting the O/U on "Sooners" getting replaced at 15 years. Any takers? When I was around six I asked my older brother where "Sooners" came from and he told me it was because they would sooner be somewhere other than Oklahoma. I believed this was the actual reason for the name for an embarrassingly long time.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 23:22 |
|
Grittybeard posted:When I was around six I asked my older brother where "Sooners" came from and he told me it was because they would sooner be somewhere other than Oklahoma. I believed this was the actual reason for the name for an embarrassingly long time. A much better reason imo
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 23:41 |
|
There were a bunch of protests like two years ago about how ou was offernsive to native Americans which got roundly ignored and forgotten. Wouldn't be surprised to see those come back regularly but I highly doubt it changes for a long time.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2017 23:42 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 04:07 |
|
I agree, OU is offensive.
Edward Mass fucked around with this message at 05:00 on Apr 22, 2017 |
# ? Apr 22, 2017 00:07 |