|
Day late, but worth sharing: And oh yeah, there's comments.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2017 22:27 |
|
|
# ? May 19, 2024 13:13 |
|
You can hear the sound of pearls being clutched from East Haven. I didn't know Italians cared about the guy that much, honestly.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2017 22:29 |
|
Jesus was rewritten already. Many times. Many many many times.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2017 22:29 |
|
Jerry Cotton posted:loving one's cousin is legal in most of the world. There's no key to know which color means what but judging by the southern US I gotta believe blue = illegal? e: hoo boy I was wrong
|
# ? Oct 10, 2017 22:35 |
|
Joey Freshwater posted:There's no key to know which color means what but judging by the southern US I gotta believe blue = illegal? USA and China. Notable liberal nations on sexuality.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2017 22:39 |
|
Joey Freshwater posted:There's no key to know which color means what but judging by the southern US I gotta believe blue = illegal? The sentence I posted above the map wasn't clue enough? I'm really not an expert of the geopolitics of cousin-loving but I'm pretty sure it really was made illegal mostly in places where it was so prevalent it was causing problems. Feel free to prove me wrong, cousinfuckologists!
|
# ? Oct 10, 2017 22:41 |
|
[quote="“Jerry Cotton”" post="“477252823”"] The sentence I posted above the map wasn’t clue enough? I’m really not an expert of the geopolitics of cousin-loving but I’m pretty sure it really was made illegal mostly in places where it was so prevalent it was causing problems. Feel free to prove me wrong, cousinfuckologists! [/quote] That's where I got confused because the second line was that it got so prevalent they had to ban it. The south is known for its cousin loving so my mind immediately went to blue=bad MY MISTAKE GEEZ e: lol I guess I should say blue=illegal. Blue still bad either way
|
# ? Oct 10, 2017 22:45 |
|
Jerry Cotton posted:I'm pretty sure it really was made illegal mostly in places where it was so prevalent it was causing problems.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2017 22:55 |
|
The Hapsburgs are not representative of communities as a whole.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2017 22:57 |
|
Jerry Cotton posted:The Hapsburgs are not representative of communities as a whole. The Hapsburgs were like a reverse super soldier program to create the least competent individual in power.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2017 23:00 |
|
https://twitter.com/nucleartakes/status/917862245563957248
|
# ? Oct 10, 2017 23:10 |
|
About the latest wildfires in California.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2017 23:10 |
|
[quote="“Dienes”" post="“477241273”"] You tell me. [timg] https://i.imgur.com/4A7Nwr8.png[/timg] [/quote] “Only intellectual posts is tolerated.” Said the ubermensch that didn’t know subjects and verbs had to agree. Unless that’s the joke but way to make your group look like idiots to the non-Ricks of the world. F_Shit_Fitzgerald posted:I'm not proud to say that red is a family member, and blue is one of their siblings (black is me): My favorite part is the “strictest gun laws” bit because that’s total bullshit, but without that lie their whole stupid argument falls apart and we can’t have that
|
# ? Oct 10, 2017 23:12 |
|
Doesn't the military oppose the draft because they don't want to process hundreds of thousands of unwilling conscripts every year? I know when Sweden paused the draft they were rejecting about 2/3 of the people who wanted to serve
|
# ? Oct 10, 2017 23:16 |
|
Dejawesp posted:Doesn't the military oppose the draft because they don't want to process hundreds of thousands of unwilling conscripts every year? That plus our military is built around the idea of professional soldiers who want to not break the incredibly expensive equipment they're expected to use. We're no longer in the "tin hat and gun" mode of war. training up a group of people who don't have the will to perform to the level that is expected is not really an option anymore.
|
# ? Oct 10, 2017 23:30 |
|
"I'm gonna call the cops" is apparently an insult. "Back in my day, we handled criminals ourselves. All we needed was a rope and a tree."
|
# ? Oct 10, 2017 23:47 |
|
We honor LEOs by never asking them to do anything
|
# ? Oct 10, 2017 23:51 |
|
Closed-Down Pizza Parlor posted:
that scene only happens in the movie not the book so whoever wrote that could be a filthy casual moviewatcher and not a True Fan
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 00:30 |
|
DC fans sure are something else.
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 00:53 |
|
Jerry Cotton posted:The sentence I posted above the map wasn't clue enough? I'm really not an expert of the geopolitics of cousin-loving but I'm pretty sure it really was made illegal mostly in places where it was so prevalent it was causing problems. Feel free to prove me wrong, cousinfuckologists! It's actually made illegal in places that fell under some faulty eugenics claims that cousin-marriages would produce a bunch of defective offspring. Europe didn't take much stock in those arguments, so they didn't do the same. I guess they just had more intimate knowledge of how much incest it takes to really start loving things up.
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 01:22 |
|
first of all, lmao @ "The Libnorents": second of all, the cited source literally makes poo poo (har har) up; that's a mugshot of a completely different guy named Michael Lacey, one of the founders of backpage.com, best known for its prostitution advertising from the article: quote:Andrew Whitmore, 53, was “visibly under the influence of alcohol,” according to witnesses, when he decided to take down his pants and defecate on the schoolyard in front of disturbed students and teachers. I mean it's literal stdh.txt for people that daydream about people smarter than themselves getting some sort of comeuppance
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 01:44 |
|
there wolf posted:It's actually made illegal in places that fell under some faulty eugenics claims that cousin-marriages would produce a bunch of defective offspring. Europe didn't take much stock in those arguments, so they didn't do the same. I guess they just had more intimate knowledge of how much incest it takes to really start loving things up. Royals had to be able to marry someone.
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 02:07 |
|
RC and Moon Pie posted:Royals had to be able to marry someone. I'm pretty sure like 90% of North America is also Hapsburgs by now.
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 02:12 |
Panfilo posted:Why are they so invested in defending her? Why doesn't the fact that you told her you were actually homeless for a while seem to have any credibility with anyone? Would she make the same assumptions about you had she run into you while you were homeless, that she makes about other homeless people as well? Telling someone you were homeless actually reduces your credibility, hth
|
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 02:14 |
|
Yeah, this is America. If you were homeless it's just because you were too lazy to pull yourself up by your bootstraps and become a self-made man!
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 02:20 |
|
Fathis Munk posted:Hahaha, bullshit. Seriously. The original statement is dickish as hell, not to mention that the whole “repeal Obamacare” thing implies denying millions health coverage and probably greatly affects people in AZ.
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 02:33 |
|
Ah yes, I'm sure arming and training a bunch of people that already dislike you and sending them off to war against their will is a great plan
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 02:35 |
|
tyblazitar posted:
"Sorry, but we don't negotiate with terrorists."
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 02:51 |
|
Besesoth posted:"Sorry, but we don't negotiate with terrorists." Also he calls out Zach Snyder despite Zach having directed BvS and Justice League?
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 03:04 |
|
Boywhiz88 posted:Also he calls out Zach Snyder despite Zach having directed BvS and Justice League? To be fair, Zach Snyder sucks rear end.
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 03:31 |
|
RC and Moon Pie posted:Royals had to be able to marry someone. You don't know how true that is... Rome actually banned cousin marriage up to three/four degrees of consanguinity, and the Church kept that rolling right into the Medieval era. But the nobility quickly all married each other, and since they couldn't/wouldn't marry anyone else, they had to get dispensations from the church for it which lead to the rules gradually getting simplified and relaxed because the demand was so high.
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 04:06 |
|
Dejawesp posted:The Hapsburgs were like a reverse super soldier program to create the least competent individual in power. Little did they know that all they needed was a reality TV show star and a dream.
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 04:12 |
|
Boywhiz88 posted:Also he calls out Zach Snyder despite Zach having directed BvS and Justice League? My man confused Zack Snyder with James Gunn lmao
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 04:30 |
|
Boywhiz88 posted:Also he calls out Zach Snyder despite Zach having directed BvS and Justice League? I was confused by that and looked it up. I guess there's a group making fun of DC and Snyder that goes by that name.
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 04:41 |
|
Adel posted:
This same individual is a Vietnam veteran (I'm not sure how much combat he saw) who is absolutely convinced that the NFL is personally disrespecting him and the rest of 'are troops' because of kneeling during the national anthem. I've tried to be understanding and to reason with him, but he nearly unfriended me in a fit of pique when I wrote a post a few weeks ago about how stupid and lovely it was to equate antifa and the Jason Kessler Nazis (I live in the Charlottesville area). I'm honestly not sure how much of it is racism and how much of it is veteran-as-an-identity (I respect his service, but I don't have much patience for entitled people - including veterans, even if they sacrificed a lot for us).
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 04:52 |
|
AppleCobbler posted:Telling someone you were homeless actually reduces your credibility, hth Maybe, but Americans also love stories of redemption. Look at evangelical testimonials about their life before being saved; they were giving handjobs for crack as a transvestite Soros Crisis Actor in Sandy hook but now they are better! If someone was formerly homeless they could argue something changed in their life to make them not-homeless, and regardless of what it was it is better that they aren't homeless if people are going to be so judgemental. I know the guy mentioned a lot of people/family were a bunch of chismosas and he probably just wanted people to leave him alone about it, but I would have taken Mimi to task by pointing out "I was homeless, and the reason I'm not is because [local program/food bank/strangers that cared/etc]. And point out cites that show that a lot of homeless people are actually employed. I mean I live in the Bay Area, there are plenty of homeless people that have jobs or their own hustle to survive, its just that rent is so expensive here it is hard to get stable places to live if you have a lot of personal misfortunes.
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 05:09 |
|
Who is Mimi?
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 05:41 |
|
TinTower posted:However, don't be the guy who carries Romeo and Juliet laws on a credit card-sized card in his wallet. This was a reference to something right?
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 06:02 |
|
screaden posted:This was a reference to something right? Transformers movie I think?
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 06:07 |
|
|
# ? May 19, 2024 13:13 |
|
Bushmaori posted:Transformers movie I think? Yes, and it's creepy as poo poo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cz9OgW4JAJ8 (I haven't even seen this movie, but this scene is infamous.)
|
# ? Oct 11, 2017 06:21 |