|
Fuegan posted:
This looks great. I would have lost patience with all those line highlights, but the end result is definitely worth it!
|
#
¿
Jul 30, 2017 02:28
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 19:08 |
|
|
goose willis posted:I have HIGH HOPES for the upcoming Chaos codex Pucker your butte. Here comes GW
|
|
#
¿
Jul 31, 2017 00:37
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 2, 2017 00:43
|
|
|
ElBrak posted:Who wants an imgur gallery of pictures of warhams games! I was even playing some of them! Hey, I know that store. I was there with lincodkilla about a week ago. You should totally meet up and slam some hams
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2017 21:40
|
|
|
A gorgeous army. Miss you bae
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2017 23:34
|
|
|
That model is so, so, busy I can't tell what's going on or what I'm looking at. I don't want to be h8ter, but I'm with the other goons who say the new GW CAD style has way too much detail.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2017 00:06
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2017 00:38
|
|
|
quote:
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2017 01:17
|
|
|
Yeah it's not like I hate it or anything, but it's too busy for me. I think that's one of the reasons I'm not drawn to most GW minis anymore. They look great with a white backdrop all alone, but when you put them in a real environment with other models the detail turns into noise.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 10, 2017 03:10
|
|
|
jadarx posted:I'm not really refusing to use flyers. I just don't think they fit the scale of the game and would prefer not to run them. But that ship has long since sailed it seems. Could you run a contemptor mortis or deredeo? Those do well against fliers if you can take them in 40k. There's also the hellblade.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 13, 2017 06:33
|
|
|
chutche2 posted:Anyone try plasma inceptors yet? Are they as lovely and overpriced as they look?  not my work
|
|
#
¿
Aug 15, 2017 20:15
|
|
|
SRM posted:For actual content, I'm making Camhammer videos again and I put this one out the other week. It's about the Horus Heresy, and whether or not you should start it now: I thought you've seen PNW crew's posting? 30k players are definitely a negative. Pretty objective other than that! The only thing I'd add is that there is an upcoming rulebook that's likely going to be 7.5. It feels to me that people don't acknowledge the significance of this- releasing a HH specific rulebook just for 30k. That speaks a lot to their commitment to staying on their own system for the indefinite future. They're also taking over the specialist game space and 30k has been on it's way to becoming it's own game for some time. One of the reasons it's been pretty balanced is that it was written in 6th and never got fully converted to 7th. They took the things they liked and ignored the ones they didn't. Some of the things people like in 8th came from the 30k books. IMO the contents of the new rulebook, whenever we get it, will be the most telling about how committed they are to keeping the game separate or not. I'm a whiny baby like Perturabo, but I'm impressed with most of 8th edition. I just prefer a less streamlined game for 30k as it's a game for grognard 40k players. It's fine if they convert it over, but that wouldn't be my preference. BULBASAUR fucked around with this message at 22:13 on Aug 15, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Aug 15, 2017 22:07
|
|
|
adamantium|wang posted:Holy hell who bought you that ahahahahaha The slack both giveth and it taketh
|
|
#
¿
Aug 16, 2017 06:54
|
|
|
Cainer posted:Why bother rolling dice? Just gaslight your opponent into thinking you won. Panascope alt account
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2017 01:04
|
|
|
Hixson posted:Sisko, nice work my dude. The robes in particular are great.  Seriously though, Sisko, it 'aint no lie. Way to crank out some good minis.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2017 19:41
|
|
|
Stop talking about 30k guys, people might get the wrong idea
|
|
#
¿
Aug 18, 2017 01:42
|
|
|
a cock shaped fruit posted:Crosspost, RE my local game stores CHAPTER CHALLENGE, and the entries we have so far: Nice sons of malice
|
|
#
¿
Aug 18, 2017 14:39
|
|
|
just lol if you actually buy GW rulebooks
|
|
#
¿
Aug 23, 2017 18:00
|
|
|
Zuul the Cat posted:Oh poo poo. It's arrived.  How is this not getting more posts?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 23, 2017 19:48
|
|
|
Thanqol posted:As the brilliant poet said elsewhere on these forums; 
|
|
#
¿
Aug 24, 2017 19:33
|
|
|
     
|
|
#
¿
Aug 31, 2017 22:08
|
|
|
Thundercloud posted:Well now I've painted 35 levels of my Warriors of Iron. That IW head swap is a nice and subtle good conversion
|
|
#
¿
Aug 31, 2017 23:53
|
|
|
TTerrible posted:The Macroarid Explorator is no mere land raider. Nice to see 40k taking advantage of our 6 year old rules
|
|
#
¿
Sep 1, 2017 18:10
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:I suspect that China doesn't have the capability to produce to the level of quality that GW is doing. This isn't some kind of dig at Chinese manufacturing; it's just that GW has a ridiculously niche application and they have spent literally decades perfecting every aspect of their process. No way. At least when it comes to resin, China can put out higher quality recasts than the original models from GW.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 5, 2017 20:27
|
|
|
The only thing they still don't touch are vacuum formed plastics such as the realm of battle boards. From speaking with a few of them, it's less about capability and more about setup costs for a niche market. Traditional resin casting isn't an option for those due to shipping costs and material costs.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 5, 2017 20:41
|
|
|
Corrode posted:I was pretty down on the Redemptor dread from the first pictures, but now I've built and painted one I'm way more into it. Great kit. Imagine a dreadnought... inside.... a dreadnought
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2017 21:32
|
|
|
JoshTheStampede posted:40k games are command and conquer. Infinity is Xcom or Frozen Synapse. 40k is Heavy Metal 2000
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2017 06:10
|
|
|
Shoulda been warthunder
|
|
#
¿
Sep 24, 2017 00:06
|
|
|
TheChirurgeon posted:So big thanks to BULBASAUR, who took a break from being mad about templates to post his Dark Mechanicus priest in the 30k thread, which I blatantly copied as inspiration for my own Dark Mechanicus Chaos Hellwright. I primarily made this guy to do team games with the guy in our group who does AdMech, but now that there's a Chaos Hellwright entry in the FW Chaos Index, I can just use him on the reg. Hey man, this guy looks great. What you did with the axe in particular PS: I'm mad, mad about templates
|
|
#
¿
Sep 25, 2017 21:22
|
|
|
Cooked Auto posted:You're not crazy, do live in Sweden. Even if its down by the southern coast. drat. I'm near Malmo at least once a year. Should slam sometime.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 25, 2017 21:33
|
|
|
The Bee posted:I feel like conscripts and artillery are going to be eating nerfs, at the very least. Hopefully more of the IG range, like tanks, becomes usable to fill the void. Fix baddle cannons
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2017 22:57
|
|
|
They're still missing the best IG faction:
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2017 23:54
|
|
|
How are the Death Korp rules? Thanks for this link! I love the "Grognard Pattern Laz Rifle". The prices are actually pretty affordable too
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2017 01:04
|
|
|
+1 WS against stationary vehicles
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2017 01:33
|
|
|
SRM posted:Hey nerds, I done made a video about why bases are super cool and good: Classic SRM. Makes a video about basing, doesn't mention rim jobs
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2017 23:31
|
|
|
Are they going to do rules for da chem dawgs?OMG sriracha pudding! posted:The different Guard regiments have always been some of the fluffiest and most characterful GW models; I'm really glad they're getting support. Rules for Tallarn and Valhallan models is so much more exciting than rules for some foregeworld no ones heard of, with models that look identical to every other mechanicum model. Check out the mad robot links earlier in the thread. They have some really nice tallarn heads.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2017 21:10
|
|
|
Ilor posted:They also released Tallarn Rough Riders. I have like 10 of them, but only 3 are painted. 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2017 22:01
|
|
|
a cock shaped fruit posted:I want to talk about recasts. Where do I do that? I'm not even in the market to buy some, just want to talk to people who do it and find out if it made the hobby better for them. Is there a thread? a cock shaped fruit posted:Not even in the surface level 'i know a guy who bought all recasts and they are lighter and smell like burning dogshit' commentary? Shame, I'm mostly wondering if it's really that prolific. I know a guy with a lot of resin, and I don't trust his collection at all. He is quick to assemble and basecoat stuff, and I suspect it's shonky. Cum to 30k slack, friend I've been needing to do a blog post about recasts. Not about buying them, but more about the history, market, quality, and those sorts of things. I'm sure it varies from area to area, but I'd wager that 80% of the models in some places I've played have been from recasters. There are more recasters now than there have ever been, largely due to the popularity of 30k and the failure of finecast.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2017 05:02
|
|
|
Mugaaz posted:Without going into nitty gritty specifics, compared to GW prices, how much are people paying percentage wise for recasts that are decent? Most recasters stick to forgeworld for a few reasons- easier to recast, higher profit margins, and very high demand. You can usually tell how well something is selling depending on how many recasters are stocking it. Another thing recasters do is that they more closely charge you for the cost of resin instead of the point value of the model on the table. So a sergent costs only a few dollars less than a limited edition named character, or whatever. GW Primaris captain- $5 vs $35 FW Castellax- $14 vs $53
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2017 07:28
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 19:08 |
|
|
i'm recast
|
|
#
¿
Oct 5, 2017 07:58
|
|