|
Lucas Archer posted:I'm looking for a little advice on the Strahd campaign I'm running. Vallaki story element spoilers Personally I don't like the idea of Strahd taking Ireena away with little to no chance of the party being able to interfere. I also don't like it happening so soon after the PCs have arrived cause Vallaki has a lot of poo poo going on and it sounds like they just arrived. Unless you want to just dump the other plotlines running around you probably don't want them itching to leave right away. As for the Baron, he is a real shitlord so I don't think it's too over the top. However, if your PCs hear the moans at dinner they will likely want to do something RIGHT NOW and I don't know if you want to do that. You'd end up missing out on the Festival and it's scene with the laughing guard. If they've only been in Vallaki for a short while you may want to keep him in play for a bit so they can learn more about how much of an rear end in a top hat he is, not to mention his lovely wife and son and Izek. Presenting him and the Lady Watcher as rivals for the PCs favor could be interesting, especially since your PCs may go the route that mine did and got rid of both to install a new burgomeister in Vallaki. Do the PCs know that there are vampire spawn at the coffin maker's? That fight was tough for my group because of the regeneration ability and because my party's cleric forgot entirely how to play his class and just plain hosed up. They were also Level 4 at the time I believe. Proper use of Turn Undead may make the battle a lot easier but you may want to keep Rictavio or someone in you back pocket to save their bacon.
|
# ¿ Dec 23, 2018 07:34 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 17:31 |
|
Toshimo posted:You mean like: Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think the Eldritch Knight gets these spells and that's dumb as hell.
|
# ¿ Dec 27, 2018 18:00 |
|
Crossposting from the GM advice thread to get some more feedback: Need some encounter building help/advice. This is for a Curse of Strahd game I'm running, currently on break while another friend DMs a game. Some spoilers for the events in Vallaki but I'm going off book for what I need advice on. My players; a fiend pact warlock, an eldritch knight, a life cleric, and a lycan bloodhunter; have turned Vallaki into somewhat of a safe haven. The bones are back under the church rendering it Hallowed ground. The party hit level 5 at the end of their last session when they deposed the Baron and set up Ismark as the new Burgomeister of Vallaki. They killed the Lady Watcher prior to that along with some of her cultists. They've met Rictavio and discovered his real identity. They'd latched on to idea that there are some remaining cultists in Vallaki that need to be eliminated before they can leave the village. So that's what I need help with is figuring out this mini-adventure. The party does not know that the warlock is a warlock and I decided I can use this to maybe out her (the player is really looking forward to the eventual reveal and how the other players will react). Here's what I have so far: The cultists are going to try to do a ritual to remove the hallowed effect from the church, they've given up on stealing the bones, or maybe they don't know about the bone part. Doesn't matter. They are communicating with each other via glamoured posters. People who aren't in the cult or "touched by a demon" see signs for a new festival. The cultists and the warlock party member will see the true message saying that at a certain day and a certain time they will gather somewhere. The party will find the cultists doing the ritual which will involve some sort of bonfire and a round into the inevitable fight they cultists will beg for aid which summons the face of Strahd formed from the smoke/fire (I just watched the Castlevania anime on Netflix and loved the image of Dracula in the fire from the first episode). The form in the fire will join the battle. What I specifically want advice on is how to do the Strahd-Flame as an enemy, statblock and ability-wise. I don't know if there's a creature in any of the Monster Manuals that would be a good substitute or if I should use some of Strahd's actual stats. I would imagine it would be immobile. I also would like advice as to how many cultists should make up the bulk of the fight, and I want at least one cultist to be a bit more scary than the rest, maybe using one of the NPC warlocks from one of the books. Advice on doing interesting things with the battle via terrain or other things welcome. Maybe the Strahd-Flame can't be directly harmed and needs something else to happen to get rid of it? Maybe there are extra cultists that aren't actually combatants but are performing the ritual and the PCs have to eliminate them while dealing with the actual cultists that are fighting them? Lastly, or really firstly, I would like there to be a bit more steps to the investigation between find the poster and go to the ritual but I'm not sure how to do that. Maybe there should even be a step before the posters. The party may insert their own steps by doing prep things but if not I feel like it should potentially be more involved. At the same time I don't want this to last more than a session or two. Any advice, criticism or ideas welcome. I've got ideas that I think are good but I'm not super experienced in how to do things mechanically. Some things that sound cool can sometimes be actually unfun so avoiding said pitfalls is part of what I'm after.
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2019 17:57 |
|
mkultra419 posted:Strahd often appears with swarms / packs of animal minions, so maybe have a group of fire themed creatures show up to keep them occupied while the face shoots the occasional scorching ray at them. I wouldn't have your party really go toe-to-toe with Strahd that early. He's a presence in the valley, but you don't want to start a straight up fight and then have to deus ex machina him away before he starts mercing PCs or you kind of weaken the effect of the eventual brawl at the end of the campaign. This alone is extremely good advice, thank you. It didn't occur to me when I was thinking this up but of course they'll try to extinguish the flame. When we start up again it'll be after a long break and I want them to encounter Strahd in some way to reinforce his presence. They haven't actually had a Strahd encounter of any kind since early in the campaign. I figured this was a way to have Strahd present but not present. I was thinking he'd fire off some scorching ray and firebolt in between his utility spells like fog cloud or gust of wind or something.
|
# ¿ Jan 8, 2019 05:10 |
|
clusterfuck posted:I've been reading this and it's good, except the price. Maybe it’s just my phone but this link doesn’t want to work for me. Which title were you recommending?
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2019 15:37 |
|
Does anyone have any opinions on Esper Genesis? It looks like the Starfinder analog to 5e, and as someone who likes 5e and is getting progressively more fed up with Starfinder I'm wondering if it's worth taking a look at. I saw it as part of the GMs Day sale on Drivethrurpg which is why I bring it up. If there’s any system that has a good take on modern/sci fi 5e I’d love to hear about it.
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2019 18:10 |
|
Numlock posted:So I’ve wrapped up my middle earth game. Which book is that adventure from? I have some AiMe books but I haven't really done much with the system yet. How do you like it?
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2019 03:21 |
|
Sage Genesis posted:Re: motivation. I was gonna make a post similar to Jeffrey from YOSPOS's about "why did you make characters who don't want to adventure," but I see you responded. Your characters are trapped in a crapsack world and their best isn't good enough, but if you made characters who check out and roll over at that kind of obstacle then it's not the module for them. They should be amped to figure out a way to punk Strahd's rear end, mad that the odds are against them and ready to gently caress up everyone in their way until they can go home. I think you also have a bit of a disconnect because you as players know your characters can't win (yet) but your characters shouldn't think so hard about "raising their power levels" until they can beat Strahd. One of the early hurdles in my Strahd game was I had the man himself show up fairly early in Barovia. My players kind of froze because they knew out of character that they couldn't kill Strahd so they were trying to metagame what to do. I had to say to them, "you and I both know you can't beat him yet but trust me I'm not gonna just kill you right here and now, take a step back and think of what your character would do right now." The fighter responded "Well my guy would try to fight his rear end" and I said go for it and we had a fun combat. I think that instance helped them get more into playing a character instead of controlling pawns in a boardgame. Maybe you guys are having a similar issue.
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2019 23:33 |
|
Elector_Nerdlingen posted:
I get that this isn't a vibe for everyone but I don't get people who play "DRACULA: THE ADVENTURE MODULE" when they know that's not their vibe.
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2019 00:10 |
|
ritorix posted:People play CoS straight without constant castylvania/true blood/whatever references?? I'm running it fairly straight for my players and it's been a lot of fun. I do plan to use a lot more Castlevania music going forward though. I managed to creep them out pretty good in the Death House. Of course there's humor, you can't do all dour all the time, contrasts are what make any tone effective. Death House was creepy, but when the child ghosts possessed a couple of my players that ended up allowing for some natural humor in how the players acted it out. I'm not gonna monkey cheese it with the Monster Mash and "I vant to suck your blud!" poo poo but I'm not gonna run it all doom all the time.
|
# ¿ Mar 11, 2019 16:40 |
|
kingcom posted:I'd be careful of the Blood Hunter, its a hot mess of a class design and only works if you are doing specific things with it. I like the Blood Hunter aesthetic a bunch but in play I think it’s a little underwhelming. It’s made of glass but not really a cannon and there are a lot of class abilities that rely on specific circumstances to be useful. I assume that’s what you mean by your post but if you think the opposite I’m curious as to why.
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2019 16:35 |
|
Glagha posted:Doing voices for characters is fun though
|
# ¿ Mar 19, 2019 20:36 |
|
If I want to be a fancy Elven Swordsman that's not a fighter how is the Kensei? Is it fun? Is it actually any good mechanically?
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2019 17:47 |
|
Epi Lepi posted:If I want to be a fancy Elven Swordsman that's not a fighter how is the Kensei? Is it fun? Is it actually any good mechanically? This got lost in the shitposts but for real I was looking for peoples thoughts on the Kensei. I know generally the question of "fancy swordsmen who's not a fighter" is bard but I'm curious as to other options.
|
# ¿ Mar 21, 2019 18:16 |
|
Is mounted combat actually fun in this edition? I really want to make a goblin that rides around on a boar sticking people with spears while the boar charges into them. Can I actually make this work in a fun way? I would assume I would make a beatsmaster ranger for this character but is cavalier better since I know the ranger, especially the beast master, isn’t great.
|
# ¿ Apr 14, 2019 06:47 |
|
Conspiratiorist posted:I've personally given up on mounted combat since I've never been able to figure out how it works. What is confusing about mounted combat? I wanna play a goblin ranger riding a boar in the mini campaign my group is about to do but I have not actually read the mounted combat rules that thoroughly yet. My ideal would be to run around plinking arrows from the boar and occasionally have the boar charge someone. Is that not as simple as I hoped?
|
# ¿ Jun 12, 2019 13:41 |
|
Taeke posted:I need some advice. If you want to just dip their toes in Strahd in a Castlevania, go kill Dracula, way you could do a modified version like this: https://www.dndbeyond.com/posts/359-strahd-must-die-tonight-how-to-play-ravenloft-in-a There’s some neat advice and rules in there about turning it into a one shot. Save the full campaign for your friends. Besides Strahd, I can’t recommend anything first hand but I think the adventure in the new essential kit has gotten some good buzz, The Dragon of Ice Spire Peak.
|
# ¿ Jul 9, 2019 14:09 |
|
Kaal posted:I don't think that D&D is an issue here, but I do think that Curse of Strahd is probably a poor fit as a first adventure given everything you've talked about. It's a dark, sprawling, narrative-driven, roleplaying-heavy campaign - so you'd need to do quite a bit of adjustment to get what you want out of it. I'd suggest checking out some of the Adventurers League modules, since they are shorter and more episodic, not to mention tend to be lighter fare generally. They give you everything you need for a party to get together, do some adventuring, beat up some baddies, and come home. Speaking of Strahd I know Misty Fortunes and Absent Hearts is supposed to be CoS adjacent but like what are those adventures actually about? Can you or someone give me a rough breakdown? I'm running CoS and if there's more stuff or just different interesting stuff in those that I can integrate into my campaign I'd love to hear about it. My party is already Level 5 and has done Death House, Barovia Village, Vallaki and are now at the Wizard of Wines so I don't know if it's too late to merge anything.
|
# ¿ Jul 9, 2019 17:47 |
|
sweet thursday posted:You know what you guys? I always thought I'd have fun playing dnd and at the ripe old age of 30, I had a lot of fun This is the good poo poo I like to hear.
|
# ¿ Jul 14, 2019 19:35 |
|
A Bad King posted:Hello Dragon thread. Yikes, unfortunately there are way too many dick GMs out there that would do that. Vampire Spawn are real rough too, even for higher level groups if they don't have appropriate magic weapons or spells.
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2019 19:32 |
|
thespaceinvader posted:Yeah, D&D is easy if you grew up with it culturally ingrained - I more or less understood the basics of character generation and mechanics of play well before I ever played, thanks to webcomics and TV - but if you're a complete novice it's a wildly opaque system, and even if you know what you're doing, character generation is a nightmare without some sort of digital assistance. PBTA are simple I guess but require a completely different mindset that I just can’t wrap my head around. Probably because I grew up on 3.5.
|
# ¿ Aug 17, 2019 19:04 |
|
I'm thinking of playing a Circle of Dreams Druid for a Level 10 one shot. Party will be 3 other players, one a Barbarian, one leaning Sorcerer and one debating between Fighter and Bard. I have never ever played a Druid so I have some questions: 1) Are there any feats I should consider or should I just use bump my ability scores up? Thinking Eladrin so I won't be able to hit 20 with WIS, but can do 18 and make Dex and Con 16 & 14. 2) I will likely be the primary healer, is it worth taking a level in Cleric? I saw some discussion about that. I would lose the Dreams 10th level ability to teleport 60ft as a bonus action, but I can see Cleric stuff being more useful than that ability is cool. 3) What are some good spells I should make sure to have? I think I want to be a buffer/healer more than anything else. 4) What are some good Wild Shape forms I should have in my pocket?
|
# ¿ Aug 28, 2019 18:15 |
|
Reposting this cause y’all have just been babbling about edition wars poo poo that nobody cares about. Advice very much appreciated. Epi Lepi posted:I'm thinking of playing a Circle of Dreams Druid for a Level 10 one shot. Party will be 3 other players, one a Barbarian, one leaning Sorcerer and one debating between Fighter and Bard. I have never ever played a Druid so I have some questions:
|
# ¿ Aug 29, 2019 01:37 |
|
MonsterEnvy posted:Flanking is decent. But as mentioned I do think Advantage is a bit too good for getting it. The simple +2 works wonders as long as it is not stacked up too much. Do you still let Rogues get sneak attack when they flank an enemy?
|
# ¿ Sep 19, 2019 17:09 |
|
Pendent posted:Well, given that if they're flanking that means an ally is adjacent by definition I would really hope so. I don't remember the wording for sneak attack but I'm guessing from your post that it specifically calls out the adjacent ally bit which makes sense since flanking is an optional rule. I just remember sneak attack as "you have it when you have advantage" so I guess I'm dumb.
|
# ¿ Sep 19, 2019 17:46 |
|
change my name posted:Yeah the way I use history rolls (and my friends do when DMing) is that you have a baseline knowledge of a thing, but the better you do on the roll the more specialized info you have one; IE, recognizing a cult symbol as a cult symbol vs. knowing who it belongs to and some history on that thing. In the Curse of Strahd game I'm running I have a player running an elf noble with history trained. Since Barovia is it's own demi-plane his characters knowledge of history has been completely useless but the party took over a manor in Vallaki and I've let him roll history to represent how much he's learned and retained from reading the books left behind by the previous owner. It let's him use one of his trained skills and given me the opportunity to let them know lore bits that may have not come up otherwise.
|
# ¿ Nov 6, 2019 18:54 |
|
I’d say it’s just an outgrowth of the fact that people nowadays like watching other people play stuff, be it videogames or ttrpgs, as much as they like playing them themselves.
|
# ¿ Nov 9, 2019 19:47 |
|
Ramos posted:The thing with a lot of them is that it takes forever to get anywhere in D&D. That's fine if I'm playing because I'm actively participating (and able to push forward if needed) but listening to other people fumble through stuff? Especially if they're also trying to put on a show for viewers? Gets obnoxious real fast. At the same time its not that different from when a serialized tv show has a terrible b plot or filler episode or even filler arc that’s just spinning wheels.
|
# ¿ Nov 9, 2019 20:23 |
|
In my entire 15 year span of playing TTRPGs I've never actually done a classic dragon fight from either side of the DM screen. The OP of this thread says that the Tyranny of Dragons hardcovers are actually lackluster, so can anyone recommend me maybe some DMs Guild adventures that are good dragon based adventures?
|
# ¿ Jun 17, 2020 23:06 |
|
Epi Lepi posted:In my entire 15 year span of playing TTRPGs I've never actually done a classic dragon fight from either side of the DM screen. The OP of this thread says that the Tyranny of Dragons hardcovers are actually lackluster, so can anyone recommend me maybe some DMs Guild adventures that are good dragon based adventures? This got lost in the ability score discussion, but I'd love some recommendations on dragon focused modules to run. Is Icespire Peak any good for experienced players or is it more geared towards new players?
|
# ¿ Jun 19, 2020 20:01 |
|
change my name posted:We're starting up a (most likely) Strahd game soon and I'm going to roll up a bard. I was thinking either eloquence or whispers, but are there a lot of chances for social interaction/RPing in the module that I'd actually get to use my skills on? Yes there are a lot of NPCs scattered all over that you and the rest of your party can interact with. As long as your party aren't complete murder hobos and can buy in to NPCs then you should get a chance. Also depends on how well your DM uses the NPCs but still I think you should be okay.
|
# ¿ Jul 4, 2020 05:14 |
|
Syrinxx posted:So does anyone have favorite campaigns they really like? Official or otherwise? I run so much AL that I guess I don't know much about most of the books at all, except GSM which as a player I can say sucks poo poo when run as an AL hardcover I've been running Strahd and if the rona ever clears up I will hopefully actually finish it! I have a big ole boner for vampire poo poo so the whole aesthetic of the book just vibes with me. It's kind of hard to run because it's relatively sandboxy and reads more like a setting guide than an adventure but between my own brain and the CoS subreddit I've been able to make something where my group has overall had a lot of fun. I'm still really worried about sticking the landing but we'll see what happens when we get there.
|
# ¿ Jul 8, 2020 05:55 |
|
Isaacs Alter Ego posted:
I'm running it and I don't understand how you can say this. The only time the DM might need to railroad the party is to make sure they get the Tarot reading. The whole book is just a list of places with the encounters and people you might meet there. There's no "make sure they go here first, and here are the two ways to resolve this area." Do we have different definitions of on rails?
|
# ¿ Jul 8, 2020 16:43 |
|
No Safe Word posted:Any one person in the campaign needs to have the content and the ability to share content (which comes from the Master tier subscription). Then that person can enable content sharing in the campaign. Just to clarify, the person who has the content doesn't have to be the same person who has the Master subscription. My friend buys the content on his account but I have the subscription and that's how we share everything with our group.
|
# ¿ Aug 26, 2020 22:56 |
|
Is there a clear write up of the changes from the UA to Tasha's for all the alternate class features? I've been off in PF2e land since last summer so I missed everything when Tasha's came out but guessing from the thread title it wasn't great.
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2021 07:30 |
|
Cornwind Evil posted:So after some years I decided to get back into D&D (5E, of course), joining a friend's Dark Sun campaign. Decided I wanted to make a healy-healer (so, as bent towards keeping people healthy as possible), so of course I go Cleric. However, Clerics in Dark Sun can only take two domains, Light and something else (So I can't take Life). One of my fellow players thinks that maybe I should consider instead a druid (which also tied into my character's backstory) for being a healy-healer so we're looking at that. She said that a homebrew druid might give me some options I otherwise I don't have, but from my basic research, no dice. So, should if I want to play a healy-healer in Dark Sun, should I stick with the original idea of a Cleric (with Light, as that's the closer domain)? Druid with Path of the Shepard? Is there some homebrew Druid path that would be useful? I played a Circle of Dreams Druid for a while and really enjoyed it. Balm of the Summer Court is some good extra healing on top of the available healing spells you get.
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2021 15:05 |
|
Curse of Strahd is extremely good and you all are super weird. Edit: or your GMs suck
|
# ¿ Jun 27, 2021 17:28 |
|
Y'all are driving me nuts!!! Curse of Strahd is a gazeteer masquerading as an adventure!! This is both good and bad. Bad because your GM has to do a LOOOT of work and if your GM is bad then it will be unfun. Good because your GM can do whatever the gently caress they want because literally all that's in the book is a premise "Find items/people from Tarokka so you can kill Strahd and go home" and a list of places and people. That's it. Everything else is what you make of it. If you feel like its a railroad that's because your GM is railroading you! If you think CoS is a railroad try playing a Paizo adventure path.
|
# ¿ Jun 28, 2021 19:12 |
|
Taeke posted:lol, you have to be more specific because that's exactly what people are complaing about and discussing. It's mostly one thing (a gazetteer) while trying to be another (an adventure) and because of that failing at both. No people are complaining it is a railroad pretending to be a sandbox and that the tone is too depressing. Those are 100% the result of how your GM runs it. It's a hard adventure to run but I have found it to be a very rewarding adventure because you can put so much of your own spin on things. Strahd can be a looming threat that never gets encountered until the end or he can masquerade as a friend in his Vasilli von Holtz persona until he betrays the party or a consistent thorn in the players side. Ireena can be the heart of the game or just a minor protection quest depending on how your players react to her, and her story can end in various ways. Vallaki can end up with vastly different political landscapes, or be burned to the ground or your PCs can just get kicked out forever. There's no specific route your players have to take, they do not have to visit any location besides Ravenloft itself. What characters become major players is entirely up to the PCs, and a little bit the Tarokka along with where they visit and when. Azathoth posted:As someone who grew up playing World of Darkness 1.0 (mostly Werewolf and Vampire), it is baffling to me why anyone would want to try to take a power fantasy ruleset and then try to apply it to gothic horror. I don't understand this take. You're playing from a completely different perspective in World of Darkness. You're playing as the vampire/werewolf and the point of the system is confronting the horror in the self. Curse of Strahd is about beating Fantasy Dracula, eventually, after struggle and toil. It's about bringing hope to a dark land and facing monsters, not being loving sad and dead. The book does not pretend to be anything different.
|
# ¿ Jun 28, 2021 23:11 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 17:31 |
|
Devorum posted:Yeah...that's the sign of a badly written adventure module. I don't know what to tell you, but an adventure module shouldn't be something else pretending to be an adventure module and it shouldn't require tons of GM labor to make it work. That's, like, the entire point of adventure modules. I have a love/hate relationship with Paizo APs, they can be fun but they're written too much with a specific path in mind that you can end up beating your head against a wall if your party doesn't do the exact thing in the exact order the writers assumed would happen. They also build way way way too many fights into each book and it can be a slog. I much much prefer how CoS is written, I have put a lot of work into running it but it was enjoyable work, and I never felt like I was fighting the adventure. I'm obviously the only person who's got extreme brainworms for this adventure, peep the Curse of Strahd subreddit for tons of info and takes from tons of people. Don't go there as a player of course. I like how there is no route that the players are forced on. There are no forced encounters with Strahd, there are no forced resolutions to any of the events in any of the locations. The adventure is honestly very simple and I don't understand how people get so far in the weeds sometimes with it. You're trapped and can't leave until you defeat Strahd. There are some people and items scattered across the land that can help you defeat him. That's it. Everything else can be as prominent or not as you and your players want it to be. There should be no issues with character motivation as going home again is a pretty universal one. People complain about the grimdark tone but I've never found it to be that grimdark. The book itself highlights how you should be using levity and humor to offset and underscore any actual horror and frankly most of the horror in the book is fun creepy horror. I also think that committing to making your players feel powerless all the time and sabotaging them all the time is a GM mistake that should be avoided. The book limits your party's resources and Strahd should be played as someone who at least thinks he's always in control but it doesn't say to poo poo on your players all the time. It doesn't say that every NPC should be dour and hateful. From my perspective my players are bringing hope and light to a hopeless world and that's not that grimdark to me. There are only a few things I don't like about it. There is an encounter in Vallaki that is way deadly for the level the players are likely to be when they get there. The mongrelfolk in the Abbey squick me out. Some of the tarokka results are just way better than others. Frankly if the idea of fighting Fantasy Dracula in Fantasy Transylvania is appealing to you then this is a good module for it. And if that doesn't then don't play it and expect it to be what it's not.
|
# ¿ Jun 29, 2021 19:11 |