|
san pellegrino owns
|
#
¿
May 25, 2017 00:41
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 12, 2024 04:09 |
|
|
fake media owned by giant fort
|
|
#
¿
May 25, 2017 00:43
|
|
|
it's called confidence and it's step 2 in the GORILLA MINDSET
|
|
#
¿
May 25, 2017 04:15
|
|
|
Giant fort will win
|
|
#
¿
May 25, 2017 16:36
|
|
|
I'm voting for Zoinkerburg
|
|
#
¿
May 25, 2017 22:32
|
|
|
mormonpartyboat posted:watch this five minute ad to fill your prescription please say "Chevy has won over 10 JD Power awards" for your pills
|
|
#
¿
May 26, 2017 02:44
|
|
|
I voted for body slams
|
|
#
¿
May 26, 2017 03:11
|
|
|
only if gianforte attacked journalists earlier he would be winning even more bigly
|
|
#
¿
May 26, 2017 03:21
|
|
|
keyboard correctly bigly to bigot, nice
|
|
#
¿
May 26, 2017 03:22
|
|
|
Stexils posted:looks like quist probably lost r i p
|
|
#
¿
May 26, 2017 04:44
|
|
|
montana loves assault and hates reporters, checks out
|
|
#
¿
May 26, 2017 04:55
|
|
|
"twitter" is a sin
|
|
#
¿
May 26, 2017 18:10
|
|
|
Klaus wants his germanybux
|
|
#
¿
May 26, 2017 19:33
|
|
|
loquacius posted:I don't think any other failed Democratic candidate has maintained this much of a stranglehold on pop-culture for this long after the election before lol if you weren't a deanbro
|
|
#
¿
May 27, 2017 03:05
|
|
|
loquacius posted:I was a libertarian in 2004, but thank god I couldn't put it in practice because I was 17 2004 was the age of Ron Paul online wasn't it? god that was awful
|
|
#
¿
May 27, 2017 03:27
|
|
|
huh. there was definitely some ron paul stuff around 2004 though, at the very least 2004-2008 although that's a given i faintly remember some posters on some old forums i used to frequent had the ron paul signatures and shared stupid videos and everything. i found it incredibly annoying and hilarious
|
|
#
¿
May 27, 2017 03:46
|
|
|
deadgoon posted:do people still google ron paul i Google Ron Paul daily
|
|
#
¿
May 27, 2017 05:07
|
|
|
what
|
|
#
¿
May 27, 2017 05:17
|
|
|
hello i am the owner of ProgressiveFuture.com and this is my op-ed declaring my endorsement of JEB!
|
|
#
¿
May 27, 2017 05:40
|
|
|
NINENINENINE
|
|
#
¿
May 27, 2017 21:13
|
|
|
From what I've heard, Exmarx was no Hillary fan so his move was not some attempt at preserving posters. I had personally "presented" two options, one was to permaban/ban as usual and the other was to forgive the permas into normal bans like how we did with the Trump toxxes. I thought that the list of toxxers was simply too large and I thought that it would be more managable if the list was culled in some way. ExMarx said he would deal with it, and that was the end of that. I have no comments on what he did other than he did what he thought was best and I wished that he had consulted us about it beforehand. My personal take is that while you can argue about the integrity of the toxx or whatever, the main reasoning behind it came from SSers / offsite morons who just wanted to throw a molotov into what they viewed as a snowflake echochamber etc. They don't really care about toxxes or how it must be respected, they just wanted things to burn. Nobody whined when we violated the integrity of the toxx by giving Trump toxxers a way out. edit: i apologize preemptively to maclaine/shengji if i missed something you guys mentioned during the whole thing, we can't reference the thread and i only remember what i posted, kinda
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2017 03:31
|
|
|
Not a Step posted:They were told they were going to be upgraded to a perma unless they renounced Trump, then they would only eat a regular probation. Trump's loss was seen as inevitable and they wanted to perma anyone who would support Trump. you can drone on about conspiracies all you want but lol this implies that exmarx is a Hillary supporter
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2017 04:14
|
|
|
we're approaching "baloogan is a Hillary supporter" status here
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2017 04:15
|
|
|
Oh Snapple! posted:the sticking point to me was that it was, as not a step mentioned, framed as something to cut down on the work required to push through all those toxxes while actually being quite a bit more work. that was just really probably. idk to be honest we were pushing a time limit for getting bans or whatever done. how we've had months to dwell on it it's more obvious but when you're facing hundreds of bans any method to cut down a few dozen is welcome. he did what he did and it can't be changed now. somebody from gbs I think was like I'LL DO THE WORK FOR YOU LOOK SO EASY and gave a list of supposed toxxes. I can tell you now that the list was maybe like 75% correct with plenty of people omitted/added at random
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2017 04:29
|
|
and it set off bullshit alarms for folks
|
Oh Snapple! posted:ftr my personal opinion was that it had less to do with defending hillary's honor or whatever than it did with wanting to provide an out for regular D&D posters who made a real bad decision as somebody who knows nothing about dnd I cannot confirm nor deny
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2017 04:33
|
|
|
oh I know this is now old news but regarding the trump toxx amnesty thing what everyone forgets (including me,until just now) is that no toxxes were upgraded to permas, except for boosted. if you actually read the thread you can see a post at some point by an admin basically stating "um of course I'm not going to randomly perma people who probably toxxed and never read the thread again" it was a massive scheme to permanently get rid of boosted which we kinda did eventually, thanks Mr. c-spam president
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2017 08:25
|
|
|
Thoguh posted:Says the guy who mostly used his IK powers to make C-SPAM a safe space for his views. 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2017 15:53
|
|
|
Boosted returns from probation on 9/11/18
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2017 21:23
|
|
|
Venom Snake posted:for the record I don't like Perez and from the beginning Iv said that Ellison should have been chair (since he has actual electoral experience) but you can't look at that utterly shook, sweating, gasping stick man and tell me that he's not collapsing like peter dauo on a 70 degree NY day bad candidate who can only win elections in the heart of deep blue cities, sad!
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2017 19:24
|
|
|
i have been moving and also the last month has been godawful and my favorite candidate dropped out early, so i kinda put off looking at NJ Dem primary candidates really in depth until uh, now. i've been on a candidate watching binge and i have opinions Jim Johnson (or is that john jimson) - pros: big ethics reform person, i like everything he wants to do on this subject. wants to bring back estate tax  cons: nothing much about healthcare other than "fight donny", education funding is great but doesn't talk about college, considers his favorite town to be seaside heights WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU Ray "Who?" Lesniak pros: big environmental person, wants complete renewables by 2020 (which i think is a little... optimistic) cons: doesn't go far enough on anything else, at all. a big believer in taking care of the olds, rather than  Phil "I Will Win" Murphy pros: he's gonna win. direct funding to transportation please thank sweet jesus, this public bank seems interesting, increase taxes on rich cons: he's gonna win. big time literal goldman sachs billionaire. wishy washing on healthcare, doesn't seem like he'll do much beyond nothing unless ACHA passes. takes the actual romney approach to healthcare in that regard, which i mean is fine i guess. reminds me of corzine. John Wisniewski pros: he is the berniebro in this election. has the entire policy suite ctrl-c from bernie's website. prosecuted bridgegate  cons: rutgers grad. i mentioned this before but he seems very ugh to me, like yeah his policies work, but he honestly runs around with something that resembles a prosecution complex and he seems very whiny. he might be a berniebro but bernie didn't even take the two minute tweet to endorse him, which is telling me something.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2017 19:37
|
|
|
wait john wisniewski wants to nuke port authority  but looking at his JERBS plan it's the most vague one out of the whole lot and that's saying a lot
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2017 19:40
|
|
|
gonna be honest lesniak is looking p. good, he's a longtime senator so i'm hoping he would otherwise be a mini-LBJ and he seems alright and his crusade to gently caress exxonmobil as hard as possible owns
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2017 19:43
|
|
|
If my plan works out, Buttigieg will be the next governor of NJ.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2017 20:01
|
|
|
i think your obsession with concerned citizen has gone too far Gene Hackman fan it's hard to tell you two apart while phoneposting
|
|
#
¿
Jun 7, 2017 00:45
|
|
|
Don't blame me I voted for Weird Unlikeable Berniebro
|
|
#
¿
Jun 7, 2017 01:38
|
|
|
Holy poo poo Wisniewski got hosed by Murphy and Jim Motherfucking Johnson nice
|
|
#
¿
Jun 7, 2017 02:55
|
|
|
I knew I should've voted for Lesniak, he got the least amount of votes and I feel bad
|
|
#
¿
Jun 7, 2017 03:00
|
|
|
hey centrists and leftists, both of your candidates suck now get outta my party and let us go full radical nilhilism
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 03:01
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 12, 2024 04:09 |
|
|
voters will respond well to my candidate's message of "death is certain"
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 03:01
|
|