|
i have off on election day, i'll get to follow along the anxiety train in real-time this year
|
# ¿ Nov 1, 2016 08:28 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 20:03 |
|
perfectly generic object for president 2020
|
# ¿ Nov 1, 2016 15:10 |
|
Empress Theonora posted:like does this even line up with other recent NC polls????? Take a breath and count to ten friend. Go for a walk outside, pet a dog.
|
# ¿ Nov 1, 2016 21:18 |
|
Harrow posted:Apparently, yes. "If she was innocent, why is she on trial????"
|
# ¿ Nov 1, 2016 21:26 |
|
suppose the gop successfully impeaches president clinton, but fails to get her actually removed from office are they free to to just keep coming up with impeachment charges until one sticks?
|
# ¿ Nov 2, 2016 02:13 |
|
Tom Guycot posted:Do you remember the obamacare votes? Expect Hillary to get impeached by the house every week for 8 years. Tricky D posted:Indeed they are. Impeachment aren't criminal charges either, so it's questionable whether double jeopardy even applies. so they don't even have to keep coming up with different, increasingly petty reasons for impeachment? they could just vote on the same charge over and over?
|
# ¿ Nov 2, 2016 02:19 |
|
BetterToRuleInHell posted:Pfft, I'm a Big Crunch kind of guy, take your Big Rip and stick a finger in a pie is what I say! the universe is the fart of god, actually
|
# ¿ Nov 2, 2016 02:31 |
|
Gyges posted:30 years of investigations mean she's guilty as sin. In fact she's so drat guilty that she's stolen all the evidence. Plus she stole the nomination from Bernie with the help of Donna Brazile and the DNC.
|
# ¿ Nov 2, 2016 04:49 |
|
climboutonalimb posted:This is gonna be a lovely week i don't know who this is. wikipedia suggests they provide grants to a couple major conservative think tanks?
|
# ¿ Nov 2, 2016 04:53 |
|
Nessus posted:Yeah but if he says "the Rothschilds," he either has to explain who they are - and there's no real way to do that without sounding anti-Semitic - or he has to get huge cheers for the reference, which would let the news media explain it. does trump care about sounding anti-semtic?
|
# ¿ Nov 2, 2016 05:14 |
|
Nessus posted:I think he is, yes. This may explain why Comey did this: it wasn't that he was trying to win it for Trump, it was a desperation move to try to stop the bleeding. i thought that was understood goal? less about supporting trump then trying to preserve republican presence
|
# ¿ Nov 2, 2016 06:11 |
|
Axetrain posted:Holy poo poo this thread is barely 2 days old and more than 120 pages already. Did something big happen or is that just the speed this thing moves at? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8X48RiKQmFQ&t=77s
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2016 02:31 |
|
hillary clinton, first woman president, first president to carry out duties of office from a white house renovated into a jail cell
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2016 03:11 |
|
FAUXTON posted:Having someone who is willing to straight up say "No, being gay isn't a goddamn disease to be cured, you loving barbarians" is going to be much better than "Well I certainly feel the pain of these inbred hicks and understand the whole christian persecution complex, but the federal government needs to be fair" but I'm dying to hear how this translates into Hillary saying gay kids won't get obamacare coverage anymore. "hillary refuses therapy for gays, condemning them to hell"
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2016 14:09 |
|
going to a taco party on election night, either way it goes it's going to be awkward when i'm the only sober person in the roomTiny Brontosaurus posted:No no no! Talking to boner confessor! I was quoting you to disprove his "only gfsincere and TB complain about the moderation" thing. after seeing more then one attempt at 'okay how can i/we get better with re: moderating' result in no, or at best temporary, change i don't really hold a lot of hope in this changing PST posted:http://europe.newsweek.com/donald-trump-vladimir-putin-russia-hillary-clinton-united-states-europe-516895 donald understand you can't let the facts get in the way of your story i see
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 17:15 |
|
Tiny Brontosaurus posted:I do understand the logic there and I try to take the same approach when I can, but invariably it gets thrown back in my face. It's pointless to worry about making people feel attacked when they are committed to attacking me. "That was pretty racist" gets heard as "you're a racist" by people who are racists. as an approach, it's probably one more effective for white people to use then people of color. it's easier to slip in and get at the actual problem when the person your talking to already perceives you as 'one of them.' i wouldn't think it fair to expect a black person to take that kind of understanding in a directly hostile conversation. i think that holds true in regards to other minority groups/issues as well
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 19:08 |
|
greatn posted:I just got an email from Hillary Clinton with the subject line "Stop Refreshing 538". she's right
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 19:39 |
|
Tiny Brontosaurus posted:America is still a slave society. prison for profit pipeline the dollop did an episode about convict leasing which is exactly what it says on the tin kids for cash was a big scandal since it effected white people there's more examples out there, i'm sure
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 19:50 |
|
"well, when you ignore context, you'll see i'm right"
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 19:55 |
|
RVProfootballer posted:In the BCE years, it was an officially legal religion and afaik there was not any systematic persecution. I believe the Jewish revolts were more about political power, but am not an expert. That seems qualitatively different than later persecutory anti-Semitism. this is my chance to promote the ancient world podcast, the current segment bloodlines, starting around episode 13 we end up in judea and the next couple episodes focuses on the history of the area under the roman empire
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 20:51 |
|
Agean90 posted:A thing to remember is that the concept of race as we know it is very much a product of the late 18/early 19th century. While stereotypes are a thing (Theres graffiti that shows that the Black men have large dicks stereotype goes back to ancient rome at least) its not like you have Romans declaring the Carthaginians biologically inferior, fit only for serving their betters. although i do distinctly remember plato's republic talking about how certain kinds of people are 'natural slaves.' women, for example. it seems like there's this feedback loop between taking slaves for seemingly strictly 'economical' reasons and needing to justify it on moral grounds which in turn because an imperative to maintaining/expanding the practice. no one wants to think they're doing a bad thing, even as they grind the neck of their fellow human beings into the dirt
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 22:43 |
|
Main Paineframe posted:I don't know about anyone else, but my biggest qualm is that "better" can mean a tremendous amount of things and packing the entirety of the worldwide human condition into a single word is so absurd as to be virtually meaningless. The other problem is that it implies a sort of inevitability - if you claim that things have always just gotten better with the passage of time over the entirety of human history, that comes with the unspoken addendum that things will inevitably continue to get better regardless of what people do. And of course, the basic assumption that everything has gotten better forever can definitely be challenged - for one thing, industrialization has allowed mass torture and murder on an unprecedented scale. what i've read about the changes in lifestyle brought about by the agricultural revolution certainly fits that, too farming means more food stability, more people can live in a smaller area, the ability for larger groups to organize and specialize their labors beyond sustenance practices, allowing well, civilization it also stunted peoples diets, shortened their lifespans, further incentivized the extortion of the many for the benefit of the few, helped solidify divisions in labor between men and women and subsequent social status that still exist to this day, etc., etc.
|
# ¿ Nov 4, 2016 22:52 |
|
Islam is the Lite Rock FM posted:Being a faithless elector sounds like a good way to get a slocking. checkout my new band, faithless elector
|
# ¿ Nov 5, 2016 00:44 |
|
Wizard Master posted:Can someone tell me if Trump is going to lose or not? This thread gets like 100 new pages per hour and it's mostly nerd poo poo trump will win or lose depending upon your vote you are the deciding factor you are the chosen one bring balance to the electorate
|
# ¿ Nov 5, 2016 00:52 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 20:03 |
|
fishmech posted:Yeah sorry, it's just the absentee ballot there. There's a form you can fill out with your county clerk to have them automatically mailed to you for future elections though, you might need to call them to get it. my mother did exactly this since she'll be recovering from surgery on election day
|
# ¿ Nov 5, 2016 02:03 |