|
I need some extra batteries for my 6D. I read that Wasabi Power and Sterlingtek both make decent 3rd party options. The Wasabi power seems like a better deal and has a better warranty. Any experience with them?
|
#
¿
May 14, 2013 16:56
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 11:45 |
|
|
ShutteredIn posted:Cool. Which ones aren't? I just got some Wasabi ones for my 6D. They seem to work great.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 12, 2013 23:51
|
|
|
dorkanoid posted:I just bought a 6D (it was 30% off with the 24-105L, how could I not?!) - and it turns out the provided software really hosed up not only my computer, but the rest of the network. Holy poo poo. I thought I was the only one. Killing the Canon wireless transfer program worked for me.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 15, 2013 13:19
|
|
|
geeves posted:The WiFi with the 6D, in the previous pages, has been mentioned to kill networks and was terrible software. This is only if you use the Canon proprietary software. Connecting it to my network, my computer then sees it as if it was plugged into USB and I can offload files as normal, albeit a little slowly. The software is a piece of poo poo, but the wifi remains perfectly functional.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 19, 2013 04:29
|
|
|
Going to take the a train trip from Portland to Glacier National Park, and then to Chicago. I've wanted to add a telephoto to my kit for a bit more reach, but I can't decide between the 70-200 F4L IS and the 70-300 F4-5.6L IS. I have a 6D, 24-105, and a 100L macro. What does the goon hive mind say? I'm interested in getting better wildlife and landscape shots, and love bug pictures.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 18, 2013 01:34
|
|
|
INTJ Mastermind posted:Canon 100-400L is great for wildlife. And you don't overlap range with your 24-105. Does the 100-400L hold up to the other two in terms of quality? I understand it to be an older lens and I am unsure about the push/pull.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 19, 2013 01:04
|
|
|
It's a bit out of my price range. The 70-300 is pushing it, but I'm willing to stretch if I find it compelling enough. I like the reach, but not the relatively poor aperture. Reverse that for the 70-200.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 19, 2013 03:37
|
|
|
BetterLekNextTime posted:I'd also suggest the 70-300L. Great IS. The difference between 200 and 300 is pretty substantial for wildlife. Compared with the 100-400, the extra 100mm on the 400 is not as big proportionally as the jump from 200 to 300, while the 70 is very useful on the wide end for landscapes or portraits. It's a great vacation lens if you aren't specializing on birds or sports. Yeah, yeah, I bought it. And a Gorillapod with a ball head so I can attach that poo poo to trees and actually be in the picture. My checkbook weeps. But it feels so NICE in my hands. 
|
|
#
¿
Aug 20, 2013 00:29
|
|
|
Encor3 posted:If you can wait for a rebate, you can get a new newer camera, two lenses, a printer, and photo paper for $50 more. I got a similar rebate with a lens and it was processed and in hand within 2-3 weeks. Also, the printer is great and I've been making prints for family and friends. Stop your bitchin', boy! ShotgunWillie fucked around with this message at 13:09 on Aug 24, 2013 |
|
#
¿
Aug 24, 2013 13:06
|
|
|
Hahahahahahahaha. I bought the 70-300 two weeks ago.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 5, 2013 00:00
|
|
|
Binary Badger posted:It's kinda cheating because it's actually combining four different exposures, but here's the night exposure mode on the EOS M, standard 18-55 STM lens. Haaaaay, Brooklyn buddy.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 21, 2013 05:44
|
|
|
Get the 40. It's awesome.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2013 14:37
|
|
|
evil_bunnY posted:He's saying "no idea" but if he's selling it he's already gotten a quote and it was not worth it. True dat. Looking at the dents on the filter ring, it was dropped at least twice, or once and high enough to bounce.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 16, 2013 21:23
|
|
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:The verdict is in: Holy poo poo dude. I think I shot that in a week after I got my 6D. Wanna trade?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 24, 2013 19:39
|
|
|
Am I the only one who thinks that he shouldn't spend hundreds of dollars on new camera equipment for his dad when all he knows is that the lenses are 'big'? Find out more about what he has and what he uses and we can give you some real suggestions.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 22, 2014 12:38
|
|
|
I have the 40 2.8 and recently it's spending as much time on my camera as my 24-105L, 100L macro, or 70-300L do combined. It's fantastic on full frame. Get it.
|
|
#
¿
May 25, 2014 02:59
|
|
|
smooth.operator posted:I have a crop sensor It's even better on crop? :-)
|
|
#
¿
May 25, 2014 16:21
|
|
|
spog posted:I am teatering on swapping all my Canon stuff for m4/3. Give me your Canon stuff. It'll make you feel better.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2014 13:54
|
|
|
I am very pleased with my 70-300L.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 18, 2014 03:32
|
|
|
mclifford82 posted:I don't see why they'd get rid of the articulating touch screen. I love that thing. Because Canon?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2014 14:28
|
|
|
alkanphel posted:I used to be a Canon user too, but I too jumped ship. The last Canon camera I ever recommended to friends was the Canon 5D2, now I mostly recommend Sony or Fuji. Those who didn't heed my advice ended up selling off their Canons like a couple of months later when new Fuji/Sony cameras came out. To be fair, there are some reason to use Canon cameras but most of my friends don't fit into those niche use-cases. I use canon because nikons don't fit in my hands well. :-(
|
|
#
¿
Nov 8, 2014 00:46
|
|
|
MrBlandAverage posted:This thread is real dumb.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 16, 2016 22:29
|
|
|
dorkasaurus_rex posted:http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/647011-USA/Canon_3554B002_EF_100mm_f_2_8L_Macro.html Just texted, you nugget.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 16, 2016 01:15
|
|
|
Thin Privilege posted:I'm working on it currently and it's a huuuuge mess because I have 6 hard drives, but I can post some actual ones eventually. For now, here's a cat. I do lots of pet photography. Sorry for the watermarks, I'm paranoid and crazy. Gonna steal this.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2017 14:04
|
|
|
Thin Privilege posted:Post it in every thread. I wouldn't want people to think it was mine.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 6, 2017 02:07
|
|
|
Helen Highwater posted:How would the OS not know whether the onboard WiFi was enabled when the user attempts to access the RAW processing functions? *Whoosh!*
|
|
#
¿
Oct 12, 2017 22:13
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 11:45 |
|
|
Can you both shut up so we can get back to pixel peeping and bitching about how Canon’s DR shits the bed by a millionth of a stop too much?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 26, 2017 20:58
|
|