What is the best flav... you all know what this question is: This poll is closed. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Labour | 907 | 49.92% | |
Theresa May Team (Conservative) | 48 | 2.64% | |
Liberal Democrats | 31 | 1.71% | |
UKIP | 13 | 0.72% | |
Plaid Cymru | 25 | 1.38% | |
Green | 22 | 1.21% | |
Scottish Socialist Party | 12 | 0.66% | |
Scottish Conservative Party | 1 | 0.06% | |
Scottish National Party | 59 | 3.25% | |
Some Kind of Irish Unionist | 4 | 0.22% | |
Alliance / Irish Nonsectarian | 3 | 0.17% | |
Some Kind of Irish Nationalist | 36 | 1.98% | |
Misc. Far Left Trots | 35 | 1.93% | |
Misc. Far Right Fash | 8 | 0.44% | |
Monster Raving Loony | 49 | 2.70% | |
Space Navies Party | 39 | 2.15% | |
Independent / Single Issue | 2 | 0.11% | |
Can't Vote | 188 | 10.35% | |
Won't Vote | 8 | 0.44% | |
Spoiled Ballot | 15 | 0.83% | |
Pissflaps | 312 | 17.17% | |
Total: | 1817 votes |
|
The Lib Dems are finished nowOwlFancier posted:Green party, one would assume? They're basically luddites. In the actual meaning of the word, rather than the pejorative one!
|
# ¿ Jun 1, 2017 01:55 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 16:09 |
|
ISeeCuckedPeople posted:What about the SNP? Plaid Cymru? Green Party? I though they were considered left? SNP aren't really left, the others are but have low single digits MPs between them. ISeeCuckedPeople posted:And the Lib-Dems? More likely to stand with the Tories than Labour? This was the case less than two years ago. I don't want to be rude but you have a lot of holes in your knowledge.
|
# ¿ Jun 1, 2017 01:58 |
|
Steve2911 posted:Except the one guy voting Tory because "the NHS needs a kick up the arse". Hmm I wonder which party has been in power for the last 7 years
|
# ¿ Jun 1, 2017 09:43 |
|
Seaside Loafer posted:Anyone know much about the whole bother with fishing quotas? My know nothing man in the pub thought is surely even fisherman understand that its there for a reason, ie to not fish the fish to extinction so we can carry on fishing. Is there some sort of nationalistic annoyance, as in 'the bloody french get more and its decided from bloody brussels' etc. You're essentially asking if people understand the tragedy of the commons and regard foreigners as anything other than a scary boogyman who hates us. The answer is that they do not.
|
# ¿ Jun 1, 2017 12:11 |
|
Jose posted:lol the libdems will tie themselves to anything that gives them power I'm not sure that's true; they'll tie themselves to the Tories more easily than Labour, in any case, because the liberal is the natural ally of the fascist.
|
# ¿ Jun 1, 2017 12:24 |
|
Macarius Wrench posted:Lot of people itt need to get their hole, or their dick or some bizarre halfway point between the 2. A lot of youse need to boil your head in acid
|
# ¿ Jun 1, 2017 14:02 |
|
Tesseraction posted:Mate you might want to set off now so you don't miss the train you should go jump in front of. A method of suicide which isn't traumatising for train drivers is better imo
|
# ¿ Jun 1, 2017 14:15 |
|
Tesseraction posted:I offer to drive the train. [Right wing blithering about UNIONS stopping you]
|
# ¿ Jun 1, 2017 14:17 |
|
Gonzo McFee posted:That's who she is!? The woman who took a picture of that house covered in England flags and the Sun acted as if it was an endorsement of ISIS? She takes pictures of absolutely everywhere she goes, it was a total stitch up that the Labour higher ups went along with forkboy84 posted:He posted in the train thread quite recently. Well, within this year. Yeah, he works for Scotrail now and has a more active social life in Glasgow than he did down south. Loving Africa Chaps posted:It is absolutely a contributing factor, next time you have a skinful have a pint of water before you go to bed. It makes a massive difference* I swear by a bit of lucozade sport or similar, or fruit juice
|
# ¿ Jun 2, 2017 00:29 |
|
The Theresy Relaunches
|
# ¿ Jun 2, 2017 08:20 |
|
Going back a few days (I've been away) but who was the guy who thought that Wargames was pro-nuclear weapons again
|
# ¿ Jun 5, 2017 21:52 |
|
Pissflaps posted:It's a pro MAD film that supports the concept of rational actors unambiguously declaring their intention to follow up any strike with an immediate retaliation, preventing the escalations that WOPR plays out in the story. Not sure about that, Pissflaps I mean I watched it only a couple of months ago
|
# ¿ Jun 5, 2017 21:58 |
|
Pissflaps posted:Sounds like some bits went over your head. Watch it again. It is Matthew Broderick's finest film but I think that's a bit soon
|
# ¿ Jun 5, 2017 22:01 |
|
Jose posted:this is grim It's also from a group of super-Blairite shitheels and doesn't reflect my experience.
|
# ¿ Jun 6, 2017 11:24 |
|
Pochoclo posted:Relax, I seriously doubt it's going to be that bad. The economy might get hit, unemployment might rise a bit, but in the end this is still one of the strongest economies in the world, it's going to survive somehow. If the City wanders off to the continent then that's 10% of tax income immediately up in smoke
|
# ¿ Jun 6, 2017 11:34 |
|
Guavanaut posted:Imagine if we replaced them with real jobs. Under a Labour government that's not impossible, under a Tory government how likely do you think that is?
|
# ¿ Jun 6, 2017 11:42 |
|
The DPRK posted:Since everyone seems to be enjoying these (I use the word loosely): The early nineties: famous for having recent, or current, Labour rule.
|
# ¿ Jun 6, 2017 18:07 |
|
A hard day out on the doorsteps. We'll see if it makes any difference.
|
# ¿ Jun 8, 2017 21:39 |
|
Pissflaps posted:Did you lose your key? I'm down staying with the other half, I don't have a key
|
# ¿ Jun 8, 2017 21:45 |
|
wocobob posted:Could someone give a quick primer on the "Sinn Fein taking seats" thing to the Americans in the thread? I get the impression they're an Irish party, but I don't know much else about them. Do they have seats in parliament that they don't occupy out of protest or something? Essentially yes
|
# ¿ Jun 8, 2017 22:54 |
|
600 majority turned into 12600 in Cambridge
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 06:32 |
|
Aww Amber Rudd survived (And currently sitting on the 2nd most labour votes in history)
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 06:41 |
|
Remember that she had that popularity because she had only been prime minster for 9 months. Blair was even more popular at that point in 1998. PMs tend to have exponential decays of popularity. (Most popular PM to call an election, not most popular ever)
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 06:46 |
|
Cerebral Bore posted:It's pretty loving funny how the Tories have gone from unstoppable juggernaut to totally hosed in six goddamn weeks. They're still the largest party
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 06:47 |
|
SamuraiFoochs posted:Someone help me. What exactly does this mean for Brexit? The Tories pushed for a hard brexit but will be forced to govern alongside at least one group (either DUP or Lib Dems) who want a soft one at most. Hard brexit's probably off the table now.
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 06:50 |
|
Even if you're a prime minister in a weak position, you're still prime minister; this is pretty much the only thing that a lot of Tories got into politics for.
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 07:18 |
|
Ratjaculation posted:Anywhere I can find the popular vote? The BBC app ain't very friendly http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2017/results Tories 42.4, Labour 40.1 as things stand. Second most Labour votes ever.
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 07:21 |
|
Endorph posted:so did they get rid of the saboteurs yet Well Nick Clegg's gone As has James Wharton, tory MP for Stockton South, who went to school with some friends of mine. Apparently he spent most of his free time talking about how "he'd love to shoot some darkies" and similar, so it couldn't happen to a nicer person.
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 07:23 |
|
Grouchio posted:Biggest Labour presence since Attlee? Wait ignore that. I misread the BBC thing. It's still up there - the most Labour votes ever is something like 13.5m, currently on 12.8.
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 07:26 |
|
I posted this on FB this morning and a guy I know who went to Eton liked it so it takes all sorts (He went to Eton because his dad worked for the UN and they paid for schooling, so his dad went "Well he's going to to the most expensive one then!")
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 07:28 |
|
OwlFancier posted:Ehhhh, number of votes is going to go up with population, vote share is the better metric. I know, Also the effect is cancelled out somewhat by lower turnout nowadays
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 07:35 |
|
communism bitch posted:Actually i think somebody may have jumped in front of a train so.... I hope not (unless it was May)
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 08:17 |
|
c0burn posted:I love DM comments at times like these The cities are subsidised by the rural areas? You learn something
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 08:21 |
|
Shibawanko posted:I'm not trying to be wishfully pessimistic here by the way, I'm on Corbyn's side, but my impression of the tories (and equivalent parties in other countries) is that they are simply unprincipled and will try to consolidate power no matter what it takes, they're willing to be extremely flexible. I see no differences between DUP and CON except for Brexit, so why would this coalition be that unstable? It seems to me they'd agree on almost everything except brexit hardness, what would the funny sneeze entail? The Tories have the amazingly useful position of knowing that things will get better for them personally no matter what happens The DUP + the Tories is still a very very slim majority.
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 08:23 |
|
Xaerael posted:Not even hyperbole in the case of Clegg's seat. Canterbury has been a constituency for nearly 700 years and has been Tory almost all of that (and never Labour)
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 10:28 |
|
Laura Pidcock (Durham North West) is a good egg
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 10:50 |
|
kustomkarkommando posted:The DUP know their role in this, they'll keep to the sidelines. Their role is propping up the prime minister, that's a pretty big opportunity to push things through
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 10:56 |
|
feedmegin posted:Ummm given there was no such thing as a Tory til the 18th century! For the subset of that for which there were political parties it's been mostly Tory
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2017 13:57 |
|
mehall posted:So the BBC got back to me after my complaint, and it's a doozy: Oh wow
|
# ¿ Jun 12, 2017 17:10 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 16:09 |
|
radmonger posted:To be fair, it could be they are right. Maybe the met actually has a policy of shooting people at random, and it was just luck that the random selection mechanism happened to pick 3 people who were, entirely coincidentally, currently doing a terrorism. The Met does not have an (official) shoot to kill policy.
|
# ¿ Jun 12, 2017 17:20 |