Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001
Lol, they manged to make another comedy without any jokes.

It feels like everyone involved knew how terrible it was and were just half rear end'ing it.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

syntaxfunction posted:

My Beanie Babies will be worth a fortune, just you wait!

I just sold one for $11,000 the other day! only have 2 more of my super rare valuable ones in stock! Set to sell them this very afternoon, but do you know what, cos I like you all I can even give you a discount $10,995, but need to decide in the next 1hr!!!

also what's a beanie baby again? ah don't worry I'll just google it.

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001
You see now I'm wondering if there is a two billion dollar mega yacht up for sale at the moment.


Deep Glove Bruno posted:

i dunno bout you all but i need exactly one billion dollars as well
Same. If we get it, go halves on a luxury mega yacht?

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

tango alpha delta posted:

They both look like literal Muppets made in Jim Hensons creature shop.

Would 100% watch film version of quite a few fraud cases where they just have a few/all of the characters as muppets. Feel like having muppets explain some of the details would make some of the dryer exposition stuff more entertaining, like what the big short did.

Hell just make it a streaming series. "A history bitcoin: A muppets tale."
Not like there isn't more than enough quality material for that.

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

Ups_rail posted:

Personally I dont see why disney would invest in a crypto exchange.

Disney does seem to have more money than they can reasonably spend.
Possibly some idiot high decided to store some in Crypto instead of a bank due to better "interest" or what not.

If it did happen and it's a large loss, they'd have to inform their shareholders at somepoint right, or can they just hide this if they want?

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

Cyrano4747 posted:

...and lost a ton of money, especially with Disney+. Replacing him isn’t a shocker.
Honestly it seems like it would of been really hard to lose money with Disney+ considering how many studios creating content Disney owns, how large their back catalog is, and how many families with young kids seem to of gotten it pretty much automatically basically just of the Disney name. Impressive really.

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

Dr. Video Games 0031 posted:

Probably because the concept is bad at a fundamental level. I don't think any of the million studio-owned streaming services are doing great right now.

Is it though? Like only if you're stealing revenue for your streaming off other revenue like box office and what not. Like as I said for Disney it makes the most sense as they do have such an insanely large back catalog at the moment. Like of all the major streaming services, Disney+ seems one of the most likely to survive. I mean they own Hulu -what ever that still consists of- so I mean it would be hard to think they won't have a streaming service of some sort going on.

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

ymgve posted:

I guess the issue is that Disney spent LOTS of money on Marvel TV shows, but not enough people subscribed to cover the costs of the productions.

I'm assuming the star wars ones as well. They may make a bit back in merchandise and what not, but yeah that just becomes how much do you need to spend on new content to keep within budget (or do you want to lose a bit while you're still growing the network. Which Disney has deep pockets, so they can afford to do it for a bit if they think it will pay off).

But yeah even if they stopped spending so much on the Marvel and Star Wars TV stuff, just do them pretty much just film only, keep putting some money into what ever cheap kids stuff they're churning out, and have their huge back catalog available. Still well worth it for a lot of people with kids. Easy money.

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

Dr. Fraiser Chain posted:

I don't know why Disney just doesn't take the check to have their poo poo on Netflix et al. Why even bother spinning up the infrastructure to serve that content. You're going to drown in operating costs and reinvent the infrastructure problem that other companies have already solved.

So like other streaming services like paramount are stupid for not doing this, but Disney legit has the back catalog, production studios, specific demographic -slightly less so with marvel/star wars/fox stuff but still all vague "family friendly" no independent, experimental or foreign films really", and brand recognition to pull it off.

Amazon and apple seem to of got into production less about the streaming and more for something to sell through their stores, so that's a bit of a different model. Seems their more trying to create a home theater model for TV series... which I dunno maybe that could work?
The actually just streaming services part of it seems more like an afterthought.

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

Darth TNT posted:

I don’t even get how streaming is supposed to be making money at all. You have a set subscription, you spend billions of dollars to make shows and maintain the infrastructure and bandwidth.

Their trying to get to where Netflix is. They had $24.9 billion revenue and $5.1 billion in profit in 2021.
https://www.businessofapps.com/data/netflix-statistics/

Although honestly the math isn't quite working for me as like 220 million subscribes X $10-20 should be in the the $2.2-4.4 billion range, and subscriptions as far as I can tell are pretty much their only revenue, but that seems to be the numbers that are generally given.

It's early, I dunno :shrug:

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

evilweasel posted:

You forgot the subscription price is per month not per year :v:
haha yep, I'm an idiot, 100% did. In my defense had yet to have my morning coffee!

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

Boxturret posted:

having a mystery penny in an account is something that would make me tear though everything to find where the error was, I can't imagine just losing 8 Billion

And the thing is that was meant to be cash. Like that should of been easier to keep track of than the value of "assets" -which I'm assuming was mostly just a bunch of crypto- that's assets can fluctuate or could lose access too, or what ever other stupid stuff happens with cypto.

Like how the hell is the cash just not there. Did they just manage to spend $ 8 Billion with out noticing. Did they never check how much cash they had left. Like the hell?

He or someone/everyone at the company else, must of just stolen it right?

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

Tsietisin posted:

It may not surprise you, but that is how a lot of those articles are written nowadays. Just churn out the articles to generate clicks.

I believe sports, finance, news sections are filled with AI written articles, as you just need to train the ai to correctly put the right numbers and names in a pretty generic formula, maybe have and editor give it a quick read for any obvious mistakes and done.

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

Ups_rail posted:

yes, I work in a law office (not a lawyer) Its my understanding that for something to be criminal it has to meet a rather high bar vs ( an honest mistake) I SBF is doing the whole Its was an accounting error I didnt just steal people deposits, and run a ponzi, It was a crypto exchange! I hosed UP! etc

I mean criminal negligence is a thing. Also I feel like he probably just did a whole lot of lying about how he secure he was keeping peoples money and what he was doing with it and what not, which should be pretty easy to prove was intentional, and which could lead to criminal fraud changes.

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001
So it's been a long time since I was even sort of aware of what crypto exchanges were around. If Binance goes under is there still any major ones running? Seems to be the main one at the moment crypto spammers, spam. Is that one that was based of magic cards still about? That was always a laugh remembering that was a thing that exists.

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001
Wait cops are allowed to arrest you when you're naked? poo poo. All my years of planning the perfect bank heist ruined. :(

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

Splicer posted:

They're allowed, the key is to make them not want to.

:hmmyes:

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

Cyrano4747 posted:

Can someone give me the short version of who she is? I've seen her a few times in this thread but I can't remember why she's important being being a high profile crypto shill.

Some kind of venture capital investor lady?

She CEO of Ark Capital, and that seems to be about it. Ark capital like to invest in Crypto and Tesla, so yeah being a crypto shill is basically her whole thing as far as I can tell.

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

CommieGIR posted:

The best part is he is so late to the NFT party, that NFT market is largely drying up as the Crypto market shudders.

lol if this is the last ever "Major" NFT release. Really would be an appropriately lovely way for NFT's to go out.

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

Elden Lord Godfrey posted:

BTW the Trump NFT thing is absolutely hilarious. Was this what he's been cooking for the past month?

Like what was he actually doing, was he micromanaging the actual artist in a way lets him scam the actual artist out of their share of the proceeds?

So gizmodo looked into a bit and it looks like a company NFT INT LLC brought the likeness rights of trump off another place, even though the CEO of NFT INT LLC says there not involved with the trump project at all. Also the companies run out of a ups mail box in Utah.

https://gizmodo.com/donald-trump-nft-trading-cards-1849900531

So yeah in short god knows what's happening. :shrug:

if you go to the place that sells the trump nfts at the bottom you'll actually see this disclaimer

quote:

NFT INT LLC is not owned, managed or controlled by Donald J. Trump, The Trump Organization, CIC Digital LLC or any of their respective principals or affiliates. NFT INT LLC uses Donald J. Trump's name, likeness and image under paid license from CIC Digital LLC, which license may be terminated or revoked according to its terms.

Also according to the website they're sold out already. lol.

Edit: also CIC Digital LLC seems to just be a shell company. it was created 9 months ago, and was register by a register agent out of that address in Delaware that's registered 285'000 plus companies. I'm just going to assume that's just a trump shell company.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporation_Trust_Center_(CT_Corporation)

dr_rat fucked around with this message at 10:29 on Dec 16, 2022

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

tango alpha delta posted:

lol, crypto will never go away; it'll be repackaged and preached over and over and over to the next group of 'true believers' until our sun finally turns into a red giant and consumes the planet millions of years from now.

e:seraph always links out of context YouTube videos to his posts when he's at the height of his manic phase. He even bought me this avatar because I made him really, really mad.

Lol bitcoiners will of used of the energy from the sun and then frozen to death long before than.

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001
Yeah possible he thinks he might find a way to bribe/lawyer his way out, possible he's just sort of deer in the headlighting.

I mean the bribery thing might even of worked if he wasn't making international headlines.

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

ashpanash posted:

Jokes on them, though. Twitter beat them to it.

Feel like twitter users and League of Legends players would both generally really hate any direct comparisons between the two.

So yeah, people should probably directly compare the groups more often I guess.

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

Powershift posted:

Prosecutors don't offer plea deals they don't need.

Don't prosecutors pretty much always offer at least some sort of plea deal, as it's just so much easy for everyone than actually going through a full court case?

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001
Okay yeah, that make sense.

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

more falafel please posted:

Good chance there'll be multiple SBF movies that release in 2023

Only one of them will be good and it won't be the one everyone expects. It will also be the one with the main actor who looks the least like SBF.

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001
I believe the guy hires two people, who alternate editing. One recently left to start their own channel and did a video a bout. I assume he hired another to replace her.

(fortunately from her video It seems he's the opposite of an rear end in a top hat to work for)

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

Alan Smithee posted:

PHILO 100 TA: "let me ask of you, do you lock your doors at night? Do you hide your crypto behind SHA256 encryption in a birdbath?"

Where those loving treacherous birds can just up and steal it?

hell not.

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001
And funnily enough reputation does sort of matter with this sort of scam. As it's very openly a scam making it know hey were crooks, but if you pay you will actually unlock you stuff makes people much more likely to pay.

For my job a while back I needed to keep track of various IT scams and what not, and I remember at the time when ever the ransom ware stuff was mentioned on IT news/security places they'd always mention, while it's not really ethical to pay, if you do they will get you're computer unencrypted.

This is slightly different because they didn't pay. But having a reputation for not being utter dicks and being understanding about stuff, might make some people more inclined to just pay up. Like good PR never hurts.

Just look at the long history of crooks, gangsters, cartel members and what not that would give small bits of there cash to help out local people in need and what not.

dr_rat fucked around with this message at 08:15 on Jan 20, 2023

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001
My lawyers were NFT apes and they were stolen before I could even sue them for badly representing in my upcoming bankruptcy case.

Now what the hell am I going to do!!!!

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001
From the replies. LOL:

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

Salt Fish posted:

NFTs are just DRM, but for some unexplained reason its good DRM that corporations will have to use in a way that isn't profitable to them, but instead profitable to the players. For some reason.

I mean DRM usually actually has protections on it stopping you from copying it. NFT's are more like putting your name in the file name or a file, than just leaving it on a random public sever and assuming no one will copy it because your names in the title.

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

ymgve posted:

but of course the majority of NFTs aren't that, the only advantage "owning" one over owning a screenshot of it is that you get the opportunity to push it onto some rube for possibly more than you paid originally

Well yeah, as the only people who actually respect NFT's as an ownership thing are the people who buy and sell them, NFT's do make at least some sense if you just ignore what ever the digital item it is they say they show ownership of and just think of them as a token that just represents itself, that people are choosing to buy and sell for speculation.

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

Ups_rail posted:

What if money is real but florida isnt?

Look either money is real and florida is real, or money isn't real and florida isn't real.

The two are far too interconnected for you to mix and match like this!

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001
And other than for advertising what companies actually use facebook? Microsoft and Google already have plenty of services used by companies for actual work related things, facebooks lucky if the IT department haven't blocked it on all work computers so employees don't waste their day browsing it.

I wonder if facebook is actually going to bother pouring money into any of the AR stuff that could actually be useful. With Zuck still in charge seems doubtful it still won't be just be wasted.

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

Lazyfire posted:

There's some other genuinely interesting AR and VR applications and ideas, but I think they have been few and far between in our world because crypto and now AI are competing with AR for engineers and funding and more people are looking for things more flashy and short term profitable.

Honestly I think AR isn't seemingly doing that much at the moment as Google and Microsoft both put quite a bit of money into their own varying versions of it, and it didn't take off, as it seems the tech just isn't there yet. Unlike VR and driving cars though there doesn't seem to need any giant technological leap forward o get it to the point where someone can start doing useful stuff with it. I'm sure within the next 10 years they'll be another big effort but one of the big tech companies to get it working, as there are very obvious real world business uses for it.

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

IUG posted:

Snapchat somehow can tell when someone takes a screenshot, can Signal do that?

Does snapchat just check if a screenshot is taken by the os screenshot feature though? I feel getting around that should be pretty trivial. Hell does it check if you just decided to take a video capture of your entire desktop as it's trivial to take an individual screen shot from that.

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

TheOneAndOnlyT posted:

I asked him what "backed by math" actually meant and he didn't have an answer.

Ponzi schemes are backed by maths! I mean math that only works for the people that their designed to work for but the math checks out perfectly. Casino's as well!

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001
The only thing run she did was not just start a life in another country.

Hell you probably wouldn't have to even hide that long. What ever crypto place made the mistake will probably go bankrupt in like three years anyway.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

dr_rat
Jun 4, 2001

Kerbtree posted:

imagine a pipe that's exactly 10 golf balls long. If you put a new ball in, one of the existing ones pops out. You still have 10 balls in the pipe, but one of them is the new one, not the one you started with. You spent/transferred that one.

It's also important to note in British banking this isn't a metaphor, and all banks have massive warehouses in the countryside filled with pipes and golf balls to keep track of how much money is in all British banks.

It's why finance types like golf so much, it's literally just hitting money around all afternoon.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply