Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: dead gay comedy forums)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

Raskolnikov38 posted:

to be the slightest bit fair I assume their thinking was “fine if it wants to be a fyad thread it can be one” without stopping to consider how fyad might think of the subject

this is really funny all round

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

social democratic hitler is a good username

could make them a mod

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

e-dt posted:

this thread needs UN peacekeeping forces deployed to it, STAT

holding out hope for Cuban military intervention instead

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE
it's cool how the compromise was to de-admin cyrano but keep him as a mod because he's some kind of gun nazi whisperer who gives them an A+ if they can write essay-length justifications of their racial theories and this is good somehow

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

gradenko_2000 posted:

finished with Beevor's book on the Spanish Civil War last week, started on Parenti's book on Julius Caesar yesterday:



the "rules based liberal order" of American foreign policy and propagandizing against enemies of the state



Jeffrey Epstein




Bernardivs Panderivs

I liked Parenti's book on Caesar for the most part - especially when he's ripping the 'gentleman historians' to shreds - but I did think it was pretty sloppy of him to cite quotes from Mithridates and Calgacus as if they were genuine criticisms of Roman imperialism from its victims and not completely invented quotes from people who might be invented themselves (in the case of Calgacus) and whose words were Romans making political points from within the system, not without. I don't really understand why he presents it this way - that the criticism comes from Tacitus and not a Caledonian chief doesn't invalidate the criticism, and in fact adds weight to the idea that there was opposition to these policies within Rome. I'm not a classicist myself by any means but I spotted this and a couple other instances, like where he cites the words of a historian who lived centuries after Caesar to prove that Caesar said or did specific things that have no other source. I'm sure there are others throughout the book too, and it weakens his case even though it's a powerful argument he makes. He's really good when focusing on the actual material situation in Roman society and how the political factions faced each other though, I thought.

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

gradenko_2000 posted:

Huh okay I didn't even know that Mithridates and Calgacus was fake news. My level of familiarity with Roman history is Dan Carlin's series on the Republic and Mike Duncan's History of Rome, so thank you for putting this into context.

Mostly I was blown away by how directly he manages to frame the issue of historiography being as colored and "biased" as it is from how we know of it, and even just the attempt of trying to write a "people's history" of Rome is a hell of a rhetorical device, even if there's bound to be wide gaping holes in it.

Yeah it's a great approach to it and vastly preferable to all the traditional history of Rome that takes slumlord nobles at their word about morality and politics. The takedown of Cato's biases is really fun.

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE
i don't have the same visceral hatred of ferrinus that some people have but

Ferrinus posted:

this actually typifies a particular left-wing deviation pretty well, specifically the anarcho-trot paranoia about Bureaucratism or whatever where the mere fact of someone doing administrative labor inevitably corrupts them beyond recognition and this is why it is simply too dangerous to ever have a state rather than a continuous global insurrection. people confuse the form for the class character

come on this is nonsense, you can't apply State and Revolution to 'modding CSPAM'

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

Celot posted:

Being totally hosed up by war and poverty in Russia and being totally hosed up by war and poverty in Iraq.

lol.

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE
if marxism is such a good framework for analysing history and society and the course of events then why were things different in two completely different societies with completely different histories at different times?

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE
the fun thing is that i'm pretty sure marxist analysis of the middle east around 2011 did in fact predict the rising power of fundamentalist religious groups. i don't have any such predictions on hand but i distinctly remember reading them at the time

edit: should clarify that I don't think this was some amazing feat of clairvoyance, they just looked at the previous thirty years of the West financing hardline fundamentalist Islamic groups and the situation that was being created in the destroyed puppet Iraq and saying 'yeah any idiot can see what's going to happen here'

John Charity Spring has issued a correction as of 20:17 on May 18, 2021

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

Jon Joe posted:

Wouldn't just about any analysis conclude "the currently ongoing rising power of fundamentalist religious groups in the middle east will continue"?

yeah, hence my edit

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

Celot posted:

The answer is actually no. The mass movement was communism, and they established a secular state.

do you think ISIS is a mass movement

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

Jon Joe posted:

here we can see the beginnings of religious fundamentalism in response to material conditions in this very thread

lmao

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

Celot posted:

If they weren’t a bunch of lunatics, they wouldn’t be Muslim fundamentalists. This is not a material condition, it is an internal mental state.

ah, you're not fishmech, you're Sam Harris

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

lumpentroll posted:

so are we all converting to islam now or what

LF revivalism

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

Atrocious Joe posted:

The 30 Years War could have been avoided if people were able to access therapy and get some SSRIs or ketamine.

Men will literally form the Evangelical Union to fight the Catholic League and kill 8 million people instead of going to therapy

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE
glad you're alright, sounds like you had a rough time of it

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

dead gay comedy forums posted:

this is a very good take imo

the USSR blundered hard with China and from my small knowledge on the matter it feels that it was rather petty on the Soviet side, like, when reading about it, Khrushchev didn't need to be overbearing at all about doctrinal principle. At all. The way he moved forward with the matter just feels incredibly personalist (at least to me) which is an amazing irony lol

if i was to put it in a glib way (and i am going to) then my take is that China was almost wholly justified on the reasoning for the Sino-Soviet Split but then almost every foreign policy decision they made afterwards was loving terrible and destrucrive whether it was invading Vietnam or supporting Pinochet and the Mujahideen

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE
poor main paineframe, posted his tier list of groups it's okay to murder and then died

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

Raskolnikov38 posted:

he’s one star and 20 minutes from achieving “ace in a day”

lmao

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

Populon posted:

give him the fallen mods stars. you keep what you kill

star silhouettes on his avatar

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE
john lennon was not killed for being Too Radical lmao

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

i truly hate jacobin lol

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

yr new gurlfrand! posted:

I thought they closed that place down

it's called the CSPAM Chat Thread now

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE
i don't think it was hypocritical of mao to want to combat the continuing destructive impact of the opium wars on china's populace

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE
I remember liking this critique of Blood Lies by Roger Keeran (himself a marxist-leninist) but I haven't read it in a couple years so I guess it might not be as good as I remember. I still intend to read Keeran's book Socialism Betrayed about the overthrow of the USSR, it's meant to be a very good analysis and account of the reasons for decline and the forces at work in capitalist restoration

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

Raskolnikov38 posted:

stalin's crime was stopping at the elbe

god, what could have been

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

Judge Dredd Scott posted:

read losurdo instead tho imo

Losurdo is loving great, Liberalism: A Counter-History is one of the best books I've read

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE
taliban mountain base cutaway diagram but with black hammer

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE
"marxists ignore race and gender issues" is largely a dishonest angle of attack by liberals imo

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

exmarx posted:

it's in his rapsheet. his other post in the "What do you want your last words to be?" thread is just as epic :D

lmfao

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

Deified Data posted:

Please don't tell me Mieville is a trot he's a big part of why I'm any kind of leftist today lol

Perdido Street Station was like a silver bullet to my chud brain when I was younger

he's the trottiest trot ever to trot. was a member of the Socialist Worker's Party and iirc left them in 2013 due to the party's rape scandal stuff

it's definitely visible in his books too. Iron Council is all about how the perfect revolution is one that never actually happens so it can't either fail or become corrupted over time, real trotskyist fantasy

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

Pentecoastal Elites posted:

Mieville is still cool and a fun writer even if he's a trot, who care.
I've had October sitting on my shelf forever and I need to get around to reading it. Hard to start when I know that there's no hot bugs w/ tittys in that one.

he is a good writer for sure. got a signed copy of The Scar which I'm happy to have, I love that book. I'm just surprised anyone didn't know his specific leanings

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

fart simpson posted:

whos nick land

english theory guy who moved in the same circles as mark fisher but went extremely fascist

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

Office Pig posted:

i was confusing him with max landis for a while there, hoooo weeee now that’s a mistake

Nick Land's Bright would be even more racist

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

R. Mute posted:

if you've ever organised anywhere near trots, you'd know you can't be in a big tent with them. just from a practical viewpoint. they're the cliché leftists - holier than thou, always have to get their way, constantly trying to enhance their own profile instead of empowering people, incessantly splitting, no plans to actually build power, being weird unwashed losers that put off the people they need to reach. and always with the newspapers

we've worked with them in the past. even formed some local coalitions with them during municipal elections. but once our party broke through on the national stage, which meant likely success on the municipal level as well, they demanded an electable spot (so second place on our party list) and broke off the coalition when we obviously said no and offered them their usual spot. then they spent the rest of the election cycle agitating against us. utterly worthless dorks.

this has also been my experience in the UK. the SWP especially made a name for themselves in trying to co-opt any movement or organising effort and then sabotaging it if they couldn't turn it into a front group. the others behave similarly. I became reasonably friendly with some International Marxist Tendency members who I met on a picket line but I didn't ever show interest in joining their group. one day i went to meet them for lunch and there was a guy there I didn't recognise - he'd travelled hundreds of miles from London, it turned out, and he grilled me about my political beliefs and how much Trotsky I'd read and I realised he'd specifically come to recruit me. he tried to get me to come to a Trotskyist Training Camp down in London (specifically described as a 'training camp' with no apparent irony) that very weekend, and when I said truthfully that I'd already got long-standing plans for that weekend he tried to convince me to abandon those plans to come to the Training Camp instead. I politely declined and he and the other IMT people promptly left and never spoke to me again. a lucky escape probably

also every trot org in the UK has had some kind of sexual assault scandal but so have the anarchist orgs and the other communist orgs in the UK too. I don't think it's specific to the trotskyists

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

Larry Parrish posted:

and also if the united States didn't do all kinds of poo poo to gently caress with them. or send marines to help the whites. or kept sending aid even after WW2. etc.

the ones that I always think about are 'what if the US had agreed to allow a disarmed neutral Germany instead of splitting it' or 'what if the capitalist powers hadn't mounted a gigantic campaign of sabotage against East Germany after partition'

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Maybe, maybe not.

But gently caress interwar Poland.

knowing our luck it would go Communist Poland > Germany invades in 1939 with the blessing of the western allies > genocidal hell war between the USSR and Germany with the US giving lend-lease to the Nazis instead, probably

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

tokin opposition posted:

If you had a time machine that could send one (1) thing to Lenin/Stalin/Mao/Fidel/whoever what would you send and when?

neon genesis evangelion dvd boxset, 1923

no dvd player or anything. it would be a spur for soviet technological development in order to experience it

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

John Charity Spring
Nov 4, 2009

SCREEEEE

Demon Semen posted:

Juche: where Marxism/Leninism/Stalinism/Maoism are revisionist bourgeois ideologies.

this more accurately describes Hoxhaist Albania imo

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply