Nuclearmonkee posted:

That's a lot of words that will responded to in 140 characters or less.

Intel&Sebastian posted:

I have a feeling the GOP will try and split the idiot/establishment difference with Scott Walker and then quickly realize he's the worst parts of GWB and Romney with none of the upsides. Oh and he said he'd bomb Iran on day one so good luck with that too.

Intel&Sebastian posted:

I meant I predict he'll end up with the actual nom and then make Romney look disciplined and cunning in comparison.

TheScott2K posted:

I've never been worried about something on Fox News tilting left before.

Joementum posted:

Josh Lyman posted:

How have I never seen this before?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLa9YxV1Xps

Lord of Pie posted:

I think it's sign language for "I'm a leg day skipping bitch boy."

Intel&Sebastian posted:

I'm sorry to pick on somebody from pages ago but LOL, of loving course they were. They were trying to kneecap everyone but Bush out there. Did you not notice Fox news all of a sudden growing spines and asking Republican candidates difficult questions? Ones specifically tailored to gently caress up said candidates?

The very first question was an attempt to killshot Trumps 3rd party run. C'mon.

And then minutes after it ended Frank Luntz brought out a rigged focus group to talk poo poo about him.

NotWearingPants posted:

drudgereport has Trump as the clear winner at 45.5%, runners up were Cruz with 14%, Rubio with 10%, and Carson with 9%.

I'd link, but gently caress that cesspool site.

Raskolnikov38 posted:

Wallace spent half the debate trying to outsmart Trump and failed spectacularly at it.

Powered Descent posted:

In chess notation, it matters which way around you put the punctuation marks. !? indicates "an interesting move that may not be best", while ?! indicates "a dubious move – one which may turn out to be bad". The difference is sometimes subtle, but still real. Exclamation point first ("interesting move") is generally the better of the two.

So should we standardize on Jeb!? or Jeb?! with this in mind?

This is important. We have to be sure about this.

greatn posted:

So Trump's VP choice, in having a hard time imagining who it is. He won't want any of the candidates he's been busy insulting, I don't think a senator it governor will denigrate themselves, and another rich rear end in a top hat like Mark Cuban would lose a tremendous amount of power by becoming a VP.

I'm thinking he chooses another television or movie celebrity who is conservative but just well spoken enough to be taken seriously? Is Arnold Schwarzenegger eligible to hold the office of vice president?

Sir Tonk posted:

Alter Ego posted:

Obama didn't lose the 2008 debates; he outperformed McCain in like all of them.

Rocks posted:

I'm so fired up for Jeb! after his amazing debate performance!!!

sharkbomb posted:

Trump has repeatedly used the phrase "We have millions of people that are waiting online to come here-- legally." I always picture millions of people sitting overseas and refreshing their internet browsers repeatedly waiting for their immigration documents.

stephenfry posted:

did I introduce you to that site?

Forums Terrorist posted:

the boomers are starting to feel the reaper's bony touch and are collectively losing their minds about their own mortality

Epic High Five posted:

They spread like loving wildfire in the exurbs and anywhere that tends to be red and uneducated. SA even has quite a few judging by how often TFLC transformation pics end up on my facebook feed as success stories for some product or another

Throwing those MLM-theme shopping parties is also an excuse for a lot of people to socialize in the same way going over to your buddy's to watch a game is, excepting that a $250 sample pack can't really be compared to, "bring a 6 pack, would ya?"

Combine that with the fact that the products themselves involve an obscene profit margin and it's really no wonder why they're so huge

messagemode1 posted:

http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/dear-trump-fan-so-you-want-someone-to-tell-it-like-it-is-ok-here-you-go/

What a magnificent article. It's like The Blaze is becoming self aware? Wait no.

Jewel Repetition posted:

http://www.theonion.com/article/jeb-bush-bungles-several-questions-first-day-back--52406

Dolash posted:

If Trump doesn't have the nomination locked down after the primaries, he should spend the whole runup to the convention preparing a ridiculous wave of supporters/rallies/protestors he can bring to Cleveland, to keep the eye of the media firestorm fixed on him. Pay to bus them in, rent a neighbouring convention hall to host them, set up a free concert, whatever it takes to take his usual show on the road and overwhelm the RNC.

Considering the voting delegates are some 2500~ yahoos that nobody really knows all that well, it might be possible a show of blunt force on Trump's part could just intimidate them into voting for him. If the media and the baying crowd all around are expecting Trump who would want their name and face paraded as one of those responsible for denying Him?

There's been all this talk about how the modern system is not well-suited to a contested convention and when it comes down to it the party nomination is basically Calvinball with committees, and Trump's not known as the Chaos Candidate for nothing. He just needs the right kind of chaos.

d_redguy posted:

God dammit it's "hanged."

Laundry is hung. People are hanged.

Zeroisanumber posted:

Evangelical voters have been ignoring what their faith says about loving their neighbor for years now, I doubt that supporting Donald Trump in spite of the fact that it would be horribly hypocritical of them is too much of a stretch.

Shageletic posted:

http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-36333933

paranoid randroid posted:

Hillary shows up to the Alex Jones show wearing snake eye contacts

Mirthless posted:

Trump becomes the first president to get a handjob from a pornstar on live radio

esp. if she refused to acknowledge it the entire interview, even if confronted