|
Considering all we know how the gently caress is that even possible?
|
# ¿ Nov 1, 2016 21:11 |
|
|
# ¿ May 13, 2024 10:18 |
|
TyrantWD posted:It will be Hillary's fault for not running a better campaign. They have underwhelmed on fundraising, GOTV, messaging, and in general have shown incredible complacency. No they haven't?
|
# ¿ Nov 1, 2016 21:49 |
|
U-DO Burger posted:early voting turnout is higher than previous election cycles so I dunno what the hell you're going on about here How much is that due to there being more early voting precincts?
|
# ¿ Nov 1, 2016 22:16 |
|
How badly is Obama regretting his Comey appointment right about now?
|
# ¿ Nov 1, 2016 22:24 |
|
canepazzo posted:Some more Early Vote numbers for FL: This is all very good news yes? It seems that the Black vote is starting to catch up and the Hispanic vote is beating past results. Am I looking at this correctly?
|
# ¿ Nov 1, 2016 23:10 |
|
nachos posted:lol what the gently caress is this new FBI release Wait what now?
|
# ¿ Nov 2, 2016 01:29 |
|
nimh posted:
Is this Karl Rove's map?
|
# ¿ Nov 2, 2016 15:57 |
|
Nonsense posted:Donald Trump has literally no idea that a new accuser is about to surface Hmm?
|
# ¿ Nov 2, 2016 20:33 |
|
Obama making a speech is amazing.
|
# ¿ Nov 2, 2016 21:31 |
|
canepazzo posted:Note: these are from an HFA operator so they might be "skewed" so to speak, but still interesting figures. Can we talk more about this? This seems like good news...
|
# ¿ Nov 2, 2016 22:48 |
|
Apraxin posted:https://twitter.com/KNXCooper/status/793931635662041089?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw How many of those journalists are actually from a major network or even an affiliate?
|
# ¿ Nov 2, 2016 22:54 |
|
Wyld Thang posted:The GOP will have a willing partner in the White House for the first time in years. Why would Hillary be a willing partner?
|
# ¿ Nov 2, 2016 23:13 |
|
Charlz Guybon posted:Anything from the last 10 hours that I should be aryzing over? There were good Florida/NC polls from both CNN and Quinipaic so no thankfully. There was a weird -3 Virginia poll from some random pollster but that goes against literally every other poll by a dozen points so I would throw it away.
|
# ¿ Nov 2, 2016 23:15 |
|
Covok posted:drat, deplorables death threated their way out of a November surprise. Deplorable. No one was going to cover it anyway.
|
# ¿ Nov 2, 2016 23:26 |
|
3 separate polls released today have Clinton up in Florida. The most recent one that has her down is from a new pollster called Remmington which is officially affiliated with the GOP and run by Ted Cruz's campaign manager.
|
# ¿ Nov 2, 2016 23:51 |
|
canepazzo posted:If you got tired of state polls, here's a new national one: That's up 1 from the +5 poll from the start of the week so it's totally back to pre-Comey. Nice.
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2016 00:09 |
|
Arrgytehpirate posted:How do I even begin to respond to this? Poster is a 30 y/o vet. Don't bother.
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2016 00:18 |
|
For whatever reason Nate's model seems to put a lot of stock in the belief that as goes Missouri so goes the nation. Missouri polls regularly drown out polls from Florida and North Carolina.
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2016 18:39 |
|
Yay https://twitter.com/jeremybird/status/794233700279955456
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2016 18:59 |
|
Suffolk NH poll has them tied which matches those other lousy polls today. What the gently caress happened, Hillary was up near double digits for MONTHS there.
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2016 19:15 |
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:Also NH has historically not been polled well + early voting in NH looks fine for HRC. NH doesn't have early voting.
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2016 19:38 |
|
theflyingorc posted:Where's the New Hampshire early voting data? It doesn't exist.
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2016 19:40 |
|
Did a poll really come out with Hillary and Trump tied in Colorado? Was it just including people who haven't voted yet?
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2016 21:06 |
|
emdash posted:44C-37T in already-voted 4-way poll; 45-38 in already-voted 2-way poll. 39-39 and 42C-41T in the "haven't voted yet" version of each, respectively So Clinton should run away with it. Great.
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2016 21:12 |
|
Samuel Clemens posted:https://twitter.com/MarcACaputo/status/794309382246977540?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw And Hispanic turnout is way up this year according to early voting. So Florida can secure the future of the Republic.
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 00:10 |
|
Dr Christmas posted:Some of the "bad news" we got from Florida this week was that while Hispanic and black early votes were up at least as high as last election, the white vote was also up high enough that it made the black vote look lower. Did I get that right? IIRC the white vote is up but the Hispanic vote is WAAAY up.
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 00:20 |
|
Samuel Clemens posted:https://twitter.com/PpollingNumbers/status/794334333519663104?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw Those rolling dates are finally 100% post Comey bomb. So that is a terrific number.
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 03:15 |
|
I am confident in saying that when early voting closes in Florida on Sunday Hillary is going to have an unassaliable lead there. Apparently this dude on Maddow tonight said that up to 70% of ALL Florida votes will be in by the end of Sunday.
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 03:24 |
|
PerniciousKnid posted:Why assume a regression to the mean instead of a continuing tend? If there's any mean regression, I would think it's toward 50/50, as people's memories fade after whatever news events previously boosted Clinton's numbers. Because we are currently experiencing the opposite, people's memories are fading after some news events that hurt Clinton's numbers. So she is trending back up toward the mean.
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 17:29 |
|
As far as slavery goes you really couldn't do better than being a slave in the Roman Empire. American slavery was much worse by nearly every metric.
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 19:54 |
|
Spacebump posted:Don't more people vote on election day and isn't Trump expected to attract a lot of voters that don't normally vote? People that don't normally vote but decide to randomly are more likely to vote on election day. There's absolutely no evidence to support the Trump campaigns belief that they are attracting previously uncommitted voters. In fact we KNOW that Hillary is bringing in tons of previously inactive Hispanics so new voters are going to help her more than him. Also Colorado is looking strong. https://twitter.com/ppppolls/status/794627523636318208
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 20:56 |
|
It's Nates own fault that his model is so temperamental when he happily includes bullshit polls from people like Remington which knowingly don't act in good faith so as to gently caress everything up. He believes that all data is useful data but that seems really naive.
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 21:44 |
|
canepazzo posted:ABC sprung a new tracking poll by surprise, now 47-43 Clinton from 47-44 earlier today. So how much does this decrease Hillarys chances on 538.
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 23:40 |
|
I've honestly put some real thought as to the implications of tension between the West and Russia as it would relate to EVE Online.
|
# ¿ Nov 5, 2016 00:04 |
|
Charlz Guybon posted:Any new early voting news? Both Nevada and Colorado are all but won already.
|
# ¿ Nov 5, 2016 00:16 |
|
Anyone else kind of relieved we made it through today without some type of Comey bullshit? Remember that dropped last Friday afternoon.
|
# ¿ Nov 5, 2016 00:21 |
|
Bloops Crusts posted:Ominous state polls for Clinton out of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and New Hampshire. If those should fall, and if Florida doesn't come through, early vote leads in Nevada and North Carolina won't necessarily matter. Firewall looking weaker by the day. You hosed up, to be an effective concern troll you need to at least feign concern, not just start jacking off about your fantasy. Shimrra Jamaane fucked around with this message at 00:27 on Nov 5, 2016 |
# ¿ Nov 5, 2016 00:24 |
|
Covok posted:Are we aryzing? Should we be? It was a great polling day despite Nate Silver literally tweeting to the contrary. He counted bad polls in Missouri, Utah, and Kansas as more impactful than good polls in Florida, NC, PA, and WI.
|
# ¿ Nov 5, 2016 00:40 |
|
Bloops Crusts posted:There's a huge danger in a lot of these polls in how low the decided vote is. Take the Detroit Free Press poll out of Michigan: Michigan is 100% going blue good god you are nuts.
|
# ¿ Nov 5, 2016 00:42 |
|
|
# ¿ May 13, 2024 10:18 |
|
Covok posted:Why? Those were red states? Because Nates model puts more stock in "trends" seen in these red states than polls from actual important states.
|
# ¿ Nov 5, 2016 00:46 |