Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

I know the best CanLit generator results should be the ones that sound hilariously close to the truth but I just love the incoherent ones the best. I forget the exact quotes but they were something like:

quote:

A fur trapper escapes the Draft in 1897 because it's 2016.

quote:

A group of writers have to leave Frobisher Bay during the Great Fire of Toronto to help take care of their family during the harsh winter.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

A couple of summer weekends we've spent at a friend's cottage were pretty much CanLit bingo.

Let's see, a downtown Toronto couple disillusioned with the pace and emptiness of urban living travel with a young scion of the Atkinson family to an island cabin on a Group of Seven lake where they find a novel about maybe having sex with a bear -- unless that was a dream, I can never tell.

(Our friend did in fact have an original copy of Bear by Marian Engel at this cabin of hers.)

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Mad Hamish posted:

Edit: my God, imagine these as pitches for a garbage sitcom on CBC - you know, one of the painfully unfunny ones.

One of the sentence fragments is "but in a funny, Little Mosque on the Prairie kind of way" so the CanLit generator already has you covered.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

brucio posted:

This is like the 4th story this month fed to the media from the Conservative party. Gotta hand it to them; they're playing the media like a fiddle, they love ATIPs

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/flight-manifest-trudeau-st-kitts-1.3732608

Am I wrong in thinking that a better strategy would be to wait to release these stories until Parliament is back doing stuff to counter-program or attempt to drown out Trudeau's policies? Nobody's switching their vote to Conservatives because of some plane tickets.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Mozi posted:

Surely I'm not the only self-lactating male around here? Nothing better than getting by on your own supply.

Nah, not with Mom right upstairs.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

CLAM DOWN posted:

Maybe he's going to run an orphan kitten sanctuary.

He's a consultant now. He's done with politics! (But advising people on how to manipulate politicians.)

MA-Horus posted:

Just what I want in my home in Canadian winters, concrete w/ no radiant in-floor heating.

Sometimes I wonder if my growth was stunted from having spent so much time growing up in our cold-rear end, mostly-unfinished, uninsulated concrete floor basement. But I'm okay if it was just my intelligence what was hurted.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

OSI bean dip posted:

Let's be honest here: nobody gives a gently caress about Ottawa.

What about in 2112 when the US attacks?

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Professor Shark posted:

Is this from a comic?

Yeah, "We Stand On Guard". Came out last year.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?


quote:

When signing the Japanese copy, Col. Cosgrave – perhaps owing to blindness in one eye – placed his scrawl below the line reserved for the Canadian signature and instead signed on the line of the French representative. In the official timeline of the ceremony, a brief but noticeable delay appears after Col. Cosgrave’s signing – the French delegate no doubt perplexed as to where to place his signature.

Each subsequent delegate eventually signed on the next available – if incorrect – line; the final delegate from New Zealand simply signing his name in a blank space underneath the others, his signature line having been commandeered by the Dutch.

When the Japanese delegation protested – could they accept a botched surrender document? – Douglas MacArthur’s famously brusque chief of staff General Richard Sutherland scratched out the now-incorrect list of Allied delegates and handwrote the correct titles under each signature, adding his initials to each correction to forestall further protest. The Japanese were then dismissed from the USS Missouri with a short “Now it’s all fine” from Gen. Sutherland.

It was a quirky end to an otherwise dark chapter of human history. Canada’s contribution to the historical blooper reel can be seen by the public at Japan’s Edo-Tokyo Museum, where the surrender document remains on display. The Allied copy of the document, it should be noted, was signed without incident.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Also, sometimes (or approaching "all the time") you're exposed to it as part of other drugs that you may or may not be addicted to:

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Now that Cho's gone from City Council, we'll have another by-election. Which means someone from the school board will drop their job like a hot potato and try running.

Toronto District School Board: Helping Kids Only Until Something Better Comes Along

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

flakeloaf posted:

There should be such a thing as an electoral quorum. 28% is embarrassing.

You're talking about turnout but the plurality percentages can be shameful as well. One of Toronto's Councillors won with 17% of the vote.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

namaste faggots posted:

you don't think there's anything disingenuous about being a right wing shithead and a gay like baird, leitch and brown?

are you out of your loving mind

If you're like Michael Chong who thinks being a Conservative is mostly about "pocketbook issues" then I guess you could try to compartmentalize and not go nuts from the cognitive dissonance.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Fluffy Chainsaw posted:

Things are likely to get worse before they get better:

http://business.financialpost.com/p...reign-buyer-tax

Sales are down but most of the price measures are still going up. Housing affordability is not so easy a dragon to slay.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Furnaceface posted:

How long has northern Ontario been planning to separate and become its own province? How am I just hearing about this now? What the hell would they call it?

They should take a page from the Virginias and Irelands and call it Northern Ontario just to make it really confusing.

"Where do you live?"
"I live in norther-- uh, north Ontario."
"Northern Ontario?"
"No, the north of regular Ontario, but very close to Northern Ontario."

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

I assume we'll also be administering this test to all current residents as well? We can't have anyone guilty of thoughtcrime.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Brannock posted:

I'm not sure I follow PK loving SUBBAN's thinking here. It's racist to determine whether or not someone is a good cultural fit for Canada? Like, let me toss out a few "Canadian values" that I think almost everyone in this thread would agree with: sexuality shouldn't be legislated against, maple syrup should be consumed, women should be treated fairly and equally. Presumably someone who thinks that the gays should be illegal, maple syrup should be tossed out, and women should be subjugated would not be a good fit for Canada.

And what of all the people in this country who don't agree with those values? What are they? Do they get a pass?

Or how about since this is a Conservative plan, are we all cool letting Conservatives determine what it means to be Canadian?

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Brannock posted:

I don't think they should get a pass, but I'm sure you know that it's much easier to go "No thanks, we don't think you'll be a good fit for our country" than to expel a citizen to Somewhere Else. (Or to throw them in jail, or to fine them for thoughtcrime, or whatever.)

If the Conservatives present a good or reasonable or close-enough outline for what it means to be Canadian, then why not go ahead and adjust it further to something you'd see more acceptable? Alternatively, if they present a crap one, then say "This is crap, get out."

Much easier to keep people out than throw them out, but if it's so important that everybody adhere to these values there are a lot more options than deportation. Is every public employee expected to pass this test? Politicians? What of the Canadian organizations the government does business with? Should we incorporate it into our citizenship tests, income tax returns, the census? If we're going to make a stand on what Canadian values are then it's hard not to read it as xenophobic lip service if we're just using it on immigrants that the same political party just last year tried to demonize.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Seat Safety Switch posted:

Everyone loves Littlest Hobo.

"Christopher Dew: There was an episode where the dog has been accidentally poisoned. I asked Chuck how we're going to make the dog stagger? He told me he had an old dog who used to be the lead but had hip problems. The way he walks, although he's not in pain, looks weird. We shot a sequence that pulls my heart out of my chest where the dog is staggering through the woods, gets to a log and jumps up on it with his front feet and drags his back feet over the log and falls in a big heap and starts to walk some more till he finally makes it to a ranger station. The amount of mail and phone calls we got the following day, the switchboard lit up. "How dare you drug the Littlest Hobo! How dare you hurt him just for showbiz!" We got ripped on by our audience, because of what they perceived we did to the Littlest Hobo. We had to issue a press release and we turned it into a positive story, about the last hurray of a great grandfather dog that had sired a bunch of the dogs on the show."


http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/an-oral-history-of-the-littlest-hobo-canadas-greatest-tv-show-144

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

A list will be provided of 100 values and the immigrant will be asked to identify which ones define Canada.

If they pick "better than the US" as the only one they get handed citizenship status right then and there.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Judging a book by its cover and remembering all the times Doug has lied or made a mountain out of a molehill, I doubt the section on the seedy goings-on of other politicians or reporters is going to be long. It's going to be a small section in a book mostly about Rob Ford because Doug Ford is nothing and needs to build himself up by associating himself with his dead younger brother in this Audacity of Hope-style push for higher public office.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Haha, the big epic discoveries of shipwrecks whose locations were a mystery (to white people) for 150+ years.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

El Scotch posted:

Who would have thought the Terror would be in Terror Bay.

There was an Inuit guy who was added to the crew and on his second day aboard the search vessel he told them that years ago he saw a mast sticking up out of Terror Bay, took pictures of it, lost the camera, then kept it to himself because losing the camera was a bad omen.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?


The goddamn Charizard...

I mean I know Pokemon is popular with people in their 20s and 30s but it's hard not to see that sign and think these banks are trying to rip off children.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

mojo1701a posted:

Charmander. Do you see wings? :colbert:

Yeah yeah I don't know all the pokey-mans.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

EvilJoven posted:

Someone needs to find a way to get Trudeau to just eat a lot of loving cheese or something. I bet a fat ugly Trudeau wouldn't get himself a second term.

You mean like

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMeKSm481LA

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

CLAM DOWN posted:

Vader guilty of 2nd degree murder (times two)

But on appeal might only get manslaughter.

Read bottom-up:

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Vegans are not okay with wild honey, because that would be stealing from bears.

Somebody fucked around with this message at 21:24 on Sep 9, 2022

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Stickarts posted:

I'm largely a vegetarian except for animals that I kill and dress myself. There's a whole bunch of valid reasons why one would want to significantly curtail their intake of meat. In my more fanatical days I was a vegan but I still ate honey and wore wool. I guess this means I'm hated by both camps.

No, I agree with you. I'm not a vegetarian but there are ethical and nutritional reasons why it's fine/good to be one. Having to eat as much meat in every meal every day and from terrible sources and practices is hosed. Being a vegan though is step too far I cannot relate to.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

David Corbett posted:

I'm not a lawyer, but I'm not sure how you could interpret the circumstances of the crime - abandoning a pair of almost-octogenarians in the woods, at least one of whom you have severely injured and is bleeding, after depriving them of all their resources, including their methods of communication, transportation, and shelter - as anything other than having a reasonably foreseeable outcome of death. If Vader *didn't* kill them in the commission of his crime, then surely he left them in a position where their deaths were inevitable; after all, it was evidently so isolated and desolate that to this day, six years later, their bodies still haven't been found.

Circumstances aside, that law prof talks about how the judge's decision is based on, and explicitly cites, a section of the Criminal Code that is unconstitutional. He is quite flabbergasted that a judge could make that mistake.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Monaghan posted:

I'm looking forward to the ontario conservatives somehow managing to gently caress up the next election.

Brown is trying to sabotage the Ontario Conservatives wellllll ahead of the next election, don't you worry:

@btaplatt "Holy cow. The Campaign Life Coalition is releasing emails Patrick Brown sent them on sex ed during the leader race"

@JamesValcke "Devastating. PC Leader @brownbarrie email promise on sex-ed to pro-life group during LDR race 'I will repeal it!'

http://www.torontosun.com/2016/09/19/ontario-pc-leader-patrick-browns-supporters-upset-with-his-sex-ed-curriculum-flip-flop

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Dreylad posted:

A lot of homeschool kids don't get socialized properly and end up...weird.

When you say "a lot", how many is that? Because there were also "a lot" of kids throughout my schooling (which was all public) who were just as weird.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Dreylad posted:

We're all chucking around personal anecdotes around so I wasn't really trying to say my sample size is representative. But they're a different kind of weird, one that normally gets teased and bullied out of kids in public school. Not saying that's a good thing, just how it seems to go.

Personally I'd like to see year round schooling with two-week breaks every few months instead of a summer long break. I think summer breaks interrupt learning so that teachers have to restart every September and re-teach basic concepts because kids (well, people) don't retain knowledge that well. It'd probably cost provinces a lot more, but I think it'd improve learning and keep kids engaged in school.

This also affects post-secondary learning. There were a lot of reasons I preferred the courses at my university lasting only a semester but one way it wasn't as good as two-semester courses was because of having to re-learn material. If "Stats" existed at one school but was broken up into "Stats 1" and "Stats 2" at my school a student could take them back to back and have only a few weeks of break but they could also leave a few semesters in between.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

JVNO posted:

Is there a situation where privatizing a profitable crown corporation is ever a good move? Is it a difficult process to do, and are there any regulations preventing such moves?

Toronto's fool mayor is going to try and sell off parts of Toronto Hydro but there is a 10% tax on it that he wants the Premier to waive or remove so that's one hurdle that could prevent the move.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

flakeloaf posted:

:shrug: I like it. They have a bunch of things that Netflix doesn't.

Netflix doesn't have it because of Shomi.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Helsing posted:

I'm not saying they aren't cutting spending in some areas --just look at their continuation of Harper's cuts to health transfer payments -- but not all of the deficit is going to "middle class" tax cuts..

Is it a cut to health transfer payments or are they slowing the growth of the payments? There's a difference between "I was going to give you 10 but now I'm only giving you 9" and "I was going to raise your payments from 10 to 12 but now I'm only raising them to 11". When people hear "cuts" they think of the former.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Brannock posted:

Seeing Hillary Clinton talk last night about how America will be the #1 superpower for clean energy made me feel bad for Canada. Y'all missed your chance to be relevant as an energy leader in the 21st century, instead pinning your future on tar sands. Imagine if instead Canada had invested heavily in alternative forms of energy, and could be instructing the rest of the world right now on how to build all the necessary infrastructure and having its experts consulted on all this stuff.

I dunno man, I think it was worth using all that oil wealth to turn Alberta into the opulent paradise it is today.

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

MA-Horus posted:


Note; Tut's teenaged bride/sister got married off to his vizier Aye and she disappears from the historical record almost IMMEDIATELY afterwards. Mind you, she did ask the Hittites for a prince to marry who got conviniently murked on the way to Egypt.

"What's that word?"
-"Hittites."
"Hittites..."

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Pitbull laws are always terrible because the law is so vague in describing which dogs (as if there's a perfect taxonomy anyway) and because the breeds that cause trouble change through the years anyway.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Lobok
Jul 13, 2006

Say Watt?

Risky Bisquick posted:

See you're joking but I'm not, I'd get a suspended sentence or community service and a 'fine' :qq:

actually come to think of it, you can simply :airquote: accidentally :airquote: hit someone with a car then drink a bunch of booze following the accident to blow over the limit.

#realchange #drewjitsu

Or just be a cop when you hit someone with your car.

quote:

Just after 5:00 p.m., the subject officer had finished escorting some vehicles through the debris when he proceeded south on the highway to just before the intersection of 25 Sideroad and parked on the west side of the southbound lanes, straddling the curb lane and the shoulder of the highway.

Mr. Brian Henderson was driving southbound on Highway 10 on his motorcycle. He slowed as he approached the cruiser and was within 20 metres of it when the officer made a U-turn from the southbound curb lane to the northbound side of the road.

Mr. Henderson applied his brakes and his motorcycle went into a skid and ended up on its side, sliding towards and then striking the front left side of the police cruiser. Mr. Henderson was hurled from his motorcycle and landed on the roadway. He was transported to hospital and later underwent surgery for spinal injuries.

Acting Director Martino said, “There are no reasonable grounds to charge the subject officer with the offence of dangerous driving under section 249 of the Criminal Code. The officer made an abrupt U-turn and cut in front of Mr. Henderson suddenly and unexpectedly. That said, the evidence falls short of indicating anything more than momentary inattentiveness on the officer’s part. That is not sufficient to satisfy the criminal fault requirement for dangerous driving of a marked departure from the objective norm. As such, no charges will issue.”

http://www.siu.on.ca/en/news_template.php?nrid=2806

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply