|
Phone posted:I want to call into his show and ask if he can remember the model of plane he was on when he got popped with having boner pills in a bottle with someone else's name on it. OF COURSE I DO. IT WAS HUGE AND LUXURIOUS AND I MADE SOMEONE ELSE PAY FOR IT!
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 18:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 06:48 |
|
|
i like the fact that the GOP can no longer legitimately claim to be the party of family values after Igrab Cuntra. Family values? well lets talk about Igrab Cuntra, sir.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 18:49
|
|
|
This is from yesterday, but still interesting (but not surprising). https://twitter.com/anniekarni/status/786706815606284288 Did I get the tweet embed right?
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 18:49
|
|
|
Someone's burn on Twitter about Paul Ryan: mauricio wokettino @ranchandsyrup @Philip_Elliott lmao he's a zombie eyed granny starver. gently caress that guy and you
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 18:50
|
|
|
Also how do I change it so tweets automatically display?
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 18:53
|
|
|
Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:This might be the sleeper nominee for new favorite Trump nonsense quote: she's transobama
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 18:53
|
|
|
Lastgirl posted:A Sexmonster Slayer gangtag is being worked on currently, but you can only get it if Few pages back but I donated because gently caress Trump. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 18:53
|
|
|
gently caress Ryan for trying to pretend that Trump isn't perfectly representative of their party. The only problem you guys had was that he didn't dog whistle enough.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 18:54
|
|
|
Gumbel2Gumbel posted:Also how do I change it so tweets automatically display? Wrap the full url in the {url}{/url} brackets (use brackets). It won't show right in preview, but will in the post.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 18:54
|
|
|
Agrajag posted:i like the fact that the GOP can no longer legitimately claim to be the party of family values after Igrab Cuntra. Family values? well lets talk about Igrab Cuntra, sir. well Reagan got away with being the national security president while selling guns to Iran, we just live in a time where they get called on that poo poo
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 18:54
|
|
|
Crow Jane posted:He's destroying the GOP and making a complete laughing stock of himself that people (excepting his hardcore base) won't touch with a ten foot pole. I like to think that a hundred years from now, his name will be synonymous with abject failure but it'll be just another idiom that no one quite understands. Like, "wow, you really trumped that up" or "he got so drunk he made a total trump of himself at that party and now everyone hates him". Who he actually was will be forgotten except maybe as a cautionary tale. Dave Barry once remarked that "Trump" sounds like it'd be something ill livestock do. As in "Git back Earl, she's fittin' to trump!" I guess the British beat him to it though.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 18:54
|
|
|
Tom Guycot posted:You know, this brings up something else. What do you honestly do when ~40% of your population believes in conspiracies? Not just right slanted media or something, but outright, flat "this president is a gay terrorist lizzard, who's the antichrist and is plotting to destroy America with chemtrails!" The ascent of social media with all the exposure to new and discomforting ideas as well as the inability to distinguish sincerity from trolling amongst all the base conduct on the internet, 9/11 and radical Islamic terrorism, the denial and rescinding of tentatively promised opportunity thanks to structural changes caused by the Great Recession, the rise of China, exploiting fears about the national debt and foretold disappearance of Social Security, the apparent multiplication of podcasts an talk radio, new Atheism and fundamentalism gaining broad media attention leading to a snider discourse, the election of a black President (a national trauma), the dual rejection of Mr. American Dream Mitt Romney/Trump (a reminder of that trauma), excessive digital immersion which partially lead to the decline of communal social interaction, police brutality and renewed racism, even the rising rates of autism, media scares about all these new diseases and more erratic weather -all of this stuff happened in less than two decades. It was a rather perfect storm of change that challenged the ability of people's latent ability to adapt. I remember growing up with severe depression and being relegated to spending a lot of time on the internet. The horrible way people act online combined with painful experiences with roommates at college lead me to become incredibly fearful and anxious about almost all other people for some years. I've overcome a lot of it, but the anchors of tradition, community and expectations that allow people to feel confident about their decisions, that was ripped out violently by technological progress and information overload. I think in the future things will be far more settled for several decades until the next major traumas.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 18:55
|
|
|
Alan Smithee posted:well Reagan got away with being the national security president while selling guns to Iran, we just live in a time where they get called on that poo poo Its much quicker for people on the fly to pull up clips of people contradicting themselves. All people who endorsed or defended Trump have thrown that argument out the door for a while. They'll still use it, I have no doubt about it, but at least they'll be called out.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 18:55
|
|
|
Paul Ryan and his ilk are way more dangerous than Trump. If I have to deal with a racist, I'd rather deal with the loud shouty one than the conniving and surreptitious one.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 18:57
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/SteveKornacki/status/786988245380898816
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 18:57
|
|
|
Lamb Chowder posted:The ascent of social media with all the exposure to new and discomforting ideas as well as the inability to distinguish sincerity from trolling amongst all the base conduct on the internet, 9/11 and radical Islamic terrorism, the denial and rescinding of tentatively promised opportunity thanks to structural changes caused by the Great Recession, the rise of China, exploiting fears about the national debt and foretold disappearance of Social Security, the apparent multiplication of podcasts an talk radio, new Atheism and fundamentalism gaining broad media attention leading to a snider discourse, the election of a black President (a national trauma), the dual rejection of Mr. American Dream Mitt Romney/Trump (a reminder of that trauma), excessive digital immersion which partially lead to the decline of communal social interaction, police brutality and renewed racism, even the rising rates of autism, media scares about all these new diseases and more erratic weather -all of this stuff happened in less than two decades. As go the goons, so goes the nation.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 18:57
|
|
|
How do third party poll numbers bear out I reality? Is Johnson actually going to get 10% of the vote or are people that respond in a poll saying they'll vote third party too unmotivated to actually go vote?
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 18:58
|
|
|
Penisaurus Sex posted:Paul Ryan and his ilk are way more dangerous than Trump. luckily we live in an age where it is very easy to associate Paul Ryan and his ilk to Trump's platform.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 18:58
|
|
|
funkymonks posted:How do third party poll numbers bear out I reality? Is Johnson actually going to get 10% of the vote or are people that respond in a poll saying they'll vote third party too unmotivated to actually go vote? Usually they collapse before election day. But they also usually don't poll as high as they are polling this year, so who knows!
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 18:58
|
|
|
funkymonks posted:How do third party poll numbers bear out I reality? Is Johnson actually going to get 10% of the vote or are people that respond in a poll saying they'll vote third party too unmotivated to actually go vote? If you've noticed he's been slowly dropping in support as the election goes on.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 18:59
|
|
|
funkymonks posted:How do third party poll numbers bear out I reality? Is Johnson actually going to get 10% of the vote or are people that respond in a poll saying they'll vote third party too unmotivated to actually go vote? Not even close. In 2012 Johnson was polling around 5% and got around 1%. Perhaps this election will see a few more third party voters than normal, but I don't see him breaking 2-3%.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 18:59
|
|
|
Johnson gets the "generic Libertarian" support, but he's a terrible candidate. If the Libertarians had run someone worthwhile this year it might be a good year for them.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 19:00
|
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:Johnson gets the "generic Libertarian" support, but he's a terrible candidate. If the Libertarians had run someone worthwhile this year it might be a good year for them. "worthwhile" "libertarian" pick one
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 19:01
|
|
|
I think Johnson was their 'someone worthwhile'. Libertarianism doesn't attract a lot of people who are very gifted politically.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 19:01
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/johnpodesta/status/786988264985100288
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 19:01
|
|
|
Dunno if this was posted already https://twitter.com/ghostfxcker/status/786753908332982272 The Site: http://www.trumpisnotateamplayer.com/
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 19:01
|
|
|
Penisaurus Sex posted:I think Johnson was their 'someone worthwhile'. Libertarianism doesn't attract a lot of people who are very gifted politically. If you believe in Libertarianism and you're politically able, you'll be a Republican.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 19:03
|
|
|
The more I think about future candidates being under a microscope the more I'm reminded of this old ethics puzzlerquote:TWO TOUGH QUESTIONS: Fallacious or not, it's an interesting what if. What if we pick the outwardly moral guy vs the drunkard despite the former being the reincarnation of hitler? It doesn't apply in this case since Trump is such a fuckup on all fronts but it certainly won't stop the deplorables from claiming we could have had the Antoninus Pius of presidents but nooooo we hated him for chasing girls on the playground
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 19:04
|
|
|
That Ryan speech makes me real goddamn worried about what happens when the GOP eventually takes back the White House and presumably has a majority in both houses of Congress. Unless something happens to whisk away gerrymandering and/or Dems actually figure out how to get out the vote in midterm elections, it feels like it's inevitable. And it'd only take them months if not days to send us back like eighty years. Even if we have a liberal Supreme Court it makes me really nervous.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 19:04
|
|
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:"worthwhile"
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 19:04
|
|
|
A politically able Libertarian is just Paul Ryan.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 19:06
|
|
|
DICKS FOR DINNER posted:That Ryan speech makes me real goddamn worried about what happens when the GOP eventually takes back the White House and presumably has a majority in both houses of Congress. Unless something happens to whisk away gerrymandering and/or Dems actually figure out how to get out the vote in midterm elections, it feels like it's inevitable. And it'd only take them months if not days to send us back like eighty years. Even if we have a liberal Supreme Court it makes me really nervous.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 19:06
|
|
|
DICKS FOR DINNER posted:That Ryan speech makes me real goddamn worried about what happens when the GOP eventually takes back the White House and presumably has a majority in both houses of Congress. Unless something happens to whisk away gerrymandering and/or Dems actually figure out how to get out the vote in midterm elections, it feels like it's inevitable. And it'd only take them months if not days to send us back like eighty years. Even if we have a liberal Supreme Court it makes me really nervous. The good news is the Ryan contingent, if they have any power at all, won't be relevant by 2020. The bad news is the replacement will probably make you pine for the Ryan contingent.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 19:06
|
|
|
Alan Smithee posted:The more I think about future candidates being under a microscope the more I'm reminded of this old ethics puzzler Boy that is really loving dumb.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 19:06
|
|
|
Tom Guycot posted:You know, this brings up something else. What do you honestly do when ~40% of your population believes in conspiracies? Not just right slanted media or something, but outright, flat "this president is a gay terrorist lizzard, who's the antichrist and is plotting to destroy America with chemtrails!" something like 80 percent of americans think jfk was killed in a conspiracy when it's insanely obvious it was oswald alone.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 19:06
|
|
|
BDawg posted:Wrap the full url in the {url}{/url} brackets (use brackets). It won't show right in preview, but will in the post. You don't actually have to do this. The link alone will automatically embed.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 19:07
|
|
|
WampaLord posted:Boy that is really loving dumb. yeah if you leave out the whole "murdered millions of jews, roma, and homosexuals out of a weird personal vendetta" it's easier to paint hitler with a rosy brush.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 19:07
|
|
|
DICKS FOR DINNER posted:That Ryan speech makes me real goddamn worried about what happens when the GOP eventually takes back the White House and presumably has a majority in both houses of Congress. Unless something happens to whisk away gerrymandering and/or Dems actually figure out how to get out the vote in midterm elections, it feels like it's inevitable. And it'd only take them months if not days to send us back like eighty years. Even if we have a liberal Supreme Court it makes me really nervous. The GOP will control all three branches when they stop thinking the way Paul Ryan does.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 19:07
|
|
|
DICKS FOR DINNER posted:what happens when the GOP eventually takes back the White House this isn't happening unless the party goes back to being rockefeller republicans. dubya was right when he spoke to that aide. he's gonna be the last.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 19:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 06:48 |
|
|
Groovelord Neato posted:something like 80 percent of americans think jfk was killed in a conspiracy when it's insanely obvious it was oswald clone.
|
|
#
?
Oct 14, 2016 19:09
|
|
