|
Groogy posted:Let's say that you have been sexually active since you were 17, guess depends on country culture and not sure what would fit USA but find 17 is conservative enough. Now you're 30 years old. And if we assume you only retain one sexual partner at a time then that means somewhere around getting a new partner every 4 days... I mean if anything if you got that stamina you should probably be studied. I think the assumption is that the default mode for gay men is just going to the nearest gay bar, grabbing the first guy you like, and then just doing that basically every single day. The assumption is that gay dudes are just ready to gently caress absolutely any other gay dude at any given moment with no emotional attachments or long term commitments at all. They gently caress on the first date and every date is a first date. No courtship, no relationships, no awkwardness, just all loving all the time! Of course if you bother getting to know gay dudes that just isn't how they are overall.
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2018 15:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 11:12 |
|
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:I think the assumption is that the default mode for gay men is just going to the nearest gay bar, grabbing the first guy you like, and then just doing that basically every single day. The assumption is that gay dudes are just ready to gently caress absolutely any other gay dude at any given moment with no emotional attachments or long term commitments at all. They gently caress on the first date and every date is a first date. No courtship, no relationships, no awkwardness, just all loving all the time! It's because, to a lot of anti-gay people, being gay is a sexual taboo and all sexual taboos are equal. People who aren't straight have already done one bad sex thing, so of course they must be willing to do all the others, if not immediately then very soon - and so they accuse gay people of being unfaithful, or pedophiles, or into bestiality, or whatever else comes to mind, because if they were willing to be gay they must also be willing to be all those things. This is also why the slippery slope arguments come out so quickly. So, they figure, why wouldn't a gay man have sex every night with someone they just met? They're gay. People who are still on Freep are not going to take a nuanced look at things they oppose, so you see this belief a lot there. Edit: Adultery often doesn't count for the men because that's just regular sex they aren't supposed to have and not something 'weird', so Trump is still OK. Women who want to do that are often weird and wrong to them, though. Prism fucked around with this message at 16:31 on Nov 5, 2018 |
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2018 16:24
|
|
|
Groogy posted:Let's say that you have been sexually active since you were 17, guess depends on country culture and not sure what would fit USA but find 17 is conservative enough. Now you're 30 years old. And if we assume you only retain one sexual partner at a time then that means somewhere around getting a new partner every 4 days... I mean if anything if you got that stamina you should probably be studied. The virgin hetero and the chad LGBTQ.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2018 16:42
|
|
|
Georgia Peach posted:I had no idea Quetzalcoatl had returned to team up with MS-13 and unidentified Middle Easterners.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2018 17:39
|
|
|
AnoHito posted:I think that was from an actual study done decades ago by some lovely homophobic group that totally wasn't biased and definitely didn't just walk up to a bunch of male prostitutes and/or make up numbers. I think the whole "gays die at 40 on average" crap came from an old Paul Cameron study, where he looked at obituaries in gay newspapers during the height of the AIDS crisis, averaged them together over a few weeks, and said "welp, here's the average age of death for the homos!" I think it's pretty easy to find a flaw or two in that methodology, but Freepers don't care where it came from. Just that it lines up with their worldview.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2018 18:44
|
|
|
Groogy posted:Let's say that you have been sexually active since you were 17, guess depends on country culture and not sure what would fit USA but find 17 is conservative enough. Now you're 30 years old. And if we assume you only retain one sexual partner at a time then that means somewhere around getting a new partner every 4 days... I mean if anything if you got that stamina you should probably be studied. I'm pretty sure FReepers are envisioning more of a non-stop series of orgies where people leave not even knowing how many people they engaged with, much less names or anything. I don't think a series of short-lived monogamous relationships live up to their standards for the gay lifestyle. e: Toxicslurpee beat me
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2018 19:31
|
|
|
I was just making fun of how reasonable 1000 sexual partners was by putting it in actual context. But I mean if it's going to be nonstop orgies I think they gotta pump those fake numbers up.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2018 20:39
|
|
|
chitoryu12 posted:I'm trying to imagine how you would have over 1000 partners. Is the gay dating scene just that easy that you've had a different guy every day? I don't even think I've seen 1000 unique gay men in my life, and I've been to Parliament House. It's about 1970s gay prostitutes being extrapolated to being all the gays ever.
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2018 20:56
|
|
|
Corsair Pool Boy posted:I'm pretty sure FReepers are envisioning more of a non-stop series of orgies where people leave not even knowing how many people they engaged with, much less names or anything. Wtf man. Who goes to an orgy and doesn't get the names and numbers of the cutest guys they hosed with, you're just leaving future great sex on the table 
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2018 22:28
|
|
|
Georgia Peach posted:I had no idea Quetzalcoatl had returned to team up with MS-13 and unidentified Middle Easterners. *quietly slids a copy of Clive Custler's Treasure across the table to you*
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2018 03:34
|
|
|
VitalSigns posted:Wtf man. Attachments are a barrier to more anonymous sex.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2018 07:13
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/oneunderscore__/status/1059917353478164480
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2018 22:26
|
|
|
Is anyone doing a Freep watch for the elections?
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2018 22:59
|
|
|
Aumanor posted:Is anyone doing a Freep watch for the elections? I would be, but seeing their ecstatic victory gloating on election night 2016 unfold in real time was enough to permanently scar my psyche. I'm waiting until after the results come in to do any delving.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2018 23:08
|
|
|
Crunch Buttsteak posted:I would be, but seeing their ecstatic victory gloating on election night 2016 unfold in real time was enough to permanently scar my psyche. I'm waiting until after the results come in to do any delving. Not until we kick their stinking asses. I want to see them devolve into a cacophony of minority hatred, screeching about non-existent voter fraud, and pronouncements that they "fear for America" or whatever.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2018 23:19
|
|
|
Its Laz's birthday today.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2018 23:21
|
|
|
Chef Boyardeez Nuts posted:Its Laz's birthday today. I thought I felt a certain darkness creeping upon the lands, somehow unrelated to the elections.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2018 23:38
|
|
|
Will 2019 be the year the Freep thread comes back into vogue?quote:Let’s face it, the president is not that popular. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2018 02:07
|
|
|
quote:To: Impy quote:To: Melian quote:To: Theodore R. quote:To: 2111USMC Mr Rogers, no!  quote:To: peggybac quote:To: nutmeg  quote:To: LittleSpotBlog
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2018 02:25
|
|
|
 quote:To: wardaddy quote:To: CaptainK quote:To: Freedom'sWorthIt quote:To: yield 2 the right (expanding )quote:To: yield 2 the right quote:To: Lazamataz quote:To: All
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2018 02:33
|
|
|
In other news: Kim Davis, clerk who refused to sign marriage licenses for gay couples, loses to Democrat quote:To: Coronal quote:To: Coronal quote:To: Coronal quote:To: Coronal
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2018 02:37
|
|
|
Get those jugs ready, there's a harvest to be had and plenty of tears for all to gorge on
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2018 05:00
|
|
|
Icon Of Sin posted:Get those jugs ready, there's a harvest to be had and plenty of tears for all to gorge on 2018 won't be the finest vintage, I imagine. Nothing to rival 2008.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2018 05:03
|
|
|
Mixed results tonight...no doubt Freep will gloat about the Senate. But we got the goddamn House, and some real pissed-off Democrats are about to get gavels and subpoena power.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2018 05:04
|
|
|
I'm the Kansas illuminati who kicked Kobach on his rear end by more than 10 points
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2018 05:04
|
|
|
Fritz Coldcockin posted:Mixed results tonight...no doubt Freep will gloat about the Senate. Anyone disappointed by a D senate loss has a broken brain, and anyone gloating about winning fewer than like 5-6 new R senate seats is a hack or stupid
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2018 05:06
|
|
|
We got the House, though. Schiff and Waters are revving their engines.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2018 05:32
|
|
|
Fritz Coldcockin posted:I want to see them devolve into a cacophony of minority hatred, screeching about non-existent voter fraud, and pronouncements that they "fear for America" or whatever. So every day that ends in a y then?
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2018 09:10
|
|
|
Potato Salad posted:I'm the Kansas illuminati who kicked Kobach on his rear end by more than 10 points Yeah, this made me pretty happy Losing the Senate and STILL having Manchin? Not so much. FReep should be fun for the next couple years while the Dems subpoena every piece of paper that was ever associated with Donnie.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2018 09:39
|
|
|
Corsair Pool Boy posted:Yeah, this made me pretty happy Losing the Senate was kind of expected. Take solace in that we're pushing back though and have the first Palestinian congressperson and the first openly gay Governor in place after last night and the delicious irony that Scott Walker of WI passed a law that the loser of a race can't call for a recount if he lost by more than 1% while he lost by 1.2%
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2018 19:28
|
|
|
Holy poo poo Freep is riled up about Jim Acosta. Multiple threads, hundreds of replies. Picked one at random and got this gem:quote:To: Ancesthntr
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2018 05:37
|
|
|
The deadly martial arts of “pardon me ma’am”.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2018 05:46
|
|
|
I love that the story the right seems to have settled on is that Acosta “karate chopped” the intern.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2018 12:25
|
|
|
This is what happens when party loyalty becomes the main factor in your life and eats your brain I mean sure, I'm Dem, but I don't let it rule my life. I'm not out marching around bitching about progressive poo poo, or determining whether something is good or bad based on low liberal it is. Freep are the nutters that rank movies my conservatism and bar the rest from their lives, or only shop certain few places because they have some right leaning policy or something.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2018 13:11
|
|
|
It's a good example of Prester Jane's inner/outer narrative. They know its ridiculous but it doesn't matter because anyone in the group knows it isnt the real argument. Edit: you can see it pretty clearly in the Acosta threads. When the occasional freeper pops up to say "that doesn't look like assault to me" they are ostracized, not debated because if they were in the group they'd just accept it. Chef Boyardeez Nuts fucked around with this message at 15:13 on Nov 8, 2018 |
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2018 15:10
|
|
|
Chef Boyardeez Nuts posted:It's a good example of Prester Jane's inner/outer narrative. They know its ridiculous but it doesn't matter because anyone in the group knows it isnt the real argument. The American right is increasingly acting like a psychotic cult and it is terrifying.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2018 16:13
|
|
|
It's a real american horror story.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2018 16:36
|
|
|
SocketWrench posted:This is what happens when party loyalty becomes the main factor in your life and eats your brain Even the people out marching for 'progressive poo poo' are actually basing their outrage on facts, outside of tiny one off protests that don't get nationwide coverage. It's not party loyalty, it's crazy people. And the right wing rhetoric helps drive people completely bonkers.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2018 16:54
|
|
|
Captain Monkey posted:Even the people out marching for 'progressive poo poo' are actually basing their outrage on facts, outside of tiny one off protests that don't get nationwide coverage. It's not party loyalty, it's crazy people. And the right wing rhetoric helps drive people completely bonkers. The American right just no longer lives in reality. This is the movement that puked out the phrase "alternative facts."
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2018 17:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 11:12 |
|
|
The people who said Ann Coulter is hot and Chelsea Clinton is ugly have been living in a false reality for a long time.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2018 17:19
|
|
